Transforming Mathematics Education: The Role of AI in Supporting Secondary Students with Special Educational Needs

This case study examines the use of artificial intelligence (AI) to transform mathematics teaching for secondary school students with special educational needs (SEN). Through the integration of adaptive learning environments, intelligent tutoring systems, and AI-driven assistive technology, teachers can design personal, accessible learning experiences. This study documents a six-month rollout of AI solutions across a mainstream secondary school with SEN students, measuring quantitative performance indicators and qualitative mathematics teachers and learner feedback. Evidence is present in the form of stark spikes in engagement, comprehension, and examination outcomes, as well as challenges encountered through accessibility and ethics. The research validates the fact that AI, if implemented properly, can reduce the disparity in mathematics education for neurodiversity learners, with the potential for an inclusive model to scale.

Artificial intelligence; special educational needs; mathematics

1. Anzalone, C., Luedke, J. C., Green, J. J., & Decker, S. L. (2022). QEEG coherence patterns related to mathematics ability in children. Applied Neuropsychology: Child, 11(3), 328-338. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bamford, J., & Moschini, E. (2024). The third space, student and staff co-creation of gamified informal learning: an emerging model of co-design. London Review of Education, 22(1), https://doi.org/10.14324/LRE.22.1.21. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Baog, I., Anit, E., Panes-Tapos, L., & Huelar, M. (2024). Unveiling the Secrets of Teaching Mathematics to Students with Special Needs: Challenges, Strategies, and Educator Insights. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science. https://doi. org/10.47772/ijriss. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Chen, Y., & Liang, S. (2023). BNMI-DINA: A Bayesian cognitive diagnosis model for enhanced personalized learning. Big Data and Cognitive Computing, 8(1), 4, https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc8010004. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Chigali, N., Bobba, S. R., Vani, K. S., & Rajeswari, S. (2020). OCR assisted translator. In 2020 7th International Conference on Smart Structures and Systems (pp. 1-4). IEEE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Dowker, A. (2024). Developmental dyscalculia in relation to individual differences in mathematical abilities. Children, 11(6), 623, https://doi.org/ 10.3390/children11060623. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Fedorenko, E. G., Kaidan, N. V., & Velychko, V. Y. (2021). Gamification when studying logical operators on the Minecraft EDU platform. CEUR Workshop Proceedings. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Geary, D. C. (2021). Mathematical Learning Disabilities in Special Populations. Cambridge: Cambridge Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Ghatpande, K., & Parchure, A. T. (2024). Zero to Hero In Mathematics With The Help of AI-Tools. Multi-Disciplinary Journal, 1(1), 1-8. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Gobert, C., & Beaudouin-Lafon, M. (2022). i-latex: Manipulating transitional representations between latex code and generated documents. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1-16). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Habibi, F., Sedaghatshoar, S., Attar, T., Shokoohi, M., Kiani, A., & Malek, A. N. (2025). Revolutionizing education and therapy for students with autism spectrum disorder: a scoping review of AI-driven tools, technologies, and ethical implications. AI and Ethics, 1-16. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Hou, H. T., Fang, Y. S., & Tang, J. T. (2023). Designing an alternate reality board game with augmented reality and multi-dimensional scaffolding for promoting spatial and logical ability. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(7), 4346-4366. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Hurwitz, S., Perry, B., Cohen, E. D., & Skiba, R. (2020). Special education and individualized academic growth: A longitudinal assessment of outcomes for students with disabilities. American Educational Research Journal, 57(2), 576-611. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Ibili, E., Çat, M., Resnyansky, D., Şahin, S., & Billinghurst, M. (2020). An assessment of geometry teaching supported with augmented reality teaching materials to enhance students’ 3D geometry thinking skills. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 51(2), 224-246. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Idowu, E. (2024). Personalized Learning: Tailoring Instruction to Individual Student Needs. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Kazakova, M. A., & Sultanova, A. P. (2022). Analysis of natural language processing technology: modern problems and approaches. Advanced Engineering Research, 22(2), 169-176. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Kim, J. (2024). Types of teacher-AI collaboration in K-12 classroom instruction: Chinese teachers’ perspective. Education and Information Technologies, 29(13), 17433-17465. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Luo, Z. (2022). Gamification for educational purposes: What are the factors contributing to varied effectiveness? Education and Information Technologies, 27(1), 891-915. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Maharani, D. P., & Mahmudi, A. (2022). How is the relation between problem solving ability and logical thinking ability? In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2575, No. 1, p. 050007). AIP Publishing LLC. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Matic, R. N. (2022). An Approach Using Affective Computing to Predict Interaction Quality from Conversations (Master's thesis, Florida Atlantic University). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Parmar, K. J., Palaniappan, D., Premavathi, T., & Jain, R. (2025). Revolutionizing Educational Assessments With AI Technology. In Rethinking the Pedagogy of Sustainable Development in the AI Era (pp. 227-252). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Patero, J. L. (2023). Revolutionizing math education: Harnessing ChatGPT for student success. International Journal of Advanced Research in Science, Communication and Technology. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Pradeep, K., Sulur Anbalagan, R., Thangavelu, A. P., Aswathy, S., Jisha, V. G., & Vaisakhi, V. S. (2024). Neuroeducation: understanding neural dynamics in learning and teaching. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 9, p. 1437418). Frontiers Media SA. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Qawaqneh, H., Ahmad, F. B., & Alawamreh, A. R. (2023). The impact of artificial intelligence-based virtual laboratories on developing students’ motivation towards learning mathematics. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 18(14), 105-121. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Rahman, M. M., Munir, M. U., Rahman, M. M., & Badiuzzaman, M. (2024). EmoDetect: a learning-centred affective database for detecting student frustration in online learning. In 2024 5th International Conference on Advancements in Computational Sciences (pp. 1-6). IEEE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Ramalingam, D., & Dharmalingam, M. (2024). Cognitive Intelligent Personal Learning Assistants for Enriching Personalized Learning. In Intelligent Systems and Sustainable Computational Models (pp. 212-223). Auerbach Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Regulation, P. (2018). General data protection regulation. Intouch, 25, 1-5. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Rodeiro, C. V., & Williamson, J. (2023). The Impact of GCSE Maths Reform on Progression to Mathematics Post-16. Research Matters, 36, 25-45. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Sheng, L. (2023). Popularization of science in colleges and universities in the new network media environment based on artificial intelligence. Soft Computing, 27(14), 10213-10223. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. World Health Organization. (2023). Global report on children with developmental disabilities. World Health Organization. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Wu, F. L., Lin, C. H., Lin, C. L., & Juang, J. H. (2021). Effectiveness of a problem-solving program in improving problem-solving ability and glycemic control for diabetics with hypoglycemia. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(18), 9559, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18189559. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Interplay of Students’ Emotional Intelligence and Attitude toward Mathematics on Performance in Grade 10 Algebra
• Numerical Simulation of Fitzhugh-Nagumo Dynamics Using a Finite Difference-Based Method of Lines
• Fixed Point Theorem in Controlled Metric Spaces
• Usage of Moving Average to Heart Rate, Blood Pressure and Blood Sugar
• Exploring Algebraic Topology and Homotopy Theory: Methods, Empirical Data, and Numerical Examples