From Burnout to Balance: Comparative Insights on Malaysian Work-Life Policies

Authors

Batrisyia Binti David Mc’Grath @ Rahmat

Faculty of Law, Universiti Teknologi MARA (Malaysia)

Danisha Irdina Binti Yusop

Faculty of Law, Universiti Teknologi MARA (Malaysia)

Husna Humaira Binti Mohamad Zamri

Faculty of Law, Universiti Teknologi MARA (Malaysia)

Shafieqa Binti Shamsudin

Faculty of Law, Universiti Teknologi MARA (Malaysia)

Nurul Izza Shamsul Kamal

Faculty of Law, Universiti Teknologi MARA (Malaysia)

Ain Maryam Zolkipli

Faculty of Law, Universiti Teknologi MARA (Malaysia)

Sayidah Asma Basir

Faculty of Law, Universiti Teknologi MARA (Malaysia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS.2025.100900080

Subject Category: Law

Volume/Issue: 10/9 | Page No: 819-822

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-09-20

Accepted: 2025-09-27

Published: 2025-10-22

Abstract

This article examines the challenges of work-life balance (WLB) within Malaysia’s private sector, where employees face long working hours, rising stress levels, and limited legal protections. Drawing on a doctrinal and comparative methodology, the study evaluates Malaysia’s Employment Act 1955 (as amended in 2022) against international models such as France’s right to disconnect, the Netherlands’ Flexible Work Act, and Belgium’s four-day workweek reform.
The literature demonstrates that while European countries have embedded WLB protections into binding law, Malaysia continues to rely on non-binding guidelines and employer discretion. The findings highlight significant gaps in statutory protections, particularly regarding flexible work and digital overconnectivity. The discussion underscores how weak enforcement and cultural norms contribute to Malaysia’s poor global ranking for WLB.
The article concludes by recommending amendments to the Employment Act, statutory recognition of the right to disconnect, and mandatory employer wellness reporting to align Malaysia’s legal framework with international best practices.

Keywords

Work-Life Balance, Malaysian Labour Law, Comparative Analysis, Right to Disconnect, Flexible Work

Downloads

References

1. Remote.com. (2023). Global Life-Work Balance Index 2023. Retrieved May 20, 2025, from https://remote.com [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Employment Hero. (2024). Wellness at Work Malaysia Report 2024. Employment Hero. Retrieved May 20, 2025, from https://employmenthero.com [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. European Parliament. (2017). Right to disconnect and work-life balance. European Union. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. International Labour Organization. (2019). Flexible working time arrangements and work-life balance. Geneva: ILO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Ministry of Human Resources Malaysia. (2022). Employment Act Amendments 2022. Putrajaya: Government of Malaysia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Netherlands Ministry of Social Affairs and Employment. (2020). Flexible Work Act. Government of the Netherlands. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Belgium Federal Public Service Employment. (2021). The four-day workweek reform. Government of Belgium. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles