Perceptions of Mental Health Nursing as a Career Path: A Descriptive-Correlational Study among Taif University Nursing Students

Authors

Dr. Jon-Jon T. Martinez

Taif University, Al Mutamarat Rd, Al Mathnah, At Taif, 26521 (Saudi Arabia)

Abdulmajid Khalil AL-Juaid

Taif University, Al Mutamarat Rd, Al Mathnah, At Taif, 26521 (Saudi Arabia)

Sultan Fayz Al-Harthi

Taif University, Al Mutamarat Rd, Al Mathnah, At Taif, 26521 (Saudi Arabia)

Rawaf Muteb AL-Otaibi

Taif University, Al Mutamarat Rd, Al Mathnah, At Taif, 26521 (Saudi Arabia)

Mamdouh Nayef AL-Harthi

Taif University, Al Mutamarat Rd, Al Mathnah, At Taif, 26521 (Saudi Arabia)

Wesam Ali AL-Shamrani

Taif University, Al Mutamarat Rd, Al Mathnah, At Taif, 26521 (Saudi Arabia)

Ghazi Fayez AL-Qathami

Taif University, Al Mutamarat Rd, Al Mathnah, At Taif, 26521 (Saudi Arabia)

Khaled Eid AL-Sufyani

Taif University, Al Mutamarat Rd, Al Mathnah, At Taif, 26521 (Saudi Arabia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS.2026.11050155

Subject Category: Mental Health

Volume/Issue: 11/5 | Page No: 1866-1883

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-05-30

Accepted: 2026-06-04

Published: 2026-06-09

Abstract

This study examined the perceptions of nursing students at Taif University toward mental health nursing as a career path. Anchored on Ajzen’s Theory of Planned Behavior, the study sought to describe students’ perceptions in terms of professional image, perceived competence and preparedness, career opportunities and advancement, emotional demands and workplace safety, and personal interest and willingness to specialize. It also determined the relationship and differences in students’ perceptions when grouped according to selected demographic and academic variables. A quantitative descriptive-correlational research design was used. The respondents were 286 undergraduate nursing students from different academic levels at Taif University. Data were collected using a researcher-developed questionnaire and analyzed using descriptive statistics, correlation, t-test, ANOVA, and multiple regression analysis. Findings revealed that the respondents generally had a positive perception of mental health nursing as a career path, with an overall mean of 3.48. Among the perception domains, professional image obtained the highest mean, while emotional demands and workplace safety received the lowest rating. Previous exposure to mental health clinical settings, academic level, and overall intention were significantly related to students’ perceptions. Students with previous mental health clinical exposure had significantly more positive perceptions than those without exposure. Regression analysis further showed that professional image, perceived competence and preparedness, career opportunities, emotional demands and workplace safety, previous exposure, and academic level significantly predicted students’ intention to pursue mental health nursing, while gender was not a significant predictor. Based on the findings, the study recommends the development of a mental health nursing career enhancement program focusing on early exposure, simulation-based learning, mentorship, reflective activities, and career orientation. The study concludes that strengthening students’ confidence, clinical readiness, and awareness of career opportunities may improve their willingness to consider mental health nursing as a future specialization.

Keywords

mental health nursing, nursing students, career path, perceptions, Taif University

Downloads

References

1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Arifoğlu, B., Dağ Canatan, S., & Buldaç, M. (2025). Psychiatric nursing and mental health course on students’ beliefs and attitudes towards mental illness. Cyprus Journal of Medical Sciences, 10(3), 212–217. https://doi.org/10.4274/cjms.2025.2024-94 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Capili, B. (2021). Cross-sectional studies. American Journal of Nursing, 121(10), 59–62. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NAJ.0000794280.73744.fe [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Cash, P., Isaksson, O., Maier, A., & Summers, J. D. (2022). Sampling in design research: Eight key considerations. Design Studies, 78, Article 101077. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2021.101077 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Dannels, S. A. (2023). Research design and methods: An applied guide for the scholar-practitioner. SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Kang, H. (2021). Sample size determination and power analysis using the G*Power software. Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions, 18, Article 17. https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2021.18.17 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Karimi Mirzanezam, A., Ghahramanian, A., Ghafourifard, M., Davoodi, A., Bagheriyeh, F., & Hajieskandar, A. (2024). Nursing students’ perception of the clinical learning environment and its impact on academic adjustment: A cross-sectional descriptive study. BMC Medical Education, 24, Article 1543. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-06562-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Mahsoon, A., Alnakli, M., Azab, S., Abed, M., Aabduqader, A., Sharif, L., & Sharif, K. (2024). Nursing students’ attitudes toward working in mental health facilities in Saudi Arabia: A cross-sectional study. Healthcare, 12(12), Article 1168. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12121168 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2021). Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice (11th ed.). Wolters Kluwer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Sanga, S. S., Tarimo, E. A. M., & Ambikile, J. S. (2023). Factors influencing career preference in mental health among nursing students and intern nurses in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. PLOS Global Public Health, 3(7), Article e0002108. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0002108 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Serdar, C. C., Cihan, M., Yücel, D., & Serdar, M. A. (2021). Sample size, power and effect size revisited: Simplified and practical approaches in pre-clinical, clinical and laboratory studies. Biochemia Medica, 31(1), Article 010502. https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2021.010502 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Shen, L., Zhang, X., Chen, J., Ye, X., Wang, Y., & Hu, R. (2023). Exploring the experience of undergraduate nursing students following placement at psychiatric units in China: A phenomenological study. Nurse Education in Practice, 70, Article 103672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2023.103672 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Simonelli-Muñoz, A. J., Jiménez-Rodríguez, D., Arrogante, O., Plaza del Pino, F. J., & Gallego-Gómez, J. I. (2023). Breaking the stigma in mental health nursing through high-fidelity simulation training. Nursing Reports, 13(4), 1593–1606. https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep13040132 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Slater, P., Hasson, F., & McIlfatrick, S. (2024). Quantitative research designs, hierarchy of evidence and validity. Journal of Research in Nursing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Turan, Z., Öner, Ö., & Atasoy, I. (2021). Male and female nursing students’ opinions about gender and nursing as a career in Turkey: A qualitative study. Nurse Education in Practice, 53, Article 103078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2021.103078 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. World Health Organization. (2020). State of the world’s nursing 2020: Investing in education, jobs and leadership. World Health Organization. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. World Health Organization. (2022). World mental health report: Transforming mental health for all. World Health Organization. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles