Managing Global Carbon Stocks: An Integrated Approach for Climate Mitigation and Sustainable Development

In the face of escalating climate change, the management of global carbon stocks stands out as among one of the critical mitigation strategies. In this review article, we explore the concept of carbon stocks by considering three important global case studies: the Amazon Fund (Brazil) for conservation, the Himachal Pradesh Reforestation Project (India) for sequestration, and the Loess Plateau Rehabilitation (China) for landscape restoration. We will analyse the implementation strategies, socio economic co-benefits, and the challenges that these projects have faced. Furthermore, we will also explore how technological carbon removals play a complementary role in carbon removal. Lastly, we will conclude with an understanding that effective carbon stock projects are those that integrate climate goals while strengthening community livelihoods, robust monitoring, review and evaluation, and stable political and financial support, offering a holistic pathway toward achieving global climate targets. Building on reviewer feedback, this revised review also critically examines the political, market, and ecological trade-offs each project encountered, incorporates updated quantitative outcomes, and proposes indicators for assessing the long-term sustainability of carbon stock interventions.

incorporates updated quantitative outcomes, and proposes indicators for assessing the long-term sustainability of carbon stock interventions

1. Giri, A., & Pant, D. (2020). Carbon management and greenhouse gas mitigation. In Encyclopedia of renewable and sustainable materials (Vol. 3, pp. 312–335). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-803581-8.11567-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Ganzemmüller, R. (2020, August 18). Human influence reduces natural land carbon stocks by 24%, study finds. The GIST. https://phys.org/news/2020-08-human-natural-carbon-stocks.html [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Debie, E., & Abro, T. W. (2024). Carbon stock dynamics in biosphere reserves and countainous forest ecosystems. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tfp.2024.100567 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Assunção, J., Gandour, C., & Rocha, R. (2020). The effect of rural credit on deforestation: Evidence from the Brazilian Amazon. Climate Policy Initiative. https://www.climatepolicyinitiative.org/publication/the-effect-of-rural-credit-on-deforestation-evidence-from-the-brazilian-amazon/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bennett, M. T. (2017). China’s Sloping Land Conversion Program: Institutional innovation or business as usual? Ecological Economics, 65(4), 699–711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.12.004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Banco Nacional de Desenvolvimento Econômico e Social (BNDES). (n.d.). Amazon Fund. Retrieved [insert date of access], from https://www.fundoamazonia.gov.br/en/home/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Bryan, B. A., Gao, L., Ye, Y., Sun, X., Connor, J. D., Crossman, N. D., … Hou, X. (2018). China’s response to a national land-system sustainability emergency. Nature, 559(7713), 193–204. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0280-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Dogra, A. (2015). Community-based forest management and carbon sequestration: A case study from Himachal Pradesh, India. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 22(5), 409–419. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2015.1063045 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Global CCS Institute. (2023). Global status of CCS 2023. https://www.globalccsinstitute.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Global-Status-of-CCS-2023_Report.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Government of Norway. (2021, December 9). Norway to resume contributions to the Amazon Fund [Press release]. https://www.regjeringen.no/en/aktuelt/norway-to-resume-contributions-to-the-amazon-fund/id2888672/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Gundimedia, H. (2013). Challenges and opportunities of the Clean Development Mechanism in India: A case of forestry sector. Journal of Environment and Development, 22(3), 321–343. https://doi.org/10.1177/1070496513492582 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Himachal Pradesh Forest Department. (2009). Himachal Pradesh Reforestation Project: Improving livelihoods and watersheds. Project design document for the Clean Development Mechanism. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. International Energy Agency. (2023). Carbon capture, utilisation and storage. IEA. https://www.iea.org/energy-system/carbon-capture-utilisation-and-storage [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2022). Climate change 2022: Mitigation of climate change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157926 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Keith, D. W., Holmes, G., St. Angelo, D., & Heidel, K. (2018). A process for capturing CO2 from the atmosphere. Joule, 2(8), 1573–1594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2018.05.006 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. May, P. H., Millikan, B., & Gebara, M. F. (2011). The context of REDD+ in Brazil: Drivers, agents and institutions. CIFOR. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Michaelowa, A., & Hermwille, L. (2019). A list of all carbon pricing models is not enough. Nature Climate Change, 9(9), 651–652. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0563-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Nepstad, D., Schwartzman, S., Bamberger, B., Santilli, M., Ray, D., Schlesinger, P., … Rolla, A. (2006). Inhibition of Amazon deforestation and fire by parks and indigenous lands. Conservation Biology, 20(1), 65–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00351.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Shi, H., & Shao, M. (2000). Soil and water loss from the Loess Plateau in China. Journal of Arid Environments, 45(1), 9–20. https://doi.org/10.1006/jare.1999.0618 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. World Bank. (2007). Restoring China’s Loess Plateau. World Bank. https://www.worldbank.org/en/results/2007/04/01/restoring-chinas-loess-plateau [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. World Bank. (2011). BioCarbon Fund experience: Insights from afforestation and reforestation Clean Development Mechanism projects. World Bank Publications.. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Butler, Rhett A (2006). World Rain Forest. Retrieved 9 January 2006, from Mongabay.com / A Place Out of Time: Tropical Rainforests and the Perils They Face. Web site: https://www.mongabay.com [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Carbon Market Watch. (2012, May 30). Forestry/land-use projects in the CDM. https://carbonmarketwatch.org/2012/05/30/forestry-projects/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Emissions-EUETS.com. (2013). CERs and ERUs market as from 2013. https://www.emissions-euets.com/cers-erus-market-as-from-2013 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Government of Brazil, Secretaria de Comunicação Social (Secom). (2025, October). In 2025, deforestation fell by 11.08 percent in the Amazon and by 11.49 percent in the Cerrado. https://www.gov.br/secom/en/latest-news/2025/10/in-2025-deforestation-fell-by-11-08-percent-in-the-amazon-and-by-11-49-percent-in-the-cerrado [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Jain, H. (2025). Synergizing carbon reduction technologies and nature-based solutions for a climate-neutral future. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 30, Article 42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-025-10237-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Li, L., Lu, Y., Liu, C., & Liu, H. (2024). Impact of the Sloping Land Conversion Program on rural household income in China. Forests, 15(12), Article 2071. https://doi.org/10.3390/f15122071 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Mongabay. (2018, December 13). Ten years on, Amazon Fund receives applause, criticism, faces new tests. https://news.mongabay.com/2018/12/ten-years-on-amazon-fund-receives-applause-criticism-faces-new-tests/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Ngaba, M. J. Y., Uwiragiye, Y., Miao, H., Li, Z., & Zhou, J. (2022). Ecological restoration stimulates environmental outcomes but exacerbates water shortage in the Loess Plateau. PeerJ, 10, Article e13658. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.13658 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Norway’s International Climate and Forest Initiative (NICFI). (2024, November 18). Norway to provide USD 60 million to Brazil following reduction in deforestation. https://www.nicfi.no/2024/11/18/norway-to-provide-usd-60-million-to-brazil-following-reduction-in-deforestation/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Pan, C., Shrestha, A., Innes, J. L., Zhou, G., Li, N., Li, J., He, Y., Sheng, C., Niles, J.-O., & Wang, G. (2022). Key challenges and approaches to addressing barriers in forest carbon offset projects. Journal of Forestry Research, 33(4), 1109–1122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-022-01488-z [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Wilson Center. (2024). The return of the Amazon Fund and Lula’s race to cut deforestation. https://www.wilsoncenter.org/article/return-amazon-fund-and-lulas-race-cut-deforestation [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. WWF Brazil. (2025). Deforestation falls by 11% in Amazon and Cerrado in a year. https://www.wwf.org.br/en/?93221%2FDeforestation-falls-by-11-in-Amazon-and-Cerrado-in-a-year= [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• A Case Study on the Development and Simulation of a High-Efficiency Flyback Converter for Portable Solar LED Lighting
• Greening the Campus: Stakeholders’ Insights on Sustainability Practices in a Chinese Higher Education Institution
• Malaysia’s Renewable Energy and CO₂ Emissions: ARDL–ECM Evidence with Policy and Managerial Implications
• Waqf within Business Model Framework: A Review and Research Agenda
• Sustainability-Driven Green City Framework and its Impact on Malaysia’s Tourism Industry Development