International Journal of Research and Innovation in Applied Science (IJRIAS)

Submission Deadline-Today
November 2024 Issue : Publication Fee: 30$ USD Submit Now
Submission Deadline-05th December 2024
Special Issue on Economics, Management, Sociology, Communication, Psychology: Publication Fee: 30$ USD Submit Now
Submission Deadline-20th November 2024
Special Issue on Education, Public Health: Publication Fee: 30$ USD Submit Now

Optimization of Total Phenolic Content from Gynura Procumbens Leaves Under Oven and Microwave Drying

  • Wan Farah Aina Wan Ahmadi
  • Amirah Adibah Ali Imran
  • Muhamad Shahmi Syahir Mustapa
  • So’bah Ahmad
  • Suzaira Bakar
  • 489-499
  • Oct 18, 2024
  • Industrialization

Optimization of Total Phenolic Content from Gynura Procumbens Leaves Under Oven and Microwave Drying

Wan Farah Aina Wan Ahmadi, Amirah Adibah Ali Imran, Muhamad Shahmi Syahir Mustapa, So’bah Ahmad*, Suzaira Bakar

School of Industrial Technology, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Universiti Teknologi MARA, 40400 Shah Alam, Selangor Malaysia

*Corresponding Author

DOI:  https://doi.org/10.51584/IJRIAS.2024.909043

Received: 09 September 2024; Accepted: 14 September 2024; Published: 18 October 2024  

ABSTRACT

The optimization of the process variable; temperature, power, and drying time, under oven and microwave drying were studied for total phenolic content of Gynura procumbens leaves. The optimization conducted using response surface methodology central composite design of experiment. The optimum drying condition was obtained at 65.61°C at 10 hours with 201.78 mgGAE/g of TPC yield for oven drying while, for microwave drying was 436.19 Watt at 8.37 minutes with 12.24 mgGAE/g of TPC yield. The response surface methodology used in this study was able to predict the optimum drying condition for total phenolic content via linear and interaction mathematical model with higher adjusted coefficient determination , for both oven and microwave drying, 0.9383 and 0.7785, respectively. Hence, the models gave good prediction of the total phenolic content obtained from Gynura procumbens leaves under the experimental conditions used in this study. In addition, these outcomes are also expected to contribute to the production of shelf stable Gynura procumbens leaves which can be used for pharmacological purposes.

Keywords: Gynura procumbens, drying, oven, microwave, optimization

INTRODUCTION

Gynura procumbens, a member of the Asteraceae family, is commonly known as longevity spinach and grows widely in India, Bangladesh, and Southeast Asia, particularly in Indonesia, Malaysia, and Thailand (Tahsin et al., 2022). In the Malay language, G. procumbens leaves are referred to as ‘Sambung Nyawa’, which translates to “prolongation of life.” On the other hand, the Chinese refer it as Bai Bing Cao, which means “100 diseases” (Rahman & Asad, 2013). This is because it has a history of being applied topically as well as internally in the practice of traditional medicine, to treat a wide variety of illnesses and diseases (Krishnan et al., 2015). The leaves are believed to alleviate kidney discomfort, reduce the risk of heart disease, lowering cholesterol and blood sugar levels (Kanzil Mowla Mou & Pristesh Ranjan Dash, 2016; Khuzaidatul Azidah et al., 2019). This is because the G. procumbens is high in antioxidants that are used for the treatment of various ailments and has a wide range of claims in pharmacological properties such as anti-inflammatory, anticancer, anti-diabetic, anti-herpes simplex virus, anti-ulcerogenic, vasorelaxant and toxicity (Mou & Dash, 2016; Rosidah et al., 2008; Tan et al., 2016; Tan et al., 2020). According to Roleira et al. (2018), the extracts of G. procumbens contain the major groups of phenolic plant metabolites, with flavonoids being one of the most abundant. Other than that, a study by Tristantini et al. (2021) stated that the main phytochemical compound that can be found in the G. procumbens leaves is p-hydroxycinnamic acid which belongs to the phenolic compound.

However, the usage of G. procumbens leaves in pharmacological industry can be difficult if the G. procumbens leaves experience interrupted supply due to a shorter lifespan. Fresh leaves of G. procumbens have a high moisture content and are chill-sensitive and classified as highly perishable (Ghasemi et al., 2017). To ensure that the leaves could be supplied throughout the year for their medicinal uses and facilitates their storage period prior extraction process, a pre-treatment to prolong the life span of fresh G. procumbens leaves should be carried out. The application of drying as a pre-treatment process could indirectly reduce processing costs thus lowering energy consumption of the process.

The drying process involves the complete removal of water from the product, thus reducing microbial deterioration as well as physical and chemical changes that happen during storage (Yan Lim et al., 2013). Traditional drying methods usually rely on sun-drying in the open air as products are being subjected to external factors such as weather, consumption by other animals or insects, and contamination from contact with animals such as rodents (Pirasteh et al., 2014). Although sun-drying is easily accessible and cheap, the process takes a long time and this process is not suitable to dry herbs as it will result in low product quality degradation (Thamkaew et al., 2021). Therefore, modern drying techniques could minimize these influences by drying in conditions that can be more controllable. An advance drying technology with shorter drying time requiring lower energy consumption and minimum processing cost is highly needed, hence, oven and microwave drying are opted in. Oven drying has been practiced for a long time and considered to be one of the most common drying methods that is also cost-effective. While microwave drying provide rapid drying, reducing drying time by almost four times (Elhussein & Şahin, 2018).

The objective of this study is to optimize the drying condition of G. Procumbens leaves using response surface methodology (RSM) through oven and microwave drying. Optimization by using response surface methodology (RSM) can simultaneously determine many responses. This optimization method will be able to analyse the impact of several factors and their interactions on one or more response variables. Therefore, optimization by using response surface methodology (RSM) can assist in establishing the best conditions for drying of G. procumbens leaves. The number of experiments needed to determine a particular number of factors and their levels is reduced by using the response surface methodology, which is frequently employed in experiment design. The term optimization has been widely used in analytical chemistry to describe the process of determining the best conditions under which to apply a procedure to produce the best possible response (Bezerra et al., 2008). Since phenolics are highly sensitive to heat, an appropriate condition by considering the temperature or power and drying time under oven and microwave drying are required to maintain the high amount of phenolic compounds. Thus, this study can help to extend the shelf life of G. procumbens leaves by determining the best conditions for preserving the leaves, which can be used for pharmacological purposes in the future.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sample Preparations

The fresh leaves of G. procumbens were collected from Alor Setar, Kedah, Malaysia. The dirt on the leaves was cleaned thoroughly and the leaves were separated from its stem. Then, only healthy, and fully expanded leaves without any defect were selected and stored in a zip-lock polyethylene bag at a temperature of 2 – 4 °C in the chiller (Berjaya 2D/DCF-SM) to maintain its freshness until the drying process as proposed by Elhussein & Şahin, (2018). Before drying, the leaves were separated from its midrib and petiole and then ground by using a food chopper for 10 seconds until uniform particles were achieved. The initial moisture level of the leaves was determined by using a moisture analyser (A&D MX-50) and the moisture ranged from 82% to 85%.

Drying Process

A forced air convection oven (Memmert UNB 300) and a microwave (Fujison FS-MO300) were used to dry the G. procumbens leaves. Each drying runs for oven were performed at different temperatures (40°C – 70°C) and drying time (5 – 15 hours) while each drying runs for microwave were performed at different powers (100-500 W) and drying time (3– 10 minutes) according to the central composite design experimental design given in Table 1. Then, 20 g of samples were placed on a steel petri dish with the same size and thickness. The samples were duplicated for both oven and microwave drying. After that, the moisture loss of leaves was determined by weight loss using an analytical balance (A&D Galaxy HR-100AZ) with a precision of 0.01g for 20 minutes and 30 seconds time interval for oven and microwave respectively.

Optimization Process

Optimization tool used in this study is the response surface methodology (Minitab 20). For oven drying, two independent factors which were temperature (N1) and drying time (N2) in a range of 40 °C – 70 °C and 5 – 15 hours respectively were selected based on a preliminary screening process. Next, for microwave drying, two independent factors which were power (N3) and drying time (N4) in a range of 100 – 500 W and 3 – 10 minutes respectively were selected. The central composite design was composed of 13 treatments including 22 factorial points, four axial point (a=1.41421) and five repetition at the centre points. The response that was measured was the total phenolic content. The design of experiments and dependent variable values were as shown in Table 1. The effects of the temperature or power and the drying time were measured via multiple regressions as described in Equation 1 for oven drying and Equation 2 for microwave drying.

Equation 1 for oven drying and Equation 2 for microwave drying

b0, b1, b2                                = linear terms

b0, b1, b2, b5                        = linear and interaction terms

b0, b1, b2, b3, b4                      = linear and square terms

b0, b1, b2, b3, b4, b5        = full quadratic terms

Table 1 Design of experiments and dependent values

Run Oven Optimization Microwave Optimization
Factor Response Factor Response
Temperature (°C) Time (hour) TPC Yield Predicted Power (Watt) Time (min) TPC Yield Predicted
1 47.50 7.50 172.56 172.812 200.00 4.75 0.192 0.169
2 62.50 7.50 173.89 177.595 400.00 4.75 2.894 5.383
3 47.50 12.50 162.06 160.448 200.00 8.25 5.553 5.551
4 62.50 12.50 177.75 179.590 400.00 8.25 9.729 12.239
5 44.39 10.00 183.47 184.865 158.58 6.50 1.604 2.137
6 65.61 10.00 205.27 201.782 441.42 6.50 13.572 10.552
7 55.00 6.46 157.93 155.565 300.00 4.03 2.229 1.000
8 55.00 13.54 147.96 148.232 300.00 8.97 10.912 9.654
9 55.00 10.00 173.23 174.638 300.00 6.50 9.410 9.117
10 55.00 10.00 180.27 174.638 300.00 6.50 8.878 9.117
11 55.00 10.00 173.23 174.638 300.00 6.50 8.080 9.117
12 55.00 10.00 173.23 174.638 300.00 6.50 9.410 9.117
13 55.00 10.00 173.23 174.638 300.00 6.50 9.809 9.117

Extraction

Based on method proposed by Roslan et al., (2020). 5 g of dried G. procumbens powdered sample that has been crushed using mortar was weighed and transferred into a conical flask. Then, 50 ml of 80% ethanol was added, and the mixture was placed on a 30°C incubator shaker (Innova 4080) for 5 hours with 400 rpm. Next, the mixture was centrifuged at 3500 rpm for 15 minutes before filtered using ashless filter paper into bottle and kept at – 20 °C.

Standard Solution

Referring the method developed by Shirazi et al., (2014), 1 g of gallic acid was dissolved in 100 ml of methanol to get 1% solution of Gallic acid (10 mg/ml). A standard gallic acid curve was constructed by preparing the dilutions of (1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0 mg/ml).

Total Phenolic Content Determination

The total phenolic content of the G. procumbens leaves for both oven and microwave drying were determined by the folin-ciocalteu method based on the method by Shirazi et al., (2014) with few modifications. 100 µl of each of the gallic acid dilutions were mixed with 500 µl of water and then with 100 µl of folin-ciocalteu reagent. Then, it was left to stand for 6 minutes at room temperature in the dark. Next, 1 ml of 7% sodium carbonate and 500 µl of distilled water was added to the reaction mixture. The absorbance was recorded after 90 minutes at 765 nm. The total phenolic content of the leaves was calculated as gallic acid equivalents (mgGAE/g). All the experiments were performed in triplicate.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Optimum Drying Condition

Figure 1 displays the outcomes of the response optimizer for oven drying under ideal conditions for target, maximum and minimum. Each ideal condition has two points which was lower and upper that needs to be determined according to the highest response value from two different groups which were the experimental (TPC) and predicted data (FITS). Table 2 represents the comparison of values of target for oven drying for different goals and values for predicted responses, as well as the feasibility of the goals. As shown in Table 2, the target goal was found to be feasible. This can be seen from Figure 1 as the optimum point of the target goal was right above the shaded region which indicating the feasibility of the goal. Thus, the target was ready to be validated. Meanwhile, both maximum and minimum goals were removed from being selected as the optimum condition since the optimal point were at the shaded region, making them not feasible. Therefore, the optimum oven drying condition for the Gynura procumbens leaves was found to be at the target goal which was 65.61 °C drying temperature and 10 hours drying time with 201.78 mgGAE/g TPC yield.

Table 2 Comparison values of target for different goals and values for oven drying predicted response

Goal   Lower Target Upper Optimum Condition Predicted Response Feasible
Temp (°C) Time (hour)
Target TPC 147.96 201.78 205.27 65.61 10.00 201.78 Feasible
FITS 148.23 205.26 225.79
Max TPC 147.96 205.27 205.27 65.61 10.25 201.92 Not Feasible
FITS 148.23 201.78 201.78
Min TPC 147.96 147.96 205.27 50.61 13.54 144.96 Not Feasible
FITS 148.23 148.23 201.78

Figure 1 Overlaid contour plot for oven optimization process of Gynura procumbens leaves (a) Target (b) Maximum (c) Minimum

Table 3 referring to the optimum conditions of microwave drying for the three goals, namely, target, maximum and minimum. The target goal was considered as feasible. As shown in Figure 2, the optimal point of the target goal was at the unshaded region while maximum and minimum were at the shaded region. Target goal was validated further while maximum and minimum goal were removed from the selection of optimum condition. Therefore, the optimum microwave drying condition for Gynura procumbens leaves was revealed at 436.19 Watt and 8.37 minutes drying time with 12.24 mgGAE/g TPC.

Table 3 Comparison values of target for different goals and values for microwave drying predicted response.

Goal   Lower Target Upper Optimum Condition Predicted

Response

Feasible
Power Time
Target TPC 0.19 13.57 13.57 436.19` 8.37 12.24 Feasible
FITS 0.17 12.24 12.24
Max TPC 0.19 13.57 13.57 418.57 8.12 12.31 Not Feasible
FITS 0.17 12.24 12.24
Min TPC 0.19 0.19 13.57 158.58 4.03 -5.24 Not Feasible
FITS 0.17 0.17 12.24

Figure 2 Overlaid contour plot for microwave optimization process of Gynura procumbens leaves (a) Target (b) Maximum (c) Minimum

Model Fitting

The experimental data were analysed using multiple linear regression, which resulted in the production of second-order polynomial models for predicting total phenolic content models as shown in Table 4. Response surface and contour plots were constructed for each of the fitted models as a function of two independent variables to visualize the combined effects of two factors on response (Johnson, 2022). This was done while maintaining the variable’s central value throughout the process. The analysis of these plots allowed for discussion of the effects of the variables on the response’s models. The percentage of the total variation in the response that can be accounted for by the model was indicated by R2 error sum of squares to the total sum of squares. R2 is the metric that is used to evaluate how well the model fits the data (Alexander et al., 2015). The greater the R2 number, the more closely the model matches the data as it represents smaller differences between the observed data and fitted values (Frost, 2018). The R2 value for oven and microwave drying reached 96.40% and 87.08% respectively. This indicated that 96.40% and 87.08% of the regression model is a good fit for the responses data for both oven and microwave. A similar trend can also be found in a study of dried moringa leaves by Alim et al. (2023), which highlighted that for a good fit model, the R2 value should be more than 80% to indicate that the models were highly compatible. However, since 𝑅2 increases with the number of terms, making the higher value of 𝑅2 to be obtained easily by simply adding the number of terms that are tested in one relationship, therefore, use of 𝑅2 as a coefficient of determination does not fully demonstrate the perfect relationship between factors and response. As a result, adjusted determination coefficient (adj R2) is utilised in assessing the correlation between factors and responses to enhance precision and reduce errors in research as the coefficient determination provided was based on a correlation between additional terms upon existing terms. Hence, it is more suitable to utilise (adj R2) as an indicator in selecting the optimal design to develop the best model to depict the correlation between factors and responses. Thus, based on the adj R2, the best model to describe the relationship between temperature or power and drying time for oven and microwave drying on total phenolic yield via linear and interaction model with given adjusted R2 were 93.83% and 77.85% respectively. Next, the equation for both oven and microwave drying are clearly illustrated in Table 4 where it gives a higher number of significant terms (6 terms) as equal to full quadratic model and has significant value for the regression with reading P value < 0.05. Therefore, the best model which represents the relationship between temperature and drying time for oven and power and drying time for microwave are clearly represented by the equations in Table 4.

Table 4 Model analysis for oven and microwave drying.

Dryer Equation R2 R2 (adj)
Oven \[
Y = 567.0 – 19.39N_1 + 24.82N_2 + 0.1661N_1^2 – 1.819N_2^2 + 0.1915N_1N_2
\]
96.40% 93.83%
Microwave \[
Y = -45.7 + 0.0993N_3 + 9.16N_4 – 0.000139N_3^2 + 0.619N_4^2 + 0.00211N_3N_4
\]
87.08% 77.85%

Effect of Variables on Total Phenolic Content Yield

Table 4 demonstrated the equation for oven and microwave drying obtained from mathematical model. For oven drying, the equation clearly showed that temperature (N1) gave a relatively larger impact compared to drying time (N2) because temperature (24.82) has a higher coefficient than the drying time (-19.39). It indicated that total phenolic content raised with increase of temperature but with decreasing of drying time. Meanwhile, for microwave drying, the power (N4) gave a relatively stronger effect than the drying time (N3), represented by a higher coefficient for the power (9.16) in comparison to the drying time (0.0993), indicating that total phenolic content raised with increasing microwave power but with the decreasing drying time.

3-D response surface plots have been proposed and recognised as extremely helpful and explicit for interpreting the interaction behaviour of system variables (Omorogie et al., 2017). A 3-D surface is represented graphically using a contour plot, which plots contours—constant z slices—on a 2-D format. For connecting the (x, y) coordinates where the z value occurs, Z lines were drawn. It represents the regression equation that shows how two factors behave while their values are fixed. Figure 3 (a) indicate the surface plot for oven drying. Oven drying reveals that the goal target was at the saddle point where the point is an inflexion point between a relative maximum and relative minimum (Bezerra et al., 2008). Other than that, as indicated in Figure 4 (a) is the surface plot for microwave drying has a concave shape. Both figures showed that there is an interaction between temperature or power with time. In general, both factors which are temperature and time for oven, and power and time for microwave have a positive effect on total phenolic yield.

Figure 3 (b) displays the 3-D response contour plot of the goal target for oven drying where saddle was at a low point between two areas of higher ground, resulting to an hourglass shape. As shown in Figure 4 (b), microwave drying has a circular distribution in the contour plot, moving from lower to higher total phenolic yield, the circles were growing in parallel with the increase in drying time and power. Both figures portray the positive effects of the variables on the total phenolic yield.

Accuracy, repeatable, reproducible, and robust upon predicted response total phenolic yield was determined by at five repetitions of proposed optimum condition as shown in Table 5. Validation was carried out at the proposed optimum drying point for both oven and microwave. Then, the results showed that no significant differences were detected between the repeated and predicted TPC yield by given P value > 0.05 (one – sample T-test, P value 0.281 and 0.103) as depicted in Table 6. The optimize models have sufficient control in process conditions with little variation which creates an ideal situation for model verification and accuracy. Thus, the proposed optimum drying point obtained in this study for both oven and microwave were accurate, reliable, and repeatable.

Figure 3 Contour and surface plot for target phenolic content in oven optimization process (a) contour plot (b) surface plot

Figure 4 Contour and surface plot for target phenolic content in microwave optimization process (a) contour plot (b) surface plot

Table 5 Optimum point for oven and microwave optimization

Dryer Process Variables TPC Yield (mgGAE/g)
Temperature (°C) /Power (W) Drying Time (hour/minute)
Oven 65.61 °C 10.00 hours 201.78
Microwave 436.19 W 8.37 minutes 12.24

Table 6 Validation for oven and microwave drying

Dryer P-Value P-value > 0.05 Result
Oven 0.281 0.281 > 0.05 No significant difference
Microwave 0.103 0.103 > 0.05 No significant difference

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, the optimum drying condition for oven is at 65.61 °C and 10 hours drying time by generated model predicted a 201.78 mgGAE/g TPC yield. Meanwhile, for microwave was found to be at 436.19 W and 8.37 minutes drying time by generated model predicted a 12.24 mgGAE/g TPC yield. From this study, it shows that although microwave drying provides a shorter drying time, oven drying of G. procumbens leaves can provide a higher TPC yield. The linear and interaction mathematical model for both oven and microwave gave good prediction of TPC yield obtained from G. procumbens leaves under experimental conditions used in this study where the adjusted coefficient determination , are 0.9383 and 0.7851, respectively. Also, this study managed to identify that the variables, temperature or power and drying time, made a significant difference to the total phenolic content yield of the leaves. Therefore, the correlation between temperature and time for oven drying and power and time for microwave drying, can help to provide predictions of the impact of process variable on the TPC yield of G.  procumbens leaves. In addition, the outcomes from this study are expected to contribute the production of a shelf stable G. procumbens leaves which can be used for pharmacological purposes.

REFERENCES

  1. Alexander, D. L. J., Tropsha, A., & Winkler, D. A. (2015). Beware of R2: Simple, Unambiguous Assessment of the Prediction Accuracy of QSAR and QSPR Models. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 55(7), 1316–1322. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.5b00206
  2. Alim, M. A., Islam, M., Akter, S., Maroua, S., Alam, A., Esrafil, M., Haque, M. A., & Begum, R. (2023). Optimization of cabinet drying conditions for dried moringa leaves by Response Surface Methodology. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research, 14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2023.100794
  3. Bezerra, M. A., Santelli, R. E., Oliveira, E. P., Villar, L. S., & Escaleira, L. A. (2008). Response surface methodology (RSM) as a tool for optimization in analytical chemistry. In Talanta (Vol. 76, Issue 5, pp. 965–977). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2008.05.019
  4. Elhussein, E. A. A., & Şahin, S. (2018). Drying behaviour, effective diffusivity and energy of activation of olive leaves dried by microwave, vacuum and oven drying methods. Heat and Mass Transfer/Waerme- Und Stoffuebertragung, 54(7), 1901–1911. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-018-2278-6
  5. Ghasemi Pirbalouti, A., Salehi, S., & Craker, L. (2017). Effect of drying methods on qualitative and quantitative properties of essential oil from the aerial parts of coriander. Journal of Applied Research on Medicinal and Aromatic Plants, 4, 35–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmap.2016.07.00
  6. Kanzil Mowla Mou, & Pristesh Ranjan Dash. (2016). A COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW ON GYNURA PROCUMBENS LEAVES. Article in International Journal of Pharmacognosy, 3(4), 167– 174. https://doi.org/10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.IJP.3(4).167-174
  7. Khuzaidatul Azidah, A. N., Norsyahida, M. F., Fhataheya, B., Qodriyah, H. M. S., Khairana, H., Ibrahim, J., & Zakiah, J. (2019). Gynura procumbens standardised extract reduces cholesterol levels and modulates oxidative status in postmenopausal rats fed with cholesterol diet enriched with repeatedly heated palm oil. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/7246756
  8. Krishnan, V., Ahmad, S., & Mahmood, M. (2015). Antioxidant Potential in Different Parts and Callus of Gynura procumbens and Different Parts of Gynura bicolor. BioMed Research International, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/147909
  9. Musfizur Rahman, A. F. M., & Sharif Al Asad, Md. (2013). Chemical and biological investigations of the leaves of Gynura procumbens. International Journal of Biosciences (IJB), 36–43. https://doi.org/10.12692/ijb/3.4.36-43
  10. Omorogie, M. O., Naidoo, E. B., & Ofomaja, A. E. (2017). Response surface methodology, central composite design, process methodology and characterization of pyrolyzed KOH pretreated environmental biomass: mathematical modelling and optimization approach. Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 3(3), 1171–1186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-017-0365-1
  11. Pirasteh, G., Saidur, R., Rahman, S. M. A., & Rahim, N. A. (2014). A review on development of solar drying applications. In Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews (Vol. 31, pp. 133–148). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.11.052
  12. Roleira, F. M. F., Varela, C. L., Costa, S. C., & Tavares-da-Silva, E. J. (2018). Phenolic Derivatives from Medicinal Herbs and Plant Extracts: Anticancer Effects and Synthetic Approaches to Modulate Biological Activity. In Studies in Natural Products Chemistry (Vol. 57, pp. 115–156). Elsevier B.V. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-64057-4.00004-1
  13. Rosidah, Yam, M. F., Sadikun, A., & Asmawi, M. Z. (2008). Antioxidant potential of Gynura procumbens. Pharmaceutical Biology, 46(9), 616–625. https://doi.org/10.1080/13880200802179642
  14. Roslan, A. S., Ismail, A., Ando, Y., & Azlan, A. (2020). Effect of drying methods and parameters on the antioxidant properties of tea (Camellia sinensis) leaves. Food Production, Processing and Nutrition, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43014-020-00022-0
  15. Shirazi, O. U., Muzaffar Ali Khan Khattak, M., Azwani Mohd Shukri, N., Sultan Ahmad Shah, J., Indera Mahkota, B., Darul Makmur, P., Mohd Nur Nasyriq, M. A., Shirazi, O., & Nur Nasyriq, M. A. (2014). Determination of total phenolic, flavonoid content and free radical scavenging activities of common herbs and spices. ~ 104 ~ Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry, 3(3).
  16. Tahsin, M. R., Tithi, T. I., Mim, S. R., Haque, E., Sultana, A., Bahar, N. B., Ahmed, R., Chowdhury, J. A., Chowdhury, A. A., Kabir, S., Aktar, F., Uddin, M. S., & Amran, M. S. (2022). In Vivo and in Silico Assessment of Diabetes Ameliorating Potentiality and Safety Profile of Gynura procumbens Leaves. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9095504
  17. Tan, H. L., Chan, K. G., Pusparajah, P., Lee, L. H., & Goh, B. H. (2016). Gynura procumbens: An overview of the biological activities. In Frontiers in Pharmacology (Vol. 7, Issue MAR). Frontiers Media S.A. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2016.00052
  18. Thamkaew, G., Sjöholm, I., & Galindo, F. G. (2021). A review of drying methods for improving the quality of dried herbs. In Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition (Vol. 61, Issue 11, pp. 1763–1786). Bellwether Publishing, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2020.1765309
  19. Tristantini, D., Setiawan, H., & Santoso, L. L. (2021). Feasibility assessment of an encapsulated longevity spinach (Gynura procumbens l.) extract plant in Indonesia. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 11(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/app11094093
  20. Yan Lim, Y., Jun Fung, J., Jun-Wen, B., Zhen-Jiang, G., Hong-Wei, X., Xiao-Tuo, W., Qian, Z., & Xiao, H.-W. (2013). Effect of Air- and Oven-Drying on the Activity of Polyphenol Oxidases and Peroxidases in the Leaves of Gynura procumbens. http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/cross_fac/iatl/reinvention/issues/volume9issue2/fung/

Article Statistics

Track views and downloads to measure the impact and reach of your article.

0

PDF Downloads

15 views

Metrics

PlumX

Altmetrics

Paper Submission Deadline

GET OUR MONTHLY NEWSLETTER