Governance Compliance, Management Practices, and Operational Challenges of CHED-Affiliated School-Based Cooperatives in Malaybalay City, Philippines

This study examined governance compliance, management practices, and operational challenges of Commission on Higher Education (CHED)-affiliated school-based cooperatives in Malaybalay City, Philippines. Using a qualitative multiple-case study design anchored in grounded theory, data were collected through focus group discussions, in-depth interviews, Delphi validation, and document analysis.
Findings revealed a high level of compliance with Republic Act No. 9520 and institutional by-laws, particularly in the functioning of the General Assembly and Board of Directors. Management practices were generally effective; however, gaps were observed in committee performance, leadership capacity, operational policy implementation, and strategic planning. Operational challenges were identified across planning, organizing, leading, and controlling functions.
The study further revealed that governance compliance contributes to organizational accountability, member participation, and financial sustainability. However, limitations in staffing, leadership training, and operational systems affect overall cooperative performance and member satisfaction. Findings also suggest that the integration of digital management systems and leadership development programs may enhance operational efficiency and governance effectiveness.
The study concludes that governance compliance provides a strong foundation for cooperative management, but long-term effectiveness depends on organizational capacity-building, financial sustainability, leadership competence, and system strengthening. Future studies may adopt mixed-methods approaches and include cooperatives from other regions in the Philippines to improve the generalizability and comparative value of the findings.

Governance compliance; cooperative management

1. Birchall, J. (2011). People-centred businesses. Palgrave Macmillan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Chaddad, F., & Iliopoulos, C. (2013). Control rights, governance, and the costs of ownership in agricultural cooperatives. Agribusiness, 29(1), 3–22. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Cornforth, C. (2004). The governance of cooperatives and mutual associations. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 75(1), 11–32. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Fayol, H. (1949). General and industrial management. Pitman Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Aldine. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. ICA. (2020). Guidance notes to the cooperative principles. International Cooperative Alliance. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Puusa, A., Mönkkönen, K., & Varis, A. (2016). Mission lost? Dilemmatic dual nature of cooperatives. Journal of Co-operative Organization and Management, 4(1), 6–14. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Zeuli, K., & Cropp, R. (2004). Cooperatives: Principles and practices. University of Wisconsin. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Empowering SME Performance Through Social Media: The Mediating Role of Entrepreneurial Orientation in Malaysian Manufacturing SMEs
• Effective School Bullying Prevention Strategies: A Thematic Review
• Impact of Workplace Conflict on the Operational Performance of Deposit Money Banks in Enugu State.
• Towards Digital Financial Solutions: A Conceptual Model of SME Strategies and Strategic Development
• Effect of Work-Life Balance and Affective Commitment on Employee Performance in the Hotel Industry in Plateau State