Impact of Leadership Styles on Employee Adaptability During Digital Transformation: Change Management Practices and Organizational Support as Moderators

The rapid pace of digital transformation has redefined organizational structures, processes, and work cultures, making leadership a critical driver of adaptability among employees. This study investigates the impact of leadership styles on employee adaptability during digital transformation, with a specific focus on the moderating role of change management practices and organizational support. Drawing responses from 426 employees working in IT companies, the study adopts a quantitative research design using structured questionnaires and statistical analysis. The findings reveal that transformational and participative leadership styles significantly enhance employee adaptability, while transactional leadership shows mixed effects. Moreover, effective change management practices and strong organizational support systems (including training, communication, and resource allocation) act as positive moderators, reducing resistance and fostering adaptability. The study highlights the importance of leaders adopting flexible, empathetic, and future-oriented approaches to successfully navigate digital transitions. The implications of the research extend to HR practitioners, policymakers, and corporate leaders in designing leadership development and change management programs to sustain competitiveness in the digital era.

Leadership Styles, Employee Adaptability, Digital Transformation, Change Management, Organizational Support, IT Companies

1. Armenakis, A. A., & Harris, S. G. (2009). Reflections: Our journey in organizational change research and practice. Journal of Change Management, 9(2), 127–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697010902879079 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Avolio, B. J., & Bass, B. M. (2004). Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire: Third Edition Manual and Sampler Set. Mind Garden. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Avolio, B. J., & Yammarino, F. J. (2013). Transformational and Charismatic Leadership: The Road Ahead. Emerald Group Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and Performance Beyond Expectations. Free Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational Leadership (2nd ed.). Psychology [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Burke, W. W. (2017). Organization Change: Theory and Practice (5th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. Harper & Row. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Cameron, E., & Green, M. (2019). Making Sense of Change Management (5th ed.). Kogan Page. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), 500–507. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.500 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Hoch, J. E., Bommer, W. H., Dulebohn, J. H., & Wu, D. (2018). Do ethical, authentic, and servant leadership explain variance above and beyond transformational leadership? Journal of Management, 44(2), 501–529. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Judge, T. A., & Piccolo, R. F. (2004). Transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(5), 755–768. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Kotter, J. P. (1996). Leading Change. Harvard Business Review Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607–610. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Park, Y., & Park, Y. (2019). Employee adaptability to change in the workplace: Empirical evidence from Korea. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 30(5), 867–889. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Moorman, R. H., & Fetter, R. (1990). Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers' trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly, 1(2), 107–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/1048-9843(90)90009-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Pulakos, E. D., Arad, S., Donovan, M. A., & Plamondon, K. E. (2000). Adaptability in the workplace: Development of a taxonomy of adaptive performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(4), 612–624. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Rafferty, A. E., & Griffin, M. A. (2006). Perceptions of organizational change: A stress and coping perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(5), 1154–1162. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.5.1154 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Rhoades, L., & Eisenberger, R. (2002). Perceived organizational support: A review of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 698–714. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.698 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Shoss, M. K., Witt, L. A., & Vera, D. (2012). When does adaptive performance lead to higher task performance? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(7), 910–924. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Vial, G. (2019). Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28(2), 118–144. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Yukl, G. (2013). Leadership in Organizations (8th ed.). Pearson. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Assessment, Engagement and Motivation among Secondary School Students in Kaduna State, Nigeria