Studies of Genotypic, Phenotypic and Path Coefficient Analysis for Yield and Yield Contributing Traits in Wheat (Triticum Aestivum L.)
Authors
Department of Crop Science, Abdullahi Fodio University of Science and Technology, Aliero 863104, Kebbi State (Nigeria)
Department of Crop Production Technology, Niger State College of Agriculture, PMB 109 Mokwa (Nigeria)
Department of Crop Science, Usmanu Danfodiyo University Sokoto (Nigeria)
Department of Education Foundation A. A. COE, Argungu, Kebbi State (Nigeria)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS.2026.11060241
Subject Category: Agriculture
Volume/Issue: 11/6 | Page No: 3151-3164
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-06-24
Accepted: 2026-06-29
Published: 2026-07-14
Abstract
The experiment conducted during 2022-23 and 2023-24 Rabi seasons at three locations with objective to identify the genotypic and phenotypic correlations and path analysis among yield-related traits in wheat. Line x tester mating design was used to generate forty five F1s hybrids by the cross of fifteen lines with three testers. Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with three replications was used during 2024 Rabi season at three locations. Observations were recorded on sixteen quantitative and qualitative parameters viz.; Days to 50% Heading (DH) and Days to Maturity (DM) (377.96), indicating that earlier heading leads to earlier maturity. DH also correlated highly with Grain Filling Period (GFP) (502.97), Plant Height (PH) (205.34), and Flag Leaf Area (FLA) (346.47). PH was significantly correlated with yield-related traits like Grain Weight per Spike (GWS) (170.02) and Grain Yield per Plant (GYP) (164.59), highlighting their importance in productivity. In phenotypic correlations, DH showed a strong negative correlation with GFP (-521.03), PH (-215.10), and GYP (-191.67), suggesting that later heading plants have longer grain filling periods and lower yield. GFP had the most significant negative correlations with PH (-379.75) and GYP (-337.96). Pearson correlation analysis found that GWS had strong positive correlations with 1000-Grain Weight (TGW) (0.761) and Biological Yield (BY) (0.6895). Path coefficient analysis revealed Plant Height (PH) as the most influential trait (0.804 total contribution), followed by Number of Grains per Spike (0.712) and 1000-Grain Weight (0.658). Thus, study identified traits that correlated directly or indirectly to grain yield in wheat.
Keywords
Trait, Phenotype, Genotype, Path Analysis, Wheat and Yield
Downloads
References
1. El-Hady A, Ramadan R. Genetic analysis for yield and its components in bread wheat. Journal of Agricultural Chemistry and Biotechnology. 2018;9(4):111–121. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Zheng Y, Cai Z, Wang Z, Maruza TM, Zhang G. The genetics and breeding of heat stress tolerance in wheat: Advances and prospects. Plants. 2025;14(2):148. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Tomar V, Dhillon GS, Singh D, Singh RP, Poland J, Chaudhary AA, Bhati PK, Joshi AK, Kumar U. Evaluations of genomic prediction and identification of new loci for resistance to stripe rust disease in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Frontiers in Genetics. 2021;12:710485. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Bajaniya N, Pansuriya A, Vekaria M, Singh C, Savaliya J. Combining ability analysis for grain yield and its components in durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.). Indian Journal of Pure and Applied Biosciences. 2019;7(4):217–224. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Kumar A, Chhaya R, Singh VP, Singh L. Exploitation of heterosis for grain yield and quality traits in wheat. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry. 2020;9(2):1465–1468. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Abbai R. Genetic Cornerstones of Grain Yield Determination in Spike-Branching Wheat (Triticum turgidum L.). Doctoral dissertation. Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale); 2024. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Dhiwar K, Sharma DJ, Agrawal AP, Pandey D. Stability analysis in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry. 2020;9(5):295–298. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Al Aboud NM, Safhi FA, Schierenbeck M, Alqudah AM, Jabbour AA, Thabet SG. Genetic associations and functional validation of the potential candidate genes that enhance macronutrient accumulation in barley grains. Cereal Research Communications. 2025;1–13. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Barot HG, Patel MS, Sheikh WA, Patel LP, Allam CR. Heterosis and combining ability analysis for yield and its component traits in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding. 2014;5(3):350–359. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Brunner S, Weichert H, Meissle M, Romeis J, Weber H. Field trials reveal trade-offs between grain size and grain number in wheat ectopically expressing a barley sucrose transporter. Field Crops Research. 2024;316:109506. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Chaturvedi T, Gupta AK, Shanker K, Dubey BK, Tiwari G. Maximizing genetic gain through unlocking genetic variation in different ecotypes of kalmegh (Andrographis paniculata). Frontiers in Plant Science. 2022;13:1042222. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Esposito S, Taranto F, Vitale P, Ficco DB, Colecchia SA, Stevanato P, De Vita P. Unlocking the molecular basis of wheat straw composition and morphological traits through multi-locus GWAS. BMC Plant Biology. 2022;22(1):519. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Gaur A, Jindal Y, Singh V, Tiwari R, Juliana P, Kaushik D, Kumar KY, Ahlawat OP, Singh G, Sheoran S. GWAS elucidated grain yield genetics in Indian spring wheat under diverse water conditions. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 2024;137(8):177. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Dewey DR, Lu KH. A correlation and path-coefficient analysis of components of crested wheatgrass seed production. Agronomy Journal. 1959;51(9):515–518. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Thabet SG, Safhi FA, Börner A, Alqudah AM. Genetic insights into intergenerational stress memory and salt tolerance mediated by antioxidant responses in wheat. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition. 2025;25(1):843–857. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Singh C, Yadav S, Khare V, Gupta V, Kamble UR, Gupta OP, Kumar R, Saini P, Bairwa RK, Khobra R, Sheoran S. Unraveling the secrets of early-maturity and short-duration bread wheat in unpredictable environments. Plants. 2024;13(20):2855. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Singh V, Poonia MS, Verma A, Tyagi BS. Multivariate biplot analysis for the diversity in bread wheat genotypes (Triticum aestivum L.). International Journal of Bio-resource and Stress Management. 2022;13(3):219–225. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Government of India. Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare. 2023. https://agricoop.nic.in/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Federal Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development of Nigeria. Federal Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development. 2023. https://fmard.gov.ng/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Food and Agriculture Organization. Food and Agriculture Organization Statistical Database (FAOSTAT) Yearbook. 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Searle SR. Phenotypic, genetic and environmental correlations. Biometrics. 1961;17(3):474–480. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Shabannejad M, Bihamta MR, Majidi-Hervan E, Alipour H, Ebrahimi A. A classic approach for determining genomic prediction accuracy under terminal drought stress and well-watered conditions in wheat landraces and cultivars. PLoS One. 2021;16(3):e0247824. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Redhu M, Singh V, Kumari A, Munjal R, Yashveer S, Nimbal S, Niwas R, Verma S, Sharma K, Loyal A, Chawla R. Unlocking genetic insights: Evaluating wheat RILs for physiobiochemical traits under terminal heat stress conditions. BMC Plant Biology. 2024;24(1):429. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Gudi S, Halladakeri P, Singh G, Kumar P, Singh S, Alwutayd KM, Abd El-Moneim D, Sharma A. Deciphering the genetic landscape of seedling drought stress tolerance in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) through genome-wide association studies. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2024;15:1351075. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Haddad L, Bachir A, Benmahammed A, Bouzerzour H. Durum wheat (Triticum turgidum ssp. durum) improvement during the past 67 years in Algeria: Performance assessment of a set of local varieties under rainfed conditions of the eastern high plateaus. Jordan Journal of Biological Sciences. 2021;14(2). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Hussain M, Gul M, Kamal R, Iqbal MA, Zulfiqar S, Abbas A, Röder MS, Muqaddasi QH. Prospects of developing novel genetic resources by chemical and physical mutagenesis to enlarge the genetic window in bread wheat varieties. Agriculture. 2021;11(7):621. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Krishnappa G, Rathan ND, Sehgal D, Ahlawat AK, Singh SK, Singh SK, Shukla RB, Jaiswal JP, Solanki IS, Singh GP, Singh AM. Identification of novel genomic regions for biofortification traits using an SNP marker-enriched linkage map in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Frontiers in Nutrition. 2021;8:669444. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Kumar N, Nayak JK, Pal N, Tyagi S, Yadav RR, Joshi P, Malik R, Dhaka NS, Singh VK, Kumar S. Development and characterization of an EMS-mutagenized population of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) for agronomic trait variation and increased micronutrient content. Cereal Research Communications. 2025;53(1):469–481. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Kumar S, Jacob SR, Mir RR, Vikas VK, Kulwal P, Chandra T, Kaur S, Kumar U, Kumar S, Sharma S, Singh R. Indian wheat genomics initiative for harnessing the potential of wheat germplasm resources for breeding disease-resistant, nutrient-dense, and climate-resilient cultivars. Frontiers in Genetics. 2022;13:834366. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Lozada DN, Carter AH, Mason RE. Unlocking the yield potential of wheat: Influence of major growth habit and adaptation genes. Crop Breeding, Genetics and Genomics. 2021;3(2). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Mokhtari N, Majidi MM, Mirlohi A. Potentials of synthetic hexaploid wheats to improve drought tolerance. Scientific Reports. 2022;12(1):20482. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Mourad AM, Sallam A, Farghaly KA, Börner A. Detailed genetic analyses highlight genetic variation and genomic regions for lead tolerance in spring wheat. Frontiers in Agronomy. 2025;7:1428366. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. Bekaddour H, Benkherbache N, Yahiaoui S, Djenadi C, Benbelkacem A, Hebbache H, Akkouche A. Multivariate analysis of agro-morphological and quality traits of a durum wheat collection under rainfed Algerian conditions. Journal of Central European Agriculture. 2024;25(2):362–374. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Breeding for a Greener Future: Selective Breeding and Crossbreeding Approaches to Minimize Methane Emissions in Ruminant Livestock
- Determinants of Adoption of Post-Harvest Losses Prevention Techniques among Banana/Plantain Marketers in Lagos State, Nigeria
- Enhancing Rice Yield Prediction Using UAV-Based Multispectral Imaging and Machine Learning Algorithms
- Seed-Borne Fungi of Groundnuts (Arachis Hypogaea) and Their Management with Ginger (Zingiber Officinale) Extract In Makurdi, Nigeria
- The Influence of Landforms and Slope on Agricultural Cropping Patterns in Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar District