Understanding Stress, Coping Strategies and Work Engagement among Faculty Administrators in a Philippine State University

Authors

Agnes Julie P. Beltran

Cebu Technological University, Cebu City, Cebu, Philippines (Philippines)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100600352

Subject Category: Guidance and Counseling

Volume/Issue: 10/6 | Page No: 5064-5073

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-06-07

Accepted: 2026-06-12

Published: 2026-06-24

Abstract

This study explored the levels of occupational stress, work engagement, and coping strategies among faculty administrators and examined the relationships among these variables during Academic Year 2023–2024. Guided by the Job Demands–Resources (JD–R) framework and related perspectives on engagement and coping, the research employed a quantitative descriptive–correlational design in a Philippine State University. The respondents included 85 faculty administrators selected through total enumeration sampling. Data were gathered using validated standardized questionnaires that measured occupational stress, work engagement and coping strategies. The data were analyzed using frequency count, percentage, weighted mean, standard deviation and Pearson Product Moment Correlation Coefficient (PPMC). Findings showed that faculty administrators experienced a moderate level of occupational stress, particularly related to workload demands and role expectations. Despite these pressures, respondents still demonstrated high levels of work engagement and frequently relied on adaptive coping strategies such as religious practices, active problem-solving, and seeking emotional support. Statistical results indicated no significant relationship between occupational stress and work engagement and between occupational stress and coping strategies. However, work engagement showed a weak but significant positive relationship with coping strategies. The study recommends implementing a Comprehensive Counseling and Wellness Development Plan to further strengthen coping resources and support the well-being of faculty administrators.

Keywords

Coping Strategies, Guidance and Counseling; Occupational Stress, Work Engagement

Downloads

References

1. Alipio, M. (2021). Education during COVID-19 era: Are learners in a less-economically developed country ready for e-learning? International Journal of Educational Research and Innovation, 15, 110–123. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2023). Job demands–resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 28(3), 273–285. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Cheng, C., Lau, H., & Chan, M. (2022). Coping strategies and psychological well-being among educators. Teaching and Teacher Education, 108, 103512. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Collie, R. J. (2021). Teacher well-being and work engagement: Job demands and resources. Educational Psychology Review, 33(2), 1–26. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Corrales, N., & Lanuza-Quimson, M. (2020). Stress and coping strategies of school administrators in Region I. Philippine Social Science Journal, 3(1), 12–20. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Dewe, P., O’Driscoll, M., & Cooper, C. (2020). Coping with work stress: A review and critique. Wiley-Blackwell. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Elomaa, M., Eskelinen, M., & Virtanen, T. (2023). Coping strategies of school principals in demanding leadership roles. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 51(2), 304–321. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Folkman, S., & Moskowitz, J. T. (2020). Stress, coping, and meaning in life. Journal of Positive Psychology, 15(3), 1–12. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. García-González, M., Torrano, F., & García-González, G. (2022). Analysis of stress factors among university faculty members. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(9), 1–13. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Gmelch, W., & Burns, J. (2021). The complexity of academic leadership. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 49(2), 145–160. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Hakanen, J., Bakker, A., & Schaufeli, W. (2020). Burnout and work engagement among teachers. Journal of School Psychology, 78, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Hart, P., & Thompson, N. (2020). Workplace coping strategies and employee resilience. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 25(3), 207–219. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Holmström, A., Tuominen, H., Laasanen, M., & Veermans, M. (2023). Teachers’ work engagement and burnout profiles: Associations with sense of efficacy and interprofessional collaboration in school. Teaching and Teacher Education, 132, 104251. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Larson, R. (2021). Stress and coping strategies among elementary school teachers. Educational Psychology, 41(3), 367–382. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Li, Z., Li, Y., Wang, J., & Li, S. (2025). The mediating role of coping strategies on job satisfaction and burnout. Frontiers in Public Health, 13, 1692851. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Ma, X., Li, Y., & Zhao, L. (2020). Coping strategies and job satisfaction among teachers. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 569–578. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Oducado, R. M., & Estoque, H. (2022). Work stress and role overload among Filipino educators. International Journal of Educational Research, 111, 101896. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Oducado, R. M., et al. (2021). Occupational stress among educators in Philippine higher education. Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 11(2), 200–214. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Potane, J. (2024). Influence of Self-Efficacy, Teachers' Stress, and Demographics on the Teachers' Work Commitment and Intention to Stay. Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 2(8), 496–511. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Pressley, T. (2021). Factors contributing to teacher burnout during COVID-19. Educational Researcher, 50(5), 325–327. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Rafique, M. (2023). Supervisor role overload and emotional exhaustion as antecedents of supervisor incivility: The role of time consciousness. Journal of Management & Organization, 29(3), 481–503. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Republic of the Philippines. (2004). Republic Act No. 9258: Guidance and Counseling Act of 2004. Official Gazette of the Republic of the Philippines. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Republic of the Philippines. (2018). Republic Act No. 11036: Philippine Mental Health Act. Official Gazette of the Republic of the Philippines. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Ross, A., Scanes, E., & Locke, W. (2023). Stress adaptation and resilience of academics in higher education. Asia Pacific Education Review, 24, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Schaufeli, W. B. (2021). Work engagement: What do we know and where do we go? Romanian Journal of Applied Psychology, 23(1), 3–10. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two-sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(1), 71–92. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Winefield, A., Boyd, C., & Winefield, H. (2021). Work stress in university staff. Higher Education Research & Development, 40(1), 1–14. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles