Contextualizing a Proposed AI Governance Policy Framework within the Communication Program of St. Paul University Manila

This study investigated the dualistic role of artificial intelligence (AI) in shaping critical thinking within educational contexts, specifically focusing on the Communication Program at St. Paul University Manila. Employing a qualitative, interpretive research design, the study utilizes comparative discourse analysis of contradicting YouTube transcripts alongside a synthetic analysis of scholarly article by Brian Bantugan that proposed a policy framework on AI governance in St. Paul University Manila. The analytical framework integrates Cognitive Hierarchy Theory, Sociocultural Theory, and Cognitive Offloading Theory to move beyond binary perspectives of advocacy or resistance. Findings reveal two primary paradigms: AI as "cognitive augmentation," where the technology reconfigures intellect toward high-level task stewardship and information verification, and AI as "cognitive substitution," where overreliance leads to "passive consumption" and cognitive atrophy. Results indicate that while AI can enhance higher-order analysis, it risks "short-circuiting" the foundational mental effort required for deep learning. Consequently, the study proposes a progressive "Learn First, Augment Later" pedagogical model. In Basic Education, AI should serve as a limited "cognitive scaffold" to protect foundational skill formation. In Higher Education, AI transitions into a "cognitive partner" for advanced synthesis, provided learners maintain active agency. These insights culminate in a modified AI governance framework for St. Paul University Manila, emphasizing stage-based integration, process-based assessment, and the transition from output-oriented to cognition-centered evaluation. Ultimately, the study concludes that AI’s impact is determined not by the technology itself, but by the developmental timing of its integration, ensuring students remain active seekers of knowledge rather than passive recipients of machine-generated content.

Artificial Intelligence (AI), AI Governance Policy

1. Al Jazeera English. (2025, July 4). Is ChatGPT hurting our critical thinking skills? | The Take. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qz_ZYa3oRSE&t=1s [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bantugan, B. (2026, February 3). A Multisectoral and Democratized AI Governance Policy for St. Paul University Manila Countering Global Techno-Authoritarianism and Abuse. International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, 13(1), 1040-1079 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bender, E. M., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A., & Shmitchell, S. (2021). On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big? Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 610–623. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Longmans. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bruner, J. S. (1960). The process of education. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Carr, N. (2010). The shallows: What the Internet is doing to our brains. W. W. Norton. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Couldry, N., & Hepp, A. (2017). The mediated construction of reality. Polity Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Denzin, N. K. (1978). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Facione, P. A. (1990). Critical thinking: A statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction. American Philosophical Association. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Floridi, L., Cowls, J., Beltrametti, M., Chatila, R., Chazerand, P., Dignum, V., … Vayena, E. (2018). AI4People—An ethical framework for a good AI society. Minds and Machines, 28(4), 689–707. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. Basic Books.Hobbs, R. (2010). Digital and media literacy: A plan of action. Aspen Institute. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., & Forcier, L. B. (2016). Intelligence unleashed: An argument for AI in education. Pearson. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2014). Critical thinking: Tools for taking charge of your professional and personal life (2nd ed.). Pearson. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Risko, E. F., & Gilbert, S. J. (2016). Cognitive offloading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(9), 676–688. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Roll, I., & Wylie, R. (2016). Evolution and revolution in artificial intelligence in education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 26(2), 582–599. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Sovorel. (2025, ZFFebruary 24). NO, AI Will Not Take Away Your Critical Thinking Skills. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l8EAHrxuAeQ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Sparrow, B., Liu, J., & Wegner, D. M. (2011). Google effects on memory: Cognitive consequences of having information at our fingertips. Science, 333(6043), 776–778. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(39). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Revolutionizing Library Services in Nairobi: Ethical Implications and Future Trends in User Interaction
• ESPYREAL: A Mobile Based Multi-Currency Identifier for Visually Impaired Individuals Using Convolutional Neural Network
• Comparative Analysis of AI-Driven IoT-Based Smart Agriculture Platforms with Blockchain-Enabled Marketplaces
• AI-Based Dish Recommender System for Reducing Fruit Waste through Spoilage Detection and Ripeness Assessment
• SEA-TALK: An AI-Powered Voice Translator and Southeast Asian Dialects Recognition