Influence Of Social Media Platforms on Social Capital Among Youths in Urban Areas of Nigeria: A Cross-Sectional Study
Authors
Sciences, Management Science, Education, Institut Universitaire La Grace (IUG Ex-ECOTES), Cotonou, Benin, Litorral (Benin)
Sciences, Management Science, Education, Institut Universitaire La Grace (IUG Ex-ECOTES), Cotonou, Benin, Litorral (Benin)
Sciences, Management Science, Education, Institut Universitaire La Grace (IUG Ex-ECOTES), Cotonou, Benin, Litorral (Benin)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS.2025.10100000107
Subject Category: Social science
Volume/Issue: 10/10 | Page No: 1243-1256
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2025-10-16
Accepted: 2025-10-22
Published: 2025-11-12
Abstract
Background: Platforms like Instagram, TikTok, and Facebook have become integral to modern communication, especially among young people. However, while social media platforms provide opportunities for building social capital, they also pose challenges such as weaker offline relationships, diminishing trust and face-to-face interactions. Understanding these platforms' roles in shaping social interactions, civic participation, and trust is crucial to addressing broader social and economic implications. This study aims to explore these relationships, providing insights into the role of social media in the development and sustainability of social capital within this demographic.
Method: A descriptive cross-sectional research design was utilized for this study. The population of this study consisted of youth aged 15 to 35 years residing in urban areas in Nigeria such as Lagos, Abuja, Port Harcourt, and Kano. The sample size was determined based on statistical power analysis to ensure that the results are statistically significant and generalizable. Respondents were selected using stratified and convenience sampling techniques. Data was collected using semi-structured questionnaire. The questionnaires was administered both online and in-person. Data was analysed using IBM SPSS Version 27. Descriptive statistics was used to summarize and describe the basic features of the dataset. T-tests and ANOVA were used to compare means and assess whether observed differences in social capital metrics are statistically significant. Regression analysis was employed to examine the relationships between social media usage and various dimensions of social capital.
Results: Respondents consistently regard social media as a positive tool for sustaining connections. The findings also suggest that while social media use among urban Nigerian youth offers some level of engagement and connectivity, it does not consistently foster the levels of trust and support necessary for robust civic participation. The Chi-Square statistic for this test is 29.72 with a p-value of 0.0000455. Thus, indicating a statistically significant difference in how Instagram, TikTok, and Facebook influence social interactions and relationships.
Conclusion: A key conclusion drawn from this study is the instrumental role social media plays in fostering bonding social capital, the development of close, trust-based relationships within tight-knit communities.
Keywords
Social media, facebook, tiktok
Downloads
References
1. Boyd, D., & Ellison, N. (2017). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210-230. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Coleman, J. (2019). The foundations of social capital. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Ellison, N., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends”: Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1143-1168. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Smith, A. (2013). Civic engagement in the digital age. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from www.pewresearch.org. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Gibson, C., & McAllister, C. (2022). Social networks and the development of bridging social capital: The case of LinkedIn. Journal of Digital Social Networks, 14(3), 210-225. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Machado Silva, H. (2025). The Reconfiguration of Social Bonds in the Digital Age: Virtual Connections vs. Face-to-Face Relationships. Nature Anthropology, 3(1), 10003–10003. https://doi.org/10.70322/natanthropol.2025.10003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Bayer, J., Riehl, T., & Berridge, C. (2020). The effects of social media platforms on social capital formation. Journal of Social Media Studies, 15(2), 123-137. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Adebayo, M., & Nwosu, P. (2022). The dynamics of social capital in contemporary society. Journal of Social Sciences, 40(3), 234-249. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Miller, D., & Brown, F. (2023). Social media analytics: Tools and techniques. Journal of Digital Media Studies, 14(2), 78-92. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Johnson, P., & Lee, M. (2022). Analyzing social media interaction data. Social Media Research Journal, 21(3), 57-71. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Anderson, A. (2023). The role of social media in shaping social capital. Social Media Studies Journal, 15(3), 22-35. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2023). Bridging social capital through social media interactions: A new perspective. Journal of Social Media Impact, 18(2), 87-101. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Lee, S., & Taylor, M. (2022). Visualizing social media engagement. Digital Media Journal, 19(2), 43-59. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Katz, J. E. (2017). Social media and communication: The power of visual media. Journal of Communication Studies, 40(3), 12-29. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Ellison, N. B., Boyd, D., & Lampe, C. (2017). Social capital and social media: The new frontier in research. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 22(3), 129-148. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Smith, J., & Lee, H. (2022). Social media usage patterns and social capital. Journal of Social Media Research, 19(1), 54-70. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Jones, K., & Lee, S. (2022). Bonding social capital in urban settings: A study of familial ties and social support. Social Science Quarterly, 47(1), 12-30. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Mitra, A., & Ghosh, P. (2021). Bridging and bonding social capital in diverse settings. Social Capital Journal, 20(1), 34-48. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2020). Social media and social capital: The benefits of online interaction for social connectedness and civic engagement. Social Media Research, 16(2), 234-248. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Walker, P., Davis, A., & Lee, S. (2022). Integrating qualitative and quantitative methods in social capital research. Journal of Sociology, 17(4), 29-42. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- The Impact of Ownership Structure on Dividend Payout Policy of Listed Plantation Companies in Sri Lanka
- Urban Sustainability in North-East India: A Study through the lens of NER-SDG index
- Performance Assessment of Predictive Forecasting Techniques for Enhancing Hospital Supply Chain Efficiency in Healthcare Logistics
- The Fractured Self in Julian Barnes' Postmodern Fiction: Identity Crisis and Deflation in Metroland and the Sense of an Ending
- Impact of Flood on the Employment, Labour Productivity and Migration of Agricultural Labour in North Bihar