A Preliminary Random Forest Baseline for Above-Ground Carbon Stock Estimation in Abuja Municipal Area Council Using Free Multi-Sensor Satellite Data: A GeoAI Approach

Authors

Idris Ibrahim

Strategic Space Applications Department, National Space Research and Development Agency (Nigeria)

Salman Salis Khalid

Strategic Space Applications Department, National Space Research and Development Agency (Nigeria)

Haruna Maryam

Strategic Space Applications Department, National Space Research and Development Agency (Nigeria)

Agu Valentine Nnaemeka

Strategic Space Applications Department, National Space Research and Development Agency (Nigeria)

Shar Joseph Terfa

Strategic Space Applications Department, National Space Research and Development Agency (Nigeria)

Ahmad Dalhatu

Strategic Space Applications Department, National Space Research and Development Agency (Nigeria)

Ahmed Mariam

Center for Atmospheric Research, Ayingba, National Space Research and Development Agency (Nigeria)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS.2026.11070060

Subject Category: Environment

Volume/Issue: 11/7 | Page No: 951-958

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-07-16

Accepted: 2026-07-21

Published: 2026-07-31

Abstract

Accurate quantification of above-ground carbon (AGC) stock is essential for climate mitigation planning, yet fine-scale carbon mapping remains scarce for rapidly urbanizing West African savanna cities. This study presents a preliminary geospatial artificial intelligence (GeoAI) baseline for AGC estimation in the Abuja Municipal Area Council (AMAC), Federal Capital Territory, Nigeria, using entirely free, cloud-hosted satellite data. A Random Forest regression model was trained on Google Earth Engine using a dry-season Sentinel-2 optical composite, a Sentinel-1 SAR composite, Copernicus DEM elevation, and NASA GEDI L4A above-ground biomass density (AGBD) footprints as the reference label. A total of 10,978 quality-filtered GEDI footprints were retrieved across AMAC's approximately 172,993-hectare extent, of which 3,309 were held out for testing. On the held-out set, the model achieved a root-mean-square error (RMSE) of 47.02 Mg/ha, a mean absolute error (MAE) of 16.52 Mg/ha, and a coefficient of determination (R²) of 0.345. Wall-to-wall prediction yielded a mean AGC density of 10.12 Mg C/ha and an estimated total AGC stock of approximately 1.75 million Mg C for AMAC. A small fraction (<1%) of anomalously high GEDI AGBD values was found to disproportionately influence RMSE relative to MAE, consistent with known GEDI performance limitations in structurally heterogeneous, non-forest-dominated landscapes. These results are presented explicitly as a reproducible starting baseline rather than a validated final product: the model uses GEDI as both the training label and the accuracy reference, and the train/test split was not spatially blocked. Field-inventory calibration, spatially blocked validation, and fine-tuning of multimodal geospatial foundation models are identified as concrete future research directions building directly on this baseline.

Keywords

GeoAI; above-ground carbon; Google Earth Engine; GEDI; Random Forest

Downloads

References

1. Abubakar, I. R. (2014). Abuja city profile. Cities, 41, 81-91. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Adewale, A., Olatunde, S., & Martins, O. (2019). Assessment of the relationship between urban growth and surface temperature in Abuja Municipal Area Council. FUDMA Journal of Sciences, 3(3), 309–327. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Dangulla, M., Manaf, L. A., Ramli, M. F., Yacob, M. R., & Namadi, S. (2021). Exploring urban tree diversity and carbon stocks in Zaria Metropolis, North-Western Nigeria. Applied Geography, 127, 102385. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Duncanson, L., Armston, J., Disney, M., Avitabile, V., Barbier, N., Calders, K., Carter, S., Chave, J., Herold, M., Crowther, T. W., Falkowski, M., Kellner, J. R., Labrière, N., Lucas, R., MacBean, N., McRoberts, R. E., Næsset, E., Nickeson, J., Réjou-Méchain, M., … Whitehurst, A. (2022). Aboveground biomass density models for the NASA GEDI mission. Remote Sensing of Environment, 270, 112845. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Duncanson, L., Leitold, V., Minor, D., Adu-Bredu, S., Armston, J., Dannunzio, R., Gamarra, J. G. P., Gutierrez, J. A., Hunka, N., Kellner, J. R., Ruiz Villar, M., Tavani, R., Duah-Gyamfi, A., Kusi, K. K., & Valbuena, R. (2026). West African footprint-level GEDI aboveground biomass estimates (Version 1) [Data set]. ORNL DAAC. https://doi.org/10.3334/ORNLDAAC/2475 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Huete, A., Didan, K., Miura, T., Rodriguez, E. P., Gao, X., & Ferreira, L. G. (2002). Overview of the radiometric and biophysical performance of the MODIS vegetation indices. Remote Sensing of Environment, 83(1–2), 195–213. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Isioye, O. A., Ikwueze, H. U., & Akomolafe, E. A. (2020). Urban heat island effects and thermal comfort in Abuja Municipal Area Council of Nigeria. FUTY Journal of the Environment, 14(1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Jakubik, J., Roy, S., Phillips, C. E., Fraccaro, P., Godwin, D., Zadrozny, B., Szwarcman, D., Gomes, C., Nyirjesy, G., Edwards, B., Kimura, D., Simumba, N., Chu, L., Mukkavilli, S. K., Lambhate, D., Das, K., Bangalore, R., Oliveira, D., Muszynski, M., … Ramachandran, R. (2024). Prithvi-EO-2.0: A versatile multi-temporal foundation model for Earth observation applications. arXiv:2412.02732. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Kanmegne Tamga, D., Latifi, H., Ullmann, T., Baumhauer, R., Bayala, J., & Thiel, M. (2023). Estimation of aboveground biomass in agroforestry systems over three climatic regions in West Africa using Sentinel-1, Sentinel-2, ALOS, and GEDI data. Sensors, 23(1), 349. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Kellner, J. R., Armston, J., & Duncanson, L. (2022). Algorithm theoretical basis document for GEDI footprint aboveground biomass density (GEDI04_A). NASA Goddard Space Flight Center. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Kouamé, Y. A. G., Millan, M., et al. (2022). Multispecies allometric equations for shrubs and trees biomass prediction in a Guinean savanna (West Africa). Silva Fennica, 56(1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Li, X., Wessels, K., Armston, J., Duncanson, L., Urbazaev, M., Naidoo, L., Mathieu, R., & Main, R. (2024). Evaluation of GEDI footprint level biomass models in Southern African savannas using airborne LiDAR and field measurements. Science of Remote Sensing, 10. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. McFeeters, S. K. (1996). The use of the Normalized Difference Water Index (NDWI) in the delineation of open water features. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 17(7), 1425–1432. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Nero, B. F., & Callo-Concha, D. (2018). Structure, diversity, and carbon stocks of the tree community of Kumasi, Ghana. Forests, 9(9), 519. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. [Author(s) verify]. (2016). Allometric models and aboveground biomass stocks of a West African Sudan Savannah watershed in Benin. Carbon Balance and Management, 11, 15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Rouse, J. W., Haas, R. H., Schell, J. A., & Deering, D. W. (1974). Monitoring vegetation systems in the Great Plains with ERTS. NASA Special Publication, 351, 309. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Shang, Z., Das, S., & Eldawy, A. (2026). Benchmarking geospatial foundation models for agriculture applications. arXiv:2606.29664. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Wari, B. O., Zakari, S., Djaouga, M., Imorou, I. T., Yabi, I., Tente, B. A., & Djego, J. G. (2023). Urban flora structure and carbon storage potential of woody trees in different land use units of Cotonou (West Africa). Urban Science, 7(4), 106. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles