A Comparative Assessment of Emerging Smart Building Technologies for Energy-Efficient Operations: Lessons from the United Kingdom for Nigeria

Authors

Obiora Uzuana

School of Engineering, College of Science and Engineering, University of Derby, Kedleston Road, Derby DE22 1GB (United Kingdom)

Fortune Ordiah

School of Engineering, College of Science and Engineering, University of Derby, Kedleston Road, Derby DE22 1GB (United Kingdom)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS.2026.11070191

Subject Category: Engineering & Technology

Volume/Issue: 11/7 | Page No: 2646-2671

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-08-03

Accepted: 2026-08-08

Published: 2026-08-19

Abstract

The building sector is a major consumer of energy and a significant source of carbon emissions, and smart building technologies are increasingly promoted as a means of improving operational energy performance. Adoption is advancing quickly in developed economies but remains limited in developing ones. This study assesses the emerging smart building technologies used for energy-efficient operation in the Nigerian building sector, compares them with practice in the United Kingdom, and identifies the lessons Nigeria can draw from UK experience. A qualitative research design was adopted, with data gathered through semi-structured interviews with 62 practitioners, 31 in the United Kingdom and 31 in Nigeria, selected by purposive sampling and drawn from engineering, policy, development, architecture, technology supply and research. The interviews were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis supported by NVivo. Three groups of technology were identified in both countries: sensor-based and automated control systems, IoT-enabled energy management systems, and renewable energy integration with smart grids. Adoption in the United Kingdom is driven by regulation that applies at the point of building control, by financial support, and by mature electrical and digital infrastructure. The same technologies are recognised in Nigeria, but adoption is constrained by four barriers: the gap between policy and enforcement, cost and access to finance, limited government support, and weaknesses in power and telecommunications infrastructure. The study finds that Nigeria does not lack energy efficiency policy so much as the means to enforce what has already been issued, since the Building Energy Efficiency Code and related instruments remain voluntary and are not embedded in state building control. Recommendations are directed at the federal and state bodies able to act on them and cover fiscal measures, adoption of existing codes, infrastructure investment and training.

Keywords

smart building technologies, energy efficiency, technology adoption, Nigeria, United Kingdom

Downloads

References

1. Affonso, E.O., Branco, R.R., Menezes, O.V., Guedes, A.L., Chinelli, C.K., Haddad, A.N. and Soares, C.A. (2024) ‘The main barriers limiting the development of smart buildings’, Buildings, 14(6), 1726. doi:10.3390/buildings14061726. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bamgbose, O.A., Ogunbayo, B.F. and Aigbavboa, C.O. (2024) ‘Measures for improving Building Information Modelling adoption in small and medium-sized enterprises in the Nigerian construction industry’, in Sustainable Construction in the Era of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. AHFE International, pp. 122-131. doi:10.54941/ahfe1005281. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2006) ‘Using thematic analysis in psychology’, Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), pp. 77-101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. British Standards Institution (2018) BS EN IEC 62443 series: Security for industrial automation and control systems. London: BSI. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. British Standards Institution (2018) BS EN ISO 50001:2018 Energy management systems. Requirements with guidance for use. London: BSI. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. British Standards Institution (2022) BS EN ISO 52120-1:2022 Energy performance of buildings. Contribution of building automation, controls and building management. Part 1: General framework and procedures. London: BSI. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Bryman, A. (2016) Social Research Methods. 5th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. BSRIA (2018) Soft Landings Framework BG 54/2018. Bracknell: BSRIA. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Central Bank of Nigeria (2020) Framework for the Financing of the National Mass Metering Programme. Abuja: Central Bank of Nigeria. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers (2009) TM39: Building energy metering. London: CIBSE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers (2012) Guide F: Energy efficiency in buildings. 3rd edn. London: CIBSE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers (2022) TM54: Evaluating operational energy use at the design stage. London: CIBSE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Davis, F.D. (1989) ‘Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology’, MIS Quarterly, 13(3), pp. 319-340. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. de Wilde, P. (2014) 'The gap between predicted and actual energy performance of buildings: a framework for investigation', Automation in Construction, 41, pp. 40-49. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS) (2021) Heat and Buildings Strategy. London: BEIS. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Department for Energy Security and Net Zero (DESNZ) (2025) Smart meter statistics in Great Britain: quarterly report. London: DESNZ. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities (DLUHC) (2021) The Building Regulations 2010: Approved Document L, Conservation of fuel and power, Volume 1 Dwellings and Volume 2 Buildings other than dwellings, 2021 edition. London: DLUHC. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Ejidike, C.C. (2022) An Assessment of the Adoption of Smart Building Concept in the Nigerian Construction Industry. Master’s dissertation. Durban University of Technology. Available at: https://hdl.handle.net/10321/4208. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Ejidike, C.C. and Mewomo, M.C. (2022) ‘A review of barriers to the adoption of smart building concepts (SBCs) in developing countries’, in Construction in 5D: Deconstruction, Digitalization, Disruption, Disaster, Development. Proceedings of the 15th Built Environment Conference. Cham: Springer, pp. 29-37. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-97748-1_3. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Federal Government of Nigeria (2021) Climate Change Act 2021. Abuja: Federal Government of Nigeria. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Federal Government of Nigeria (2023) Electricity Act 2023. Abuja: Federal Government of Nigeria. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Federal Ministry of Communications and Digital Economy (2020) Nigerian National Broadband Plan 2020 to 2025. Abuja: Federal Ministry of Communications and Digital Economy. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Federal Ministry of Power, Works and Housing (2016) Building Energy Efficiency Guideline for Nigeria. Abuja: Federal Ministry of Power, Works and Housing, with GIZ under the Nigerian Energy Support Programme. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Federal Ministry of Power, Works and Housing (2017) Building Energy Efficiency Code. Abuja: Federal Ministry of Power, Works and Housing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Federal Republic of Nigeria (2015) National Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency Policy. Abuja: Federal Ministry of Power. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Federal Republic of Nigeria (2016) National Energy Efficiency Action Plan 2016 to 2030. Abuja: Federal Ministry of Power. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Federal Republic of Nigeria (2022) Nigeria Energy Transition Plan. Abuja: Federal Government of Nigeria. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Guest, G., Bunce, A. and Johnson, L. (2006) ‘How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability’, Field Methods, 18(1), pp. 59-82. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Hamma-Adama, M. (2020) Framework for macro building information modelling (BIM) adoption in Nigeria. Doctoral dissertation. Robert Gordon University. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. HM Government (2021) Smart Systems and Flexibility Plan 2021. London: Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy and Ofgem. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Humble, N. and Mozelius, P. (2022) ‘Content analysis or thematic analysis: similarities, differences and applications in qualitative research’, Proceedings of the 21st European Conference on Research Methodology for Business and Management Studies, pp. 251-258. doi:10.34190/ecrm.21.1.316. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Lincoln, Y.S. and Guba, E.G. (1985) Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Mohanty, S.P., Choppali, U. and Kougianos, E. (2016) ‘Everything you wanted to know about smart cities’, IEEE Consumer Electronics Magazine, 5(3), pp. 60-70. doi:10.1109/MCE.2016.2556879. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. National Audit Office (2016) Green Deal and Energy Company Obligation. HC 607, Session 2015-16. London: National Audit Office. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission (NERC) (2018) Meter Asset Provider Regulations 2018. Abuja: NERC. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Nwankwo, N., Daniel, E.I., Chinyio, E. and Gyoh, L. (2023) ‘Exploring the application of internet of things (IoT) for energy efficient buildings in Nigeria’, Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Construction in the 21st Century (CITC-13), Arnhem, The Netherlands, 8-11 May 2023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Ofgem (2022) Energy Company Obligation (ECO4): 2022 to 2026. London: Ofgem. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Rogers, E.M. (2003) Diffusion of Innovations. 5th edn. New York: Free Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Sahin, I. (2006) ‘Detailed review of Rogers’ diffusion of innovations theory and educational technology-related studies based on Rogers’ theory’, The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 5(2), pp. 14-23. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. UK Green Building Council (2021) Net Zero Whole Life Carbon Roadmap for the Built Environment. London: UK Green Building Council. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. United Kingdom (2015) The Energy Efficiency (Private Rented Property) (England and Wales) Regulations 2015, SI 2015/962. London: The Stationery Office. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. United Kingdom (2022) Product Security and Telecommunications Infrastructure Act 2022. London: The Stationery Office. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. United Nations (2015a) Paris Agreement. Paris: United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. United Nations (2015b) Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. New York: United Nations. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) (2021) 2021 Global Status Report for Buildings and Construction: Towards a Zero-Emission, Efficient and Resilient Buildings and Construction Sector. Nairobi: UNEP. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B. and Davis, F.D. (2003) 'User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view', MIS Quarterly, 27(3), pp. 425-478. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles