Integrated Green-Fintech Framework for Value-Based Islamic Wealth Creation: Bridging Green Sukuk, Smart Contracts, and Maqasid al-Shariah

Authors

Zahirah Hamid Ghul1

Department of Economics and Finance, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Malaysia (Malaysia)

Norhasimah Shaharuddin

Department of Economics and Finance, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Malaysia (Malaysia)

Nik Rozila Nik Mohd Masdek

Department of Economics and Finance, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Malaysia (Malaysia)

Muhammad Abd Hadi bin Abd Rahman

Department of Economics and Finance, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Malaysia (Malaysia)

Norsaliza Abu Bakar

Department of Economics and Finance, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Malaysia (Malaysia)

Heizal Hezry Omar

Department of Economics and Finance, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Malaysia (Malaysia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100800722

Subject Category: Environmental Engineering

Volume/Issue: 10/8 | Page No: 10650-10658

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-08-26

Accepted: 2026-08-31

Published: 2026-09-16

Abstract

The exponential expansion of Sustainable and Responsible Investment (SRI) alongside rapid advancements in distributed ledger technology (DLT) presents a transformative opportunity for Islamic Financial Institutions (IFIs). While Green Sukuk have emerged as vital Shariah-compliant debt instruments for financing sustainable infrastructure, systemic operational bottlenecks—specifically high administrative transaction fees, a deficit in real-time impact verification, and persistent risks of "greenwashing"—hinder market scalability. This paper proposes the Integrated Green-Fintech (IGF) Framework, an interdisciplinary theoretical and conceptual model combining blockchain smart contracts, Artificial Intelligence (AI), Internet of Things (IoT) data Oracles, and the foundational objectives of Maqasid al-Shariah (focusing on Hifz al-Mal and Hifz al-Biah). AI-processed environmental data into self-executing smart contracts can theoretically automate Sukuk profit disbursements based on verifiable ESG key performance indicators (KPIs), addressing governance fragmentation and advancing Value-Based Intermediation (VBI). Addressing critical peer-review observations, this revised paper clearly distinguishes between established empirical literature and hypothesized framework benefits. Furthermore, it provides an in-depth analysis of technical failure modes (Oracle security, smart contract bugs, IoT tamper-resistance), delineates continuous Shariah governance mechanisms, formulates testable empirical propositions, and addresses multi-jurisdictional legal enforceability across major Islamic finance hubs.

Keywords

Green Sukuk; Green Fintech; Smart Contracts; Maqasid al-Shariah; Impact Verification; Oracle Security; Continuous Shariah Governance; Value-Based Intermediation (VBI).

Downloads

References

1. Alan Nur, R., & Herianingrum, S. (2023). Maqasid Al-Shariah and Green Finance: A Theoretical Framework on Islamic Finance with Sustainable Development Goals for a Greener Future. Journal of Islamic Economics and Sustainable Finance, 3(2), 112–128. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Arrazi, M. F. (2025). Maqasid al-Shariah and sustainable finance: Analyzing the impact of green sukuk allocation in Indonesia. Muslim Business and Economics Review, 4(1), 89–107. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bank Negara Malaysia (BNM). (2018). Value-based Intermediation: Strengthening the Roles and Impact of Islamic Finance. Kuala Lumpur: Bank Negara Malaysia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Chapra, M. U. (2000). The Islamic vision of development in the light of Maqasid al-Shariah. London: International Institute of Islamic Thought (IIIT). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Delle Foglie, A., & Keshminder, J. S. (2024). Green sukuk – Malaysia surviving the bumpy road: Performance, challenges and structural bottlenecks. Qualitative Research in Financial Markets, 16(1), 76–98. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Endri, E., Syafrida, I., & Rasyid, A. (2022). Green Sukuk and sustainable development goals: Evidence from Islamic capital markets. Journal of Environmental Accounting and Management, 10(3), 245–259. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Hafssa, R., & Oumaima, B. (2020). Smart contracts and blockchain technology in Islamic finance: Opportunities and Shariah compliance challenges. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 13(4), 589–605. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Hashim, F., Hassan, M. K., & Abdullah, S. (2023). Legal and regulatory framework for digital Sukuk and fintech integration: A comparative analysis of Malaysia and UAE. Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, 31(3), 310–332. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Hassan, M. K., Rashid, M., & Aliyu, S. (2021). Sustainable finance and Islamic banking: A Maqasid al-Shariah perspective. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 28(5), 412–427. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Izzati, A. N., Tumuyu, S. S., & Wardhana, Y. M. A. (2025). Reconceptualizing green sukuk through Maqashid al-Shariah for advancing sustainable development goals. Journal of Islamic Economics Lariba, 11(2), 1833–1862. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Jibo, U. M. (2025). Green Fintech and blockchain integration in Islamic banking: Enhancing transparency and sustainability. Journal of Financial Technology and Shariah Governance, 7(1), 45–62. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Lahsasna, A., Hassan, M. K., & Ahmad, R. (2018). Blockchain technology and smart sukuk: Innovation and transformation in Islamic capital markets. London: Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Laldin, M. A., & Furqani, H. (2018). Innovation and size in Islamic finance: A Maqasid al-Shariah perspective. Humanomics, 34(1), 78–86. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Muneeza, A., Arshad, N. A., & Arifin, A. T. (2018). The application of blockchain technology in crowdfunding: Towards financial inclusion via Islamic finance. International Journal of Management and Applied Research, 5(2), 82–99. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. OECD. (2023). ESG Investing and Climate Transition in Developing Countries: Regulatory and Market Bottlenecks. Paris: OECD Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Rafique, M. O., & Raza, K. M. (2026). Islamic Green Finance: A marriage of ethics and environmental responsibility in light of Maqasid al-Shari'ah. In E. Smolo & M. O. Rafique (Eds.), Islamic Green Finance (pp. 3–20). London: Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Rejeb, A. (2022). Blockchain technology in Islamic finance: A systematic review and future research agenda. Technology in Society, 68, 101847. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Supriatno, E. (2026). Green Sukuk and sustainable development: An Islamic finance and environmental governance perspective. Journal of Oeconomia Syariah et Civitas, 2(2), 101–118. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Volz, U. (2022). Fostering Sustainable Finance in Emerging Markets: Challenges and Policy Options. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 12(3), 645–667. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. World Bank. (2024). Global Sukuk Market Report: Green and Sustainable Finance Development. Washington, DC: World Bank Group. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. World Economic Forum (WEF). (2023). Harnessing Artificial Intelligence and IoT for Climate Action and Sustainable Capital Markets. Geneva: World Economic Forum. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles