“Digital Evidence Integrity Verification Using AI + Blockchain”

The credibility of digital evidence is a cornerstone of modern cybercrime investigations, digital forensics, and judicial processes. However, adversarial tampering, deepfake manipulation, and insider threats have raised significant concerns regarding the authenticity and admissibility of such evidence. Conventional integrity-preservation methods—such as hashing, encryption, and secure storage—struggle to meet the demands of scalability, transparency, and resilience in today’s forensic environments. Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) and blockchain offer promising avenues for overcoming these limitations. AI techniques contribute to content-level verification by detecting anomalies, forgeries, and manipulations in digital artefacts, while blockchain ensures tamper-proof chain-of-custody management through decentralization, immutability, and auditability. This review synthesizes the state of the art in digital evidence integrity verification through the combined application of AI and blockchain. We examine existing frameworks, datasets, algorithms, and deployment models, while critically analyzing their strengths and limitations. Furthermore, we identify gaps in scalability, explainability, and legal admissibility, proposing future directions such as federated learning, explainable AI, zero-knowledge proofs, and quantum-resistant blockchains. By consolidating research across computer science, law, and digital forensics, this review highlights the potential of AI–blockchain synergy to establish robust, scalable, and trustworthy evidence verification frameworks for real-world forensic and judicial systems.

Digital Forensics, Evidence Integrity, Blockchain

1. Casey, E. Digital Evidence and Computer Crime. Academic Press, 2019. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Roussev, V. “Digital Forensics: Emerging Trends and Future Outlook,” Digital Investigation, vol. 29, pp. 1–9, 2019. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), “Guide to Integrating Forensic Techniques into Incident Response,” NIST SP 800-86, 2020. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Garfinkel, S. “Digital forensics research: The next 10 years,” Digital Investigation, vol. 7, pp. S64–S73, 2010. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Verdoliva, L. “Media Forensics and DeepFakes: An Overview,” IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 910–932, 2020. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bayar, B., & Stamm, M. “A Deep Learning Approach to Universal Image Manipulation Detection Using a New Convolutional Layer,” ACM Workshop on Information Hiding and Multimedia Security, 2016. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Rossler, A., et al. “FaceForensics++: Learning to Detect Manipulated Facial Images,” ICCV, 2019. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Tuor, A., et al. “Deep learning for unsupervised insider threat detection in structured cybersecurity data streams,” AAAI Workshops, 2017. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Yli-Huumo, J., et al. “Where Is Current Research on Blockchain Technology?—A Systematic Review,” PLoS ONE, vol. 11, no. 10, e0163477, 2016. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Androulaki, E., et al. “Hyperledger Fabric: A Distributed Operating System for Permissioned Blockchains,” EuroSys, 2018. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Casino, F., Dasaklis, T., & Patsakis, C. “A systematic literature review of blockchain-based applications: Current status, classification and open issues,” Telematics and Informatics, vol. 36, pp. 55–81, 2019. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Liang, X., et al. “Integrating blockchain for data sharing and collaboration in mobile healthcare applications,” IEEE Access, vol. 6, pp. 2829–2839, 2018. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Mirsky, Y., et al. “DeepFake detection using temporal cues,” IEEE Security & Privacy Workshops, 2020. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Croman, K., et al. “On scaling decentralized blockchains,” International Conference on Financial Cryptography and Data Security, pp. 106–125, 2016. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Biggio, B., & Roli, F. “Wild Patterns: Ten Years After the Rise of Adversarial Machine Learning,” Pattern Recognition, vol. 84, pp. 317–331, 2018. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Almashaqbeh, G., et al. “Blockchain-Based Trust Systems: A Comprehensive Survey,” ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 1–40, 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Casey, E. Digital Evidence and Computer Crime. Academic Press, 2019. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Kent, K., Chevalier, S., Grance, T., & Dang, H. “Guide to Computer Security Log Management,” NIST Special Publication 800-92, 2006. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Liu, H., et al. “Log Integrity Verification for Cloud Forensics,” Future Generation Computer Systems, vol. 119, pp. 44–55, 2021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Carvey, H. Windows Forensic Analysis Toolkit. Elsevier, 2014. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Dolan-Gavitt, B., et al. “Virtuoso: Narrowing the semantic gap in virtual machine introspection,” IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, 2011. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Verdoliva, L. “Media Forensics and DeepFakes: An Overview,” IEEE JSTSP, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 910–932, 2020. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Bayar, B., & Stamm, M. “Constrained Convolutional Neural Networks for Image Manipulation Detection,” IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, vol. 13, no. 11, pp. 2691–2706, 2018. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Quick, D., & Choo, K.-K. “Digital Droplets: Microsoft SkyDrive Forensic Data Remnants,” Future Generation Computer Systems, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 1378–1394, 2013. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Zawoad, S., & Hasan, R. “Cloud Forensics: A Meta-Study of Challenges, Approaches, and Open Problems,” IEEE Security & Privacy, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 38–45, 2016. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Oriwoh, E., et al. “Internet of Things Forensics: Challenges and Approaches,” IEEE International Conference on Collaborative Computing, 2013. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Carrier, B., & Spafford, E. “Getting Physical with the Digital Investigation Process,” International Journal of Digital Evidence, vol. 2, no. 2, 2003. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Rogers, M. “Anti-Forensics,” in Advances in Digital Forensics II, Springer, 2006. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Mirsky, Y., et al. “DeepFake Detection Using Temporal Cues,” IEEE S&P Workshops, 2020. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Garfinkel, S. “Digital forensics research: The next 10 years,” Digital Investigation, vol. 7, pp. S64–S73, 2010. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. SWGDE. “Best Practices for Maintaining the Chain of Custody of Digital Evidence,” Scientific Working Group on Digital Evidence, 2018. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Kessler, G. “Judicial and Legal Aspects of Digital Evidence,” Handbook of Digital Forensics and Investigation, Academic Press, 2010. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Almashaqbeh, G., et al. “Blockchain-Based Trust Systems: A Comprehensive Survey,” ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 1–40, 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Androulaki, E., et al. “Hyperledger Fabric: A Distributed Operating System for Permissioned Blockchains,” EuroSys, 2018. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. McMillan, J., et al. “Challenges in Digital Evidence Admissibility: Insights from the UK,” Digital Investigation, vol. 38, 301308, 2021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Croman, K., et al. “On Scaling Decentralized Blockchains,” Financial Cryptography and Data Security, Springer, pp. 106–125, 2016. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Quick, D., & Choo, K.-K. “Big Digital Forensic Data: Volume, Variety and Velocity in Cloud Forensics,” Future Generation Computer Systems, vol. 78, pp. 299–310, 2018. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Nakamoto, S. “Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System,” 2008. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Yli-Huumo, J., et al. “Where Is Current Research on Blockchain Technology?—A Systematic Review,” PLoS ONE, vol. 11, no. 10, e0163477, 2016. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Crosby, M., et al. “Blockchain Technology: Beyond Bitcoin,” Applied Innovation Review, vol. 2, pp. 6–19, 2016. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Zyskind, G., et al. “Decentralizing Privacy: Using Blockchain to Protect Personal Data,” IEEE Security & Privacy Workshops, 2015. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Kshetri, N. “Blockchain’s Roles in Strengthening Cybersecurity and Protecting Privacy,” Telecommunications Policy, vol. 41, no. 10, pp. 1027–1038, 2017. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Cachin, C., & Vukolić, M. “Blockchain Consensus Protocols in the Wild,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.01873, 2017. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Wood, G. “Ethereum: A Secure Decentralised Generalised Transaction Ledger,” Ethereum Yellow Paper, 2014. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Androulaki, E., et al. “Hyperledger Fabric: A Distributed Operating System for Permissioned Blockchains,” EuroSys, 2018. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Al-Bassam, M. “Blockchain-Based Decentralized Cloud Computing,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.06146, 2018. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Benet, J. “IPFS – Content Addressed, Versioned, P2P File System,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1407.3561, 2014. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Merkle, R. “Protocols for Public Key Cryptosystems,” IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, 1980. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Wüst, K., & Gervais, A. “Do You Need a Blockchain?” Crypto Valley Conference on Blockchain Technology, 2018. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Liang, X., et al. “Integrating Blockchain for Data Sharing and Collaboration in Mobile Healthcare Applications,” IEEE Access, vol. 6, pp. 2829–2839, 2018. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Casino, F., Dasaklis, T., & Patsakis, C. “A Systematic Literature Review of Blockchain-Based Applications: Current Status, Classification and Open Issues,” Telematics and Informatics, vol. 36, pp. 55–81, 2019. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Zhaofeng, M., et al. “Blockchain-Based Forensic Framework for IoT,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 4671–4682, 2019. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. European Union. “General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR),” 2016. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. Croman, K., et al. “On Scaling Decentralized Blockchains,” Financial Cryptography and Data Security, Springer, pp. 106–125, 2016. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. Finck, M. “Blockchain and the General Data Protection Regulation,” European Parliamentary Research Service, 2019. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. Almashaqbeh, G., et al. “Blockchain-Based Trust Systems: A Comprehensive Survey,” ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 1–40, 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

57. Gatteschi, V., et al. “Blockchain and Smart Contracts for Insurance: Is the Technology Mature Enough?” Future Internet, vol. 10, no. 2, 2018. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• “Next-Generation Cybersecurity Through Blockchain and AI Synergy: A Paradigm Shift in Intelligent Threat Mitigation and Decentralised Security”
• Forensic Payroll Analytics for IPPIS: A Hybrid Anomaly-Detection Framework to Expose Payroll Fraud, Improve Data Governance, and Protect Employee Rights
• Factors Influencing Data Protection on Global Trade
• Development Of Artificial Intelligence-Based Model for Forensic Analysis of Cross-Platform Deepfakes
• Cyber Threats and Nigeria’s National Security: Assessing the Role of Regional Cooperation in West Africa