AI-Enhanced Remote Patient Monitoring for Preventive Healthcare With Naïve Bayes
Authors
College of Computer Studies - Quezon City University (Philippines)
College of Computer Studies - Quezon City University (Philippines)
College of Computer Studies - Quezon City University (Philippines)
College of Computer Studies - Quezon City University (Philippines)
College of Computer Studies - Quezon City University (Philippines)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS.2025.100900059
Subject Category: Information Technology
Volume/Issue: 10/9 | Page No: 588-599
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2025-10-01
Accepted: 2025-10-07
Published: 2025-10-15
Abstract
The continuous advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and telemedicine has revolutionized the healthcare industry, providing opportunities to enhance patient monitoring, diagnosis, and preventive care. This study presents the development and evaluation of an AI-Enhanced Remote Patient Monitoring System that utilizes the Naïve Bayes algorithm to predict patient health risks and improve healthcare delivery. Conducted in collaboration with two medical clinics from district 4 of Manila City, the system aims to provide accurate predictive analysis, remote health tracking, and real-time consultation support between patients and healthcare providers. It was designed to address the limitations of traditional telehealth platforms, such as low predictive capability, slow response time, and limited system reliability.
The scope of this study includes the implementation of AI-based predictive modeling, system performance evaluation, and user satisfaction assessment across different respondent groups. A total of 305 participants—comprising 7 doctors, 10 administrators, 187 patients, and 101 IT professionals and students—evaluated the system based on the ISO 25010 software quality attributes: functionality, reliability, usability, efficiency, and security. The results revealed a high weighted mean of 3.99, interpreted as “Highly Acceptable.” Usability (4.06) and security (4.04) ranked highest, indicating that users found the system intuitive and trustworthy. Comparative benchmarks also showed the proposed system achieving 94.6% predictive accuracy and 96.2% reliability, outperforming existing telehealth platforms.
The methodology involved system design, data preprocessing, model training using the Naïve Bayes classifier, and validation using healthcare-related datasets. Detailed evaluation metrics—including predictive accuracy, system reliability, response time, and user satisfaction—were analyzed to assess system performance. The interpretation of data indicated that the integration of AI significantly improved the monitoring process and provided users with timely, accurate health assessments. However, limitations such as dependency on internet connectivity and restricted access to large-scale patient data were observed.
In conclusion, the study demonstrates that the AI-Enhanced Remote Patient Monitoring System effectively enhances preventive healthcare by delivering reliable, data-driven health predictions. The results confirm its potential to improve healthcare accessibility and operational efficiency while ensuring patient data security. It is recommended that future developments incorporate larger datasets, improve data processing speed, and integrate additional AI models for more complex health predictions. The system contributes a significant advancement toward intelligent, patient-centered, and technology-driven healthcare management.
Keywords
A Predictive Health Analysis, AI-Enhanced Remote Patient Monitoring System, Naïve Bayes Algorithm
Downloads
References
1. Al-Turaiki, I., & Alshahrani, M. (2020). A comparative study of machine learning algorithms for predicting diabetes prevalence. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 11(1), 590–596. https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2020.0110174 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Bokolo, A. J. (2021). Use of telemedicine and virtual care for remote treatment in response to COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Medical Systems, 44(7), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-020-01596-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Davenport, T., & Kalakota, R. (2019). The potential for artificial intelligence in healthcare. Future Healthcare Journal, 6(2), 94–98. https://doi.org/10.7861/futurehosp.6-2-94 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Jiang, F., Jiang, Y., Zhi, H., Dong, Y., Li, H., Ma, S., Wang, Y., Dong, Q., Shen, H., & Wang, Y. (2017). Artificial intelligence in healthcare: Past, present and future. Stroke and Vascular Neurology, 2(4), 230–243. https://doi.org/10.1136/svn-2017-000101 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Jiang, F., Jiang, Y., Zhi, H., Dong, Y., Li, H., Ma, S., Wang, Y., Dong, Q., Shen, H., & Wang, Y. (2017). Artificial intelligence in healthcare: Past, present and future. Stroke and Vascular Neurology, 2(4), 230–243. https://doi.org/10.1136/svn-2017-000101 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Kotsiantis, S. B., Zaharakis, I., & Pintelas, P. (2007). Supervised machine learning: A review of classification techniques. Emerging Artificial Intelligence Applications in Computer Engineering, 160(1), 3–24. IOS Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Kotsiantis, S. B., Zaharakis, I., & Pintelas, P. (2007). Supervised machine learning: A review of classification techniques. Emerging Artificial Intelligence Applications in Computer Engineering, 160(1), 3–24. IOS Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Li, J., & Chen, H. (2018). Naïve Bayes classifier for predicting diabetes in healthcare applications. International Journal of Information Technology and Computer Science, 10(2), 34–40. https://doi.org/10.5815/ijitcs.2018.02.05 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Patel, J., & Desai, K. (2019). Performance analysis of Naïve Bayes and other machine learning algorithms in healthcare data. International Journal of Computer Applications, 178(39), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.5120/ijca2019918726 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Shaban-Nejad, A., Michalowski, M., & Buckeridge, D. L. (2021). Health intelligence: How artificial intelligence transforms population and personalized health. NPJ Digital Medicine, 4(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-021-00407-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Shaban-Nejad, A., Michalowski, M., & Buckeridge, D. L. (2021). Health intelligence: How artificial intelligence transforms population and personalized health. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics, 25(6), 1824–1832. https://doi.org/10.1109/JBHI.2021.3051898 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Sharma, S., & Gupta, A. (2021). AI-powered remote patient monitoring for cardiovascular disease management. Health Informatics Journal, 27(3), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/14604582211012345 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Topol, E. (2019). High-performance medicine: The convergence of human and artificial intelligence. Nature Medicine, 25(1), 44–56. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-018-0300-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Wang, F., Casalino, L. P., & Khullar, D. (2020). Deep learning in health care: Promise, progress, and challenges. JAMA, 324(12), 1201–1202. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.11100 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Smart Iot Device for Weather And Health
- Merlarchive: A Web-Based Academic Hub for UDM With AI-Powered Natural Language Processing
- Enhanced Social Network Security System: Integrating Biometric Authentication for Improved User Verification and Privacy Protection
- Smart Budget Allocation in Public Policy: A Data-Driven Approach for Equitable Resource Distribution
- Decision Support System for Faculty Selection, Promotion, and Reclassification Using Predictive Analytics