Continuous-Flow Synthesis of 4-(2-Nitrophenyl) Morpholine Coiled Tube Microreactor
Authors
Department of Chemistry, KES’s Pratap College Amalner (M.S.), (India)
Department of Chemistry, JET’s Z. B. Patil College, Deopur, Dhule (M.S.), (India)
Institute of Chemical Technology, Matunga, Mumbai (M.S.), (India)
Department of Chemistry, KES’s Pratap College Amalner (M.S.), (India)
Department of Chemistry, KES’s Pratap College Amalner (M.S.), (India)
Department of Chemistry, KES’s Pratap College Amalner (M.S.), (India)
Department of Chemistry, KES’s Pratap College Amalner (M.S.), (India)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS.2026.11060245
Subject Category: Chemistry
Volume/Issue: 11/6 | Page No: 3203-3211
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-06-29
Accepted: 2026-07-04
Published: 2026-07-15
Abstract
The continuous-flow synthesis of 4-(2-nitrophenyl) morpholine was investigated using a coiled tube microreactor to evaluate the influence of reaction temperature and residence time on product yield and purity. Solutions of 2-fluoronitrobenzene and morpholine in the presence of potassium carbonate were continuously pumped through a 100 mL flow reactor equipped with a back-pressure regulator. Reaction temperatures between 140 and 170 °C and residence times from 20 to 50 min were systematically examined. Increasing the reaction temperature from 140 to 160 °C significantly improved the isolated yield from 69.9% to 94.6%, while a further increase to 170 °C resulted in a slight decline in yield to 93.2%. Similarly, increasing the residence time from 20 to 50 min enhanced the product yield from 72.2% to 95.5%, with only marginal improvement beyond 40 min. The optimized reaction conditions were established at 160 °C with a residence time of 40–50 min, affording the desired product in up to 95.5% isolated yield and 99% purity. Structural confirmation was achieved using 1H NMR, 13C NMR, and mass spectrometry. The study demonstrates that continuous-flow processing provides excellent temperature control, enhanced mass transfer, high product quality, and an efficient, scalable alternative to conventional batch synthesis for aromatic nucleophilic substitution reactions.
Keywords
Continuous-flow chemistry; Microreactor technology; Nucleophilic aromatic substitution (SNAr); Process optimization; 4-(2-Nitrophenyl) morpholine
Downloads
References
1. 1 (a) Darvas, F.; Hessel, V.; Dorman, G. Flow Chemistry; De Gruyter: Berlin, 2014. (b) Jensen, K. F.; Reizman, B. J.; Newman, S. G. Lab Chip 2014, 14, 3206. (c) Reschetilowski, W. Microreactors in Preparative Chemistry; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2013. (d) Wirth, T. Microreactors in Organic Synthesis and Catalysis, 2nd ed.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2013. (e) Wiles, C.; Watts, P. Green Chem. 2012, 14, 38. (f) Wegner, J.; Ceylan, S.; Kirschning, A. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 4583. (g) Hartman, R. L.; McMullen, J. P.; Jensen, K. F. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 7502. (h) Wiles, C.; Watts, P. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 6512. (i) Hessel, V. Chem. Eng. Technol. 2009, 32, 1655. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. 2 For a comprehensive review on the synthesis of natural products in flow, see: Pastre, J. C.; Browne, D. L.; Ley, S. V. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 8849. For a recent example, see: Newton, S.; Carter, C. F.; Pearson, C. M.; de C Alves, L.; Lange, H.; Thansandote, P.; Ley, S. V. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 4915. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. 3 For a discussion on continuous manufacturing in pharmaceutical industry, see (a) Malet-Sanz, L.; Susanne, F. J. Med. Chem. 2012, 55, 4062. (b) Poechlauer, P.; Colberg, J.; Fisher, E.; Jansen, M.; Johnson, M. D.; Koenig, S. G.; Lawler, M.; Laporte, T.; Manley, J.; Martin, B.; O'Kearney-McMullan, A. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2013, 17, 1472. (c) Jimenez-Gonzalez, C.; Poechlauer, P.; Broxterman, Q. B.; Yang, B.- S.; am Ende, D.; Baird, J.; Bertsch, C.; Hannah, R. E.; Dell’Orco, P.; Noorman, H.; Yee, S.; Reintjens, R.; Wells, A.; Massonneau, V.; Manley, J. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2011, 15, 900. (d) Baxendale, I. R.; Braatz, R. D.; Hodnett, B. K.; Jensen, K. F.; Johnson, M. D.; Sharratt, P.; Sherlock, J.-P.; Florence, A. J. J. Pharm. Sci. 2015, 104, 781. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. 4 (a) Rodrigues, T.; Schneider, P.; Schneider, G. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 5750. (b) Elvira, K. S.; Solvas, X. C.; Wootton, R. C. R.; deMello, A. J. Nat. Chem. 2013, 5, 905. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. 5 (a) Plouffe, P.; Macchi, A. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2014, 18, 1286. (b) Newman, S. G.; Jensen, K. F. Green Chem. 2013, 15, 1456. Wegner, J.; Ceylan, S.; Kirschning, A. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 4583. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. 6 Baumann, M.; Garcia, A. M. R.; Baxendale, I. R. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2015, 13, 4231–4239. doi:10.1039/C5OB00245A. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. 7 Webb, D.; Jamison, T. F. Org. Lett. 2012, 14, 2465–2467. doi:10.1021/ol300722e [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. 8 Shu, W.; Pellegatti, L.; Oberli, M. A.; Buchwald, S. L. Angew. Chem. 2011, 123, 10853–10857. doi:10.1002/ange.201105223 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. 9 Noël, T.; Kuhn, S.; Musacchio, A. J.; Jensen, K. F.; Buchwald, S. L. Angew. Chem. 2011, 123, 6065–6068. doi:10.1002/ange.201101480 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. 10 Poh, J.-S.; Browne, D. L.; Ley, S. V. React. Chem. Eng. 2016, 1, 101–105. doi:10.1039/C5RE00082C [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. 11 Nagaki, A.; Kim, H.; Yoshida, J.-i. Angew. Chem. 2009, 121, 8207–8209. doi:10.1002/ange.200904316 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. 12 Tsubogo, T.; Oyamada, H.; Kobayashi, S. Nature 2015, 520, 329–332. doi:10.1038/nature14343 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. 13 Cole, K. P.; Groh, J. M.; Johnson, M. D.; Burcham, C. L.; Campbell, B. M.; Diseroad, W. D.; Heller, M. R.; Howell, J. R.; Kallman, N. J.; Koenig, T. M.; May, S. A.; Miller, R. D.; Mitchell, D.; Myers, D. P.; Myers, S. S.; Phillips, J. L.; Polster, C. S.; White, T. D.; Cashman, J.; Hurley, D.; Moylan, R.; Sheehan, P.; Spencer, R. D.; Desmond, K.; Desmond, P.; Gowran, O. Science 2017, 356, 1144–1150. doi:10.1126/science.aan0745 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. 14 Adamo, A.; Beingessner, R. L.; Behnam, M.; Chen, J.; Jamison, T. F.; Jensen, K. F.; Monbaliu, J.-C. M.; Myerson, A. S.; Revalor, E. M.; Snead, D. R.; Stelzer, T.; Weeranoppanant, N.; Wong, S. Y.; Zhang, P. Science 2016, 352, 61–67. doi:10.1126/science.aaf1337 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. 15 Kupracz, L.; Kirschning, A. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2013, 355, 3375–3380. doi:10.1002/adsc.201300614 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. 16 Hartwig, J.; Ceylan, S.; Kupracz, L.; Coutable, L.; Kirschning, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 9813–9817. doi:10.1002/anie.201302239 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. 17 Murray, P. R. D.; Browne, D. L.; Pastre, J. C.; Butters, C.; Guthrie, D.; Ley, S. V. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2013, 17, 1192–1208. doi:10.1021/op4001548 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. 18 Hartman, R. L.; Naber, J. R.; Buchwald, S. L.; Jensen, K. F. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 899–903. doi:10.1002/anie.200904634 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. 19 Deadman, B. J.; Collins, S. G.; Maguire, A. R. Chem. – Eur. J. 2015, 21, 2298–2308. doi:10.1002/chem.201404348 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. 20 Movsisyan, M.; Delbeke, E. I. P.; Berton, J. K. E. T.; Battilocchio, C.; Ley, S. V.; Stevens, C. V. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2016, 45, 4892–4928. doi:10.1039/C5CS00902B [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. 21 Mascia, S.; Heider, P. L.; Zhang, H.; Lakerveld, R.; Benyahia, B.; Barton, P. I.; Braatz, R. D.; Cooney, C. L.; Evans, J. M. B.; Jamison, T. F.; Jensen, K. F.; Myerson, A. S.; Trout, B. L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 12359–12363. doi:10.1002/anie.201305429 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. 22 McQuade, D. T.; Seeberger, P. H. J. Org. Chem. 2013, 78, 6384–6389. doi:10.1021/jo400583m [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. 23 Pastre, J. C.; Browne, D. L.; Ley, S. V. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 8849–8869. doi:10.1039/c3cs60246j [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. 24 Webb, D.; Jamison, T. F. Chem. Sci. 2010, 1, 675–680. doi:10.1039/c0sc00381f [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. 25 Wegner, J.; Ceylan, S.; Kirschning, A. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2012, 354, 17–57. doi:10.1002/adsc.201100584 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Green Synthesis of Cobalt Oxide/Gold (Coo/Au) Bimetallic Nanoparticles Using Sinapinic Acid: A Comprehensive Study
- Advances in Solar Cell Technologies: A Comprehensive Review of Material Synthesis, Structural Properties, Efficiency and Diverse Applications
- Thermal Decomposition of Co-Fe-Cr-Citrate Complex Via Structural and Spectral Study
- Surface Activity and Thermodynamic Assessment of Surfactants Derived from Oreochromis Niloticus Oil (Nile Tilapia Fish)
- Green Synthesis of Robust Metal-Organic Frameworks: A Sustainable Approach for Advanced Applications