Socio-Economic Characterisation of Maize Farmers, Profitability,and Yield Performance of Maize under Integrated Nutrient Management in Two Agro-Ecological Zones of Ghana

Authors

Emmanuel Baah

Department of Crop and Soil Sciences Education, Akenten Appiah-Menka University of Skills Training & Entrepreneurial Development (Ghana)

Harrison Kwame Dapaah

Department of Crop and Soil Sciences Education, Akenten Appiah-Menka University of Skills Training & Entrepreneurial Development (Ghana)

Margaret E. Essilfie

Department of Crop and Soil Sciences Education, Akenten Appiah-Menka University of Skills Training & Entrepreneurial Development (Ghana)

Ebenezer Kwasi Ntiri

Department of Horticulture, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi (Ghana)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS.2025.10100000160

Subject Category: Agriculture

Volume/Issue: 10/10 | Page No: 1804-1823

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-10-25

Accepted: 2025-11-01

Published: 2025-11-18

Abstract

The study combined a socio-economic survey with multi-season field trials to assess the socio-economic characteristics, yield, and profitability performance of maize under Integrated Nutrient Management (INM) in two Agro-ecological zones of Ghana. The research survey was conducted between December 10, 2022, and March 20, 2023, at the Mampong Municipal and the Ejura Sekyere District Assemblies in Ghana's Ashanti Region. A purposive multi-stage sampling approach was employed to interview 50 maize farmers, while the field experiment utilised a Randomised Complete Block Design (RCBD) with twelve treatments and four replications during the 2023 major and minor cropping seasons at Fumesua (Kumasi) and Asante Mampong. The treatments included Agro Charger, Agro Clean (296 mL per 148 L of water/ha each), poultry manure (10 t/ha), and NPK (250 kg/ha), applied individually and in various combinations. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, gross margin (cost–return) analysis, and Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) in SAS. Socio-economic results showed that 76% of the respondents were men and 24% were women, with a mean age of 49 years; 64% were married. Education levels were generally low: 40% had no formal education, 34% had completed junior high school, 22% had attained an O-level/SHS Education, and only 4% had reached tertiary education. Profitability analysis indicated that maize production was economically viable across most treatments. Field trial results revealed significant differences in yield between fertilized plots and the control plot. The combination of Poultry Manure + Agro Charger + Agro Clean (PM + A.CH + A.CL) achieved yields of 5.3-6.6 t/ha, compared to 1.6–3.0 t/ha in the control, representing a potential yield increase of up to 120%. These findings suggest that integrating organic and inorganic nutrient sources can substantially enhance maize productivity and should be recommended for adoption by farmers in similar Agro-ecological zones.

Keywords

Socio-Economic, Maize, Agro-ecological zones, Maize Farmers

Downloads

References

1. Adeagbo, O. A., Ojo, T. O., & Adetoro, A. A. (2021). Understanding the Determinants of Climate Change Adaptation Strategies among Smallholder Maize Farmers in South-Western Nigeria. Heliyon, 7(2). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Akurugu, J. A. (2022). Factors Influencing School Dropout Among Female Junior High School Pupils in the Pusiga District. International Journal of Social Sciences and Management Review, 5(2), 31-49. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Amankwah, A., Ambel, A., Gourlay, S., Kilic, T., Markhof, Y., & Wollburg, P. (2024). Fertilizer Price Shocks in Smallholder Agriculture. World Bank. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Amanullah, M. M., Somasundaran, E., Vaiyapuri, K., & Sathyamoorthi, K. (2007). Poultry manure to crop s- A review. Agricultural reviews, 28(3), 216-222. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Asante, F., van Ittersum, M. K., Jongeneel, R. A., Adjei-Nsiah, S., & Akotsen, C. (2017). Improving food security by reducing the maize yield gap in Ghana. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Baillie, L. (2015). Promoting and evaluating scientific rigour in qualitative research. Nursing Standard (2014+), 29(46), 36. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Barker, N. (2022). The Effects of Female Land Inheritance on Economic Productivity in Ghana. University of Chicago, Chicago. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Bigombe, B., & Khadiagala, G. M. (2004). Major trends affecting families in Sub-Saharan Africa. Alternativas. Cuadernos de Trabajo Social, N. 12 (diciembre 2004); pp. 155-193. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Bilong, E. G., Abossolo-Angue, M., Nanganoa, L. T., Anaba, B. D., Ajebesone, F. N., Madong, B. A., & Bilong, P. (2022). Effects of Organic Manures and Inorganic Fertilisers on Soil Properties and Economic Analysis under Cassava Cultivation in Southern Cameroon. Scientific reports, 12(1), 20598. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Bua, S., El Mejahed, K., MacCarthy, D., Adogoba, D. S., Kissiedu, I. N., Atakora, W. K., ... & Bindraban, P. S. (2020). Yield responses of maize to fertilizers in Ghana (No. 2, p. 3). Accra: IFDC FERARI Research Report. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Creswell, J. D., Pacilio, L. E., Lindsay, E. K., & Brown, K. W. (2014). Brief mindfulness meditation training alters psychological and neuroendocrine responses to social evaluative stress. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 44, 1-12. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Gatare, E., Zenon, M., & Oduor, J. (2015). Factors Affecting Market Access for Agricultural-Based Projects in Rwanda: A Case Study of the Home-Grown School Feeding (HGSF) Project in Nyaruguru District. International Journal of Civil Engineering, Construction and Estate Management, 3(4), 20-30. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. George, D., & Mallery, P. (2016). Frequencies. In IBM SPSS Statistics 23 step by step (pp. 115-125). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Jayne, T. S., Chamberlin, J., Traub, L., Sitko, N., Muyanga, M., Yeboah, F. K., ... & Kachule, R. (2016). Africa's Changing Farm-Size Distribution Patterns: The Rise of Medium-Scale Farms. Agricultural Economics, 47(S1), 197-214. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Larsen, S. (2014). An Appraisal of Quality Basic Education in Ashanti Farming Communities of Ghana. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Masi, M., De Rosa, M., Vecchio, Y., Bartoli, L., & Adinolfi, F. (2022). The Long Road to Innovation Adoption: Insights from Precision Agriculture. Agricultural and Food Economics, 10(1), 27. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Mwamadi, N., & Seiffert, B. (2012, September). Reducing Child Labour in Agriculture through good agricultural practices: FAO experiences. In the National Conference on Eliminating Child Labour in Agriculture. Lilongwe, Malawi: FAO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Neupane, D., Adhikari, P., Bhattarai, D., Rana, B., Ahmed, Z., Sharma, U., & Adhikari, D. (2022). Does climate change affect the yield of the top three cereals and food security in the world? Earth, 3(1), 45 -71. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Pallant, J. (2020). SPSS Survival Manual: A Step-by-Step Guide to Data Analysis Using IBM SPSS. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Philip, T. K., & Itodo, I. N. (2012). Demographic Characteristics and Agricultural and Technological Profiles of Acha Farmers in Nigeria. Agricultural Engineering International: CIGR Journal, 14(1), 89-93. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Poku, A. G., Birner, R., & Gupta, S. (2018). Why do maize farmers in Ghana have a limited choice of improved seed varieties? An assessment of the governance challenges in seed supply. Food security, 10(1), 27-46. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Ricker-Gilbert, J. (2024). Increasing agricultural productivity in Sub-Saharan Africa during times of volatile prices and a changing climate. Agrekon, 63(4), 213-222. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Smith, C., Hill, A. K., & Torrente-Murciano, L. (2020). Current and future role of Haber–Bosch ammonia in a carbon-free energy landscape. Energy & environmental science, 13(2), 331-344. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Teusner, A. (2016). Insider research, validity issues, and the OHS professional: One person’s journey. International journal of social research methodology, 19(1), 85-96. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Wahab, I., Jirström, M., & Hall, O. (2020). An integrated approach to unravelling smallholder yield levels: The case of small family farms in the Eastern Region, Ghana. Agriculture, 10(6), 206. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Wongnaa, Camillus & Awunyo-Vitor, Dadson & Mensah, Amos & Adams, Faizal. (2019). Profit Efficiency Among Maize Farmers and Implications for Poverty Alleviation and Food Security in Ghana. Scientific African. 6. e00206. 10.1016/j.sciaf. 2019.e00206. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. World Bank Open Data. (2025, January 7). World Bank Open Data. Retrieved August 29, 2025, from https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SL.TLF.CACT.NE.ZS?locations=gh [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Li, J., Van Gerrewey, T., & Geelen, D. (2022). A meta-analysis of biostimulant yield effectiveness in field trials—Frontiers in Plant Science, 13, 836702. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Leroux, L., Castets, M., Baron, C., Escorihuela, M. J., Bégué, A., & Seen, D. L. (2019). Maize yield estimation in West Africa from crop process-induced combinations of multi-domain remote sensing indices. European Journal of Agronomy, 108, 11-26. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Shang, Y., Hasan, M. K., Ahammed, G. J., Li, M., Yin, H., & Zhou, J. (2019). Applications of nanotechnology in plant growth and crop protection: a review. Molecules, 24(14), 2558. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Koleška, I., Hasanagić, D., Todorović, V., Murtić, S., Klokić, I., Parađiković, N., & Kukavica, B. (2017). Biostimulants prevent yield loss and reduce oxidative damage in tomato plants grown on reduced NPK nutrition. Journal of Plant Interactions, 12(1), 209-218. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles