RSIS International

Submission Deadline: 30th December 2024
Last Issue of 2024 : Publication Fee: 30$ USD Submit Now
Submission Deadline: 21st January 2025
Special Issue on Education & Public Health: Publication Fee: 30$ USD Submit Now
Submission Deadline: 05th January 2025
Special Issue on Economics, Management, Psychology, Sociology & Communication: Publication Fee: 30$ USD Submit Now

International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS) | Volume VI, Issue VI, June 2022 | ISSN 2454–6186

Perceptions of headteachers and teachers on the Annual Performance Appraisal System in selected primary schools of Lusaka District

Jenipher Nyeleti – Chisefu,1Kalisto Kalimaposo,2Angel Kabwe Chisefu,3Kaiko Mubita,4Kasonde Mundende5 and Inonge Milupi6
1,3River of Blessing Bible College, Lusaka, Zambia.
2University of Zambia, School of Education, Department of Educational Psychology, Sociology and Special Education.
4,5,6University of Zambia, School of Education, Department of Language and Social Science Education

IJRISS Call for paper

Abstract: The study explored perceptions of head teachers and teachers on the Annual Performance Appraisal System (APAS) in selected primary schools of Lusaka District. The study was exploratory in nature and located within an interpretive qualitative research design. The study objectives were threefold: (i) to explore perceptions head teachers and teachers hold concerning the Annual Performance Appraisal System (APAS); (ii) to establish ways in which APAS had motivated teachers in primary schools (iii) to ascertain levels of teacher satisfaction on the use of Annual performance Appraisal System. The sample comprised twenty participants; five head teachers and fifteen class teachers.
The study revealed that teachers lacked proper understanding of APAS which consequently led to the development of negative perceptions and attitudes towards the system. The study revealed that the majority of teachers did not see the importance of APAS in their career because the system was perceived as an academic exercise without tangible results. It was further revealed that the majority of teachers were not motivated with appraisal systems, and that head teachers were not providing appropriate guidance and initiating programme to build capacity in teachers. In addition, teachers were dissatisfied with APAS because teachers were not well inducted about the appraisal process as coaching and monitoring appeared inadequate. The study revealed that supervisors involved in appraisal process lacked necessary skills of evaluating teachers. One of the major recommendations made by this study was that the MoE should provide in-house training through workshops to ensure that supervisors involved in appraising teachers acquired requisite skills for conducting teacher appraisals.

Key words: Annual Performance Appraisal, monitoring, supervisor, perception, attitudes.

I.BACKGROUND TO THE STUDY

Improving performance management has become a major focus for many organizations for the past decade. In 1997, the Zambian government introduced the Public Sector Management Program Support Project (PSMPSP) whose purpose was to improve performance management and to institutionalize strategic performance management in the public service (World Bank, 2005:2). Before the introduction of the Performance Management Package (PMP), assessment of individual performance was through the Annual Confidential Report (ACR).

 


Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Sign up for our newsletter, to get updates regarding the Call for Paper, Papers & Research.