“From Ethical Awareness to Quality Action: Giving Voice to Values, Ethical Voice and Quality Management in Contemporary Organizations – A Secondary-Data Study”

Contemporary organizations increasingly recognize that organizational quality cannot be sustained exclusively through technical procedures, standards and performance measurement. Quality also depends upon organizational culture, ethical leadership, employee participation, responsible decision-making and the willingness of employees to raise concerns when organizational practices deviate from expected standards. In this context, Mary C. Gentile's Giving Voice to Values (GVV) framework provides an important action-oriented approach for understanding how individuals can translate ethical values into organizational action. The present study examines the relationship between Giving Voice to Values, ethical leadership, employee voice, psychological safety and organizational quality through a systematic analysis of secondary data.
The study adopts a qualitative and integrative secondary-data research design. Evidence is drawn from peer-reviewed academic literature, published empirical studies, quality-management frameworks, institutional reports and contemporary organizational evidence. The analysis particularly connects GVV with the quality-management principles of leadership, engagement of people, process orientation, improvement and evidence-based decision-making. ISO's quality-management principles explicitly recognize leadership, engagement of people, improvement and evidence-based decision-making as foundations of quality management.

The findings indicate that ethical voice can function as an important organizational-quality mechanism. Employees who are willing and able to identify problems, communicate ethical concerns and challenge questionable practices can contribute to improved decision quality, process quality, governance quality, information quality and continuous improvement. Evidence from recent research also indicates that ethical leadership is positively associated with ethical voice and that psychological safety can play an important role in enabling employees to speak up.
The paper proposes an integrated GVV–Quality Action Framework, conceptualizing organizational quality as a process in which values awareness is transformed into ethical voice, corrective action and continuous improvement. The study contributes theoretically by connecting the action-oriented GVV perspective with quality management and organizational behaviour, and practically by proposing mechanisms through which organizations can institutionalize ethical voice as part of their quality systems.

Giving Voice to Values; Ethical Voice; Quality Management; Ethical Leadership; Psychological Safety; Employee Voice; Organizational Quality.

1. Gentile, M. C. (2010). Giving Voice to Values: How to Speak Your Mind When You Know What's Right. Yale University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Gentile, M. C. (2012). Values-driven leadership development: Where we have been and where we could go. Organization Management Journal, 9(3), 188–196. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Miller, W. F., Shawver, T. J., & Mintz, S. M. (2024). An empirical analysis of the theoretical foundation of the Giving Voice to Values pedagogy. Accounting Education, 33(3), 319–337. The study found that GVV exposure increased students' confidence and likelihood of acting in response to unethical workplace practices. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Shawver, T. J., & Miller, W. F. (2023). Assessing the impact of values change using Giving Voice to Values. In Research on Professional Responsibility and Ethics in Accounting. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Hu, S., Nadeem, M. A., Luo, J., & Yi, X. (2024). The effects of psychological safety and employee voice behavior on flight attendants' mindful safety practices adoption. Frontiers in Public Health, 12, 1398815. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Burhan, Q.-A., Khan, M. A., & Malik, M. F. (2023). Ethical leadership: A dual path model for fostering ethical voice through relational identification, psychological safety, organizational identification and psychological ownership. RAUSP Management Journal. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Journal of Business Ethics (2024). Generating the moral agency to report peers' counterproductive work behavior in normal and extreme contexts: The generative roles of ethical leadership, moral potency and psychological safety. Journal of Business Ethics, 195, 653–680. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. International Organization for Standardization. ISO 9001: Quality management systems — Quality management principles. ISO identifies leadership, engagement of people, process approach, improvement, evidence-based decision-making and relationship management among its quality-management principles. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. International Organization for Standardization. Quality management principles: The foundation for success. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. OECD. Behavioural Insights for Public Integrity. OECD discussion of organizational culture, integrity and the importance of employees being able to voice concerns about misconduct. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. United Nations Global Compact. Corporate Communication on Progress materials concerning employee speak-up mechanisms, reporting channels, confidentiality and non-retaliation. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. United Nations Global Compact. From policy to practice: Embedding compliance, ethics and anti-corruption at scale. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. World Economic Forum. (2025). Advancing Responsible AI Innovation: A Playbook. The report emphasizes operationalizing responsible AI and identifies responsible AI as important for trust and resilient markets. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. World Economic Forum. (2025). The Trust Imperative: 5 Levers for Scaling Responsible AI. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. World Economic Forum. (2025). Research reveals 9 essential plays to govern AI responsibly in a multipolar world. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. European Foundation for Quality Management / AFNOR. EFQM Excellence Model. The EFQM approach emphasizes organizational transformation, improvement and sustainable organizational performance. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Oxford Academic. Application of EFQM criteria to organizational quality assessment, including leadership, values, ethics and improvement. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Tams, C., & Gentile, M. C. (2020). Giving voice to values: Responsible management as facilitation of ethical voice. In Research Handbook of Responsible Management. Edward Elgar Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Morrison, E. W. (2023). Employee voice and silence: Taking stock a decade later. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 10, 79–107. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Zheng, Y., Epitropaki, O., Graham, L., & Caveney, N. (2022). Ethical leadership and ethical voice: The mediating mechanisms of value internalization and integrity identity. Journal of Management, 48(4), 973–1002. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Responsible Leadership, Digital Transformation Capability, and Sustainability Performance in Business and Higher Education Institutions
• Navigating the Adverse Strategies in Managing Hostile, Resistant and Disruptive Community Project Stakeholders in Nairobi County, Kenya.
• Why Management Control Systems Fail or Succeed: A Legitimacy-Based Process Explanation of Financial Performance
• An Empirical Study of Impact of Digital Marketing Frauds on Customers’ Online Buying Behaviour in Madhya Pradesh
• Modelling Bim–Circular Economy Integration for Construction Waste Minimisation in Malaysia: A Pls-Sem Approach