ISO/IEC 17025-Compliant Calibration of Biomedical Equipment: Frameworks, Methods, and Measurement Uncertainty Assessment

Modern healthcare would not be possible without the use of biomedical equipment, which is crucial in supporting diagnosis, therapy, monitoring of patients, and life-sustaining processes. Clinical devices like ventilators, infusion pumps, defibrillators, patient monitors, ECG systems, thermometers, and laboratory instruments directly relate to the clinical decision-making and delivery of treatment. Thus, they necessitate regular calibration and frequent validation of these instruments to maintain reliability, safety, accuracy and consistent performance over the entire life of the instrument. Any inaccuracy in measuring or in performance of functions can result into wrong diagnosis, ineffective treatment or a greater risk to patient safety. The ISO/IEC 17025 standard of competence of testing and calibration laboratories offers a robust and internationally recognized framework of ensuring technically valid, traceable and reliable results of calibration [1]. It provides rules of lab competence, unbiasedness, traceability of measurements, validation of methods, qualification of personnel, control of the environment and quality management systems. By adhering to this standard, biomedical calibration labs are able to maintain high standards of technical accuracy, and to express a degree of confidence in their results. The paper provides a critical review of ISO/IEC 17025-conforming calibration practices of biomedical equipment, including quality system, metrological traceability, estimation of uncertainty, risk-based calibration timeframes, documentation control, personnel competence, and internal quality assurance. It also talks about calibration methodology of commonly used biomedical devices such as patient monitors, infusion pumps, defibrillators, electrosurgical units, ventilators, thermometers, sphygmomanometers, pulse oximeters, ECG systems, and weighing scales. Particular attention is paid to evaluation of the uncertainty of measurements, environmental factors, and rules to evaluate conformity. Moreover, the paper examines some of the major issues that healthcare facilities and labs in developing nations face, including the lack of strong chains of traceability, trained staff, regulatory control, and reliance on non-accredited service providers [2]. Lastly, practical recommendations are made to the hospitals, regulators and laboratories to have sustainable biomedical metrology systems in accordance with the ISO/IEC 17025 requirements. The paper concludes that systematic calibration within a certified structure is a significant intervention to improve patient safety, clinical confidence, regulatory compliance, operational efficiency, and overall healthcare outcomes.

Biomedical equipment, ISO/IEC 17025, calibration

1. ISO/IEC 17025:2017. General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization; 2017. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. World Health Organization. Barriers to medical device maintenance in low-resource settings. WHO Medical Device Technical Series. Geneva: WHO; 2015. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Khandpur RS. Biomedical Instrumentation: Technology and Applications. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2019. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. World Health Organization. Medical device equipment management: How to manage the maintenance of medical devices. WHO Medical Device Technical Series. Geneva: WHO; 2011. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology. International vocabulary of metrology – Basic and general concepts and associated terms (VIM). JCGM 200:2012. Sèvres: BIPM; 2012. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. IEC 60601-1:2020. Medical electrical equipment – Part 1: General requirements for basic safety and essential performance. Geneva: IEC; 2020. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. ISO 14971:2019. Medical devices – Application of risk management to medical devices. Geneva: ISO; 2019. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Joint Commission International. JCI Accreditation Standards for Hospitals. 7th ed. Oak Brook: JCI; 2020. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Carr JJ, Brown JM. Introduction to Biomedical Equipment Technology. 4th ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall; 2000. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Dyro JF. Clinical Engineering Handbook. Burlington: Elsevier Academic Press; 2004. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. O’Brien E, Atkins N, Stergiou G, et al. European Society of Hypertension International Protocol for the validation of blood pressure monitors. J Hypertens. 2010;28(Suppl 2):S3-S8. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. ISO 80601-2-12:2020. Medical electrical equipment – Part 2-12: Particular requirements for basic safety and essential performance of critical care ventilators. Geneva: ISO; 2020. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. IEC 60601-2-4:2018. Medical electrical equipment – Part 2-4: Particular requirements for the basic safety and essential performance of defibrillators. Geneva: IEC; 2018. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. EURAMET cg-13. Calibration of pressure transducers. EURAMET; 2018. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. EURAMET cg-8. Calibration of temperature sensors. EURAMET; 2019. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. EURAMET cg-15. Calibration of electrical measuring instruments. EURAMET; 2020. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. ILAC P14:09/2020. ILAC policy for measurement uncertainty in calibration. ILAC; 2020. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. IEC 60601-2-25:2011. Medical electrical equipment – Part 2-25: Particular requirements for the basic safety and essential performance of electrocardiographs. Geneva: IEC; 2011. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. IEC 60601-2-24:2012. Medical electrical equipment – Part 2-24: Particular requirements for the basic safety and essential performance of infusion pumps and controllers. Geneva: IEC; 2012. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. ISO 80601-2-13:2022. Medical electrical equipment – Part 2-13: Particular requirements for basic safety and essential performance of anaesthetic workstations. Geneva: ISO; 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. IEC 60601-2-2:2017. Medical electrical equipment – Part 2-2: Particular requirements for the basic safety and essential performance of high frequency surgical equipment. Geneva: IEC; 2017. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. OIML R 111-1:2004. Weights of classes E1, E2, F1, F2, M1, M2, M3. Paris: OIML; 2004. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. IEC 62353:2014. Medical electrical equipment – Recurrent test and test after repair of medical electrical equipment. Geneva: IEC; 2014. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology. Evaluation of measurement data – Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (GUM). JCGM 100:2008. Sèvres: BIPM; 2008. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. EA-4/02 M:2022. Expression of the uncertainty of measurement in calibration. European co-operation for Accreditation; 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. ILAC G8:09/2019. Guidelines on decision rules and statements of conformity. ILAC; 2019. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Webster JG, editor. Medical Instrumentation: Application and Design. 5th ed. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons; 2020. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Dyro JF, editor. Clinical Engineering Handbook. 2nd ed. Burlington: Elsevier; 2019. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. AAMI EQ56:2022. Recommended practice for a medical equipment management program. Arlington: AAMI; 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. ISO/IEC 17043:2023. Conformity assessment – General requirements for proficiency testing. Geneva: ISO; 2023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. OIML D 10:2007. Guidelines for the determination of recalibration intervals of measuring equipment. Paris: OIML; 2007. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Perry L, Malkin R. Effectiveness of medical equipment donations to improve health systems: a systematic review of the literature. J Glob Health. 2019;9(1):010301. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. World Health Organization. Global model regulatory framework for medical devices. Geneva: WHO; 2017. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. IAEA Human Health Series No. 33. Quality assurance and calibration of radiation therapy equipment. Vienna: IAEA; 2017. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. NIST Technical Note 1297. Guidelines for evaluating and expressing the uncertainty of NIST measurement results. Gaithersburg: NIST; 1994. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. PTB. Metrology for health: Publications of the Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt. Braunschweig: PTB; 2020. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. ANSI/AAMI/ISO 17664-1:2021. Processing of health care products – Information to be provided by the medical device manufacturer for the processing of medical devices. Arlington: AAMI; 2021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. ASTM E2877-21. Standard guide for digital contact thermometers. West Conshohocken: ASTM; 2021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. NPL. A beginner's guide to measurement uncertainty (Good Practice Guide No. 11). Teddington: National Physical Laboratory; 2018. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. IEC 60601-2-49:2022. Medical electrical equipment – Part 2-49: Particular requirements for the basic safety and essential performance of multifunction patient monitors. Geneva: IEC; 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. FDA. Medical Device Quality Systems Regulation (21 CFR 820). Silver Spring: FDA; 2020. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. IFMBE. Clinical engineering recommendations for calibration intervals. IFMBE White Paper. Singapore: IFMBE; 2019. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. NABL 100:2020. National Accreditation Board for Testing and Calibration Laboratories – General criteria for accreditation. New Delhi: NABL; 2020. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. APMP. APMP guidance on healthcare metrology. Asia Pacific Metrology Programme; 2014. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. UNICEF. Medical device procurement and quality assurance manual. Copenhagen: UNICEF; 2018. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Cohen ER, Cvitas T, Frey JG, et al. Quantities, Units and Symbols in Physical Chemistry (IUPAC Green Book). 3rd ed. Cambridge: RSC Publishing; 2007. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. BSI. BS 7000-2:2018 Design management systems – Guide to managing the design of medical devices. London: BSI; 2018. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Green Synthesis of Calcium Oxide Nanoparticles from Pigeon Eggshells for Cement Composites
• Needs Analysis: Development of an Interactive Digital Storybook in Teaching Mixtures and their Characteristics among Grade 6 Learners
• Thickness Dependent Structural, Optical, Electrical and Gas Sensing properties of ZnO thin film
• Forensic Chemistry Laboratory Works from Home: Challenges Encountered by Criminology Students During the Conduct of their Laboratory Activities at Home
• The Concept of Wellness Club and How it Differs from the Present Gym?