Developing a Teaching Case Study on Regional Security under Great-Power Competition: The Impact of China–US Rivalry on the Kurdistan Region of Iraq

One of the pedagogical problems in teaching great-power competition in courses of international relations and area studies is the lack of teaching resources that focus on sub-state and semi-autonomous actors as they engage in such competition. Teaching case studies about great-power competition tend to emphasise state-level cases and a limited geographic focus, leaving the instructor little material with which to explore how sub-state and semi-autonomous actors perceive and adapt to such competition. This article seeks to solve this problem by constructing a full teaching case study, suitable for graduate and advanced undergraduate courses, built around the Kurdistan Region of Iraq (KRI) as a sub-state actor caught between forms of US and Chinese competition. The case is based on original research by the author conducted from 2014 to 2024, including a structured survey of 43 expert respondents and elite interviews, and is here reframed as a teaching tool, rather than a policy report. The article offers a four-part teaching syllabus, with learning objectives, multi-tiered discussion questions, a role-play game ("The KRG Strategic Council") and a combined assessment rubric. It teaches the concept of asymmetric hedging not as an iron-clad conclusion but rather as a teaching tool with which students can play and experiment. The article provides a contribution to the creation of teaching case libraries (jiaoxue anli ku) in international and area studies teaching and provides a lesson for how research can be repackaged for the classroom.

case-based teaching; international relations pedagogy; teaching case library; modular instructional design; Kurdistan Region of Iraq.

1. Acharya, A. (2020). The end of American world order (2nd ed.). Polity Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Aldecoa, F., & Keating, M. (Eds.). (1999). Paradiplomacy in action: The foreign relations of subnational governments. Frank Cass. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Biggs, J. (1996). Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. Higher Education, 32(3), 347–364. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Buzan, B., Wæver, O., & de Wilde, J. (1998). Security: A new framework for analysis. Lynne Rienner Publishers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Calabrese, J. (2020). China and the Middle East: Transition and turbulence. Middle East Institute. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Caspersen, N. (2012). Unrecognized states: The struggle for sovereignty in the modern international system. Polity Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. d'Hooghe, I., Kranenburg, V., & van Veen, E. (2023). China in Iraq: Strategic investment in a politically complex landscape. Clingendael Institute. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Goh, E. (2005). Meeting the China challenge: The U.S. in Southeast Asian regional security strategies. East-West Center. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Golich, V. L. (2000). The ABCs of case teaching. International Studies Perspectives, 1(1), 11–29. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Gunter, M. M. (2019). The Kurdish question in Iraq during and after the US occupation. Third World Quarterly, 40(8), 1481–1496. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Ismail, M. S. (2026, March). Personal interview with the author. Former Director-General, KRG Department of Foreign Relations; former Iraqi Ambassador to China (2004–2010). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Knights, M. (2016). The long haul: Building Iraqi military capacity against ISIL. The Washington Institute for Near East Policy. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. KRG. (2023). Kurdistan Region of Iraq: Official website of the Kurdistan Regional Government. https://www.gov.krd [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Krasner, S. D., & Risse, T. (2014). External actors, state-building, and service provision in areas of limited statehood: Introduction. Governance, 27(4), 545–567. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Kuik, C. C. (2016). How do weaker states hedge? Unpacking ASEAN states' alignment behavior towards China. Journal of Contemporary China, 25(100), 500–524. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Kuznetsov, A. S. (2015). Theory and practice of paradiplomacy: Subnational governments in international affairs. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Lantis, J. S., Kuzma, L. M., & Boehrer, J. (Eds.). (2000). The new international studies classroom: Active teaching, active learning. Lynne Rienner Publishers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Liwa Ayoub Yousif Ahmed. (2026, March). Personal interview with the author. Senior Peshmerga Commander, Kurdistan Regional Government. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Mearsheimer, J. J. (2001). The tragedy of great power politics. W. W. Norton. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Meijer, H., & Brooks, S. G. (2021). Illusions of autonomy: Why Europe cannot provide for its security if the United States pulls back. International Security, 45(4), 7–43. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Natali, D. (2010). The Kurdish quasi-state: Development and dependency in post-Gulf War Iraq. Syracuse University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Romano, D. (2021). The transformation of Iraqi Kurdistan: Statehood without sovereignty. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Saeed, S. J. (2026). China–US cooperation and competition and its impact on Kurdistan regional security [Master's thesis]. China Three Gorges University. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. She, G. (2021). Asymmetric competition on a new battleground? Middle Eastern perspectives on Sino-US rivalry. The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 14(2), 249–280. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Stansfield, G. (2013). The unravelling of the post-First World War state system? The Kurdistan Region of Iraq and the transformation of the Middle East. International Affairs, 89(2), 259–282. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Tang, D. X., & Zhang, L. (2019). The Kurdish question under Middle Eastern transformations. Inner Mongolia Social Sciences, 40(1), 67–74. [in Chinese] [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Tavares, R. (2016). Paradiplomacy: Cities and states as global players. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Waltz, K. N. (1979). Theory of international politics. McGraw-Hill. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]