The Politics of Climate Finance in Ghana; Access, Equity, and the Socio-Economic Implication of the Green Transition
Authors
University Of Ghana (Ghana)
HSE University (Russia)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS.2025.1010000043
Subject Category: Political Science
Volume/Issue: 10/10 | Page No: 551-567
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2025-09-25
Accepted: 2025-10-02
Published: 2025-11-03
Abstract
Background: The discourse of climate finance has become a cornerstone in the pantheon of global climate governance, typified by contestations on issues of credibility, equity, and effectiveness.
Objective: This paper explores the politics of climate finance in Ghana through the interrelated issues of access, equity, and socioeconomic consequences.
Method: Within the framework of climate justice, the analysis draws on qualitative data gathered through semi-structured interviews with policymakers, representatives of civil society, international organizations, and youth advocacy groups and supported by secondary data.
Results: The findings show Ghana to be grappling with the mobilization of funds from several mechanisms such as the Green Climate Fund, Climate Investment Funds, and Article 6 carbon markets, yet there are many administrative bottlenecks, with weak institutional capacity undermining access in a meaningful way. The equity issues also exist with climate finance flows concentrating in the south and urban areas, leaving women, youth, and northern communities dominated and marginalized in governance and benefit-sharing. Socio-economic outcomes weave another set of narratives, for on one side projects like the Shea Landscape Emission Reductions Project have improved women's livelihoods and created green jobs, whereas on the other, trade-offs come along with restrictions to charcoal-dependent livelihoods and costly industrial compliance that actually present new risks.
Conclusion: The study argues that climate finance in Ghana reflects both the opportunities for and the tensions of doing an actual green transition delivering co-benefits in renewable energy and resilience yet reinforcing inequalities when badly timed. Policy recommendations are made for strengthening institutional capacity, targeting vulnerable regions and groups, and embedding gender and youth quotas in governance, while livelihood safeguards need to be integrated into project design. By situating Ghana's experience into the broader climate justice discourse, the paper adds to debates on how climate finance can promote not just environmental outcomes but also equity and sustainable development in the Global South.
Keywords
Climate finance, Climate justice, Sustainable development framework
Downloads
References
1. Anjanappa, J., Samant, S., & Thakur, B. (2024). bridging the gap: addressing the unequal allocation of climate adaptation finance in global South. Available at SSRN 4985851. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Asare, F., Owusu, F. W., & Gazo, R. (2022). Sustainable charcoal production drive in rural communities in Ghana, West Africa. Energy for Sustainable Development, 68, 364–372. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Banu, N., & Fazal, S. (2025). Climate change, livelihood crisis and resilience: an introduction. In Livelihoods and Well-Being in the era of climate change: risk to resilience across India (pp. 3-18). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Barnard, S., Watson, C., Greenhill, R., Caravani, A., Trujillo, N. C., Hedger, M., & Whitley, S. (2014). Climate finance: is it making a difference. Overseas Development Institute. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Blanchard, L., Haya, B., Lezak, S., & Anderegg, W. (2024). The History of. Approaches For Climate Mitigation: A Narrative Review. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Bhardwaj, M. (2008). The role and relationship of climate justice and common but differentiated responsibilities & respective capabilities (CBDR-RC) principle in the international climate change legal framework: historical evaluation, developments, challenges & future outlooks of CBDR-RC principle & climate justice (Doctoral dissertation, Thesis for MSc in Public Policy & Human Development (Foreign Policy), United Nations University & Maastricht University). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Boamah, F. (2025). Dancing on the head of a needle?‘Disciplining’energy justice scholarship. Dialogues in Human Geography, 20438206251347245. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Boateng, D., Bloomer, J., & Morrissey, J. (2025). Fueling homes and lighting lives: understanding household energy decisions in off-grid rural Ghana. Energy Research & Social Science, 125(10410), 5. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Bondinuba, F., Jones, C. A., & Akinbogun, S. Building Equitable and Resilient Communities in the Global South Through Housing Justice and Climate Justice. Available at SSRN 5260550. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Brobbey, L. K., Pouliot, M., Hansen, C. P., & Kyereh, B. (2019). Factors influencing participation and income from charcoal production and trade in Ghana. Energy for Sustainable Development, 50, 69–81. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Bulkeley, H., Edwards, G. A. S., & Fuller, S. (2014). Contesting climate justice in the city: Examining politics and practice in urban climate change experiments. Global Environmental Change, 25, 31–40. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Chen, Y., Wu, F., & Zhang, D. (2024). Global Climate Finance Architecture: Institutional Development. In Climate Finance: Supporting a Sustainable Energy Transition (pp. 51-100). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Ciplet, D., Roberts, J. T., & Khan, M. R. (2015). Power in a warming world: The new global politics of climate change and the remaking of environmental inequality. MIT Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Clean Cooking Alliance. (2021). Market assessment of improved cookstoves in Ghana [Report]. Environmental Protection Agency of Ghana. Retrieved from https://cmo.epa.gov.gh/wp-content/ uploads/2024/04/150224_Ghana_ICS_MADD_redacted.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Dafermos, Y. (2025). Climate finance and global justice. Climate Policy, 1-17. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Espelage, A., Ahonen, H. M., & Michaelowa, A. (2022). The role of carbon market mechanisms in climate finance. In Handbook of International Climate Finance (pp. 352-378). Edward Elgar Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Green Climate Fund. (2020). Enhancing climate resilience in Ghana’s agricultural sector through Shea Landscape Emission Reductions. Green Climate Fund Project Document. Retrieved from https:// www.greenclimate.fund/sites/default/files/document/fp137-undp-ghana_0.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Fonta, W. M., Ayuk, E. T., & van Huysen, T. (2018). Africa and the Green Climate Fund: Current challenges and future opportunities. Climate Policy, 18(9), 1210–1225. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. GROMEA, J. V. (2025). The Cost of Climate Justice: Applying the Principle of Common but Differentiated Responsibilities and Respective Capabilities (Doctoral dissertation, UNIVERSITY OF ST. LA SALLE). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Islam, M. S. (2024). Rethinking climate justice: insights from environmental sociology. Climate, 12 (12), 203. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Jha, M. K., & Dev, M. (2024). Impacts of climate change. In Smart internet of things for environment and healthcare (pp. 139-159). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Kaklauskaite, U., & Streimikiene, D. (2024). Climate justice from the lens of sustainable development. Sustainable Development, 32(6), 6788-6800. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Kangero, D. S. (2024). Environmental Equity, a Means for Securing Our Environment. In (In) Security: Identifying the Invisible Disruptors of Security (pp. 351-380). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Leal-Arcas, R. (2025). Carbon Markets, International Trade, and Climate Finance. Forthcoming in Trade, Law and Development, 16(2). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Lindqvist, E. (2025). The GCF in a fragmented climate finance system:: A discourse analysis of accountability, legitimacy, effectiveness and equity. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Ministry of Finance (MoF). (2022). Ghana Green Finance Taxonomy. Accra: Government of Ghana. Retrieved from https://share.google/Zp0EBSlTImuKz7UI3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Nath, P. K., & Behera, B. (2011). A critical review of impact of and adaptation to climate change in developed and developing economies. Environment, development and sustainability, 13(1), 141-162. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Newell, P., & Mulvaney, D. (2013). The political economy of the ‘just transition’. The geographical journal, 179(2), 132-140. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Nakouwo, S. N., & Zhang, D. (2024). Climate finance and investment in Africa: A case study of Ghana. In Climate finance: Supporting a sustainable energy transition (pp. 315-374). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Okereke, C. (2010). Climate justice and the international regime. Wiley interdisciplinary reviews: climate change, 1(3), 462-474. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. Owusu-Manu, D. G., Mankata, L. M., Debrah, C., Edwards, D. J., & Martek, I. (2021). Mechanisms and challenges in financing renewable energy projects in sub-Saharan Africa: a Ghanaian perspective. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, 26(3), 319-336. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. Pastor, M., Cha, J. M., Méndez, M., & Morello-Frosch, R. (2024). California dreaming: Why environmental justice is integral to the success of climate change policy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 121(32), e2310073121. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
35. Pauw, W. P., Castro, P., Pickering, J., & Bhasin, S. (2020). Conditional nationally determined contributions in the Paris Agreement: foothold for equity or Achilles heel?. Climate policy, 20(4), 468-484. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
36. Persson, A., & Remling, E. (2014). Equity and efficiency in adaptation finance: initial experiences of the Adaptation Fund. Climate Policy, 14(4), 488-506. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
37. Pienaah, C. K., Baruah, B., & Luginaah, I. (2024). Women's perspectives on addressing the decline of Shea trees in Northern Ghana. GeoJournal, 89(1), 9. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
38. Rajamani, L. (2018). The principle of common but differentiated responsibilities and respective capabilities in the international climate change regime. In Research Handbook on Climate Disaster Law (pp. 46-60). Edward Elgar Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
39. Rahman, S. M., & Ahmad, M. M. (2015). Climate finance towards vulnerable countries: evidence from the Global Environment Facility (GEF). International Journal of Green Economics, 9(2), 199-214. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
40. Roberts, J. T., & Weikmans, R. (2017). Postface: fragmentation, failing trust and enduring tensions over what counts as climate finance. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 17(1), 129-137. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
41. Salvi, S. L. (2025). A Just Adjustment Mechanism? Investigating the Alignment of the EU’s CBAM with the CBDR-RC Principle. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
42. Schultheis, S. (2024). Investigating buyer preferences in climate finance under Article 6.2 of the Paris Agreement. IIIEE Masters Thesis. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
43. Shah, G. M., Sapkota, K., & Spakota, M. (2025). A Comprehensive Review of Theories, Models and Approaches Governing Climate Change Discourse and Global Climate Finance. Models and Approaches Governing Climate Change Discourse and Global Climate Finance (June 05, 2025). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
44. Schalatek, L., & Bird, N. (2016). The principles and criteria of public climate finance–A normative framework. Washington: Heinrich Böll Stiftung North America. https://www. odi. org/sites/odi. org. uk/files/resource-documents/11018. pdf. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
45. Schlosberg, D. (2013). Theorising environmental justice: The expanding sphere of a discourse. Environmental Politics, 22(1), 37–55. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
46. Sefa-Nyarko, C. (2024). Ghana's National Energy Transition Framework: Domestic aspirations and mistrust in international relations complicate ‘justice and equity’. Energy Research & Social Science, 110, 103465. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
47. Siddiqui, A. (2024). Climate Change and Global Governance: Challenges in Policy Coordination. Journal of Future Building, 1(1), 15-30. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
48. Singu-Hansen, H. (2024). Civil society, youth, and social change: A case study of Femina Hip (Doctoral dissertation, Loughborough University). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
49. Social, G. (2025). Climate Financing, Institutional Structure, and Budget Tracing in Ethiopia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
50. Steiner, A. (2019). Climate change, environment, and sustainable development in Africa. In African Economic Development (pp. 93-110). Emerald Publishing Limited. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
51. Stopponi, G., Jepsen, T., Jørgensen, N. O., & Pouliot, M. (2025). Opportunities and Challenges of Shea Trees Agroforestry Systems and Management Practices in Northern Ghana: A Socio-Ecological Perspective. Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 1-26. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
52. Skovgaard, J., Adams, K. M., Dupuy, K., Dzebo, A., Funder, M., Fejerskov, A. M., & Shawoo, Z. (2023). Multilateral climate finance coordination: Politics and depoliticization in practice. Global Environmental Politics, 23(2), 125-147. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
53. Suárez-Eiroa, B., Ferreira, A., Sánchez, V. J., & Alonso-Rodríguez, A. Social Change in Sustainability Transitions: An Assessment Through the Case of the Circular Economy. Available at SSRN 4798233. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
54. Tetteh, C. K. (2025). Innovative Climate Adaptation Financing Options for Ghana: Focus on the AFOLU Sector. Climate Action in Ghana, 178. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
55. Tyce, M., Abdulai, A. G., & Asante, K. P. (2025). Confronting shifting energy landscapes and contested domestic politics: Ghana's national oil company and the global energy transition. Energy Research & Social Science, 119, 103901. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
56. UNFCCC, S. (2022). Fifth Biennial Assessment and Overview of Climate Finance Flows. Biennial Assessment Fifth. Bonn: Standing Committee on Finance (https://unfccc. int/sites/default/files/ resource/J0156_UNFCCC% 20BA5_2022_Report_v4% 5B52% 5D. pdf (Accessed: 2 December 2022). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
57. UNDP. (2022). Human development report 2022: Uncertain times, unsettled lives. New York: United Nations Development Programme. Retrieved from https://share.google/BQHPujMWQ19YyO6AW [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
58. Visconti, G., Ramírez, G., & Braly-Cartillier, I. (2024). Enhancing Access to Concessional Climate Finance: Perspectives from the IDBs Experience with Major Climate Funds: CIF, GCF, and GEF. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
59. Voigt, C., & Ferreira, F. (2016). The Paris Agreement: What is the standard of conduct for parties? Questions of International Law, 26, 17–39. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
60. Weikmans, R., & Roberts, J. T. (2019). The international climate finance accounting muddle: is there hope on the horizon?. Climate and Development, 11(2), 97-111. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
61. World Bank. (2021). Ghana: Scaling Up Renewable Energy Program (SREP). Washington, DC: World Bank. Retrieved from https://share.google/y6TxhBFcOdZ1v5ERa [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Global Political Economy and Educational Reforms in the Global South: An Evolutionary Study of Ghana
- Electoral Militarization and the Challenges of Free and Fair Elections in Nigeria: A Focus on the 2023 Presidential Election
- Political Awareness and Engagement in Relation to Voting Behavior among College Students
- Role of Community Leaders in Ensuring Secure Electoral Process in Nairobi City County, Kenya
- Assessing the Delivery of Local Disaster Management Services and Client Satisfaction through SERVQUAL Dimensions