Aqueous Radical Polymerization of Poly (Methyl Methacrylate): A Comparative Study of Surfactant-Free Suspension and Copper-Mediated Emulsified Systems

Authors

Mehakpreet Kaur

Department of Chemistry, Baddi University of Emerging Sciences and Technology (BUEST), Solan (India)

Neha Sharma

Department of Chemistry, Baddi University of Emerging Sciences and Technology (BUEST), Solan (India)

Harpreet Kaur

Department of Chemistry, Baddi University of Emerging Sciences and Technology (BUEST), Solan (India)

Sarvjeet Kaur

Department of Chemistry, Baddi University of Emerging Sciences and Technology (BUEST), Solan (India)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS.2026.11070108

Subject Category: Polymerisation

Volume/Issue: 11/7 | Page No: 1562-1570

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-07-25

Accepted: 2026-07-30

Published: 2026-08-07

Abstract

Poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) is technologically important due to its wide range of applications, good chemical resistance and its high transparency. In this research, PMMA was prepared by two different radical polymerization methods in an aqueous medium. the first approach include surfactant free suspension initiated by potassium persulfate and second approach involved copper-mediated radical polymerisation take out in an emulsion system. these methods were employed to inspect essential way for PMMA synthesis under aqueous condtions. The impact of the reaction environment and initiator concentration on polymer formation, particle morphology, and monomer conversion was rigorously investigated. Suspension polymerization resulted in PMMA particles, which were formed via monomer droplet polymerization without surfactants; conversely, the copper-mediated system generated smaller particles that were stabilized by an emulsifier under aqueous conditions. FTIR and ¹H NMR spectroscopy confirmed the structure of PMMA, and SEM and TEM were employed to examine particle morphology and size distribution. The findings reveal distinct disparities in particle properties arising from the two aqueous polymerization methodologies, thereby illustrating the influence of the polymerization medium and catalytic system on PMMA synthesis. This comparative analysis offers valuable perspectives on aqueous radical polymerization techniques for PMMA, without suggesting controlled or living polymerization characteristics.

Keywords

Poly(methyl methacrylate) nanoparticles; aqueous dispersed polymerization; Cu-mediated radical polymerization; suspension polymerization

Downloads

References

1. Odian G (2004) Principles of polymerization. Wiley, New York [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Young RJ, Lovell PA (2011) Introduction to polymers. CRC Press, Boca Raton [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Allcock HR, Lampe FW, Mark JE (2003) Contemporary polymer chemistry. Pearson, Upper Saddle River [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Ratner BD, Hoffman AS, Schoen FJ, Lemons JE (2013) Biomaterials science. Academic Press, London [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Paul DR, Robeson LM (2008) Polymer 49:3187–3204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2008.04.017 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Gilbert RG (1995) Emulsion polymerization. Academic Press, London [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Cunningham MF (2008) Prog Polym Sci 33:365–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2007.11.002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Qiu J, Charleux B, Matyjaszewski K (2001) Prog Polym Sci 26:2083–2134. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6700(01)00014-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Matyjaszewski K (2001) Chem Rev 101:2921–2990. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr940534g [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Braunecker WA, Matyjaszewski K (2007) Prog Polym Sci 32:93–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2006.11.002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Perrier S (2017) Macromolecules 50:7433–7447. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.macromol.7b00767 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Cunningham MF, Jessop PG (2014) Macromolecules 47:581–592. https://doi.org/10.1021/ma402365b [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Matyjaszewski K, Tsarevsky NV (2009) Nat Chem 1:276–288. https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.221 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Konkolewicz D, Wang Y, Zhong M, Matyjaszewski K (2013) Macromolecules 46:8749–8772. https://doi.org/10.1021/ma401596g [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Destarac M (2018) Polym Chem 9:4947–4967. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8PY01052A [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Corrigan N, Jung K, Moad G, Hawker CJ, Matyjaszewski K, Boyer C (2020) Prog Polym Sci 111:101311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2020.101311 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Truong NP, Whittaker MR, Anastasaki A, Haddleton DM (2021) Chem Rev 121:1351–1389. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00765 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Zhang W, D’Agosto F, Rieger J, Charleux B (2020) Polym Chem 11:2357–2366. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0PY00131A [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Park S, Lee H, Lee J (2021) J Appl Polym Sci 138:e50312. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.50312 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Li X, Zhang Y, Wang R (2022) Polymers 14:3156. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14153156 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Singh R, Kaur G, Sharma A (2023) Mater Today Chem 28:101350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtchem.2023.101350 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Chen M, Zhong M, Johnson JA (2016) Chem Rev 116:10167–10211. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00174 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. D’Agosto F, Rieger J, Lansalot M (2020) Angew Chem Int Ed 59:8368–8392. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201916469 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Yeow J, Chapman R, Gormley AJ, Boyer C (2018) Chem Rev 118:872–915. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00504 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Zhou Y, Luo Z, Li B (2013) J Polym Sci A 51:198–207. https://doi.org/10.1002/pola.26105 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Kricheldorf HR (2005) Handbook of polymer synthesis. CRC Press, Boca Raton [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Socrates G (2004) Infrared and Raman characteristic group frequencies. Wiley, Chichester [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Bovey FA, Mirau PA (1996) NMR of polymers. Academic Press, San Diego [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Charleux B, Delaittre G, Rieger J, D’Agosto F (2012) Macromolecules 45:6753–6765. https://doi.org/10.1021/ma300713g [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Anastasaki A, Nikolaou V, Pappas GS et al (2021) Chem Rev 121:1352–1397. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00823 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Zhang H, Cheng Z, Zhu X (2019) Prog Polym Sci 98:101142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2019.101142 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Li M, Zhang L, Cheng Z (2022) J Polym Sci 60:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/pol.20210792 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Wang W, Zhou Y, Luo Z (2020) Macromol Rapid Commun 41:2000123. https://doi.org/10.1002/marc.202000123 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Rieger J (2015) Macromol Rapid Commun 36:1458–1471. https://doi.org/10.1002/marc.201500183 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Lansalot M, D’Agosto F (2017) Polym Chem 8:6025–6038. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7PY01062G [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Truong NP, Gu W, Prasadam I et al (2013) Nat Commun 4:1902. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms2902 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Parkatzidis K, Wang HS, Truong NP, Anastasaki A (2020) Chem 6:1575–1588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chempr.2020.05.004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Matyjaszewski K (2020) Macromolecules 53:495–497. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.macromol.9b02569 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Li Y, Armes SP (2020) Angew Chem Int Ed 59:13136–13149. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202004284 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Zhang Q, Zhu S (2022) Ind Eng Chem Res 61:12025–12036. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.2c01578 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles