Light Yield, Non-Proportionality, and Emission Characteristics of Scintillator Materials for Silicon Photomultiplier–Based Radiation Detectors

Authors

Raja Babu

University Department of Physics, Bhupendra Narayan Mandal University, Madhepura, India (India)

Ashim Roy

University Department of Physics, Bhupendra Narayan Mandal University, Madhepura, India (India)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS.2026.11080147

Subject Category: Physics: Nuclear and High Energy Detector

Volume/Issue: 11/8 | Page No: 1937-1948

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-09-03

Accepted: 2026-09-08

Published: 2026-09-19

Abstract

A scintillation detector read out by a silicon photomultiplier (SiPM) is limited primarily by three properties of the scintillator: the number of optical photons generated per unit of absorbed energy (light yield), the constancy of that yield with the energy of the exciting radiation (proportionality), and the wavelength distribution of the emitted light relative to the spectral response of the sensor. This review compiles and cross-checks reported light yields, emission maxima, decay times and densities for the inorganic crystals and polyvinyltoluene plastics most often coupled to SiPMs — NaI(Tl), CsI(Tl), CsI(Na), BGO, LYSO(Ce), GSO(Ce), GAGG(Ce), LaBr₃(Ce), LaCl₃(Ce) and EJ-200 — and states the governing relations for intrinsic yield, energy-resolution decomposition, spectral overlap, microcell saturation and ionization quenching in one consistent notation. Two points distinguish it from material-only surveys. Most tabulated resolutions were obtained with photomultiplier or avalanche-photodiode readout and are systematically better than those achieved with SiPMs, so the comparative tables here keep the two readout classes separate. And the finite microcell count of a SiPM produces a compressive non-linearity that can be mistaken for intrinsic non-proportionality, so the two must be separated experimentally before a material is judged. A worked decomposition of the 662 keV resolution shows that non-proportionality, not photon statistics, dominates in the alkali halides, whereas LaBr₃(Ce) operates close to its statistical limit. The review closes with the selection trade-offs for compact SiPM-coupled instruments and the reporting gaps that currently prevent scintillator–SiPM combinations from being compared on equal terms.

Keywords

scintillator; light yield; non-proportionality; emission spectrum; silicon photomultiplier; photon detection efficiency; energy resolution

Downloads

References

1. G. F. Knoll, Radiation Detection and Measurement, 4th ed. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley, 2010 C. Piemonte and A. Gola, “Overview on the main parameters and technology of modern silicon photomultipliers,” Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A, vol. 926, pp. 2–15, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.nima.2018.11.119. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. P. Dorenbos, J. T. M. de Haas, and C. W. E. van Eijk, “Non-proportionality in the scintillation response and the energy resolution obtainable with scintillation crystals,” IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci., vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 2190–2202, 1995. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. J. D. Valentine, B. D. Rooney, and J. Li, “The light yield nonproportionality component of scintillator energy resolution,” IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci., vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 512–517, 1998. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. M. Moszyński, A. Syntfeld-Każuch, Ł. Świderski, M. Grodzicka, J. Iwanowska, P. Sibczyński, and T. Szczęśniak, “Energy resolution of scintillation detectors,” Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A, vol. 805, pp. 25–35, 2016. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. C. Dujardin, E. Auffray, E. Bourret-Courchesne, P. Dorenbos, P. Lecoq, M. Nikl, A. N. Vasil’ev, A. Yoshikawa, and R.-Y. Zhu, “Needs, trends, and advances in inorganic scintillators,” IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci., vol. 65, no. 8, pp. 1977–1997, Aug. 2018. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. P. Dorenbos, “Light output and energy resolution of Ce³⁺-doped scintillators,” Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A, vol. 486, no. 1–2, pp. 208–213, 2002. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. C. W. E. van Eijk, “Inorganic-scintillator development,” Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A, vol. 460, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2001. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. W. W. Moses, “Current trends in scintillator detectors and materials,” Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A, vol. 487, no. 1–2, pp. 123–128, 2002. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. C. Kim, W. Lee, A. Melis, A. Elmughrabi, K. Lee, C. Park, and J.-Y. Yeom, “A review of inorganic scintillation crystals for extreme environments,” Crystals, vol. 11, no. 6, art. 669, 2021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. C. L. Melcher and J. S. Schweitzer, “Cerium-doped lutetium oxyorthosilicate: A fast, efficient new scintillator,” IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci., vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 502–505, 1992. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. K. Kamada, T. Yanagida, T. Endo, K. Tsutumi, Y. Usuki, M. Nikl, Y. Fujimoto, A. Fukabori, and A. Yoshikawa, “2 inch diameter single crystal growth and scintillation properties of Ce:Gd₃Al₂Ga₃O₁₂,” J. Cryst. Growth, vol. 352, no. 1, pp. 88–90, 2012. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. E. V. D. van Loef, P. Dorenbos, C. W. E. van Eijk, K. W. Krämer, and H. U. Güdel, “High-energy-resolution scintillator: Ce³⁺ activated LaBr₃,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 79, no. 10, pp. 1573–1575, 2001. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. E. V. D. van Loef, P. Dorenbos, C. W. E. van Eijk, K. W. Krämer, and H. U. Güdel, “Scintillation properties of LaCl₃:Ce³⁺ crystals: Fast, efficient and high-energy-resolution scintillators,” IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci., vol. 48, no. 3, p. 341, 2001. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. J. Glodo, W. W. Moses, W. M. Higgins, E. V. D. van Loef, P. Wong, S. E. Derenzo, M. J. Weber, and K. S. Shah, “Effects of Ce concentration on scintillation properties of LaBr₃:Ce,” IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci., vol. 52, no. 5, p. 1805, 2005. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. M. S. Alekhin, J. T. M. de Haas, I. V. Khodyuk, K. W. Krämer, P. R. Menge, V. Ouspenski, and P. Dorenbos, “Improvement of γ-ray energy resolution of LaBr₃:Ce³⁺ scintillation detectors by Sr²⁺ and Ca²⁺ co-doping,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 104, art. 161915, 2014. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Eljen Technology, “EJ-200: General purpose plastic scintillator,” product data sheet. [Online]. Available: https://eljentechnology.com (accessed 2026). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. T. Yanagida, “Inorganic scintillating materials and scintillation detectors,” Proc. Jpn. Acad. Ser. B, vol. 94, no. 2, pp. 75–97, 2018. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. V. Tatischeff and P. Laurent, “Hard X-ray and gamma-ray detectors,” book chapter, arXiv:2411.11987 [astro-ph.IM], 2024 (preprint). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. I. V. Khodyuk, J. T. M. de Haas, and P. Dorenbos, “Non-proportional response between 0.1 and 100 keV energy by means of highly monochromatic synchrotron X-rays,” IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci., vol. 57, no. 3, p. 1175, 2010. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. G. Bizarri, W. W. Moses, J. Singh, A. N. Vasil’ev, and R. T. Williams, “The origins of scintillator non-proportionality,” IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci., vol. 59, no. 5, pp. 2038–2044, 2012. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. W. Setyawan, R. M. Gaume, R. S. Feigelson, and S. Curtarolo, “Comparative study of nonproportionality and electronic band structure features in scintillator materials,” IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci., vol. 56, no. 5, pp. 2989–2996, 2009. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. M. Balcerzyk, M. Moszyński, M. Kapusta, D. Wolski, J. Pawelke, and C. L. Melcher, “YSO, LSO, GSO and LGSO: A study of energy resolution and nonproportionality,” IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci., vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 1319–1323, 2000. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. A. Ulyanov, O. Morris, O. J. Roberts, I. Tobin, L. Hanlon, S. McBreen, D. Murphy, N. Nelms, and B. Shortt, “Localisation of gamma-ray interaction points in thick monolithic CeBr₃ and LaBr₃:Ce scintillators,” Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A, vol. 844, pp. 81–89, 2017. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. B. Seitz, N. Campos Rivera, and A. G. Stewart, “Energy resolution and temperature dependence of Ce:GAGG coupled to 3 mm × 3 mm silicon photomultipliers,” IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci., vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 503–508, 2016, doi: 10.1109/TNS.2016.2535235. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. M. Bonesini, “Gamma-ray and high-energy X-ray detection with large-area scintillating crystals: A hands-on review,” Front. Detect. Sci. Technol., vol. 3, art. 1551948, 2025, doi: 10.3389/fdest.2025.1551948. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. J. B. Birks, The Theory and Practice of Scintillation Counting. Oxford, U.K.: Pergamon Press, 1964. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. T. J. Hajagos, C. Liu, N. J. Cherepy, and Q. Pei, “High-Z sensitized plastic scintillators: A review,” Adv. Mater., vol. 30, no. 27, art. 1706956, 2018. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. M. Kole and N. De Angelis, “Measurements of the Birks’ coefficient of GAGG:Ce using hard X-rays,” Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A, vol. 1084, art. 171206, 2026. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. P. Lecoq, “Development of new scintillators for medical applications,” Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A, vol. 809, pp. 130–139, 2016. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles