The "Pleasure Governance" of Ludocapitalism——How Enjoyment Becomes a Disguise for Exploitation
Authors
School of Finance, Shanghai Lixin University of Accounting and Finance, Shanghai 201620, China; School of Marxism, Qinghai Minzu University, Xining 810007, Qinghai (China)
School of Finance, Shanghai Lixin University of Accounting and Finance, Shanghai 201620, China; School of Marxism, Qinghai Minzu University, Xining 810007, Qinghai (China)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100700212
Subject Category: Political Economy
Volume/Issue: 10/7 | Page No: 3087-3098
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-07-12
Accepted: 2026-07-18
Published: 2026-07-29
Abstract
Contemporary digital games have evolved into a key arena for capital accumulation and new forms of exploitation. Their core mechanism lies in transforming players' pleasurable experiences into a covert instrument of exploitation through what this study terms "pleasure governance." Based on a quantitative survey of 358 valid questionnaires and in-depth interviews with 11 players of diverse profiles, this research analyzes how such governance integrates psychoanalytic, ideology critique, and biopolitical theories to program desire, colonize time, and commodify social relations. The gacha mechanism functions as a "desire programmer" that manufactures cycles of continuous engagement; mission and season systems act as "time planners" that reframe leisure into structured labor; and social display systems serve as "identity performance arenas" that drive symbolic consumption. Despite clear awareness, players remain deeply immersed, exhibiting a cynical addiction wherein the subject is recruited as an affective laborer, self-optimizer, and symbolic consumer. By modulating circuits of pleasure production, ludocapitalism achieves a comprehensive colonization of life-time, affective energy, and social relations. There is an urgent need to explore paths of transcendence through regulation, community praxis, and critical self-reflection.
Keywords
digital games; governance of pleasure; political economy of desire
Downloads
References
1. During, S. (2020). Foucault and literature: Towards a genealogy of writing. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Gabarnet, A., Feixas, G., & Montesano, A. (2025). Who am I inside the screen? Construction of virtual identity in multiplayer online videogames and its psychological functions. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 28(1), 52-59. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Hoens, D. (2013). You never know your luck: Lacan reads Pascal. Continental Philosophy Review, 46(2), 241-249. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Kirkpatrick, G. (2017). Critical technology: A social theory of personal computing. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. McDaniel, E. L., Davis, J., & Weeks, M. (2024, March). Assessing the flow state in a classic video game through simulation. In SoutheastCon 2024 (pp. 1119-1124). IEEE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. McGowan, T. (2012). The end of dissatisfaction?: Jacques Lacan and the emerging society of enjoyment. SUNY Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Miller, J. A., & Lacan, J. (2018). The four fundamental concepts of psycho-analysis. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Neil, K. (2012, January). Game design tools: Time to evaluate. In Proceedings of Nordic DiGRA 2012 Conference. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Nicoll, B. (2023). Enjoyment with (out) exception: Sex and the unconscious drive to fail in videogame play. Angelaki, 28(5), 97-114. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Pongratz, L. (2011). Controlled freedom—the formation of the control society. Journal of Pedagogy, 2(2), 161. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Stavrakakis, Y. (2021). Lacanian theory: Ideology, enjoyment and the spirits of capitalism. In Routledge international handbook of contemporary social and political theory (pp. 60-70). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Tamer, V. (2023). Narrative design for mobile and live games. CRC Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Urošević, M. (2024). Theory and history of “governmentality” and governmental regimes in the work of Michel Foucault. Etnoantropološki problemi/Issues in Ethnology and Anthropology, 19(3), 921-942. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Wilde, P. (2023). Posthuman gaming: Avatars, gamers, and entangled subjectivities. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Zhao, C., Guo, W., Li, Z., Habule, M., Li, T., & Zhang, W. (2025). A sensitive tool for capturing the development, maintenance, and relapse of internet gaming disorder: Development and validation of the persistent gaming intention scale among Chinese people. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 100851. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Banditry as Political Economy: Violence, Extraction, and Subnational State-Building in Northwest Nigeria
- The Political Economy of Digital Economy in Nigeria and the Challenge of Underserved and Marginalised Communities: Interrogating the Prospects for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI).
- The New Global Order Compared to Other World Orders: A Critical Analysis in International Political Economy
- Bridging Political Economy and Phenomenology: Ideology, Intentionality, and Material Structures in International Relations
- China’s Investment in Africa: A Zimbabwe Case Study