Methodological Standardization in Knee Joint Ultrasound: A Comprehensive Research Procedure
Authors
Athreya Medtech (USA)
DeCure Center (USA)
Shahroud University of Medical Sciences (USA)
Chiro-Care Chiropractic Clinic (USA)
Athreya Medtech (USA)
Athreya Medtech (USA)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS.2025.10100000176
Subject Category: Diagnosis
Volume/Issue: 10/10 | Page No: 2022-2036
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2025-10-29
Accepted: 2025-11-05
Published: 2025-11-21
Abstract
Background: Knee ultrasonography is a key diagnostic and research tool for evaluating joint effusion, synovitis, tendon, and ligament integrity. Despite its widespread use, methodological inconsistencies across studies—ranging from patient positioning to probe settings—limit reproducibility and cross-study comparability.
Objective: To outline a standardized, evidence-based procedure for knee joint ultrasound suitable for research applications, aligning with international guidelines to ensure methodological rigor and reproducibility.
Methods: A comprehensive research framework was developed incorporating standardized participant selection, equipment calibration, scanning parameters, patient positioning, and both static and dynamic maneuvers
Results: Implementing standardized ultrasound protocols minimizes measurement variability, improves the accuracy of synovial and vascularity assessment, and enhances longitudinal monitoring of therapeutic responses.
Conclusion: Methodological standardization in knee ultrasound strengthens data validity, promotes reproducibility, and facilitates integration of imaging biomarkers into clinical and translational musculoskeletal research. The outlined framework serves as a template for future multicenter and longitudinal ultrasound studies.
Keywords
Knee ultrasound; musculoskeletal imaging; methodological standardization; dynamic ultrasound; research protocol.
Downloads
References
1. magnetic resonance imaging. Arthritis Rheum. 2001 Sep;44(9):2018–23. Terslev L, Naredo E, Aegerter P, Wakefield RJ, Backhaus M, Balint P, et al. Scoring ultrasound synovitis in rheumatoid arthritis: a EULAR–OMERACT ultrasound taskforce—part 2: reliability and application to multiple joints. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Mar;76(3):420–25. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Silverwood V, Blagojevic-Bucknall M, Jinks C, Jordan JL, Protheroe J, Jordan KP. Current evidence on risk factors for knee osteoarthritis in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2015 Apr;23(4):507–15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Abbas K, Oteibi M, Khazaei D, Balaguru B, Etesami F, Khazaei H. Evaluation of AI-assisted ultrasound-guided galvanic therapy (AAUGGT) for the treatment of inflammation-induced pain versus other modalities. Int J Res Innov Appl Sci. 2025;10(2):703-714. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Szkudlarek M, Court-Payen M, Strandberg C, Klarlund M, Klausen T, Østergaard M. Power Doppler ultrasonography for assessment of synovial inflammation in the metacarpophalangeal joints of patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison with dynamic [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Koski JM, Saarakkala S, Helle M, Hakulinen U, Heikkinen JO, Hermunen H. Power Doppler ultrasonography and synovitis: correlating ultrasound imaging with histopathological findings and evaluating different joint areas in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010 Mar;69(3):549–52. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Abbas K, Oteibi M, Khajehee B, Khazaei H. AI-assisted ultrasound-guided electrical therapy for musculoskeletal disorders (AAUGET). Int J Res Innov Appl Sci. 2025;10(9):399-410. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Naredo E, Valor L, De la Torre I, Montoro M, Bello N, Martínez-Barrio J, et al. Predictive value of Doppler ultrasound-detected synovitis in relation to short-term flare in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in clinical remission. Arthritis Rheum. 2013 Feb;65(2):376–85. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Backhaus M, Burmester GR, Gerber T, Grassi W, Machold KP, Swen WA, et al. Guidelines for musculoskeletal ultrasound in rheumatology. Ann Rheum Dis. 2001 Jul;60(7):641–49. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Bianchi S, Martinoli C. Ultrasound of the Musculoskeletal System. 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer; 2007. p. 801–820. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. 10.Abbas K, Oteibi M, Khajehee B, Khazaei H, Khazaei D, Balaguru B, Khanbabazadeh M. AAUGET — AI-Assisted Ultrasound-Guided Electrical Therapy for Musculoskeletal Disorders. Int J Res Innov Appl Sci (IJRIAS). 2025;10(8):1005-17. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Jacobson JA. Fundamentals of Musculoskeletal Ultrasound. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2017. p. 251–273. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Özçakar L, Kara M, Chang KV, Çarl AB, Akkaya N, Tok F, et al. EURO-MUSCULUS/USPRM basic scanning protocols for knee. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2015 Dec;51(6):721–26. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Abbas K, Khajehee B, Khanbabazadeh M, Oteibi M, Khazaei H, Balaguru B. AI-Assisted Ultrasound-Guided Galvanic Therapy (AAUGGT) – An Innovative Approach to Pain Management – Fundamental Mechanisms, Biomedical and Technical Development. Int J Res Innov Appl Sci. 2025;10(7):1280-1291. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]