Submission Deadline-08th July 2024
June 2024 Issue : Publication Fee: 30$ USD Submit Now
Submission Deadline-20th July 2024
Special Issue of Education: Publication Fee: 30$ USD Submit Now

Assessment of the Quality of Bar Soaps Produced from Blends of Palm-Oil and African Walnut Seed-Oil

  • Adeyemi, A. E­
  • Akindele, B. O
  • Okan, H. E
  • Ekpenyong, E. V
  • Echiwo, J. A
  • 183-195
  • Sep 23, 2023
  • Micronutrient

Assessment of the Quality of Bar Soaps Produced from Blends of Palm-Oil and African Walnut Seed-Oil

Adeyemi, A. E­1, Akindele, B. O2, Okan, H. E3, Ekpenyong, E. V4, Echiwo, J. A5

1,2,4,5Department of Basic Science, Federal College of Medical Laboratory Science and Technology, Jos, Nigeria.

3Department of Medical Laboratory Science, Federal College of Veterinary and Medical Laboratory Technology, Vom Jos, Nigeria.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.51584/IJRIAS.2023.8815

Received: 21 July 2023; Accepted: 26 August 2023; Published: 23 September 2023

ABSTRACT

This study was conducted to determine the characteristics of soap produced from various fats and oils. Palm oil was purchased, and walnut oil was extracted from its seeds. Five blends of palm oil and African walnut oil were used, together with their individual oils. The cold method of soap-making was employed in this study. Five blends (PW0, PW1, PW2, PW3, and WP0) were prepared in a ratio, and each blend was used for soap production. Each oil blend was characterized for saponification value, acid value, peroxide value, iodine value, and free fatty acid content, and their results were as follows: (182±0.20 – 234±0.30 mgKOH/g), (1.60±0.20 – 3.37±0.12 mgKOH/g), (5.0±0.25 –12.5±0.1 Meq KOH/g), (37.5±0.50 – 55.6±0.25 gI2100/g) and (0.80±0.20 – 1.68±0.12 mgKOH/g). The percentage of total fatty matter in the soap samples ranged from (52±0.1% to 77 ± 0.05%). WP0 (palm oil 0% – walnut oil 100%) had the lowest percentage value of total fatty matter (52±0.1%) among the soap samples produced, while PW0 (palm oil 100% – walnut oil 0%) had the highest percentage value of total fatty matter (77±0.05%). Judging by % total fatty matter, PW0 gave the best soaps because its total fatty matter value fell within the acceptable limits of the Standard Organization of Nigeria (SON). The pH values observed from the blended samples ranged from 10.28 ± 0.01 – 12.20 ± 0.03. PW3 (palm oil 25% – walnut 75%) had the highest values of 12.20 ± 0.03, which makes it harsh for the body. Thus, based on the findings of this study, it can be concluded that soap samples PW0 (palm oil 100% – walnut 0%) and PW1 (palm oil 75% – walnut 25%) can be suggested for use in laundry due to their favorable physicochemical properties (high% Total Fatty Matter, normal pH values, high foam ability).

Key Words: Soap, African Walnut, Palm Oil, Total Fatty Matter, pH

INTRODUCTION

Nuts have remained a major part of the diet for humans since pre-agricultural times. (King et al., 2008). Hazel nut, macadamia, pecan, pistachio, cashew, almond, peanut, Brazil, and English walnut are some of the well-known and well-liked edible nuts (Bolling et al., 2011). They can be consumed as meals or snacks. According to Rajaram and Sabate (2006), they are eaten whole (fresh or roasted), as spreads (peanut butter, almond paste), or as a component of commercial items like sauces, baked goods, oils, sauces, etc.

The African Walnut (Tetracarpidium conophorum) is a climbing shrub 10-20ft long. It is found mainly in Nigeria, Gabon, Equatorial Guinea Gambia, Sierra Leone, and Cameroon (Amaeze et al., 2011). It is referred to as ukpa (Igbo) in Southern Nigeria and awusa or asala (Yoruba) in Western Nigeria. The seed is formed of two cotyledons wrapped in a hard shell-like casing, and the nuts are housed in pods that can have two to five nuts inside them. The nuts mature and are harvested between June and September, and are primarily processed in Nigeria by boiling in water or roasted in hot sand before being eaten as snacks (Nkwonta et al., 2010). After consuming the nuts, drinking water frequently results in a bitter taste. This could be attributed to the presence of chemical substances such as alkaloids (Nkwonta et al., 2010).

The nut is widely used in decoctions in ethnobotanical medicine to treat a variety of illnesses, including dysentery, constipation, abdominal cramps, malaria, male sterility dysfunction, and general fever, as well as to manage chronic conditions such as diabetes, cancer, and high blood pressure. (Aladeokin and Umukoro, 2011; Amaeze et al., 2011). The nut is extremely prone to fungal infestation; within a few days of harvest, as the pods decompose to release the nuts, they become moldy. The cotyledons become sticky, and fungal contamination is visible if the nutshells are cracked. (Amaeze et al., 2011).

Palm oil is naturally reddish in color because of its high beta-carotene content. Red palm oil is named after its characteristic dark red color, which comes from carotenes, such as alpha-carotene, beta-carotene and lycopene, the same nutrients that give tomatoes, carrots, and other fruits and vegetables their rich colors. Red Palm Oil contains 10 other carotenes, tocopherols and tocotrienols (members of the vitamin E family), phytosterols, and glycolipids (Ping and Yuen, 2000).

A chemical molecule or mixture of chemical compounds known as soap can be described as the product of the reaction between fatty acids or fatty glycerides and a metal radical (or organic base). A soap may also be described as any water-soluble salt of fatty acids that contain eight or more carbon atoms. Sodium and potassium, which generate water-soluble soaps, are the most commonly used metals in soap production (Chalmers and Bathe, 1978).

Calcium soap has been utilized in animal feed composition, and soaps are often used for cleaning and laundry (Kuntom et al., 1994). The quantity and composition of the fatty acids in the starring oil define the characteristics of the soap. In each method used to make soap, blends of oils have always been used. By blending the separated fatty acids of palm oil (PO) and palm kernel oil (PKO), Kuntom (1996) generated soaps of desirable grade, and the quality of the soap produced was comparable to that of commercially available soaps. Therefore, this research aims to add to the scientific knowledge already established on the possible use of palm oil and African walnut oil in the manufacture of Bar Soaps.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All chemicals and solvents used in the experimental work were of analytical grade (AR), and all commercial solvent samples were purified by the method reported in the literature (AOAC, 2005).

2.1 Samples collection and preparation

African walnuts ‟Asala or Awusa” (2kg) were purchased at terminus market in Jos, Nigeria. The kernel of the walnut was carefully separated from the seed. The immature seeds were then removed and later cut into small pieces (approximately 0.5 mm) to facilitate drying, and the sliced walnuts were first sun dried to reduce the moisture content of the fresh seeds. After sun-drying the nuts were sorted by removing decayed or defective seeds to ensure the quality of the extracted oil (Oloko, 2019).

2.2 Extraction of Walnut Seed Oil

For easier oil extraction, dried walnut seeds were ground into a powder using an electric blender. Oil was extracted from the samples using a solvent extraction method. 100g milled sample was wrapped with filter paper and then placed in a cellulose thimble in a soxhlet extractor, some n-hexane was placed in a round bottom flask up to two-third capacity full. The round-bottom flask was placed on a heating mantle, and temperature of the mantle was adjusted to 50-600C and evaporation occurred over a period of 8hrs.

The extracted oil was reheated to remove n-hexane through evaporation (Oloko, 2019).

2.3 Bleaching of Palm Oil

Palm oil (1.5kg) was placed in a strong saucepan material and allowed to boil for 2hrs using a charcoal stove. By inserting a piece of white paper into the oil, the paper turned oily and showed that the oil was fully bleached oil. The bleached Oil was allowed to cool and stored in a heat-safe plastic container (James, 2007)

2.4 Oil Blending

Oil blending was carried out in varying compositions as described by Eke et al., (2004). The blends were represented as shown below in Table 1

Table 1: Individual Oil and their Blend in Percentage Composition

Blend Percentage Composition
P (%) W(%)
PWo 100 0
PW1 75 25
PW2 50 50
PW3 25 75
WP0 0 100

P= Palm Oil, W= Walnut Oil

2.5 Determination of Physicochemical Properties of the Oil

2.5.1     Saponification Value

This represents the number of milligrams of KOH or NaOH required to saponify 1g of fat under specified conditions. The oil sample (2g) was weighed into a 500cm3 conical flask and a 25ml pipette of 0.5M KOH solution was poured into the conical flask containing the oil. The reflux condenser in the flask was immersed in boiling water for one hour and two drops of phenolphthalein indicator were added after refluxing and titrated carefully with 0.5M hydrochloric acid. A blank (pottasium hydroxide solution without oil) was titrated using the same procedure. (Oloko, 2019; AOAC 2006)

Saponification Value =                     (1)

A= Titrate of the sample

B= Titrate of the Blank

W= Weight of the sample, g

M= Molarity of HCl Solution

56.1= equivalent weight of potassium hydroxide

2.5.2    Acid Value

The Acid Value is defined as the number of milligrams of KOH needed to neutralize the organic acid present in 1g of fat and, is a measure of the free fatty acids present in the fat and oil. 25cm3 of diethyl ether with 25cm3 of ethanol was mixed and 1.0cm3 of 1% phenolphthalein solution neutralized the ethanol by titrating the solution with 0.1M KOH. 10g of oil sample was measured in a separate conical flask, neutralized ethanol was added, and the solution was boiled and heated until the sample neutralized the ethanol completely. The mixture was titrated against 0.1M potassium hydroxide and a few drops of phenolphthalein indicator was added (Obanla, et al., 2018; AOAC, 2006).

Acid Value =                                                       (2)

V= Volume of KOH required to neutralize the oil solution (ml)

M= Molar concentration of standard KOH

W= Weight of Oil sample (g)

56.1= Equivalent molecular weight of KOH

Acidity is frequently expressed as a free fatty acid for which the calculation is as follows:

Acid Value= Free fatty Acid x 1.99

2.5.3    Oil Yield

The oil was recovered by evaporation of the solvent on a heating mantle. The recovered oil was transferred to a beaker and placed in a water bath for complete evaporation of the solvent. The recovered oil was weighed (Obanla et al., 2018).

% oil yield =                                                          (3)

Z= Weight of the seed before extraction

Y= Weight of the seed oil after extraction

2.5.4    Iodine Value

The Iodine value is a measure of the degree of unsaturation of oil. It is the mass of iodine in grams consumed by 100g of chemical substance. The oil (0.5g) was weighed in a glass stoppard bottle. 10cm3 of chloroform was added and dissolved, 20cm3 of iodine solution was added and a stopper was inserted. The solution was allowed to stand in the dark for 30 minutes and 10cm3 of 15% potassium iodide solution was added and shaken thoroughly, after which 100cm3 of boiled and cooled water was used to wash down any free iodine in the stopper. The mixture was titrated against 0.1M sodium thiosulphate, a few drops of starch indicator were added, and a colourless white solution showed the end point of the titration. The same procedure was repeated for the blank titration (without oil samples) (Oloko, 2019; AOAC 2006).

Iodine Value =   (4)

A = Volume in ml of standard sodium thiosulphate solution require for the blank

B = Volume in ml of standard sodium thiosulphate solution require for the sample

M = Molarity of standard sodium thiosulphate solution

W = Weight in gm of the sample

2.5.5    Peroxide Value

The oil sample (1g) was weighed into a 250cm3 Erlenmeyer flask with a glass stopper, 20cm3 solvent mixture (acetic acid: chloroform, 3:2) and 1cm3 of 1% saturated potassium iodide were added, followed by shaking for 1min, 30cm3 of distilled water after shaking was added and shake again for 1min, the mixture was titrated against 0.025M Na2S2O3 with vigorous agitation, 0.5cm3 of 1% starch solution was added to the mixture with constant agitation to liberate iodine from the solvent layer. A blank titration was carried out without the oil (AOAC, 2006).

Peroxide Value =                                           (5)

S= cm3 of Na2S2O3 (Test-Blank)

M= Molarity of standard sodium thiosulphate solution

W= Weight in gm of the sample.

2.6   GC-MS Analysis

SHIMADZU GC-2010 was used to examine the oil blends (PW1, PW2 and PW3) using gas chromatography. The GC was outfitted with an auto-sampler (AOC-20s), an auto-injector (AOC-20i), and a capillary column with a film size of 30m x 0.25mm x 0.25m made by SH Rxi 5MS Sill. Helium was used as the carrier gas at a flow rate of 2.0 mL/min. The GC oven’s initial temperature was 1400C for 10min, and then raised by 70C/min to a final temperature of 2500C for 10min. The injection volume was 1.0 L with a 75:1 split ratio, and the injector temperature was 2500C. The solvent had a 3.40-minute cutoff, and the entire run took 35.71 minutes. The SHIMADZU GCMS-QP-2020 detector was employed, at a temperature of 2550C (Olujuyigbe et al., 2019).

2.7 Preparation of Soap Samples (Saponification)

The cold process method was used for the saponification and the soap produced did not contain any additives (Muhammed and Usman 2018; Eke et al., 2004). The amount of oil used for saponification was 40 g, and each oil blend required a different amount of base (NaOH) to react completely, owing to the difference in the saponification value. The blended oil samples used for saponification were prepared by varying the weights of palm oil and walnut oil. For example, the blend containing 40g of palm oil and 0g walnut oil was labelled PW0, and the blend containing 30g of palm and 10g of walnut oil was labelled PW1. The blends yielded P: W ratios of 4:0, 3:1, 2:2, 1:3, and 0:4 (Table 1).

NaOH was dissolved in 16.5cm3 of distilled water (alkali: water mixture is 25%), and 40g of the oil blend was slowly poured into NaOH solution. The solution was repeatedly stirred to form a liquid paste. The paste was stirred continuously until the paste thickness increased and a trace mark was observed. The paste was then transferred into a plastic silicon mold and cured at ambient temperature into a solid rectangular soap bar.

2.8 Determination of the Physicochemical Properties of Soap

2.8.1   pH                                                                                               

A 5g sample of the soap shavings was weighed and dissolved in distilled water in a 100cm3 volumetric flask. The electrode of a standardized pH meter was inserted into the soap solution, and pH readings were recorded. (Warra et al., 2012)

2.8.2    Moisture content

5g of soap samples was accurately weighed using an analytical balance of sensitivity 0.1 mg into dried tarred moisture dish in an oven for 2hrs at a temperature of 101˚C. It was allowed to cool and then weighed. The percentage moisture was calculated. (AOAC, 2006)

% moisture content =                                    (6)

C= Weight of crucible + sample after floating

Cs = Weight of crucible + sample

Cw = Weight of crucible

2.8.3 Total Fatty Matter (TFM)

The total fatty matter content was determined by reacting soap with the acid in the presence of hot water and measuring the fatty acid obtained. Approximately 10g of the finished soap was weighed and placed in a 250cm3 beaker, 100cm3 of distilled water was added, and the mixture was heated in a water bath until the soap melted. Subsequently, 10cm3 of 20% H2SO4 was added, and the mixture was heated until a clear solution was obtained. The fatty acids on the surface of the resulting solution were solidified by adding 5g of candlewax and reheated until the wax melted (Roila et al., 2001).  The contents were allowed to cool to room temperature to form a cake. The cake was removed, blotted to dry, and weighed to obtain the total fatty matter using the following equation. (Eke et al.,2004)

%TFM =                                                           (7)

A= Weight of wax + Oil

M= Weight of wax

W= Weight of Soap

2.8.4   Free Caustic Alkali (FCA)

A sample of scrapped soap (10g) was placed in a conical flask, and 100cm3 of neutralized alcohol was added. The flask and the contents were placed in a water bath and heated until the soap dissolved. 10 cm3 of 10% barium chloride solution and 2–3 drops of phenolphthalein indicator were added. The whole content was titrated against 0.1N H2SO4 until the solution became colourless. The free caustic alkali was then calculated. (AOAC, 2006)

FCA                                                               (8)

 VA= Volume of acid

 W = Weight of Soap

RESULTS

3.1 Physicochemical Properties of the oils and their blends

The results obtained for the physicochemical properties of the oil and their blend are presented in Table 2.

Table 2: Physico-chemical Properties of Palm Oil-Walnut Oil Blend

Samples Value Blend Comp (P: W) FFA (mg   KOH/g) Peroxide Value (Meq KOH/g) Saponification Value (mg KOH/g) Iodine Value (gI2100/g) Acid (mgKOH/g)
PW0 ± 0.12 100:0 1.68 ± 0.12 5.0 ± 0.25 234 ± 0.30 55.6 ± 0.25 3.37
PWI ± 0.10 75:25 1.40 ± 0.10 7.50 ± 0.10 217 ± 0.50 52.0 ± 0.55 2.80
PW2 ± 0.20 50:50 1.20 ± 0.20 9.09 ± 0.10 199 ± 0.40 46.9 ± 0.60 2.40
PW3 ± 0.10 25:75 0.95 ± 0.10 11.36 ±0.20 187 ± 0.20 42.4 ± 0.60 1.90
WP± 0.20 0:100 0.80 ± 0.20 12.5 ± 0.1 182 ± 0.20 37.5 ± 0.50 1.60

P – Palm Oil, W – Walnut Oil, FFA ­– Free Fatty Acid, Comp – Composition

All values are mean and standard deviation of the samples. Result represent average of two replications.

3.2 GC-MS Results and Suggested Compounds 

The Gas Chromatographic and Mass Spectra results of the oil blend samples showing some of the suggested compounds are presented in Tables 3 – 5 together with their spectrum. GC-MS analysis was carried out only on the oil blends PW1 (75:25), PW2 (50:50), and PW3 (25:75), and the results obtained were compared with GC-MS results of palm oil and walnut oil in the literature (Ogunmoyela and Ojo, 2020; Rubalya et al., 2014).

Table 3 Suggested Compounds in blended Oil PW1 (75:25)

Peak# Suggested Compounds RT % Area    MF    MW
1 Tridecanoic acid 15.25 0.68 C13H26O2 214.34     
2 Undecanoic acid 16.06 1.35 C11H22O2 186.29
3 Cyclooctene, 3-ethenyl- 18.68 7.18 C10H16 136.23
4 Butyraldehyde, 4 (methylenecyclopropyl)- 18.84 15.49 C8H12O 124.18
5 9,12,15-Octadecatrien-1-ol, (Z,Z,Z)- 19.28 49.48 C18H32O 264.4
6 9,12,15-Octadecatrien-1-ol, (Z,Z,Z)- 19.43 18.64 C18H32O 264.4
7 cis,cis,cis-7,10,13-Hexadecatrienal  19.99 2.00 C16H26O 234.38
8 1,4,9-Decatriene, (E)- 31.34 3.23 C10H16 136.23
9 1,4,9-Decatriene, (E)- 32.65 1.96 C10H16 136.23

RT-Retention Time; MF- Molecular formula; MW-Molecular weight

Table 4. Suggested Compounds in Blended Oils of PW2 (50:50)

Peak# Suggested Compounds RT %Area MF MW
1 Nonanoic acid (Pelargonic) 15.06 3.66 C9H18O2 158.24
2 Cyclohexanebutanoic acid 16.49 11.57 C10H18O2 170.25
3 10-Undecyn-1-ol 18.21 13.51 C11H20O 168.28
4 10-Undecyn-1-ol 18.58 25.61 C11H20O 168.28
5 11-(2-Cyclopenten-1-yl) undecanoic acid, (+)- (Hydnocarpic acid) 19.73 10.30 C16H28O 252.39
6 2,4-Hexadiene, 1,6-dimethoxy-, (E,E)- 22.75 5.65 C8H14O 142.20
7 Cyclopropanecarboxylic acid, dodec-9-ynyl ester 32.10 11.87 C17H28O2 264.4
8 1,5-Heptadiene, (Z)- 32.81 10.29 C7H12 96.17
9 10-Undecyn-1-ol 34.40 7.54 C11H20O 168.28

RT- Retention Time; MF- Molecular formula; MW-Molecular weight

Table 5: Suggested compounds in Blended Oils PW3 (25:75)

Peak# Suggested Compounds RT %Area MF MW
1 Undecanoic acid, 10-bromo- 15.36 2.22 C11H21BrO2 265.19
2 Ethyl .alpha.-d-glucopyranoside 17.72 10.61 C8H16O6 208.21
3 9,12-Octadecadienoyl chloride, (Z,Z)- 18.36 9.00 C18H31ClO 298.9
4 10-Undecyn-1-ol 18.77 23.44 C11H20O 168.28
5 10-Undecyn-1-ol 18.97 10.43 C11H20O 168.28
6 1,6-Octadiene 19.38 11.99 C8H14 110.20
7 1,4,9-Decatriene, (E)- 19.71 7.56 C10H16 136.23
8 1-(2-Propenyl)cyclopentene 20.85 7.50 C8H12 108.18
9 Cycloheptane, bromo- 29.79 3.10 C7H13Br 177.08
10 Cyclopentaneundecanoic acid 36.04 8.96 C16H30O2 254.41
11 3-Octen-1-ol, (Z)- 36.26 5.27 C8H16O 128.21

RT- Retention Time; MF- Molecular formula; MW-Molecular weight

Fig 1. Chromatogram of GC-MS Analysis of Blended Oil PW1

Fig 2. Chromatogram of GC-MS Analysis of Blended Oil PW2                 

The excess free caustic alkali present in all of the soap

Fig 3. Chromatogram of GC-MS Analysis of Blended Oil PW3

3.3 Physicochemical properties of the Soap Blends

The Physicochemical properties of the soap blend produced from the oil samples are presented in Table 6. Percent moisture content, pH, foam ability, percent total fatty matter and free caustic alkali were the major physicochemical properties deduced.

Table 6 Physico-Chemical properties of the soap blend

Samples Blend Composition (P:W) pH TFM (%) FCA (g) Moisture Content (%) Foam Ability Test (cm3)
PW0 100:0 10.0 ± 0.01 77 ± 0.05 0.79 ± 0.15 12 ± 0.01 150 ± 0.1
PW1 75:25 10.90 ± 0.02 74 ± 0.1 0.96 ± 0.3 10 ±0.05 126 ± 0.15
PW2 50:50 12.20 ± 0.03 67 ± 0.15 1.06 ± 0.1 8 ± 0.02 70 ± 0.2
PW3 25:75 10.39 ± 0.01 55 ± 0.05 0.93 ± 0.1 12 ± 0.01 68 ± 0.1
WP0 0:100 10.28 ± 0.01 52 ± 0.1 1.15 ± 0.05 8 ± 0.01 80 ± 0.1

Values are expressed as mean and ± standard deviation of double determinations. P – Palm Oil, W – Walnut Oil, wt – weight, TFM – Total Fatty Matter, FCA – Free Caustic Alkali

DISCUSSION

Oil Yield

The oil yield from African walnut seeds was 40%. Comparing the value with other seeds oil such as corn oil (4.5%), soya beans (21%), Cotton seed (22.9%) as reported by Rahib et al., (2015). This shows that African walnuts can produce similar quantities of chestnut and watermelon oil. This also indicates that the processing of African walnuts seed oil for industrial or edible purposes would be economical.

Saponification Value

As shown in Table 2, the saponification value (mgKOH/g) for the PW0, PW1, PW2, PW3, and WP0 blends ranged between 182 ± 0.20 – 234 ± 0.30 mgKOH/g. These values are lower than the Avogadro seed oil of 246.7 mgKOH/g (Rahib et al., 2015), but greater than that of Moringal Oil, which has a saponification value of 155.8 mgKOH/g (Afolayan et al., 2014). Table 4 shows that PW0 has a higher saponification value, whereas WP0 has a lower saponification value. This implies that the higher the saponification value, the shorter the fatty acid chain and the lower the molecular weight of the oil and vice versa. On the other hand, the larger the SV, the better the soap-making ability of the oil.

Peroxide Value

The peroxide Value is a measure of the oil deterioration. It gives the extent to which rancidity reactions have occurred during storage. As shown in Table 2, the peroxide values of PW0, PW1, PW2, PW3, and WP0 ranged from 5.0 ± 0.25 12.5 ± 0.1 Meq/KOH/g. This implies that PW0 had the lowest peroxide value, whereas WP0 had the highest. A peroxide value of less than 10 Meq/KOH/g is considered free from rancidity (Obanla et al., 2018). PW0, PW1, PW2 blend values are in the range 5.0 ± 0.25 to 9.09 ± 0.10 Meq/KOH/g are considered to be free from rancidity, while PW3 and WP0 were 11.36 ± 0.20 and 12.5 ± 0.1 Meq/KOH/g are considered to be rancid.

Iodine Value

The Iodine Value is a measure of the degree of unsaturated fatty acids in an oil and can be used to quantify the number of double bonds present in the oil, which reflects the susceptibility of oil to oxidation (Afolayan et al., 2014). As shown in Table 2, the iodine values for samples PW0, PW1, PW2, PW3, and WP0 ranged from 37.5 ± 0.50 – 55.6 ± 0.25 gI2100/g. This implies that PW0 has the highest value of iodine and is the most unsaturated, whereas WP0 has the lowest value of iodine and is the least unsaturated. The iodine values of all the samples in Table 2 are lower than the iodine value of water melon seed oil with a value of 121.51 gI2100/g (Duduyemi et al., 2013), but greater than that of moringa seed oil with value 35.85 gI2100/g (Afolyan et al., 2014).

Acid Value and Free Fatty Acid

The acidity of oil results from the breakdown of triacylglycerol due to a chemical reaction called hydrolysis, in which free fatty acids are formed. Thus, free fatty acids are a direct measure of oil quality (Hesham et al., 2015). As shown in Table 2, the free fatty acid values for PW0, PW1, PW2, PW3, and WP0 ranged from 1.68 ± 0.12 – 0.80 ± 0.20 mgKOH/g. This implies that PW0 had the highest value of free fatty acid and WP0 had the lowest value. Comparing these values with other seed oil, the free fatty acid of PW3 (0.95) and WP0 (0.80) has lower values as that of sunflower (0.4); soya beans (0.5), and cotton seed (0.7) while PW0 (1.68), PW1 (1.40) and PW2 (1.20) have higher values as that of corn oil (1.5) and chestnut (3.01) as reported by Rahib et al., (2015).

GC-MS interpretation of the Oil-Blend

The GC-MS results of the PW1 oil blend in Table 3 show that there are nine (9) compounds present in the oil blend, two of which are saturated fatty acids, tridecanoic acid, and undecanoic acid. In the PW2 oil blend, GC-MS results in Table 4 show that there are nine compounds present in the oil blend, two of which are fatty acids: nonanoic acid (a saturated fatty acid) and hydnocarpic acid (a monounsaturated fatty acid). In the PW3 oil blend, GC-MS results in Table 5 show that there are 11 compounds present in the oil blend, one of which is a saturated fatty acid, 10-bromoundecanoic acid. Comparing the GC-MS results of the oil-blend PW1, PW2 and PW3 in table 3.- 5 with GCMS results of the individual oils in literature review, it was shown that all the fatty acid compound found in the oil-blends were present in the individual oils.

Quality Parameter of the Soap Samples produced

Moisture Content

Moisture content is used to assess the shelf life of a product. (Idoko et al., 2018). As shown in Table 6, the moisture contents of PW0, PW1, PW2, PW3, and WP0 ranged from 8.0 ± 0.01% to 12 ± 0.01%. PW0 had the highest moisture content, whereas PW3 and WP0 had the lowest. The % moisture content of commercial bar soap lux (16.65) and premier (15.94), as reported by James (2012), was higher than the moisture content of all the soap samples produced in Table 6. However, the moisture contents of PW0, PW1, and PW3 fell within the limits (10 – 15%) of the Encyclopedia of Industries Chemical analysis, while PW2 and WP0 did not.

pH of the Soap Samples

 As shown in Table 6, the pH values of the soap samples produced PW0, PW1, PW2, PW3, and WP0 ranged between 10.28 ± 0.01 – 12.20 ± 0.03. PW2 had the highest pH, whereas WP0 had the lowest value. However, the pH value of the PW0, PW1, PW3, and WP0 falls within the acceptable limits of pH (9-11) in soaps set by Standard Organization of Nigeria while PW2 do not, this was as a result of incomplete hydrolysis resulted from saponification process (Idoko et al., 2018)

Foam Ability Test

The foam Ability Test of soap (or the measure of foam height) is an important factor that attracts consumer interest, even though it has little contribution to the cleansing ability of the soap (Mak-Mensah and firepong, 2011).

As shown in Table 6, the foaming ability of the soap samples PW0, PW1, PW2, PW3, and WP0 ranged from 68 ± 0.1 – 150 ± 0.1. PW0 had the highest value of foaming ability while PW3 had the lowest.

Free Caustic Alkali Content of the Soap Samples

The Free Caustic Alkali of soap is a measure of its abrasiveness or roughness. (Ashrafy et al., 2016) As shown in Table 6, the free caustic alkalis of PW0, PW1, PW2, PW3, and WP0 ranged from 0.93 ± 0.1 – 1.15 ± 0.05g. WP0 had the highest FCA, whereas PW3 had the lowest. However, the free caustic alkalis of PW0, PW1, PW2, PW3, and WP0 were higher than the acceptable limits set by the Standard Organization of Nigeria (≤ 0.05). The excess free caustic alkali present in all of the soap samples produced can have adverse effect on the skin or cloth but it can be reduced by adding humectants such as propylene glycol, glycerol on the soap (Woollatt, E. 1985).

Percent Total Fatty Matter

Table 8 shows that the % TFM of the soap samples ranged from 52 ± 0.1 – 77 ± 0.05%. PW0 had the highest value, whereas WP0 had the lowest value. The TFM of PW0 (77%) and PW1 (74%) falls within the limits set by the International Standard Organization (ISO 685) which is 73-77%, indicating good quality soap. PW2, PW3, and WP0 fall below the limits set by ISO because of the presence of unreacted NaOH in the soap of PW2, PW3, and WP0.

CONCLUSION

Quality parameters such as total fatty matter, free alkali, moisture content, pH, and foam ability were investigated for the bar soaps produced. The total fatty matter of PW0 and PW1 soaps is said to fall within the acceptable limits set by the International Standard Organization, while PW2, PW3, and WP0 fall below the limit set by the ISO. The pH values of all the bar soaps produced are within the limit set by the Standard Organization of Nigeria (9-11) except for PW2 soap, which is 12.20. Thus, from the results obtained in this study, it can be concluded that because of the favorable physicochemical properties (high % TFM, normal pH value, and high foam ability) of PW0 and PW1, these soaps can be recommended for laundry.

RECOMMENDATIONS

From the analysis of the oil and the bar soaps produced;

  1. It is recommended that a commercial plant be designed and set up to extract walnut oil from the seed in large quantities for commercial purposes.
  2. It is recommended that the waste product from walnut fruit be converted to other by-products such as biofuels.

REFERENCES

  1. Afolayan, M., Akanji, F. and Idowu, D. (2014). Extraction and Physicochemical analysis of some selected seed oils. International Journal of Advanced Chemistry, 2(2), 70 – 73
  2. Aladeokin, A. C. and Umukoro, S. (2011). Psychopharmacological properties of an aqueous extract of Tetracarpidium conophorum Hutch Dalziel in mice. Journal of Natural Medicines, 65(3-4), 411–416.
  3.  Amaeze, O. U., Ayoola, G. A., Sofidiya, M. O., Adepoju-Bello, A. A., Adegoke, A. O., & Coker, H. A. B. (2011). Evaluation of antioxidant activity of Tetracarpidium conophorum (Müll. Arg) Hutch & Dalziel leaves. Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity, 2011, 976701.
  4. AOAC. (2005). Official Method of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemist. Washington DC, USA
  5. AOAC. (2006). Official Method of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemist. Washington DC, USA.
  6. Ashrafy, H., Sazal, K., Sajal, S.M., Joyanto, K., Khodeza, K.M., & Sharif M.A. (2016): Study on the Physicochemical Properties of Some Commercial Soaps Available in Bangladeshi Market. International Journal of Advanced Research in Chemical Science, 3(6), 9-12.
  7. Bolling, B. W., Chen, C. Y. O., McKay, D. L., & Blumberg, J. B. (2011). Tree nut phytochemicals: composition, antioxidant capacity, bioactivity, impact factors. A systematic review of almonds, Brazils, cashews, hazelnuts, macadamias, pecans, pine nuts, pistachios and walnuts. Nutrition Research Reviews, 24(2), 244
  8. Chalmers, L., & Bathe, P. (1978) Chemical Specialist, Domestic and Industrial. 2nd Edition, George Godwin, UK, 1-15
  9. Duduyemi, A., Oyedele, O.A., & Oladipo, I.O. (2014): Investigation into Edible and Non-edible oil potentials of chestnut Grown in Nigeria. Merit Research Journal of Agricultural Science and Soil Sciences, 2(12), 154 – 160.
  10. Eke, U. B., Dosumu, O. O., Oladipo, E., & Agunbiade, F.O. (2014) Analysis of locally produced soap using Sheabutter Oil (SBO) blended with Palm-Kernel Oil (PKO). Nigeria journal of Science, 38, 19-24.
  11. Hesham, R.L., Celine, M., & Celestine, R. (2015): Analysis of different   Namibian traditional oils against commercial sunflower and olive oils. African Journal of Food Science, 9(6), 372-379.
  12. Idoko O., Emmanuel, S.A., Salau, A.A., and Obigwa P. A (2018): Quality Assessment on Some Soaps Sold in Nigeria. Nigeria Journal of Technology, 37(4), 1137-1140. International Standard specification for soaps, ISO 685:1975.
  13. King, J. C., Blumberg, J., Ingwersen, L., Jenab, M., & Tucker, K. L. (2008). Tree nuts and peanuts as components of a healthy diet. The Journal of Nutrition, 138(9), 1736S– 1740S
  14. Mak-Mensah, E.E., and Firempong, C.K. (2011): Chemical Characteristics of Toilet Soap Prepared from Neem (Azadirachta indica A. Juss)   Seed Oil, Asian Journal of Plant Science and Research, 1(4), 1.
  15. Muhammed, U.F., and Usman, A. (2018). Physico chemical Analysis of some soap produced from five locally processed Nigeria oil. Internal   Journal of Scientific and Engineering, 9(12), 2229-5518.
  16. Nkwonta, C. G., Ezeokonkwo, C. A., Obidoa, O., & Joshua, P. E. (2010). Effects of Roasted Tetracarpidium conophorum-Based Diet on some heamatological parameters renal and liver function biomarkers in male wister rats. Journal of Pharmacy Research, 3(8), 1865–1871
  17. Obanla, O. R., Ajani O. O., Omodara O. J., and Omolewa D. A. (2018) Extraction, comparative study and property evaluation of synthesized bar soap from locally sourced rubber seed oil and palm kernel oil. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology. 9(12), 308-319.
  18. Ogunmoyela, O.B., and Ojo, T.I. (2020). Volatile Bioactive Components of Boiled and Roasted African Walnut (Tetracapidium conophorum) Extracts Using GC-MS. Journal of Nigerian Institute of Food Science and Technology, 38(1), 23 – 33.
  19. Oloko S.A. (2019). Extraction of Oil from Africa walnut seed- Tetracarpidium conophorum. International Journal of Innovative Science and Technology, 6(6), 2348-7968
  20. Olujuyigbe, A.A., Amah, G.H., Adebawo, O.O. and Olujuyigbe, O.O. (2019). Extraction and GC-MS analysis of fatty acids in commonly consumed melon seed varieties in Nigeria. GSC Biological and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 07 (03):077-092.
  21. Ping, B., and Yuen, C. (2000). Valuable minor constituents of commercial red palm olein: carotenoids, vitamin E, ubiquinones and sterols. Journal of Oil Palm Research, 12(1), 14-24.
  22. Rahib, H., Ayed, H., Asadullah, S., and Mehdeehazeb, G. (2015). Physico-chemical properties and Assessment of Edible Oil potential of Peanuts Grown in Kurram Agency, Parachinar. Pak. J. Anal. Environ. Chem, 16(1), 45 – 51.
  23. Rajaram, S., & Sabate, J. (2006). Nuts, body weight, and insulin resistance. British Journal of Nutrition, 96(Suppl. 2), S79–S86.
  24. Rubalya V.S., Aniruthaan, K., Jeyanthinathan, G., and Neelameagam P. (2014): Profiling of Fatty Acid Compositional Alterations in Edible Oil Upon Heating Using Gas Chromatography. Journal of Physical Science, 25(2), 1–14
  25. Warra, A.A. (2012) Production of Soap from an Indigenous Moringa oliefera Lam Seed Oil. J.Raw Materials Res, 7(1&2), 26-35.
  26. Woollatt E. (1985) first ed. Ellis Hardwood Ltd; West Sessux, England: The Manufacturer of Soaps, other detergents and Glycerin. Pages 34-35, 47-55, 267 and 284.

Article Statistics

Track views and downloads to measure the impact and reach of your article.

2

PDF Downloads

737 views

Metrics

PlumX

Altmetrics

Paper Submission Deadline