International Journal of Research and Innovation in Applied Science (IJRIAS)
Industrialization in Nigeria: In-country Capital Goods Manufacturing
Abubakar Sani Sambo, Mamuda Muhammad, Ismail Abubakar Jumare
Faculty of Engineering and Environmental Design, Usmanu Danfodiyo University Sokoto, Nigeria (P.M.B 2346)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51584/IJRIAS.2024.909004
Received: 09 September 2024; Accepted: 14 September 2024; Published: 28 September 2024
Industrialization is fundamental towards advancement in economic growth and development of a country. Capital goods are key to industrial operations and expansions leading to economic transformation. This paper offers a concise submission on industrialization with focus on capital goods, looking at the case of Nigeria. Overview of capital goods as well as good practices and success stories around the world have been showcased. Follow-up measures towards industrialization in Nigeria in line with capital goods focus has been successfully offered. This comprises of some exemplary capital goods to target, policy measures, social security inputs, and lastly energy access and diversifications with security in view of sustainability in productions. With such measures in place, industrialization is achievable in Nigeria with enormous success stories.
Keywords: Industrialization; Capital Goods; Energy Access; Economic Transformation; Nigeria
Industrialization is understood to be a strong key to unlocking the economic growth, development and transformation of any country globally. The Industrial Policy of Nigeria, which was made public in 1989, aims to make the industrial sector the main source of strength of its economy with the following elements as reported by [1]:
Furthermore, numerous policies and actions have been taken by Governments over the years to support industrial development in Nigeria, which included the Nigerian Indigenization Policy (NIP) of 1972-77, Structural Adjustment Program (SAP) of 1986, Trade and Financial Liberalization Policy (TFLP) of 1989, establishment of the Bank of Industry in 2000, National Economic Empowerment and Development Strategy (NEEDS) of 2004, and the Nigerian Industrial Revolution Plan (NIRP) of 2014.
It is crucial to specify the fact that the economy of Nigeria has been described as middle-income, mixed economy and emerging market with expanding manufacturing, financial, services, communications, entertainment sub-sectors and lots more. As far as the economic indicators are concern, Nigerian gross domestic product (GDP) was estimated in 2022 as $ 472.62, which led to a per capita value of $ 2,163 while being the 33rd strongest economic in global ranking [2]. Regarding the sectorial contributions to the GDP value, services being the highest in share contributed about 44.04%, leaving agriculture and industry with 23.69% and 30.78% respectively [3]. In spite of all these outstanding records, only 3 subsectors in the industrial or manufacturing domain accounts for the 77% of the manufacturing activities of the country. The subsectors are food and beverages, cement, and textiles. There is basically nothing in terms of new manufacturing techniques with also no local Capital Goods production.
Further inputs regarding the capital goods on the global concern showed only few countries produce most of the capital goods, however, poor country lacking economic philosophy and technical knowhow are the major importers of the capital goods and major exporters of intermediate goods [4]. Also, the dependence on capital goods supply further depends on a country’s level of income, which is ultimately linked to the gross domestic product value. It can be logically stated that the ratio of import to production of capital good is a strong measure in determining the economic power of a country. High production to import ratio shows strong economy and vice versa.
Numerous studies on industrialization have been conducted around the world, as efforts to economic development and transformation. Franck and Galor [5] conducted a study on industrialization and long run development. The study focussed on technological impact and its associated driving and hindering factors on the French economy basing on short run and long run distinctions. The role of industrialization on economic growth based on Senegal experience has been studied by Ndiaya and Lv [6]. The authors utilized numerous data sets for a period of 1960 – 2017, coupled with robust statistical analysis in establishing the relationship between industrial outputs and economic parameters. Xu et al. [7] researched on the impact of industrialization and urbanization on carbon emission intensity of energy consumption for the case of China. The study employed statistical analysis on the linkage of industrialization, urbanization and social affairs, energy consumption and carbon emissions. The effect of industrialization on climate change has been studied by Wadanambi et al. [8]. The study focussed on Sri Lanka’s experience based on its industrial contributions of greenhouse gases for some selected industries, with mitigation strategies proposed.
Finally, this paper is aimed at providing intellectual submissions for industrialization based on capital goods focus in the Nigerian context. It is however structured into sections namely: section 1 – introduction, section 2 – overview of capital goods and major producers, section 3 – major requirements for in-country capital goods manufacturing in Nigeria, and section 4 – conclusion
According to [9], Capital Goods are tangible assets used by companies to produce consumer goods and services. Capital Goods include buildings, machinery, equipment, vehicles and tools. Capital Goods are not finished products or what is termed consumer goods from the definition provided. Hence, the consumer goods are the end products of the production and manufacturing process. Further point implied consumer goods to be low-cost items as contrary to capital goods being usually involving investments of large sum of money. The more a country invests in its capital goods the stronger its economy and GDP.
Capital goods are durable products used to produce other products and services. Examples include:
Linked up to the capital goods is the capital good sector, which according to [10], it is also referred to as the industrial sector, and a category of stocks related to manufacturing and distributing of goods and services. The sector is obviously diverse, comprising of different companies with the sole target of capital goods manufacturing, consultancy services, with research and development (R&D) for improvements. It must be noted further that the capital goods sectors are impacted in a number of ways in the country they are located. Part of the impact has been on the nature of a country’s budget and areas of priority, which ultimately results in high demand for any aspects or resources or assets linked to the priority area and hence more order for such assets at the capital good sector associated. The operations of a capital good sector is also understood to have environmental impact, hence proper choice of approach and deals are necessary in view of abating the fear of climate change with its devastating impacts.
As far as the manufacturers of capital goods are concern, the top 10 manufacturing nations in the world on Capital Goods sectorial activities ground have been sourced, and with their shares of the global total presented for the year 2019. They have been classified in table 1 as follows:
Table 1: Top 10 Manufacturing Nations on Capital Goods Basis in 2019 [11]
| Country | Share of the World Manufacturing (%) |
| China | 28.4 |
| United States | 16.6 |
| Japan | 7.5 |
| Germany | 5.8 |
| India | 3.3 |
| South Korea | 3.0 |
| Italy | 2.3 |
| France | 1.9 |
| United Kingdom | 1.8 |
| Indonesia | 1.4 |
It must be noted that other countries in descending order of their percentage contribution of manufacturing outputs include: Russia, Mexico, Canada, Ireland, Spain, Brazil, Turkey, Switzerland, Thailand, Netherlands, Poland and Saudi Arabia. Furthermore, economic analysis have been observed of different regions around the world for the cumulative monetary value for the export and import of the capital goods with their respective production shares. Table 2 provided the details of such financial assessment.
Table 2: Regional Import and Export Analysis for Capital Goods in 2021 [12]
| Region | Export (USD) | Import (USD) | Export Share | Import Share |
| East Asia and Pacific | 2.70 Billion | 3.48 Billion | 41.20 | 46.97 |
| Europe and Central Asia | 2.46 Billion | 2.02 Billion | 27.71 | 25.27 |
| North America | 1.33 Billion | 622.11 Million | 34.85 | 28.02 |
| Latin America and Carribean | 435.71 Million | 299.07 Million | 32.75 | 22.82 |
| Middle East and North Africa | 327.15 Million | 54.92 Million | 27.34 | 5.05 |
Furthermore, the evolution or trend as per investment in capital goods, with focus on machinery and equipment has been presented in figure 1. The data shows the cross-country median values of the real investment in machinery and equipment to real GDP ratio for emerging markets and developing economies.
Figure 1: Evolution of the Relative Price of Machinery and Equipment and Investment Rates around the World [13]
The information in figure 1 as a strong economic indicator for emerging markets having presented in a trend wise manner showed the simultaneous inverse proportional rising and falling of the investments and prices of the specified capital goods over the past years. This is a clear evidence that successive and enhanced investments in capital goods resulted in positive change in the price data as a strong economic breakthrough. This could be linked to enhanced research and development practices on the capital goods in view of cost effectiveness and efficiency. Hence basing on the Nigerian context, it should serve as a wake-up call towards such considerations as a strong economic driver, ultimately accelerating the research and development practices with more success stories in that direction. Nigeria is a big market with enormous potentials.
To complement on the existing points, for Nigeria to industrialise in view of boosting its economic growth, development and transformation, it must commence arrangements for the local production of the following Capital Goods within the country:
The listed 10 capital goods are not exhaustive but can be taken as the first phase of the initiative. Two or three of the countries with strong base in the manufacture of capital goods could be approached to set up their plants in Nigeria. The Nigerian plants will commence as assembly plants but with increasing local contents as raw materials are obtained locally.
To expand further, the evolvement of a solid in-country Capital Goods industry in Nigeria will require a robust “National Policy on Capital Goods”. The policy should include partnership with advanced nations, and investment schemes as well as the associated legal and regulatory frameworks.
Other aspects of consideration are as highlighted below for progress:
There is need for significant improvement of current security situation in the country so that investors, especially from abroad, will come to Nigeria. In line with such, there is need for the speedy elimination of the menace of terrorism, insurgencies, banditry, kidnappings and unknown gunmen. This can be achieved via the following measures:
The next major requirement for a solid Capital Goods sector in Nigeria is the availability of stable and reliable electricity supply which can be realized by:
Other solid minerals and composites are also needed for the Capital Goods industry in the country and they can be secured from the excellent endowment of the nation by serious encouragement of the setting up of several open-cast and underground mines and mineral processing plants with the following considerations:
The paper offers a comprehensive and substantial submission on the industrialization measures in the case of Nigeria, with strong focus on capital goods as a major driver while also linked to sustainable power supply. Several concerns were discussed and a number of recommendations for the nation’s economic growth and development were provided. Hence, the following points are finally noted:
The authors’ are very grateful to HRM Engr. Otis Anyaeji, former president of the Nigerian Society of Engineers, who requested Professor Sambo to undertake the study and prepare a presentation on capital goods for growth and development of Nigeria.
Authors Contribution
Numenclature
GDP – Gross Domestic Product
ICT – Information and Communication Technology
HRM – His Royal Majesty
NEEDS – National Economic Empowerment and Development Strategy
NIP – Nigerian Indigenization Policy
NIRP – Nigerian Industrial Revolution Plan
NSE – Nigerian Society of Engineers
PPP – Public Private Partnership
SAP – Structural Adjustment Program
TFLP – Trade and Financial Liberalization Policy
USD – United States Dollars