Is Strike Relevant in the Modern Era? Evidence from Indian Manufacturing, IT/Ites, FMCG, Electronics and Emerging Sectors

Strikes have historically been one of the most visible instruments of collective action available to workers in India, protected under the framework of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. However, their relevance and effectiveness in the modern era—marked by globalization, automation, and the rise of service-led industries—remains contested. This study critically examines the role of strikes across manufacturing, Information Technology (IT), Fast-Moving Consumer Goods (FMCG), and electronics sectors in India. Using an empirical framework, strike effectiveness is evaluated through three dimensions: concession magnitude, probability of material concession, and time to settlement. Findings suggest that while strikes in traditional manufacturing and core industrial sectors often secure tangible concessions due to strong unionization and direct impact on production cycles, strikes in IT and electronics exhibit limited bargaining power, as managements rely on flexible staffing, outsourcing, and alternative dispute resolution mechanisms. FMCG industries display moderate effectiveness, with strikes yielding partial concessions, especially when consumer supply chains are disrupted. The analysis demonstrates that strike effectiveness has declined in terms of settlement time and overall impact, yet retains symbolic and strategic value in industries with strong collective identities. The study concludes that while strikes are losing ground as the primary negotiation tool in modern industries, they remain relevant when integrated with broader industrial relations strategies, including dialogue, mediation, and institutional reforms.

Strike, Industrial Relations, Collective Bargaining, Labour Unions, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

1. Sanyal, B. (2019). Strikes and Lockouts in Indian Industries: A Historical and Contemporary Perspective. Indian Journal of Labour Economics, 62(3), 427–450. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Sharma, A. (2021). "Labour Unrest and Industrial Peace: A Study of Strike Effectiveness in Indian Manufacturing." Economic and Political Weekly, 56(32), 45–52. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Ramaswamy, E.A. (2018). Industrial Relations in India. Macmillan Publishers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Sen, R. (2020). "Are Strikes Still Relevant in the IT Sector? An Empirical Review." Journal of Employment Relations in Emerging Economies, 12(2), 134–150. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Das, P. & Mishra, R. (2022). "Impact of Strikes on Productivity and Concessions: An Empirical Analysis of Indian Manufacturing Firms." Asian Journal of Industrial Relations, 28(1), 77–95. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Supreme Court of India (2002). T.K. Rangarajan vs Government of Tamil Nadu. AIR 2003 SC 3032 – Held that government employees have no fundamental right to strike. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. International Labour Organization (ILO). (2020). Right to Strike and Its Limitations: Global Trends in Collective Bargaining. ILO Report, Geneva. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Deshpande, S. & Sarkar, S. (2021). "Strikes and Employee Voice in Contemporary India: Alternatives and Challenges." Indian Journal of Human Resource Management, 8(1), 65–83. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Dhal, M. (2017). "Collective Bargaining and Strikes in India: A Legal and Industrial Perspective." Management and Labour Studies, 42(4), 289–310. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• A Qualitative Exploration of Work-Life Balance Among Private Universities Lecturers in Klang Valley
• Leadership Styles and Employee Motivation: Examining the Impact on Job Satisfaction and Turnover