Factors Influencing Grade 10 Students’ Decision Regarding the Selection of Their Senior High School Academic Strand
- Reñel M. Sabanal
- 690-711
- May 13, 2025
- Education
Factors Influencing Grade 10 Students’ Decision Regarding the Selection of Their Senior High School Academic Strand
Reñel M. Sabanal
College of Arts and Sciences, Isabela State University – Echague Campus
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51584/IJRIAS.2025.10040059
Received: 02 April 2025; Accepted: 11 April 2025; Published: 13 May 2025
ABSTRACT
Selecting a suitable track is critical for a student who has yet to decide what academic strand to follow in his/her senior high school year. The main goal of the study was to look at how personal interest, family influence, job opportunities, financial condition, and peer pressure affected grade 10 decisions when choosing an academic strand in order to better prepare them for senior high school coursework. The researcher employed the descriptive and inferential research design to investigate the objectives and generate a new understanding of the data collected. The study involved one hundred seventeen (117) grade 10 students enrolled at Saint John Berchman High School Incorporated during SY 2022-2023. Additionally, the researcher employed an online survey questionnaire as a primary tool to gather and compile information based on the five factors, using a 4-point Likert scale for each indication and examining the samples’ responses. The result showed that there is a significant difference between the friends/peers influence factor when group by sex and age. Moreover, there is no significant difference between the five factors when group by the grade 10 students’ chosen strands.
Keywords: personal interest, family influence, job opportunities, financial condition, friends/peers influence, academic strand
INTRODUCTION
The K–12 Basic Education Program in the Philippines includes an overview of Senior High School (SHS), which is the latter two years of a new six-year secondary education system. Instead of just promoting readiness for post-secondary education, the SHS Curriculum intends to prepare students for their higher education or employment (Uy and Martinez, 2019).
Students’ abilities will improve as a result of the government’s implementation of the K–12 curriculum, and they will become more capable of understanding and coping with new courses. The curriculum has been enhanced to better meet the local needs of students, enabling them to select a specialization that best complements their interests (Rio et al., 2022).
Students in Junior High School (JHS) Grade 10 will follow a uniform curriculum and be given an option of seven academic strands in their SHS year level: Accountancy, Business, and Management (ABM) Strand; Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Strand; Humanities and Social Science (HUMSS) Strand; General Academic Strand (GAS); Technical-Vocational-Livelihood (TVL) Track; Arts and Design Track; and Sports Track.
Making a decision when choosing an academic strand to consider a variety of factors. In the study of Galowich and Bers (2002), the majority of college students have a course that their parents have selected for them to enroll in because they discovered the course to be uninteresting, and the majority of them tend to receive poorer grades. If a student’s chosen academic strand does not support their desired progress, it has many consequences for them. Some students who don’t want to take the course tend to not take it seriously, and their only intention is just to graduate.
Some factors have an impact on junior high school students’ decisions regarding their chosen academic strands. This study intends to determine the factors affecting grade 10 students at Saint John Berchmans High School Incorporated in choosing an academic strand based on the survey data that were provided to them. Choosing an academic strand shouldn’t be taken for granted. In this scenario, the study will conclude what factors students may want to consider while selecting a course. Additionally, the junior high school students saw that their decisions were influenced by their interests, peer pressure, family influence, financial condition, and opportunities for future employment.
This study was conducted at Saint John Berchmans High School Incorporated (SJBHSI) in Cordon, Isabela. The research looked at how personal interest, family influence, job opportunities, financial condition, and peer pressure affected junior high school students’ decisions when choosing an academic strand in their SHS year. It also aims to examine if there is a significant difference between the mean score of the factors affecting students’ decisions when choosing their academic strand when grouped by age, sex, and their chosen academic strand.
Conceptual Framework
Students must take the time to consider their selections because a course can have a significant impact on job seekers’ employment chances. For JHS students, it is crucial to think about numerous options that will influence your decisions regarding what academic strand to take in your senior high school year. A path can significantly impact your future and plays a significant role in whom you will become.
Personal Interest
Personal interest reflects the student’s interest in their selected careers (Liaw et al., 2017). According to Holland’s Theory of Career Typology (1966), people pick careers that best suit their personalities and interests. Parents, educators, friends, and life experiences influence your preferences. Interest is a key factor when it comes to inspiring individuals to carry out the good deeds they enjoy.
Family Influence
Family influences on their children’s decision when choosing academic strand are significant. In this situation, parents are crucial because they exert enormous pressure on their children’s professional decisions through a variety of means, such as direct inheritance and the requirement of an apprenticeship or role model.
Job Opportunities
Job opportunity refers to any existing position that is open and unfilled by a qualified candidate. Rising employment rates and rising consumer spending capacity are indeed related to the country’s economic growth. Students are drawn to certain fields as a result. They perceive huge potential in their progress in life and a reliable income. This finding is consistent with other studies that demonstrate how students select the most pertinent academic strand because they want a stable job with a high salary (Fizer, 2013).
Financial Condition
Financial Condition means the financial resources needed to perform the contract. Some students come from households with minimal financial resources and lower socioeconomic backgrounds. Students may often encounter this difficulty if they are aware of how expensive their education is (Vallente et al., 2016).
Friends or Peers Influence
The impact that friends or peers have over students is referred to as “friends/peer influence.” This factor influences students’ decision-making while selecting an academic strand since it’s crucial to feel included in a group. When a student consults a classmate or peers for all of his or her decisions, there are various outcomes. Sometimes, classmates or friends can influence your choice.
Figure 1. Research Paradigm of the Study
Statement of the Problem
This study aims to determine the different factors influencing Grade 10 students’ decision in choosing an academic strand. Specifically, this study will answer the following:
- What strand is most chosen by the Grade 10 students?
- What factor has the greatest influence on the Grade 10 students in selecting an academic strand?
2a. Personal Interest 2d. Financial Condition
2b. Family Influence 2e. Friends/Peer Influence
2c. Job Opportunities
- Is there a significant difference between the mean score of the different factors when grouped by
3a. Sex?
3b. Age?
3c. Chosen strand?
Statement of Hypotheses
To answer 3rd question, hypotheses were set as:
– There is no significant difference between the mean score of the different factors when grouped by sex, age, and the chosen strand.
: There is a significant difference between the mean score of personal interest when grouped by sex, age, and the chosen strand.
: There is a significant difference between the mean score of family influence when grouped by sex, age, and the chosen strand.
: There is a significant difference between the mean score of job opportunity when grouped by sex, age, and the chosen strand.
: There is a significant difference between the mean score of financial condition when grouped by sex, age, and the chosen strand.
: There is a significant difference between the mean score of friends/peers influence when grouped by sex, age, and the chosen strand.
Significance of the Study
Multiple fields can benefit from this study. First, the study’s findings will be helpful to students, their parents, and junior high school counselors by giving them information on the senior high school academic strand selection process. The results may be a useful tool for self-discovery by offering a framework for evaluating suitable academic strand selections. The findings of this study should guide the students in selecting the most appropriate and suitable academic strand for them.
JHS students – This research assists students who will be entering senior high school in identifying the factors to be considered while choosing an academic strand. They must consider their passions, innate talents, and capacities. They will be able to make better decisions as a result of this study.
Guidance Counselors – The junior and senior high school guidance counselors will benefit from this study as well. The best way to ensure a student’s career success is to provide them with appropriate assistance when choosing an academic strand that is compatible with their intelligence, abilities, and personality. By combining career plans with the curriculum, it is possible to support students in making an informed choice about the academic strand they should enroll in. Additionally, it should be essential that every high school student leaves with a better career plan from their guidance counselor.
Parents or Guardians – This study will be beneficial to all parents and guardians who play a significant role in their children’s career development and decision-making. Parents want their children to be happy and successful in life, and one aspect that affects happiness and success is the choice of employment. Students are more confident in their capacity to investigate jobs and select an academic strand that would be engaging and exciting when they feel their parents’ love and support.
Scope and Delimitation of the Study
This study focuses on the factors influencing grade 10 students’ decisions regarding the selection of their academic strand. This study was conducted at Saint John Berchmans High School Incorporated (SJBHSI), a private school in Cordon, Isabela. The respondents are the. grade 10 students in SJBHSI enrolled during 2022-2023. Rio’s (2022) questionnaire on factors influencing the preferences of grade 10 students in choosing their preferred senior high school track, was used to collect the data. 117 students took the questionnaire out of 189 students. The study was limited to only five academic strands: STEM; ABM; HUMSS; GAS; and TVL.
Definitions of Terms
Academic Strands –refers to a specialization given to incoming senior high school students. There are several academic strands: STEM; ABM; HUMSS; GAS; and TVL.
Factors – refers to the situation, person, condition, or element(s) that causes a given effect; examples include family history, academic background, references from others, and educational aspirations. These are a few of the elements that could have an impact on students’ decision to choose an academic strand.
METHODS
Participants
Enrollees of SJBHSI was used primarily as the participant in the study. Convenient non-random sampling was used to choose the respondents. The participants in this study were male and female grade 10 students, aged 14 to 17, who were enrolled during SY 2022–2023. Out of 189 students, there are 117 students willingly took the questionnaire.
Research Instrument
Rio’s (2022) questionnaire on factors influencing the preferences of grade 10 students in choosing their preferred senior high school track, was used to collect the data. There are three sections to the online questionnaire. The explanation, goal, significance of the study, and general directions are provided in Part 1. The respondents’ demographic profile, such as their age and gender, is included in Part 2. The third section of the poll is made up of the five factors that have been identified as influencing students’ decisions when choosing an academic strand: Personal Interest, Family Influence, Job Opportunities, Financial Conditions, and Friends/Peers’ Influence.
Procedure
An identical survey questionnaire was distributed to the selected participants via a Google Form link. Both the researcher and the voluntary participants strictly followed the procedures to ensure clarity and high-quality responses aligned with the research objectives. The principal of SJBHSI was formally notified about the data collection process conducted through Google Forms. Upon approval, the researcher proceeded with the survey administration. No classes were interrupted during the gathering of data.
Data Analysis
Treatment of the Data
Statistical Product and Service Solutions (SPSS) version 23 was utilized to analyze the data inferentially and descriptively. The inferential statistics were used to examine if there is a significant difference between the mean score of the different factors when grouped by age, sex, and chosen academic strand, whereas the descriptive statistics were utilized to analyze, interpret, and classify the factors influencing the grade 10 students’ decision when choosing an academic strand.
Scoring Procedure
The researchers utilized the method, which assigns a qualitative equivalent to each numerical or quantitative score. The rating and its qualitative equivalent are as follows:
Table 1. Guide for Interpretation
Score | Mean | Qualitative Description | Qualitative Statement |
4 | 3.50-4.00 | Strongly Agree | Very Influencing |
3 | 2.50-3.49 | Agree | Moderately Influencing |
2 | 1.50-2.49 | Disagree | Less Influencing |
1 | 1.00-1.49 | Strongly Disagree | Not Influencing |
Normality Test
Before comparing the factors and the profile variables of the respondents if they are significantly different, the researcher ensured that all the assumptions needed for the sample t-test and ANOVA were met. The preliminary tests were shown in Appendix II, III, and IV.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
Section 1: Profile of the Respondents
Sex of the Respondents
Figure 2. Frequency Count of Sex of the Respondents
Figure 2 shows the number of male and female Grade 10 students of SJBHSI. The majority of the respondents were female students. There are 74 female students and 43 male students who willingly took the questionnaire.
Age of the Respondents
Figure 3. Frequency Count of Age of the Respondents
Figure 3 presents the frequency count of the age of the respondents. Out of 117 respondents, there are 99 respondents aged 15 years old. The frequency of respondents ages 14 years old is 21 and the frequency of respondents ages form 16-17 years old is 8.
Chosen Academic Strand of the Respondents
Figure 4. Frequency Count of the Chosen Academic Strand of the Respondents
Figure 4 revealed the chosen academic strand of the grade 10 students. The majority of the respondents chose STEM Strand (50.4%) as their specialization in their senior high school year. There are 26 respondents who selected HUMSS Strand, 16 respondents who chose ABM Strand, 8 respondents who picked GAS Strand, and 8 respondents who chose TVL Strand as their academic strand in their senior high school.
Section 2: Factors Influencing Grade 10 Students’ Decision Regarding the Selection of their Academic Strand Using Descriptive Statistics
Summary of Factors That Influence Student’s Decision in Choosing an Academic Track
Table 2 displays the mean, standard deviation, and qualitative description of each factor that influences on student’s decision in choosing an academic track
Personal interest, family influence, financial condition, and job opportunities have a moderate influence on the Grade 10 students when choosing an academic strand. Personal Factor has the highest mean which means that among the four aforementioned factors, personal interest has been the first factor to be included when choosing an academic strand with a mean of 3.32 and a standard deviation of 0.506. After considering their interest, the respondents included job opportunities. This factor has a mean of 3.21 and a standard deviation of 0.539. The next factor with the highest mean of 2.79 and standard deviation of 0.554 is the financial condition factor. And lastly, family influence has a mean of 2.53 and a standard deviation of 0.623. The respondents agreed that these factors have a moderate influence on them.
Friends and peers were less influential to the respondents with a mean of 2.11 and a standard deviation of 0.538.
Table 2. Frequency and Percent Distribution of the Five Factors Influencing Grade 10 Students in Choosing their Academic Strand
Factors | Qualitative Description | Frequency | Percent |
Personal Interest
Mean: 3.32 (Moderately Influencing) SD: 0.506 |
Not Influencing | 0 | 0% |
Less Influencing | 2 | 1.7% | |
Moderately Influencing | 75 | 64.1% | |
Very Influencing | 40 | 34.2% | |
Family Influence
Mean: 2.53 (Moderately Influencing) SD: 0.623 |
Not Influencing | 3 | 2.6% |
Less Influencing | 54 | 46.2% | |
Moderately Influencing | 55 | 47.0% | |
Very Influencing | 5 | 4.3% | |
Financial Condition
Mean: 2.79 (Moderately Influencing) SD: 0.554 |
Not Influencing | 0 | 0% |
Less Influencing | 33 | 28.2% | |
Moderately Influencing | 76 | 65.0% | |
Very Influencing | 8 | 6.8% | |
Job Opportunities
Mean: 3.21 (Moderately Influencing) SD: 0.539 |
Not Influencing | 0 | 0% |
Less Influencing | 7 | 6.0% | |
Moderately Influencing | 78 | 66.7% | |
Very Influencing | 32 | 27.4% | |
Friends/Peers Influence
Mean: 2.11 (Less Influencing) SD: 0.538 |
Not Influencing | 10 | 8.5% |
Less Influencing | 85 | 72.6% | |
Moderately Influencing | 21 | 17.9% | |
Very Influencing | 1 | 0.9% |
Factors That Influence Student’s Decision in Choosing an Academic Track
Table 3 shows the mean, standard deviation, and qualitative description of each item of the five factors influencing grade 10 students in choosing their academic strand.
As shown in Table 3, personal interest has a moderate influence on students’ decisions in choosing an academic strand. The statements included in the personal interest are all about their interest, skills, and freedom when choosing an academic strand. It can be concluded that grade 10 students choose their academic strand based on their desire (statement 1) and their skills and interest (statement 4). This supports the claim made by Nyamwange’s (2016) study that earlier exposure to a profession is essential for igniting and sustaining interest in that subject. This is due to the fact that past knowledge prepares a person for the requirements of obtaining and choosing a career, which explains in part why the overall mean for this aspect is perceived as an extreme one when deciding on a preference for a senior high school strand.
In terms of family influence, this factor has a moderate influence on the respondents except for statement 3. Their parents did not force the respondents to enroll in a specific strand. However, the respondents consider their parent’s careers when choosing an academic strand (Statement 1). The study of Tillman (2015) shows that those who are negatively influenced by their parents are less likely to choose the same career field as their parents.
The financial condition has a moderate influence also to the respondents when choosing a strand. Respondents choose an academic strand with a monetary benefit to them (Statement 3). Respondents also consider their parents when choosing an academic strand (Statement 4). Parents’ income significantly affects the decision of students when choosing their senior high school academic strand (Dahie et al., 2016).
Respondents were moderately influenced by job opportunities. They consider the future work environment (Statement 4) and the stability of the work (Statement 3) related to the academic strand they will pick. This means that students choose a senior high school strand based on the job opportunities available since they consider it important.
Lastly, friend’s and peer’s influence has less influence on the grade 10 student when choosing an academic strand for the senior high school year. Most of the respondents still consider their close friends when choosing a strand (Statement 4). When it comes to a student’s decision in choosing an academic strand, the circle of peers has zero influence (Olamide & Olawaiye, 2013).
Table 3. Mean, Standard Deviation, and Qualitative Description of each item of the Five Factors Influencing Grade 10 Students in Choosing their Academic Strand
Factors | Statement | Mean | SD | Qualitative Description |
Personal Interest | 1. I choose based on my desire. | 3.39 | 0.491 | Moderately Influencing |
2. I consider my aptitudes and capabilities in choosing a strand. | 3.27 | 0.532 | Moderately Influencing | |
3. I choose out of my freedom. | 3.24 | 0.638 | Moderately Influencing | |
4. My personality and habits are suited to the strand I choose. | 3.22 | 0.617 | Moderately Influencing | |
5. I choose the track that fits my skills and interest. | 3.37 | 0.553 | Moderately Influencing | |
Family Influence | 1. I consider my parents’ career in choosing my senior high school strand. | 2.87 | 0.737 | Moderately Influencing |
2. I choose the strand based on my parents’ preferences. | 2.51 | 0.715 | Moderately Influencing | |
3. My parents pushed me to enroll in the specific strand. | 2.15 | 0.582 | Less Influencing | |
4. I chose the strand out of my parents’ influence. | 2.57 | 0.686 | Moderately Influencing | |
5. My parents advised me to choose this strand. | 2.57 | 0.758 | Moderately Influencing | |
Financial Condition | 1. I choose this strand based on my parents’ income. | 2.75 | 0.681 | Moderately Influencing |
2. I choose the strand based on tuition cost. | 2.66 | 0.604 | Moderately Influencing | |
3. I prefer the strand based on its scholarship opportunities. | 2.9 | 0.648 | Moderately Influencing | |
4. I choose the strand that would not cause financial stress for my parents. | 2.86 | 0.606 | Moderately Influencing | |
5. I choose the strand that would not stress my present work | 2.81 | 0.629 | Moderately Influencing | |
Job Opportunities | 1. I choose this strand based on its demand. | 3.07 | 0.666 | Moderately Influencing |
2. I choose a strand based on salary expectations. | 3.07 | 0.716 | Moderately Influencing | |
3. I prefer a strand based on its employability and stability. | 3.24 | 0.536 | Moderately Influencing | |
4. I choose a strand based on its future work environment. | 3.34 | 0.56 | Moderately Influencing | |
5. I choose a strand based on its availability in the news and job market. | 3.09 | 0.61 | Moderately Influencing | |
Friends/Peers Influence | 1. I was influenced by my classmates. | 2.14 | 0.647 | Less Influencing |
2. I am afraid to be left out by my friends. | 2.09 | 0.616 | Less Influencing | |
3. My friend’s decision is my decision as well. | 1.98 | 0.508 | Less Influencing | |
4. I talked to my friend before choosing a strand. | 2.39 | 0.682 | Less Influencing | |
5. My peer group and I shared the same preferences. | 2.33 | 0.67 | Less Influencing |
Section 3: Factors Influencing Grade 10 Students’ Decision Regarding the Selection of their Academic Strand Using Inferential Statistics
Significant Difference between the Mean Score of each Factor when Group By Sex
Table 4 shows the independent-sample t-test result on significant differences in the mean score of each factor when grouped by sex.
Table 4 illustrates that the influence of friends and peers has a significant difference in the grade 10 student’s decision when choosing their academic strand when grouped by sex (p=0.007). This meant that male students (m=2.34, sd=0.487) are significantly higher than female students (m=2.10, sd=0.455). This further means that male students tend to be more influenced by their friends or peers when choosing their academic strand. This result agreed with the findings of Obiyo and Eze (2015) that peer groups are significant to the career choice of students. Additionally, girls are more likely to be affected by their classmates when choosing a strand since they depend on them (Kazi & Akhlaq, 2017).
As shown also in table 4, there were no significant differences between their personal interest (p=0.147), family influence (p=0.324), financial condition (p=0.386), and job opportunities (p=0.517) when grouped by sex. This indicates that the influence of the four mentioned factors on the students is the same regardless of their sex.
Table 4. Independent-Sample T-Test Result on Significant Difference in the Mean Score of each Factor when Grouped by Sex
Factors | Sex | N | Mean | SD | t | df | p-value |
Personal Interest | Male | 43 | 3.38 | 0.490 | 1.466 | 76.29 | 0.147 |
Female | 74 | 3.25 | 0.412 | ||||
Family Influence | Male | 43 | 2.47 | 0.589 | -0.990 | 115 | 0.324 |
Female | 74 | 2.57 | 0.474 | ||||
Financial Condition | Male | 43 | 2.85 | 0.531 | 0.870 | 115 | 0.386 |
Female | 74 | 2.76 | 0.464 | ||||
Job Opportunities | Male | 43 | 3.20 | 0.527 | 0.650 | 115 | 0.517 |
Female | 74 | 3.14 | 0.482 | ||||
Friends/Peers Influence | Male | 43 | 2.34 | 0.487 | 2.727 | 115 | 0.007** |
Female | 74 | 2.10 | 0.455 |
* Significant at the 0.05 level of significance
** Significant at the 0.01 level of significance
Significant Difference between the Mean Score of each Factor when Group By Age
Table 5 shows the ANOVA result on significant differences in the mean score of each factor when grouped by age.
Table 5 showed that there existed a significant difference between the influence of friends/peers and the decision of the grade 10 student when grouped by age (p=0.002) which implied that students ages 16-17 years old (m=2.60, sd=0.595) significantly higher than student ages 14 (m=1.94, sd=0.530) and 15 years old (m=2.21, sd=0.428). This also means that students ages 16-17 years old are more influenced by their friends and peers than students aged 14 and 15 years old. The study of Steinberg and Monahan (2007) also revealed that friends’ and peers’ influence was one of the significant factors. They also added that peer influences increase linearly as they grow.
Their personal interest (p=0.661), family influence (p=0.968), financial condition (p=0.093), and job opportunities (p=0.692) are not significantly different from the grade 10 decision in choosing an academic strand when grouped by age. This implies that the influence of the four mentioned factors on the students is the same regardless of their age.
Table 5. ANOVA Result on Significant Difference in the Mean Score of each Factor when Grouped by Age
Factors | Age | N | Mean | SD | F | df | p-value |
Personal Interest | 14 years old | 21 | 3.32 | 0.417 | 0.415 | 2 | 0.661 |
15 years old | 88 | 3.28 | 0.445 | ||||
16-17 years old | 8 | 3.43 | 0.539 | ||||
Family Influence | 14 years old | 21 | 2.52 | 0.496 | 0.033 | 2 | 0.968 |
15 years old | 88 | 2.54 | 0.504 | ||||
16-17 years old | 8 | 2.50 | 0.771 | ||||
Financial Condition | 14 years old | 21 | 2.59 | 0.471 | 2.429 | 2 | 0.093 |
15 years old | 88 | 2.83 | 0.470 | ||||
16-17 years old | 8 | 2.93 | 0.650 | ||||
Job Opportunities | 14 years old | 21 | 3.12 | 0.538 | 0.370 | 2 | 0.692 |
15 years old | 88 | 3.16 | 0.488 | ||||
16-17 years old | 8 | 3.30 | 0.535 | ||||
Friends/Peers Influence | 14 years old | 21 | 1.94 | 0.530 | 6.325 | 2 | 0.002** |
15 years old | 88 | 2.21 | 0.428 | ||||
16-17 years old | 8 | 2.60 | 0.595 |
* Significant at the 0.05 level of significance
** Significant at the 0.01 level of significance
Significant Difference between the Mean Score of each Factor when Group by Strand
Table 6 shows the independent-sample t-test result on significant differences in the mean score of each factor when grouped by strand. For this table, the strands were categorized into two which are STEM and NON-STEM (ABM, HUMMS, GAS, and TVL).
As shown in Table 6, the results revealed that all of the five factors: Personal Interest (p=0.664); Family Influence (p=0.796); Financial Condition (p=0.680); Job Opportunities (p=0.906); and Friends/Peers Influence (p=0.998), has no significant difference when group by strand. This indicates that the influence of all factors on the students is the same regardless of their chosen strand.
Table 6. Independent-Sample T-Test Result on Significant Difference in the Mean Score of each Factor when Grouped by Strand
Factors | Strand | N | Mean | SD | t | df | p-value |
Personal Interest | STEM | 58 | 3.32 | 0.471 | 0.435 | 115 | 0.664 |
NON-STEM | 59 | 3.28 | 0.420 | ||||
Family Influence | STEM | 58 | 2.52 | 0.502 | -0.260 | 115 | 0.796 |
NON-STEM | 59 | 2.55 | 0.539 | ||||
Financial Condition | STEM | 58 | 2.81 | 0.484 | 0.414 | 115 | 0.680 |
NON-STEM | 59 | 2.78 | 0.497 | ||||
Job Opportunities | STEM | 58 | 3.16 | 0.395 | -0.119 | 101.922 | 0.906 |
NON-STEM | 59 | 3.17 | 0.585 | ||||
Friends/Peers Influence | STEM | 58 | 2.19 | 0.529 | -0.002 | 115 | 0.998 |
NON-STEM | 59 | 2.19 | 0.431 |
* Significant at the 0.05 level of significance
** Significant at the 0.01 level of significance
SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Summary
This study was conducted in order to determine the factors influencing the decision of Grade 10 students when choosing their senior high school academic strand. The factors involved in this study were personal interest, family influence, financial condition, job opportunities, and friends/peers’ influence.
Summary of Findings
- There are 59 students out of 117 students chose the STEM strand as their senior high school academic strand. There are 26 students who chose HUMSS, 16 students who chose ABM Strand, 8 students who chose GAS Strand, and 8 students who chose TVL Strand.
- Based on the mean, the personal interest factor has the greatest influence on the Grade 10 students in selecting an academic strand (m=3.32). Followed by the job opportunities factor with a mean of 3.21. Then by financial condition factor with a mean of 2.79. Lastly the financial influence factor with a mean of 2.53. The four aforementioned factors moderately influence the decision of Grade 10 students in choosing an academic strand. Friends and peers influence has less influence on the grade 10 students of SJBHSI (m=2.11).
- There is a significant difference between the mean score of friends/peers influence factor when grouped by sex and age (p=0.007 and p=0.002, respectively). But there is no significant difference between the mean score of the different factors when grouped by strand.
Conclusions
The majority of students prefer to take the STEM strand. This is followed by HUMSS, ABM, and, lastly, GAS and TVL. In terms of the factors’ level of influence, the personal interest factor gained the highest level of influence, followed by job opportunities, financial condition, parent’s influence, and friends/peer’s influence. In terms of significant differences between the factors and sex, friends/peers influence affect students’ decision in choosing a strand for senior high school. The same factor was influenced by the grade 10 students in selecting their academic strand when grouped by age. There is no significant difference between the students’ chosen strand and the factors affecting it.
Recommendations
The following are the suggestions based on the study’s findings and analysis of the data obtained:
- For the Grade 10 students – Students should make their decision on their talent, skill, and ability when selecting a senior high school academic strand. Students must be aware of their career goals. Students should consider guidance from a knowledgeable source that is either reasonable or applicable to their circumstances. Students must have the opportunity to do self-evaluation and job inquiry in order to form informed judgments. Before enrolling in a chosen track, students should research the benefits and opportunities it offers. `
- For the SJBHSI – Students should undergo orientation at the school to increase their literacy and capacity to prevent future bridging. Students who are having trouble selecting an academic strand should be identified by the counseling office, and assistance should be offered. In order to lessen the negative effects of peer pressure in the classroom, teachers and parents should be open to preventative measures. And lastly, the school is required to offer a counseling service for students who are experiencing financial issues.
- For the parents – For their children’s senior high school preparation, parents should set aside funds for their children’s education and parents should encourage their kids’ interests and passions.
- For the government – The government should increase the number of scholarship programs available for students in need.
- For future researchers – They must consider the other two strands not included in this paper: Arts and Design Track; and Sports Track. Aside from the grade 10 student’s sex, age, and chosen, academic strand, the researcher can add more profile variables added in the inferential problem like academic grade. Future studies might explore qualitative insights (e.g., student interviews) to add depth to the reasons behind their academic strand choices.
REFERENCES
- A. A. Humayon et al. (2018). Effect of Family Influence, Personal Interest and Economic Considerations on Career Choice amongst Undergraduate Students in Higher Educational Institutions of Vehari, Pakistan. International Journal of Organizational Leadership. https://ijol.cikd.ca/article_60333.html
- A. Dahie (2016). Socioeconomic Status and Academic Achievement at Secondary Schools in Mogadishu Somalia. International Journal in Management and Social Science. www.researchgate.net/publication/287705958_The_Impact_of_Parental_Socioeconomic_Status_on_Students’_Academic_Achievement_in_Secondary_Schools_in_Tanzania
- A. Kazi and A. Akhlaq (2017). Factors Affecting Students’ Career Choice. Journal of Research and Reflections in Education. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/325987918_Factors_Affecting_Students’_Career_Choice
- A. L. Tortor et al. (2020). Financial Status, Parents Influence, Peer Influence and Self-Choice of Students in Selection of Strand in The Senior High School, Cebu, Philippines. Macrothink Institute Business and Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.5296/ber.v10i1.16241
- C. B. Valliente et al. (2016). Factors Influencing Student’s Choice for a Senior High School Academic Track. Bukidnon State University, College of Teacher Education, Bukidnon. https://www.academia.edu/24592420/Factors_Influencing_Students_Choice_for_a_Senior_High_School_Academic_Track#:~:text=6%20Factors%20that%20has%20the,peer%20influence%20Family%20Background%20Figure1.
- D. Fizer (2013). Factors Affecting Career Choices Of College Students Enrolled in Agriculture. Studocu. https://www.studocu.com/ph/document/western-philippines-university/statistics/fizer-research-project-final/27999977
- J. Nyamwange (2016). Influence of Student’s Interest on Career Choice Among First Year University Students in Public and Private Universities in Kisi County, Kenya. Journal of Education and Practice. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1092415
- K. Rio et al. (2022). Factors Influencing the Preferences of Grade 10 Students in Choosing their Preferred Senior High School Track. International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews. https://ijrpr.com/uploads/V3ISSUE1/IJRPR2506.pdf
- K. Tillman (2015). Parental Influence on College Students’ Career Aspirations. University Honors Program Theses. https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/honors-theses/86
- L. Steinberg and K. Monahan (2007). Age Differences in Resistance to Peer Influence. American Psychological Association. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18020830/#:~:text=Results%20show%20that%20across%20all,or%20between%2018%20and%2030.
- M. Pownall et al. (2022). The Impact Of Open And Reproducible Scholarship On Students’ Scientific Literacy, Engagement, And Attitudes Towards Science: A Review And Synthesis Of The Evidence. School of Psychology, Cambridge University, Cambridge, United Kingdom. https://osf.io/preprints/metaarxiv/9e526/
- N. Obiyo and C. Eze (2015). Parental Socio-Economic-Status as Predictor of Vocational Aspirations of Secondary School Students in Nigeria: Implications for Peace, Curriculum Planners, and Special Educators. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Parental-socio-economic-status-as-predictor-of-of-Obiyo-Eze/37c0e7001a444bb31bbf895b64c3254fe8da600d
- P. A. Malaguial et al. (2022). Senior High School Strands: Factors Affecting the Students’ Preference. ASEAN Journal of Educational Research and Technology. https://ejournal.bumipublikasinusantara.id/index.php/ajert/article/viewFile/135/131
- S. Liaw et al. (2017). Development and Psychometric Testing Of An Instrument To Compare Career Choice Influences And Perceptions Of Nursing Among Healthcare Students. BMC Medical Education. https://bmcmededuc.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12909-017-0910-7
- S. Olamide and Olawaiye, (2013). The Factors Determining the Choice of Career Among Secondary School Students. The International Journal of Engineering and Science. http://theijes.com/papers/v2-i6/Part.2/E0262033044.pdf
- T. Bers and P. Galowich. (2002). Using Survey and Focus Group Research to Learn About Parents’ Roles in The College Degree Choice Process. Community College Review. https://go.gale.com/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CA86743294&sid=googleScholar&v=2.1&it=r&linkaccess=abs&issn=00915521&p=AONE&sw=w
APPENDIX
Appendix I
The Questionnaire
Factors Influencing Grade 10 Students’ Decision Regarding the Selection of their Senior High School Academic Strand
Dear Respondent,
I am inviting you to participate in this research by completing the following survey. This research aims to determine the factors influencing the Grade 10 students’ choice of an academic strand. The following questionnaire will require approximately 5-10 minutes to complete. Thank you for taking your time thein assisting me with this research. The data collected will remain confidential and used solely for academic purposes.
Sincerely,
Reñel M. Sabanal
Researcher
Name: _______________________________________
Sex: ______________
Age: ___________
DIRECTIONS
This form consists of statements on the following five factors: Personal Interest, Family Influence, Job Opportunities, Financial Condition, and Friends/Peer Influence. These five factors can reflect the influence in choosing your preferred academic strand in your senior high school. There are no correct or incorrect responses. Read each statement carefully. Please think about how you feel about each statement.
Legends: SA – Strongly Agree
A – Agree
D – Disagree
SD – Strongly Disagree
Personal Interest | SA | A | D | SD |
1. I choose based on my desire. | ||||
2. I consider my aptitudes and capabilities in choosing an strand. | ||||
3. I choose out of my freedom | ||||
4. My personality and habits are suited to the strand I choose. | ||||
5. I choose the track that fits my skills and interest. |
Family Influence | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
1. I consider my parents’ career in choosing my senior high school strand. | ||||
2. I choose the strand based on my parents’ preferences. | ||||
3. My parents pushed me to enroll in the specific strand. | ||||
4. I chose the strand out of my parents’ influence. | ||||
5. My parents advised me to choose this strand. |
Financial Condition | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
1. I choose this strand based on my parents’ income. | ||||
2. I choose the strand based on tuition cost. | ||||
3. I prefer the strand based on its scholarship opportunities. | ||||
4. I choose the strand that would not caused financial stress for my parents. | ||||
5. I choose the strand that would not stress my present work |
Job Opportunities | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
1. I choose this strand based on its demand. | ||||
2. I choose a strand based on salary expectation. | ||||
3. I prefer a strand based on its employability and stability. | ||||
4. I choose a strand based on its future work environment. | ||||
5. I choose a strand based on its availability in the news and job market. |
Friends/Peer Influence | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
1. I was influenced by my classmates. | ||||
2. I am afraid to be left out by my friends. | ||||
3. My friend’s decision is my decision as well. | ||||
4. I talked to my friend before choosing a strand. | ||||
5. My peer group and I shared the same preferences. |
Appendix II
Problem 3a Procedure
Problem: Is there a significant difference between the mean score of the different factors when grouped by sex?
Objective: to compare the mean score of the different factor of male and female Grade 10 students
Step 1: State Ho and Ha
: There is no difference between the mean score of the different factors when grouped according to their sex.
: There is a significant difference between the mean score of the different factors when grouped according to their sex.
Step 2: 𝛼 = 0.05
Step 3: Possible Test (T-test for independent samples / Mann-Whitney U test)
Preliminary analysis:
- The purpose is to compare means of two independent groups (Male and female group)
- By C.L.T, the data is normally distributed (n>30)
With the preliminary test, the appropriate test for the data is t-test for independent samples.
Step 4: Generate the result
Step 5: Decision
- Personal Interest – Accept the null hypothesis. There is no significant difference between the mean score of personal interest factor when group by sex
- Family Influence – Accept the null hypothesis. There is no significant difference between the mean score of family influence factor when group by sex
- Financial Condition – Accept the null hypothesis. There is no significant difference between the mean score of financial condition factor when group by sex
- Job Opportunity – Accept the null hypothesis. There is no significant difference between the mean score of job opportunity factor when group by sex
- Friends/peers Influence – Reject the null hypothesis. There is a significant difference between the mean score of friends/peers influence factor when group by sex
Step 6: Interpretation
Table 1 shows the independent-sample t-test result on significant differences in the mean score of each factor when grouped by sex.
Table 1 illustrates that the influence of friends and peers has a significant difference in the grade 10 student’s decision when choosing their academic strand when grouped by sex (p=0.007). This meant that male students (m=2.34, sd=0.487) are significantly higher than female students (m=2.10, sd=0.455). This further means that male students tend to be more influenced by their friends or peers when choosing their academic strand. This result agreed with the findings of Obiyo and Eze (2015) that peer groups are significant to the career choice of students. Additionally, girls are more likely to be affected by their classmates when choosing a strand since they depend on them (Kazi & Akhlaq, 2017).
As shown also in table 1, there were no significant differences between their personal interest (p=0.147), family influence (p=0.324), financial condition (p=0.386), and job opportunities (p=0.517) when grouped by sex. This indicates that the influence of the four mentioned factors on the students is the same regardless of their sex.
Table 1. Independent-Sample T-Test Result on Significant Difference in the Mean Score of each Factor when Grouped by Sex
Factors | Sex | N | Mean | SD | t | df | p-value |
Personal Interest | Male | 43 | 3.38 | 0.490 | 1.466 | 76.29 | 0.147 |
Female | 74 | 3.25 | 0.412 | ||||
Family Influence | Male | 43 | 2.47 | 0.589 | -0.990 | 115 | 0.324 |
Female | 74 | 2.57 | 0.474 | ||||
Financial Condition | Male | 43 | 2.85 | 0.531 | 0.870 | 115 | 0.386 |
Female | 74 | 2.76 | 0.464 | ||||
Job Opportunities | Male | 43 | 3.20 | 0.527 | 0.650 | 115 | 0.517 |
Female | 74 | 3.14 | 0.482 | ||||
Friends/Peers Influence | Male | 43 | 2.34 | 0.487 | 2.727 | 115 | 0.007** |
Female | 74 | 2.10 | 0.455 |
* Significant at the 0.05 level of significance
** Significant at the 0.01 level of significance
Appendix III
Problem 3b Procedure
Problem: Is there a significant difference between the mean score of the different factors when grouped by age?
Objective: to compare the mean score of the different factor of Grade 10 student’s age
Step 1: State Ho and Ha
: There is no difference between the mean score of the different factors when grouped according to their age.
: There is a significant difference between the mean score of the different factors when grouped according to their age.
Step 2: 𝛼 = 0.05
Step 3: Possible Test (One-way ANOVA / Kruskal Wallis)
Preliminary analysis:
- The purpose is to compare three or more independent samples (Age of the respondents)
- By C.L.T, the data is normally distributed
With the preliminary test, the appropriate test for the data is One-way ANOVA.
Step 4: Generate the result
Step 5: Decision
- Personal Interest – Accept the null hypothesis. There is no significant difference between the mean score of personal interest factor when group by age
- Family Influence – Accept the null hypothesis. There is no significant difference between the mean score of family influence factor when group by age
- Financial Condition – Accept the null hypothesis. There is no significant difference between the mean score of financial condition factor when group by age
- Job Opportunity – Accept the null hypothesis. There is no significant difference between the mean score of job opportunity factor when group by age
- Friends/peers Influence – Reject the null hypothesis. There is a significant difference between the mean score of friends/peers influence factor when group by age
Step 6: Post hoc comparison test for friends /peers influence factor
Step 7: Interpretation
Table 2. ANOVA Result on Significant Difference in the Mean Score of each Factor when Grouped by Age
Factors | Age | N | Mean | SD | F | df | p-value |
Personal Interest | 14 years old | 21 | 3.32 | 0.417 | 0.415 | 2 | 0.661 |
15 years old | 88 | 3.28 | 0.445 | ||||
16-17 years old | 8 | 3.43 | 0.539 | ||||
Family Influence | 14 years old | 21 | 2.52 | 0.496 | 0.033 | 2 | 0.968 |
15 years old | 88 | 2.54 | 0.504 | ||||
16-17 years old | 8 | 2.50 | 0.771 | ||||
Financial Condition | 14 years old | 21 | 2.59 | 0.471 | 2.429 | 2 | 0.093 |
15 years old | 88 | 2.83 | 0.470 | ||||
16-17 years old | 8 | 2.93 | 0.650 | ||||
Job Opportunities | 14 years old | 21 | 3.12 | 0.538 | 0.370 | 2 | 0.692 |
15 years old | 88 | 3.16 | 0.488 | ||||
16-17 years old | 8 | 3.30 | 0.535 | ||||
Friends/Peers Influence | 14 years old | 21 | 1.94 | 0.530 | 6.325 | 2 | 0.002** |
15 years old | 88 | 2.21 | 0.428 | ||||
16-17 years old | 8 | 2.60 | 0.595 |
* Significant at the 0.05 level of significance
** Significant at the 0.01 level of significance
Table 2 shows the ANOVA result on significant differences in the mean score of each factor when grouped by age.
Table 2 showed that there existed a significant difference between the influence of friends/peers and the decision of the grade 10 student when grouped by age (p=0.002) which implied that students ages 16-17 years old (m=2.60, sd=0.595) significantly higher than student ages 14 (m=1.94, sd=0.530) and 15 years old (m=2.21, sd=0.428). This also means that students ages 16-17 years old are more influenced by their friends and peers than students aged 14 and 15 years old. The study of Steinberg and Monahan (2007) also revealed that friends’ and peers’ influence was one of the significant factors. They also added that peer influences increase linearly as they grow.
Their personal interest (p=0.661), family influence (p=0.968), financial condition (p=0.093), and job opportunities (p=0.692) are not significantly different from the grade 10 decision in choosing an academic strand when grouped by age. This implies that the influence of the four mentioned factors on the students is the same regardless of their age.
Appendix IV
Problem 3c Procedure
Problem: Is there a significant difference between the mean score of the different factors when grouped by strand?
Objective: to compare the mean score of the different factor and the chosen strand of the grade 10 students
Step 1: State Ho and Ha
: There is no difference between the mean score of the different factors when grouped by their chosen strand.
: There is a significant difference between the mean score of the different factors when grouped strand.
Step 2: 𝛼 = 0.05
Step 3: Possible Test (T-test for independent samples / Mann-Whitney U test)
Preliminary analysis:
- The purpose is to compare means of two independent groups (STEM and NONSTEM)
- By C.L.T, the data is normally distributed (n>30)
With the preliminary test, the appropriate test for the data is t-test for independent samples.
Step 4: Generate the result
Step 5: Decision
- Personal Interest – Accept the null hypothesis. There is no significant difference between the mean score of personal interest factor when group by sex
- Family Influence – Accept the null hypothesis. There is no significant difference between the mean score of family influence factor when group by sex
- Financial Condition – Accept the null hypothesis. There is no significant difference between the mean score of financial condition factor when group by sex
- Job Opportunity – Accept the null hypothesis. There is no significant difference between the mean score of job opportunity factor when group by sex
- Friends/peers Influence – Accept the null hypothesis. There is no significant difference between the mean score of friends/peers influence factor when group by sex
Step 6: Interpretation
Table 3 shows the independent-sample t-test result on significant differences in the mean score of each factor when grouped by strand. For this table, the strands were categorized into two which are STEM and NON-STEM (ABM, HUMMS, GAS, and TVL).
As shown in Table 3, the results revealed that all of the five factors: Personal Interest (p=0.664); Family Influence (p=0.796); Financial Condition (p=0.680); Job Opportunities (p=0.906); and Friends/Peers Influence (p=0.998), has no significant difference when group by strand. This indicates that the influence of all factors on the students is the same regardless of their chosen strand.
Table 3. Independent-Sample T-Test Result on Significant Difference in the Mean Score of each Factor when Grouped by Strand
Factors | Strand | N | Mean | SD | t | df | p-value |
Personal Interest | STEM | 58 | 3.32 | 0.471 | 0.435 | 115 | 0.664 |
NON-STEM | 59 | 3.28 | 0.420 | ||||
Family Influence | STEM | 58 | 2.52 | 0.502 | -0.260 | 115 | 0.796 |
NON-STEM | 59 | 2.55 | 0.539 | ||||
Financial Condition | STEM | 58 | 2.81 | 0.484 | 0.414 | 115 | 0.680 |
NON-STEM | 59 | 2.78 | 0.497 | ||||
Job Opportunities | STEM | 58 | 3.16 | 0.395 | -0.119 | 101.922 | 0.906 |
NON-STEM | 59 | 3.17 | 0.585 | ||||
Friends/Peers Influence | STEM | 58 | 2.19 | 0.529 | -0.002 | 115 | 0.998 |
NON-STEM | 59 | 2.19 | 0.431 |
* Significant at the 0.05 level of significance
** Significant at the 0.01 level of significance