Crop Shifts and Remedies: Socio Economic Problems and Health Hazards of Rubber Farmers

Agriculture is the main economic activity of Kerala, accounting for 45 percent of the state’s income and 48 percent of total employment. Kerala’s agriculture stands out as unique in the Indian agriculture scene and has many distinctive features. The agricultural population, with its fixed outlook and attitude, is a great stabilization influence in the social and political spheres. Nearly 85 percent of the total cropped areas in the state were used for the cultivation of 11 major crops. The major portion of Kerala’s population depends for its livelihood on cash crops, mainly coconut and rubber since, during the last few decades, rubber has emerged as the more profitable crop and the second largest in terms of the cropped area. Kerala produces 92 percent of India’s natural rubber. Kerala and Tamil Nadu together occupy 86 percent of the growing area of natural rubber. This topic has, therefore, a great social significance and is current in its relevance. The objectives included in the study are to analyze the socio-economic problems of rubber farmers, to find out the shift in cropping due to price fluctuations of rubber, to understand the health problems of rubber farmers, and to recommend suggestions for solving the problems of rubber farmers.

Hevea Brasiliensis, Varco elastic, vulcanized rubber, elastomers, gutta-percha (Palaquium gutta)

1. D. Narian. (1965). Impact of price movements on areas under selected crops in India (1930-1939). Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Devi, U. (1984). The impact of plantations on Kerala economy with special reference to rubber: Some historical and quantitative aspects (Unpublished M.Phil thesis). University of Kerala, Trivandrum. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Dhindsa, K. S., & Sharma, A. (n.d.). Analysis of cropping pattern in Punjab during 1965-66 to 1990-91. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. George, K. T., & Sethuraj, M. (1996). Dynamics of world natural rubber economy: Its relevance to India. Economic and Political Weekly, June 1996. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. George, K. T., Joseph, T., & Joseph, J. (2002). Natural rubber in post–quantitative restrictions regime. Economic and Political Weekly, August 10, 2002. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. George, K., & Joseph. (1973). Natural rubber economy: Its relevance to India. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, October-December 1973. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. George, R. (1996). The consumption, saving and investment pattern in the rubber plantation sector of Kerala economy (Unpublished M.Phil thesis). Department of Economics, University of Kerala, Trivandrum. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Government of India. (1992). Report of Tariff Commission on the revision of raw rubber prices. Bombay. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Job, E., & Mukundan, K. (1984). Economics of rubber cultivation by small holders in Kottayam District. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, XXXI (1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Jorge, T., Haridasan & Sreekumar. (1988). Role of government and structural changes in rubber plantation. Industry Economic and Political Weekly, XXIV, 48, November 26. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Jose, R. V. (1978). Economics of rubber cultivation in Kerala (Unpublished Ph.D. thesis). University of Cochin. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Joseph, T., & George, K. (1996). Primary processing of rubber wood in Kerala: Report of a sample survey. Wood News, January-March, 39-43. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Krishnakumar, R. (2001, January 20–February 2). Kerala. Frontline, 18, 4. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Kurian. (1982). Agricultural changes: A comparison of Tamil Nadu and Kerala. In P. P. Pillai (Ed.), Agricultural development in Kerala (pp. 6–17). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Lakshmi, S., & George, K. T. (2003). Expansion of natural rubber cultivation in Kerala: An exploratory analysis. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 58(2). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Mani, S. (1982). An analysis of Indian natural rubber market (Unpublished M.Phil dissertation). Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Narayana, D. N. (1990). Agriculture economy of Kerala in the post seventies: Stagnation or cycles? C.V.S Working Paper No. 235, pp. 12, 30. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Pillai, P. P. (1982). Growth of agricultural output in Kerala during 1952-53 to 1978-79. In P. P. Pillai (Ed.), Agricultural development in Kerala. Agriculture Publishing Company, New Delhi. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Prabhakar, & Bhattacharya, P. (2025). Land ownership and socio-economic dependence on rubber plantations: Insights from smallholder farmers in Tripura, India. Journal of Land and Rural Studies, 13(2), 181–196. https://doi.org/10.1177/23210249251328798 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Pradeep, B., & Jacob, J. (2021) Kerala growers and their interest in rubber cultivation. Economic & Political Weekly, 56(34). EPW Engage [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Prakash, B. A. (n.d.). Growth and survival. In The Kerala economy. Sage Publications, New Delhi, p. 22. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Rejimol, M., & Jagathish, M. (2022) A study on the problems faced by the rubber farmers of Kerala. International Journal of Food and Nutritional Sciences, 11(10). https://www.ijfans.org/issue-content/a-study-on-the-problems-faced-by-the-rubber-farmers-of-kerala [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Shruthi (2023) A study on socio-economic status and the problems of rubber planters with special reference to Kadaba Taluk of Dakshina Kannada District, Karnataka. PARIPEX - Indian Journal of Research. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Sudhardi, A. (1975). Tapping specialization in menera Pkebanam. Rubber Research Center, Gatus Stratiga, Indonesia (p. 401). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Thomas, C. (1984). An economic analysis of rubber cultivation in Kerala (Unpublished M.Phil dissertation). University of Kerala. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Unni, J. (1983). Change in the cropping pattern of Kerala. Economic and Political Weekly, XIII (39). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Unni, J., & George. (1969-1970). Rubber small holdings in India: Report of sample survey 1969-70. Rubber Board, Kottayam. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Vimala Ratne, S. D. (1973). Economic evaluation of tapping systems (p. 401). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Vyas, N. (1995). India’s marketing game plan for the 1990’s. Indian Journal of Marketing, XXIV (1), 10-12. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Impact of Foreign Direct Investment in India
• Issues Involved in Digitalisation Special Reference to Indian Tourism Growth
• Relationship Marketing and Customer Loyalty in the Fast-Moving Consumer Goods (FMCG) Industry in Nairobi County
• Financial Literacy or Financial Inclusion? Which is Which, What is What—To Achieve Uganda’s 10-Fold Economic Growth By 2040
• Harnessing Natural Gas for Economic Transformation: Overcoming the Regulatory and Infrastructural Bottlenecks in Nigeria