Regulator Sandboxes for DeFi: A Comparative Analysis of Policy Effectiveness in the EU, US, and Asia Pacific
Authors
Reasearch Scholar, Dept. Of Bba, Kl Business School, Klef (India)
Reasearch Scholar, Dept. Of Bba, Kl Business School, Klef (India)
Reasearch Scholar, Dept. Of Bba, Kl Business School, Klef (India)
Reasearch Scholar, Dept. Of Bba, Kl Business School, Klef (India)
Reasearch Scholar, Dept. Of Bba, Kl Business School, Klef (India)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS.2025.10100000129
Subject Category: FINANCE
Volume/Issue: 10/10 | Page No: 1446-1449
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2025-10-28
Accepted: 2025-11-03
Published: 2025-11-14
Abstract
Regulatory sandboxes—controlled environments where firms test innovations under regulatory supervision—have been adopted globally to manage fintech and crypto experimentation. This paper compares sandbox approaches and policy effectiveness for decentralized finance (DeFi) across the European Union, the United States, and the Asia-Pacific. Using a mixed-methods design (document analysis, stakeholder reports, and an illustrative quantitative model), we assess objectives, design choices, risk controls, and outcomes (market access, investor protection, and innovation diffusion). Findings show the EU’s pan-European coordination aims to harmonize testing and legal clarity; the US displays fragmented, agency-led pilot initiatives with stronger enforcement posture; Asia-Pacific exhibits rapid, varied adoption with jurisdictional leaders (Singapore, Hong Kong, Australia) using sandboxes as precursors to more formal rulebooks. Policy effectiveness depends on clarity of legal scope, cross-agency coordination, and well-designed exit and scaling rules. We conclude with policy recommendations and a research agenda for empirically measuring sandbox effectiveness for DeFi.
Keywords
Regulatory Sandboxes, Decentralized Finance (DeFi)
Downloads
References
1. European Commission (2024). European Blockchain Sandbox Report. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. BIS (2024). Regulatory Sandboxes and Fintech Funding. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. OECD (2023). Asia Capital Markets Report. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. TRM Labs (2024). Global Crypto Policy Review. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. WEF (2024). Digital Assets Regulation Insights. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. CFTC (2023). Decentralized Finance (DeFi) Advisory Report. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Baker McKenzie (2023). Guide to Fintech Regulatory Sandboxes in Asia-Pacific. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. FCA (2023). Innovation Hub and Sandbox Annual Review. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. MAS (2024). FinTech Regulatory Sandbox Guidelines. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. IOSCO (2023). Decentralized Finance Policy Recommendations. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Financial Technology (Fintech): Current Research at The Cutting Edge
- Reforming Corporate Governance in Malaysia to Address Fraudulent Financial Reporting Cases
- Stock Market Efficiency and Economic Diversification in Nigeria and South Africa
- Financial Stability and Financial Performance of Small and Medium Tiered Deposit Taking Savings and Credit Cooperatives in Kenya.
- Determinants of Value Chain Accounting and Margin Ratios in listed Consumer Conglomerate Companies in Nigeria