Prevalence and Distribution of Tick-Borne Protozoan Infections in Cattle in the South Rift Region of Kenya

Authors

Irene Chepkoech

Department of Biological Sciences, School of Science, University of Eldoret, P.O. Box 1125-30500, Eldoret (Kenya)

Moses M. Ngeiywa

Department of Biological Sciences, School of Science, University of Eldoret, P.O. Box 1125-30500, Eldoret (Kenya)

Paul M. Wanjala

Department of Biological Sciences, School of Pure and Applied Sciences, Maasai Mara University, P.O. Box 861-20500, Narok; Adjunct Research Scientist (ARS), African Institute of Capacity Development (AICAD), Juja, P.O. Box 46179-00100, Nairobi (Kenya)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS.2026.11060102

Subject Category: Parasitology - Health Sciences

Volume/Issue: 11/6 | Page No: 1256-1270

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-05-31

Accepted: 2026-06-05

Published: 2026-06-26

Abstract

Background: Tick-borne diseases (TBDs) remain a major constraint to cattle production globally, particularly in tropical and subtropical regions where environmental conditions favor tick survival and proliferation. In sub-Saharan Africa, tick-borne protozoan infections such as babesiosis and theileriosis are among the leading causes of cattle morbidity, mortality, reduced productivity, and significant economic losses. In Kenya, despite long-term control efforts including acaricide use, vaccination, and veterinary extension services, TBDs continue to undermine livestock productivity, especially among smallholder dairy farmers. The South Rift region, covering Kericho and Bomet Counties, has experienced rapid expansion of dairy farming alongside increased use of exotic and crossbred cattle, which are highly susceptible to tick-borne infections.
Objective: This study assessed the prevalence, spatial distribution, and risk factors of major tick-borne protozoan infections in cattle in selected sub-counties of Kenya’s South Rift region.
Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 196 cattle from 100 farms in Kipkelion West, Bureti, and Bomet Central sub-counties. Blood samples were analyzed using Giemsa-stained thin blood smears and ELISA for microscopic and serological detection of infections, respectively. Tick vectors were collected and identified morphologically. Data on herd management and tick control practices were obtained through structured questionnaires administered to livestock owners. Analysis was performed using descriptive statistics and Chi-square tests at a 95% confidence level.
Results: Microscopy revealed an overall prevalence of 29.6%, while ELISA detected a higher seroprevalence of 66.8%. Babesiosis was the most prevalent infection, followed by theileriosis. Significant spatial variation was observed across study sites (p < 0.05), with Bureti recording the highest prevalence. Adult cattle showed higher infection rates than calves, although the association was not statistically significant (p>0.05). Infections persisted despite widespread acaricide use, indicating ongoing transmission.
Conclusion: Tick-borne protozoan infections remain endemic in Kenya’s South Rift and continue to negatively impact cattle productivity. Strengthened integrated control strategies involving effective tick management, vaccination, surveillance, farmer education, and acaricide resistance monitoring are urgently required.

Keywords

Tick-borne diseases, Cattle, Epidemiology, South Rift Kenya

Downloads

References

1. McCosker PJ. The global importance of babesiosis. In: Ristic M, editor. Babesiosis of domestic animals and man. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 1988. p. 1–24. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Norval RAI, Perry BD, Young AS. The epidemiology of theileriosis in Africa. London: Academic Press; 1992. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Perry BD, Young AS. The past and future roles of epidemiology and economics in the control of tick-borne diseases of livestock in Africa: the case of theileriosis. Prev Vet Med. 1995;25(2):107–20. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Gachohi J, Skilton R, Hansen F, Ngumi P, Kitala P. Epidemiology of East Coast fever (Theileria parva infection) in Kenya: past, present and the future. Parasit Vectors. 2012; 5:194. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Jongejan F, Uilenberg G. The global importance of ticks. Parasitology. 2004;129(Suppl):S3–14. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. de la Fuente J, Estrada-Peña A, Venzal JM, Kocan KM, Sonenshine DE. Overview: ticks as vectors of pathogens that cause disease in humans and animals. Front Biosci. 2008; 13:6938–46. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Radostits OM, Gay CC, Hinchcliff KW, Constable PD. Veterinary medicine: a textbook of the diseases of cattle, horses, sheep, pigs and goats. 10th ed. Edinburgh: Saunders Elsevier; 2007. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Soulsby EJL. Helminths, arthropods and protozoa of domesticated animals. 7th ed. London: Baillière Tindall; 1982. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Katende JM, Morzaria SP, Toye PG, Skilton RA, Nene V, Nkonge C, et al. An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for detection of Theileria parva antibodies using a recombinant polymorphic immunodominant molecule antigen. Parasitol Res. 1998; 84:408–16. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Nielsen K, Smith P, Gall D, Perez B, Cosma C, Mueller P, et al. Development and validation of indirect ELISA methods for serological diagnosis of bovine infectious diseases. Prev Vet Med. 1996; 27:133–42. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Bishop R, Musoke A, Morzaria S, Gardner M, Nene V. Theileria: intracellular protozoan parasites of wild and domestic ruminants transmitted by ixodid ticks. Parasitology. 2004;129(Suppl): S271–83. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Kocan KM, de la Fuente J, Blouin EF, Coetzee JF, Ewing SA. The natural history of Anaplasma marginale. Vet Parasitol. 2010; 167:95–107. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Lawrence JA, Perry BD, Williamson SM. East Coast fever and related tick-borne diseases. In: Coetzer JAW, Tustin RC, editors. Infectious diseases of livestock. Cape Town: Oxford University Press; 2004. p. 448–67. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Walker AR, Bouattour A, Camicas JL, Estrada-Peña A, Horak IG, Latif AA, et al. Ticks of domestic animals in Africa: a guide to identification of species. Edinburgh: Bioscience Reports; 2003. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. FAO. World livestock: transforming the livestock sector through the Sustainable Development Goals. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2018. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Kenya National Bureau of Statistics. 2021 Economic Survey. Nairobi: KNBS; 2021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock, Fisheries and Cooperatives. Kenya livestock master plan. Nairobi: Government of Kenya; 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Muraguri GR. Epidemiological and financial impact of vector-borne diseases on productivity of smallholder dairy cattle in coastal Kenya. Reading: University of Reading; 2000. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Cochran WG. Sampling techniques. 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1977. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. OIE (World Organisation for Animal Health). Manual of diagnostic tests and vaccines for terrestrial animals. Paris: WOAH; 2021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Chiuya T, Villinger J, Masiga DK, Amimo JO, Njenga MJ, Kahariri S, et al. Molecular prevalence and risk factors associated with tick-borne pathogens in cattle in western Kenya. BMC Vet Res. 2021; 17:363. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Okal MN, Odhiambo BO, Otieno P, Bargul JL, Masiga DK, Villinger J. Detection of Anaplasma and Theileria pathogens in cattle at wildlife–livestock interfaces in Kenya. Microorganisms. 2020; 8:1830. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Peter SG, Aboge GO, Gakuya DW, Nthiwa DN, Bebora LC, Mbuthia PG. Molecular prevalence of Anaplasma and Ehrlichia pathogens in dairy cattle in Kenya. BMC Vet Res. 2020; 16:364. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles