Story-Based Science Learning Capsules: Its Impact on Scientific Literacy among Grade 7 Science Learners

The increasing need for learner-centered science education in the 21st century highlights the demand to develop learners who are not only competent but also scientifically literate. Scientific literacy enables learners to understand scientific concepts, think critically, and apply scientific knowledge to real-life situations. However, many Grade 7 learners struggle to fully understand abstract scientific views when presented through traditional teaching approaches and standard instructional materials. This challenge calls for emerging approaches that make science more meaningful and engaging. Among this approach is the use of story-based instructional materials, particularly Story-Based Science Learning Capsules, which incorporate narratives into science lessons to improve comprehension, retention, and interest. By presenting scientific concepts through relatable stories, learners are more likely to build deeper understanding and stronger connections to the subject matter

The study’s significance is based on its potential to provide teachers with an alternative and innovative instructional strategy that enhances both engagement and comprehension in science classes

1. Alshammari, M. (2024). Constructivism in education: Exploring the contributions of Piaget, Vygotsky, and Anastasiou. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Anastasiou, P. (2022). Using digital storytelling in science: Meaning making with students aged 10–12 years old (Doctoral dissertation, The Open University). Open Research Online. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Archer, L., & DeWitt, J. (2023). Understanding the science capital of early adolescents: Implications for scientific literacy. Research in Science Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Babao, F. J. L., Ordijan, A. P., Pauchano, J. A. B., & Siva, R. F. V. (2024). The use of graphic storytelling in enhancing reading comprehension of Grade Seven learners [Unpublished bachelor's thesis]. Central Philippine University. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Baltikian, M., Kärkkäinen, S., & Kukkonen, J. (2024). Assessment of scientific literacy levels among secondary school students in Lebanon: Exploring gender-based differences. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(3), em2407. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14279 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Basilio, C. R., & Sigua, E. M. S. (2022). Development and validation of multimedia-based instructional module in Science 7. International Research Journal of Science, Technology, Education, and Management, 2(1), 152–162. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6496847 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Batac, K. I. T. (2021). Development and validation of a nature of science-based online course in evolution by natural selection (Master's thesis, De La Salle University). Animo Repository. https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etdm_scied/9/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Belisario, J. M., & Paglinawan, J. L. (2025). The relationship between instructional materials availability and student engagement in science. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Applied Science (IJRIAS), 10(5), 263–270. https://doi.org/10.51584/IJRIAS.2025.100500025 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Bilbao, P. P., Corpuz, B. B., Llagas, A. T., & Salandanan, G. G. (2021). The teaching profession (3rd ed.). Lorimar Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Bremner, N. (2023). Self-directed learning and student-centred learning: Justificatory narratives and context-appropriate standards. Research in Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Cavalcante, L. S. (2022). Contação de histórias: Uma forma lúdica de promoção do letramento científico [Master's dissertation, Universidade de Brasília]. Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Brasília. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Cebesoy, U. B. (2021). The effect of teaching science through storytelling on students' academic achievement and opinions about practice. International Journal of Progress in Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Conjusta, G. V., & Conjusta, M. V. (2022). Exploring children's literature: Reading for knowledge, understanding, and pleasure. Lorimar Publishing, Inc. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Croce, K. A. (2020). Developing science literacy in the 21st century. Information Age Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Dela Cruz, K. J. G. (2022). Historical vignettes: An approach to bring back students' interest in science (Master's thesis, De La Salle University). Animo Repository. https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etdm_scied/27/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Department of Education. (2016). Policy guidelines on daily lesson preparation for the K to 12 basic education program (DepEd Order No. 42, s. 2016). Department of Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Department of Education. (2021). General and technical specifications of learning resources (DepEd Memorandum No. 164, s. 2021). Department of Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Department of Education. (2023, September 8). DepEd Memorandum No. 054, s. 2023: Pilot implementation of the MATATAG curriculum. https://www.deped.gov.ph/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Department of Education. (2024, July 23). DepEd Order No. 010, s. 2024: Policy guidelines on the implementation of the MATATAG Curriculum. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Esguerra, C. T. (2025). Student-crafted digital storytelling (DST) for enhancing STEM students' conceptual understanding of evolution and the origin of biodiversity (Master's thesis, De La Salle University). Animo Repository. https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etdm_scied/77/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Falculan, C. F. (2025). Instructional scaffolding strategies, inquiry-based teaching approach and leadership skills among elementary science teachers. Asia Pacific Journal of Management and Sustainable Development, 13(1), 56–64. https://doi.org/10.70979/CXMB7834 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Fuchs, H. U., & Dumont, E. (2025). Narrative approaches in science education: From conceptual foundations to gamification. Chemistry Proceedings. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Gormally, C., Brickman, P., & Lutz, M. (2012). Developing a Test of Scientific Literacy Skills (TOSLS): Measuring undergraduates' evaluation of scientific information and arguments. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 11(4), 364–377. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.12-03-0026 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Haden, C. A., et al. (2023). Science in stories: Implications for Latine children's science learning through home-based language practices. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1096833. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1096833 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Heryani, R., et al. (2024). Promoting language and scientific literacy through children's literature: A systematic literature review. Salud, Ciencia y Tecnología, 4(1), 77–91. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=9872694 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Hougham, R. J. (2020). Science to story, story to social. Connected Science Learning. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Jiménez-Valverde, G. (2025). Narrative approaches in science education: From conceptual understanding to applications in chemistry and gamification. Encyclopedia, 5(3), 116–132. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Karakoyun, F., & Alper, A. (2021). Digital storytelling: Developing 21st century skills in science education. European Journal of Educational Research. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Lederman, N. G., & Lederman, J. S. (2021). Nature of science and scientific inquiry as foundations for scientific literacy. Journal of Science Teacher Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Leedy, P. D., & Ormrod, J. E. (2015). Practical research: Planning and design (11th ed.). Pearson. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Mayer, R. E. (2023). Multimedia learning (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Miller, E. M. (2021). The impact of visual literacy in secondary science education (Master's thesis, Bethel University). Spark Repository. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Montebon, D. R. T., & Orleans, A. V. (2021). Contextualized science instruction and learners' attitudes toward science. Asia Pacific Journal of Management and Sustainable Development. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Osborne, J., & Pimentel, D. (2024). Inquiry-based science education and scientific reasoning development. Research in Science Education. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0738059324000257?via%3Dihub [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Pavey, A. M. (2020). Science literacy: An undergraduate alternative to traditional introductory science courses (Master's thesis, Ball State University). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Rubin, N. T., & Travero, A. S. (2022). Fostering reading level and story comprehension through MARITES (Marungko Approach Reading Intervention to Elementary Schoolers) with mentor-mentee arrangement. International Research Journal of Science, Technology, Education, and Management, 2(3), 18–25. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7136494 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Santos, M. L. (2023). Story-based instructional materials and their effect on students' scientific literacy (Unpublished master's thesis). University of the Philippines. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Usman, A. (2025). Development of Articulate Storyline media based on socioscientific issues to improve science literacy of elementary students (Master's thesis, Surabaya State University). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Veneracion, E. V. (2023). Motivation, learning strategies, and academic performance in science among Grade 8 students in the new normal. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 15(3), 242–259. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10171150 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Yumang, M. G. C. (2024). Connecting classroom science to social realities: Exploring senior high school students' scientific literacy in the Earth and Life Science course (Master's thesis, De La Salle University). Animo Repository. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Green Synthesis of Calcium Oxide Nanoparticles from Pigeon Eggshells for Cement Composites
• Needs Analysis: Development of an Interactive Digital Storybook in Teaching Mixtures and their Characteristics among Grade 6 Learners
• Thickness Dependent Structural, Optical, Electrical and Gas Sensing properties of ZnO thin film
• Forensic Chemistry Laboratory Works from Home: Challenges Encountered by Criminology Students During the Conduct of their Laboratory Activities at Home
• The Concept of Wellness Club and How it Differs from the Present Gym?