Effectiveness of Muscle Energy Technique Combined with Neuromuscular Control Training Versus Mulligan's Mobilization with Movement Combined with Core Stabilization on Pain, Lumbopelvic Stability, And Functional Disability in Patients with Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction

Background: Sacroiliac joint dysfunction (SIJD) is a prevalent musculoskeletal disorder that contributes significantly to low back pain, lumbopelvic instability, and functional disability. Despite growing therapeutic options, comparative evidence regarding multimodal physiotherapy interventions remains limited.
Objective: To compare the effectiveness of Muscle Energy Technique (MET) combined with Neuromuscular Control Training (NMCT) versus Mulligan's Mobilization with Movement (MWM) combined with Core Stabilization (CS) on pain intensity, lumbopelvic stability, and functional disability in patients with SIJD.
Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted on 60 patients diagnosed with SIJD (age 25–55 years). Participants were randomly assigned to Group A (MET + NMCT, n = 30) or Group B (MWM + CS, n = 30). Both groups received 12 treatment sessions over 4 weeks. Outcome measures included the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), Active Straight Leg Raise test (ASLR) for lumbopelvic stability, and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) for functional disability. Assessments were performed at baseline, 2 weeks, and 4 weeks.
Results: Both groups demonstrated statistically significant improvements in all outcome measures from baseline to 4 weeks (p < 0.001). Group A (MET + NMCT) showed superior improvements in NPRS (mean reduction: 3.8 ± 0.9 vs. 2.9 ± 1.1, p = 0.002), ASLR scores (mean improvement: 1.6 ± 0.5 vs. 1.2 ± 0.6, p = 0.014), and ODI scores (mean reduction: 22.4% ± 5.1 vs. 17.6% ± 6.3, p = 0.003) compared to Group B. Between-group differences were statistically significant for all outcomes.
Conclusion: Both MET combined with NMCT and MWM combined with CS are effective in managing SIJD. However, the MET + NMCT combination demonstrated greater efficacy in reducing pain, improving lumbopelvic stability, and decreasing functional disability. These findings support the integration of MET and neuromuscular retraining as a preferred multimodal approach in clinical practice.

Sacroiliac joint dysfunction, Muscle Energy Technique, Mobilization with Movement, Neuromuscular Control, Core Stabilization, Lumbopelvic stability

1. Sembrano JN, Polly DW. How often is low back pain not coming from the back? Spine. 2009;34(1):E27–E32. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Vleeming A, Schuenke MD, Masi AT, et al. The sacroiliac joint: an overview of its anatomy, function and potential clinical implications. J Anat. 2012;221(6):537–567. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Laslett M, Aprill CN, McDonald B, Young SB. Diagnosis of sacroiliac joint pain: validity of individual provocation tests and composites of tests. Man Ther. 2005;10(3):207–218. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. van der Wurff P, Hagmeijer RHM, Meyne W. Clinical tests of the sacroiliac joint: a systematic methodological review. Part 1: reliability. Man Ther. 2000;5(1):30–36. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Wilson E, Payton O, Donegan-Shoaf L, Dec K. Muscle energy technique in patients with acute low back pain: a pilot clinical trial. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2003;33(9):502–512. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Vicenzino B, Paungmali A, Buratowski S, Wright A. Specific manipulative therapy treatment for chronic lateral epicondylalgia produces uniquely characteristic hypoalgesia. Man Ther. 2001;6(4):205–212. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Fryer G. Muscle energy technique: An evidence-informed approach. Int J Osteopath Med. 2011;14(1):3–9. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Kamali F, Zamanlou M, Ghanbari A, et al. Comparison of manipulation and stabilization exercises in patients with sacroiliac joint dysfunction. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2019;23(1):177–182. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Hungerford B, Gilleard W, Lee D. Altered patterns of pelvic bone motion determined in subjects with posterior pelvic pain using skin markers. Clin Biomech. 2004;19(5):456–464. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Mulligan BR. Manual Therapy 'NAGs', 'SNAGs', 'MWMs' etc. 6th ed. Wellington: Plane View Services Ltd; 2010. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Konstantinou K, Foster N, Rushton A, Baxter D. The use and reported effects of mobilization with movement techniques in low back pain management; a cross-sectional descriptive survey of physiotherapists in Britain. Man Ther. 2002;7(4):206–214. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Richardson CA, Snijders CJ, Hides JA, et al. The relation between the transversus abdominis muscles, sacroiliac joint mechanics, and low back pain. Spine. 2002;27(4):399–405. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Mens JMA, Vleeming A, Snijders CJ, et al. The active straight leg raising test and mobility of the pelvic joints. Eur Spine J. 1999;8(6):468–473. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Pool-Goudzwaard A, Hoek van Dijke G, van Gurp M, et al. Contribution of pelvic floor muscles to stiffness of the pelvic ring. Clin Biomech. 2004;19(6):564–571. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Lee D, Lee L-J. Integrated, multimodal approach to the treatment of lumbopelvic/hip disorders. In: Magee D, ed. Pathology and Intervention in Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation. 2nd ed. Elsevier; 2016. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Slipman CW, Whyte WS, Chow DW, et al. Sacroiliac joint syndrome. Pain Physician. 2001;4(2):143–152. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Damen L, Buyruk HM, Güler-Uysal F, et al. Pelvic pain during pregnancy is associated with asymmetric laxity of the sacroiliac joints. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2001;80(11):1019–1024. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Arab AM, Abdollahi I, Joghataei MT, et al. Inter- and intra-examiner reliability of single and composites of selected motion palpation and pain provocation tests for sacroiliac joint. Man Ther. 2009;14(2):213–221. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Hancock MJ, Maher CG, Latimer J, et al. Systematic review of tests to identify the disc, SIJ or facet joint as the source of low back pain. Eur Spine J. 2007;16(10):1539–1550. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Airaksinen O, Brox JI, Cedraschi C, et al. Chapter 4: European guidelines for the management of chronic nonspecific low back pain. Eur Spine J. 2006;15(Suppl 2):S192–S300. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Prevalence and Impact of Dietary Habits on Headache Incidence among College Students: A Survey-Based Study
• Rehabilitation of Patients With Low Back Pain in Hospitals in Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria.
• “A Comparative Study to Find the Effects of Mulligan Sustained Natural Apophyseal Glide Versus Sub-Occipital Myofascial Release Techinique for the Treatment of Cervicogenic Headache.”
• Bridging the Gap Between Evidence and Practice: A Survey-Based Review of Physical Therapy Management for Diastasis Recti with Emphasis on Transverse Abdominis (TRA) Exercise in the Postpartum Period
• Knowledge and Using of Dry Needling by Physiotherapists in Central Africa in the Management of Trigger Points : The First Cross Sectional Survey in Cameroon