International Journal of Research and Innovation in Applied Science (IJRIAS)

International Journal of Research and Innovation in Applied Science (IJRIAS)
Submission Deadline-26th July 2024
July 2024 Issue : Publication Fee: 30$ USD Submit Now
Submission Open
Special Issue of Education: Publication Fee: 30$ USD Submit Now

Some Inclusion Results of Operators Associated with a Generalization of the Mittag-Leffler Function

Some Inclusion Results of Operators Associated with a Generalization of the Mittag-Leffler Function
Jamal Salah
Department of Basic Science, College of Applied and Health Science, A’Sharqiyah University, Post Code 42, 400 Ibra, Oman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.51584/IJRIAS.2023.8809

Received: 14 July 2023; Revised: 10 August 2023; Accepted: 14 August 2023; Published: 10 September 2023

ABSTRACT

In this study, we consider one of the generalizations of the well-known Mittag-Leffler function, namely Eθα,β(z). We normalize the latter by multiplication with the factor zΓ(β) to generate a power series that belongs to the well-known class of analytic functions A , in the unit disk D. Consequently, and using spiral-like functions, we investigate some inclusion results.
Keywords: Convolution, Inclusion results, Integral Transform, Spiral-like functions, Mittag-Leffler function Mathematics Subject Classification: 30C45, 30C50

PRELIMINARIES

One of the functions that characterize exponential behavior was developed by a Swedish mathematician and is known as “The Mittag-Leffler Function” (see [1]). The Mittag-Leffler function (M-L) has become more significant due to its widespread applicability in many scientific and technical domains. In some branches of the physical and applied sciences, including probability and statistical distribution theory, fluid mechanics, biological issues, electrical networks, and others, the (M-L) function has been used recently. Lev́y flights, random walks, and—most importantly—generalization of kinetic equations are examples of integro-differential equations in which this function naturally occurs [2, 3]. The (M-L) function has been studied extensively in the literature for its normalization, generalization, characteristics, applications, and extension. One can check out [4, 5] and [6] for further information. The study of fractional generalization of kinetic equations, random walks, Lev́y flights, super-diffusive transport, complex systems, and delayed fractional reaction diffusion all involve fractional-order differential and integral equations; the solutions invariably contain  (M-L) function (see [7–10]). Recently, the one-parameter (M-L) function has also been suggested as a solution for mathematical models in biology and tourism (see [11,12]).
Initially, the one-parameter (M-L) function E_α (z) for α∈C, with Re (α>0) (see [13] and [14]) is defined as:
Let S be the subclass of A whose members are univalent in . Robertson [22] studied two well-known subclasses of S, namely, the classes of starlike and convex functions. Function f ∈ A given by (1.1) is said to be starlike of order γ,0≤γ<1, if and only if  and the function class is denoted as S*(γ). We also write S*(0)= : S*, where S* denotes the class of functions f ∈ A such that f is starlike domain with respect to the origin. Function f ∈ A is said to be convex of order γ,0≤γ<1, if and only if and the class is denoted as K(γ). Furthermore, K:=K(0) represents the well-known standard class of convex functions. By Alexander’s duality relation (see [23]), we know that . Function f ∈ A is said to be spiral-like if

INCLUSION RESULTS FOR THE NORMALIZED (M-L)

We follow the same approach of authors in [28-30], who studied the two-parameter (M-L): E(α,β)(z). Here, we extend the results by involving the three-parameter (M-L) Eθα,β. Prior to proving our main results, we compute the following:

then  where Eθα,β is defined by (1.2)

INCLUSION RESULTS FOR THE IMAGE OF A LINEAR OPERATOR

First, we introduce the following linear operator Λβα:A→A by the means of Hadamard product
Next, we explore the sufficient conditions for the images of the linear operator  Λβα on functions of the class Rτ (ϑ,δ). Thus, we provide sufficient conditions such that these images are in the classes S(ξ,γ,ρ) and K(ξ,γ,ρ), respectively.
 Theorem 3.1.  For f(z) ∈ A.  If
Using Lemma 1.2 and following the same procedure as in the proof of Theorem 2.2, we obtain the following result:

We deduce that

INCLUSION RESULTS FOR THE ALEXANDER INTEGRAL OPERATOR

Theorem 4.1. For the Alexander Integral Operator  Ψβα  be given by
The proof of Theorem  is parallel to that of Theorem 2.1.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, we normalized the generalized (M-L) to deduce the analytic form E θ (α,β), that we investigated its inclusion results in the subclasses the classes S(ξ,γ,ρ) and K(ξ,γ,ρ). In addition, we discuss sufficient conditions for the  linear operator  Λβα (f), f ∈ Rτ(ϑ,δ) to be a member of the same subclasses, i.e. S(ξ,γ,ρ) and K(ξ,γ,ρ). Finally, the investigation has been extended to involve Alexander operator Ψβα by the means of Hadamard product.
Conflict of Interest
The author has no conflicts of interest to declare.

FUNDING STATEMENT

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency.

REFERENCES

  1. G. Mittag-Leffler, Sur la représentation analytique d’une branche uniforme d’une fonction monogène. Acta Math., 29 (1905), 101–181. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02403200
  2. G. Mittag-Leffler, Sur la Nouvelle Fonction E_α (x), Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des Sciences Paris, 137 (1903), 554-558. Available from: https://archive.org/details/comptesrendusheb137acad/page/554/mode/2up
  3. D. Bansal, S. Maharana, Sufficient Condition for Strongly Starlikeness of Normalized Mittag-Leffler G. Mittag-Leffler Function, Journal of Complex Analysis, 2017 (2017), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/6564705
  4. S. Elhaddad, M. Darus, Some properties of certain subclass of analytic functions associated with generalized differential operator involving Mittag-Leffler function. Transylvanian Journal of Mathematics and Mechanics 10 (2018), 1–7. http://tjmm.edyropress.ro/journal/18100101.pdf
  5. A. A. Attiya, Some applications of Mittag-Leffler function in the unit disc. Filomat 30 (2016), 2075–2081. https://doi.org/10.2298/FIL1607075A
  6. D. Răducanu, On partial sums of normalized Mittag-Leffler functions. Analele Universitatii” Ovidius” Constanta-Seria Matematica 25(2017), 123–133. https://sciendo.com/article/10.1515/auom-2017-0024
  7. Y. Kao, Y. Li, J. H. Park and X. Chen, “Mittag–Leffler Synchronization of Delayed Fractional Memristor Neural Networks via Adaptive Control,” in IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems (32) (5) (2021), 2279-2284. doi: 10.1109/TNNLS.2020.2995718
  8. Cao Y, Kao Y, Park JH, Bao H. Global Mittag-Leffler Stability of the Delayed Fractional-Coupled Reaction-Diffusion System on Networks Without Strong Connectedness. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst, 33(11) (2022), 6473-6483. doi: 10.1109/TNNLS.2021.3080830. Epub 2022 Oct 27. PMID: 34081585.
  9. Kao Y, Cao Y, Chen X. Global Mittag-Leffler synchronization of coupled delayed fractional reaction-diffusion Cohen-Grossberg neural networks via sliding mode control. Chaos, (32) (11) (2022), 113123. doi: 10.1063/5.0102787. PMID: 36456319.
  10. Almeida, R., A Caputo fractional derivative of a function with respect to another function. Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation., 44 (2017), 460-481.
  11. Jamal Salah, Maryam Al Hashmi, Hameed Ur Rehman, Khaled Al Mashrafi, Modified Mathematical Models in Biology by the Means of Caputo Derivative of A Function with Respect to Another Exponential Function, Mathematics and Statistics, (10) (6) (2022), 1194 – 1205. DOI: 10.13189/ms.2022.100605
  12. Omar Jawabreh, Ahmad Abdel Qader, Jamal Salah, Khaled Al Mashrafi, Emad Al Dein AL Fahmawee, Basel J. A. Ali, Fractional Calculus Analysis of Tourism Mathematical Model, Progr. Fract. Differ. Appl. (9) (S1) (2022), 1 -11. DOI: 10.18576/pfda/09S101 URL: https://www.naturalspublishing.com/Article.asp?ArtcID=26373
  13. H. U. Rehman, M. Darus, J. Salah, Coefficient properties involving the generalized k-Mittag–Leffler functions, Transylv. J. Math. Mech., 9 (2017), 155-164. http://tjmm.edyropress.ro/journal/17090206.pdf
  14. KS Nisar, SD. Purohit, MS. Abouzaid, MA. Qurashi, Generalized k-Mittag-Leffler function and its composition with pathway integral operators, J. Nonlinear Sci. App, 9 (2016), 3519-3526. http://dx.doi.org/10.22436/jnsa.009.06.07
  15. A. Wiman, Über den Fundamentalsatz in der Teorie der Funktionen E_α (x), Acta Mathematica, 29 (1905), 191-201. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02403202
  16. A. K. Shukla, J. C. Prajapti, on a generalization of Mittag-Leffler function and its properties, Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 336 (2007), 797-811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2007.03.018
  17. Wiman, Adders, Über den Fundamentalsatz in der Teorie der Funktionen E_α (x), Acta Mathematica, 29 (1905), 191-201. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02403202
  18. J. Salah, M. Darus, A note on generalized Mittag-Leffler function and Application, Far East. Journal of Mathematical Sciences (FJMS), 48 (2011), 33-46. http://www.pphmj.com/abstract/5478.htm
  19. Jamal Salah, Hameed Ur Rehman, Iman Al Buwaiqi, Ahmad Al Azab, Maryam Al Hashmi. Subclasses of spiral-like functions associated with the modified Caputo’s derivative operator.  AIMS Mathematics, (8) (8) (2023), 18474-18490. doi: 10.3934/math.2023939
  20. T. R. Prabhakar, A single integral equation with a generalized Mittag – Leffler function in the kernel, Yokohama Math. J, (19) (1997),7-15.
  21. D. Bansal and J. K. Prajapat, Certain geometric properties of the Mittag-Leffler functions, Complex Var. Elliptic Equ., (61) (3) (2016), 338-350. DOI:10.1080/17476933.2015
  22. M. S. Robertson, On the theory of univalent functions, Ann. of Math., (37) (2) (1936), 374-408.
  23. P. L. Duren, Univalent Functions, Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften Series 259, Springer Verlag, New York, 1983.
  24. L. Spaček, Contribution à la théorie des fonctions univalentes, Časopis Pro Pěstování Matematiky., (62) (1932), 12-19.
  25. G. Murugusundaramoorthy, Subordination results for spiral-like functions associated with the Srivastava-Attiya operator, Integral Transforms Spec. Funct., (23) (2) (2012), 97-103, 2012, DOI: 10.1080/10652469.2011.562501.
  26. G. Murugusundaramoorthy, D. Răducanu and K. Vijaya, a class of spirallike functions defined by Ruscheweyh-type q-difference operator, Novi Sad J. Math., (49) (2) (2019), 59-71. DOI: 10.30755/NSJOM.08284.
  27. A. Swaminathan, Certain sufficient conditions on Gaussian hypergeometric functions, Journal of Inequalities in Pure and Applied Mathematics, (5) (4) (2004), 10. Article ID 83.
  28. G. Murugusundaramoorthy and T. Bulboacă, SUFFICIENT CONDITIONS OF SUBCLASSES OF SPIRAL-LIKE FUNCTIONS ASSOCIATED WITH MITTAG-LEFFLER FUNCTIONS, Kragujevac Journal of Mathematics, (48) (6) (2024), 921-934.
  29. Salah, Jamal, and S. Venkatesh. “Inequalities on the Theory of Univalent Functions.” Journal of Mathematics and System Science (4) (7) (2014).
  30. Jamal Y. Salah, Closed-to-convex criterion associated to the modified Caputo’s fractional calculus derivative operator, Far East J. Math. Sci. (FJMS) (101) (1) (2017), 55-59.

Article Statistics

Track views and downloads to measure the impact and reach of your article.

4

PDF Downloads

335 views

Metrics

PlumX

Altmetrics

Paper Submission Deadline