A MuSk is a Must: Biodegradable and Disposable Facemask from Musa spp (Banana) Pseudostem

Authors

Lyanne T. H. Jover

Shalom Crest Wizard Academy (Philippines)

Almahden C. Lumidseg

Shalom Crest Wizard Academy (Philippines)

Roden C. Yumol

Shalom Crest Wizard Academy (Philippines)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS.2026.11050091

Subject Category: Environmental Science

Volume/Issue: 11/5 | Page No: 1046-1054

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-05-06

Accepted: 2026-05-12

Published: 2026-06-01

Abstract

The primary raw materials for the manufacturing of the facemasks are non- biodegradable synthetic polymers derived from petrochemicals. Disposable face masks are made of plastic, which does not biodegrade easily. This study aims to determine the effectiveness of the Banana Pseudo Stem Face Mask. Candle testing was conducted to determine the filtering ability. This was attained by blowing a candle while wearing a mask; the amount of air that escapes from your mask determines the result. MuSk Fabric is effective for a strong prevention from a simulation for everyday respiratory exchanges and interactions such as coughs and conversations. Particle filtration is what helps block droplets and particles from traveling through your mask. This test determines if it can preserve the respiratory system against the non-desirable air droplets and aerosols such as the viral or pollution particles. MuSk Fabric particle filtration testing, indicating that the particles did not pass through. It indicates that MuSk Fabric has the potential to preserve the respiratory system against the non- desirable air droplets and aerosols such as the viral or pollution particles. Using a 0.5 mL Pasteur pipette, water was dropped onto the surface of each three MuSk Fabrics and Abaca Face Mask. A 1000x USB Microscope took a close-up photo upon contact. On average, MuSk Fabrics obtained a higher contact angle of 162° over the 131° calculated for the Abaca Face Mask. Independent Sample T-test was confirmed that this difference is statistically significant at an alpha of 0.05. Biodegradability of MuSk Fabric shows significant results which indicates that MuSk Fabric is biodegradable. These results demonstrate that MuSk is effective its use as an alternative face mask.

Keywords

Biodegradable, Disposable, Face Mask, Musk

Downloads

References

1. Aragaw, T. A. (2020). Surgical face masks as a potential source of microplastic pollution in the COVID-19 scenario. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 159, 111517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.111517 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. ACS Nano. (2020). Aerosol filtration efficiency of common fabrics used in respiratory cloth masks. ACS Nano. https://pubs.acs.org/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR). (2021). Medical waste generation in the Philippines during the COVID-19 pandemic. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Linseis. (n.d.). Contact angle measurement. Retrieved from https://www.linseis.com/en/wiki/contact-angle/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Rab, S., Javaid, M., Haleem, A., & Vaishya, R. (2020). Face masks are new normal after COVID-19 pandemic. Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research & Reviews, 14(6), 1617–1619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsx.2020.08.021 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Rossol, E. (2019). Banana fiber and its environmental advantages. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Subagyo, A., & Chafidz, A. (2018). Banana pseudo-stem fiber: Preparation, characteristics, and applications. In Banana Nutrition – Function and Processing Kinetics. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.76944 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Sumondong, M. J. (n.d.). Paper bag made from banana stem: An alternative way to reduce plastic bags. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Tcharkhtchi, A., Abbasnezhad, N., Seydani, M. Z., Zirak, N., Farzaneh, S., & Shirinbayan, M. (2021). An overview of filtration efficiency through the masks: Mechanisms of the aerosols penetration. Bioactive Materials, 6(1), 106–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.08.002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. University of Southern Denmark. (2021). Disposable face masks and environmental risks during COVID-19. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. World Health Organization (WHO). (2021). Global analysis of health care waste in the context of COVID-19. https://www.who.int [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Ahmed, M. B., Zhou, J. L., Ngo, H. H., Guo, W., Chen, M., & Nguyen, D. D. (2021). Progress in the preparation and application of modified cellulose-based materials for wastewater treatment. Science of the Total Environment, 690, 122–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.07.145 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Nanda, S., Patra, B. R., Patel, R., Bakos, J., & Dalai, A. K. (2020). Innovations in applications and prospects of bioplastics and biopolymers: A review. Environmental Chemistry Letters, 20(1), 379–395. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-020-01084-9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Sharma, S., Batra, S., & Gupta, D. (2021). Banana fiber reinforced biodegradable composites and their applications: A review. Materials Today: Proceedings, 44, 4378–4384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.10.826 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Prata, J. C., Silva, A. L. P., Walker, T. R., Duarte, A. C., & Rocha-Santos, T. (2020). COVID-19 pandemic repercussions on the use and management of plastics. Environmental Science & Technology, 54(13), 7760–7765. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c02178 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Avossa, J., Carleo, B., Boccia, G., Borriello, A., Diana, S., & Esposito, E. (2021). Sustainable and biodegradable materials for face mask production: Current advances and future perspectives. Materials, 14(23), 7480. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14237480. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles