Regulator Sandboxes for DeFi: A Comparative Analysis of Policy Effectiveness in the EU, US, and Asia Pacific

Authors

K. Krishna Rao

Reasearch Scholar, Dept. Of Bba, Kl Business School, Klef (India)

Shakil Khan

Reasearch Scholar, Dept. Of Bba, Kl Business School, Klef (India)

B. Surya Singh

Reasearch Scholar, Dept. Of Bba, Kl Business School, Klef (India)

N. Sai Kiran

Reasearch Scholar, Dept. Of Bba, Kl Business School, Klef (India)

K. Mokshagna

Reasearch Scholar, Dept. Of Bba, Kl Business School, Klef (India)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS.2025.10100000129

Subject Category: FINANCE

Volume/Issue: 10/10 | Page No: 1446-1449

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-10-28

Accepted: 2025-11-03

Published: 2025-11-14

Abstract

Regulatory sandboxes—controlled environments where firms test innovations under regulatory supervision—have been adopted globally to manage fintech and crypto experimentation. This paper compares sandbox approaches and policy effectiveness for decentralized finance (DeFi) across the European Union, the United States, and the Asia-Pacific. Using a mixed-methods design (document analysis, stakeholder reports, and an illustrative quantitative model), we assess objectives, design choices, risk controls, and outcomes (market access, investor protection, and innovation diffusion). Findings show the EU’s pan-European coordination aims to harmonize testing and legal clarity; the US displays fragmented, agency-led pilot initiatives with stronger enforcement posture; Asia-Pacific exhibits rapid, varied adoption with jurisdictional leaders (Singapore, Hong Kong, Australia) using sandboxes as precursors to more formal rulebooks. Policy effectiveness depends on clarity of legal scope, cross-agency coordination, and well-designed exit and scaling rules. We conclude with policy recommendations and a research agenda for empirically measuring sandbox effectiveness for DeFi.

Keywords

Regulatory Sandboxes, Decentralized Finance (DeFi)

Downloads

References

1. European Commission (2024). European Blockchain Sandbox Report. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. BIS (2024). Regulatory Sandboxes and Fintech Funding. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. OECD (2023). Asia Capital Markets Report. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. TRM Labs (2024). Global Crypto Policy Review. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. WEF (2024). Digital Assets Regulation Insights. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. CFTC (2023). Decentralized Finance (DeFi) Advisory Report. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Baker McKenzie (2023). Guide to Fintech Regulatory Sandboxes in Asia-Pacific. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. FCA (2023). Innovation Hub and Sandbox Annual Review. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. MAS (2024). FinTech Regulatory Sandbox Guidelines. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. IOSCO (2023). Decentralized Finance Policy Recommendations. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles