Breeding for Yield Stability for Sustainable Production of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in Nigeria
Authors
Department of Crop Science, Abdullahi Fodio University of Science and Technology, Aliero 863104, Kebbi State (Nigeria)
Department of Crop Science, Abdullahi Fodio University of Science and Technology, Aliero 863104, Kebbi State (Nigeria)
Department of Crop Science, Abdullahi Fodio University of Science and Technology, Aliero 863104, Kebbi State (Nigeria)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS.2026.11080168
Subject Category: Agriculture
Volume/Issue: 11/8 | Page No: 2264-2276
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-08-16
Accepted: 2026-08-21
Published: 2026-09-21
Abstract
Stability analysis is a major constraint to the identification and deployment of wheat genotypes with consistently high performance across contrasting production environments. This study evaluated the yield performance and stability of 67 wheat genotypes comprising 15 parental lines, three testers, four checks and 45 F₁ hybrids across three locations in Nigeria. The genotypes were evaluated in a randomized complete block design with three replications, and stability was assessed using the Eberhart and Russell model based on genotype mean performance, regression coefficient (bᵢ) and deviation from regression (S²dᵢ). The evaluated traits included biomass yield, harvest index, grain yield per plant, and grain weight per spike, 1000-grain weight, spike length, number of grains per spike, chlorophyll content, and number of productive tillers, grain-filling period and number of spikelets per spike. Marked genotypic differences in mean performance and stability parameters were observed across traits. For grain yield per plant, DH-3086 × PBW-343 and DBW-222 × PBW ZN1 combined relatively high mean performance with comparatively favorable stability parameters. DBW-173 and PBW ZN1 showed comparatively low environmental responsiveness and relatively good stability, although their mean grain yields were moderate. For chlorophyll content, several hybrids, particularly HD-3721 × PBW-343 and PBW-550 × PBW-343, showed high mean performance with comparatively favorable stability. Overall, no single genotype was consistently superior and stable for all evaluated traits, emphasizing the importance of trait-specific selection and multi-environment testing in wheat breeding for Nigeria. The identified high-performing and comparatively stable genotypes provide useful breeding material for developing wheat cultivars with improved adaptability and yield stability.
Keywords
Bread wheat; stability analysis; grain yield; wheat breeding
Downloads
References
1. Bouchareb, R., & Guendouz, A. (2022). Grain yield stability analysis of some durum wheat (Triticum durum L) genotypes growing under sub-humid conditions. Agricultural Science Digest, 42, 48–52. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Dhiwar, K., Sharma, D. J., Agrawal, P. A., & Pandey, D. (2020). Stability analysis in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry, 9(5), 295–298. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Eberhart, S. A., & Russell, W. A. (1966). Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop Science, 6, 36–40. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Fellahi, Z. A., Hannachi, A., Bouzerzour, H., & Boutekrabt, A. (2019). Line × tester mating design analysis for grain yield and yield related traits in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). International Journal of Agronomy. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Gami, R. A., Tank, C. J., Patel, S. S., Chauhan, R. M., & Patel, C. G. (2010). Genetic analysis for grain yield and quality in durum wheat (Triticum durum) under late sown condition. Green Farming, 1(6), 600–601. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Gulzar, S., Kamaluddin, Bhatt, M. A., Yusuf, N., & Khan, M. A. (2015). Stability analysis for yield, yield component and quality traits in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under temperate conditions in Kashmir Valley. Plant Archives, 15(1), 433–440. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Gupta, V. K., Agarwal, A. P., & Minz, M. G. (2019). Combining ability analysis for yield and its component traits in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under timely sown irrigated condition. International Journal of Bio-resource and Stress Management, 8(6), 784–789. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Hajer, S. A. H., Salih, M. M., & Altaweel, M. S. (2021). Heterosis and combining ability for yield and its related traits in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Plant Cell Biotechnology and Molecular Biology, 22(33), 46–53. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. IBPGR & ICRISAT. (1993). Descriptors for sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench]. International Board for Plant Genetic Resources, Rome, Italy; ICRISAT, Patancheru, India. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Jat, M. L., Jat, R. K., Singh, P., Jat, S. L., Sidhu, H. S., & Jat, H. S. (2020). Predicting yield and stability analysis of wheat under different crop management systems across agro-ecosystems in India. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 8, 1977–2012. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Kant, L., Mahajan, V., & Gupta, H. S. (2011). Mid-parent advantage and heterobeltiosis in hybrids from crosses of winter and spring wheat. SABRAO Journal of Breeding and Genetics, 43(2), 91. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Kshatri, A., Chaudhari, P., Agrawal, A. P., & Sharma, D. J. (2021). Stability analysis of wheat genotypes under different water regimes. International Journal of Chemical Studies, 6(4), 34–45. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Kumar, A., Mishra, V. K., Vyas, R. P., & Singh, V. (2019). Heterosis and combining ability analysis in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). International Scholars Journal, 6(2), 75–79. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Kumar, D., Kumar, A., Kaur, S., & Yadav, A. K. (2020). Combining ability for yield attributing traits in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry, Special Issue, 2730–2735. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Kumar, P. S., Verma, D. K., Tiwari, A. K., Raji, V., Singh, G., & Raghvendra, S. (2020). Yield gap under late sowing through front line demonstrations in eastern Uttar Pradesh. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, Special Issue, 180–184. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Madariya, R. B., Poshiya, V. K., & Kavani, R. H. (2001). Phenotypic stability of yield and its contributing characters in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L. em. Thell.). Madras Agricultural Journal, 88, 648–650. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Maeng, D. J. (2019). Studies of yield and yield components in hybrid winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). African Journal of Biotechnology, 10, 2875–2885. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Meena, H. S., Kumar, D., Srivastava, T. K., & Prasad, S. R. (2014). Stability for grain yield and its contributing traits in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 84, 1486–1495. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Patel, B. C., Rojasara, Y. M., Akbari, V. R., & Patel, J. A. (2021). Stability analysis for grain yield in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) for irrigated ecosystems. Journal of Wheat Research, 6(2), 160–161. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Ranjana & Kumar, S. (2023). Genotype × environment interaction over extended dates of sowing for grain yield and its attributing traits in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Annals of Biological Research, 4, 238–241. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Saleem, N., Ahmad, M., Wani, S. A., & Dar, Z. A. (2015). Genotype × environment interaction and stability analysis in wheat for protein and gluten contents. Scientific Research and Essays, 10(7), 260–265. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Samier, K., & Ismail, A. (2021). Heterosis and combining ability analysis for yield and its components in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 4(8), 1–9. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Siddhi, S., Patel, J. B., & Patel, N. (2019). Stability analysis in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry, 7(4), 290–297. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Uresh, N., & Bishnoi, O. P. (2020). Review on hybrid wheat, problems and prospective. International Journal of Current Advanced Research, 8, 120–125. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Breeding for a Greener Future: Selective Breeding and Crossbreeding Approaches to Minimize Methane Emissions in Ruminant Livestock
- Determinants of Adoption of Post-Harvest Losses Prevention Techniques among Banana/Plantain Marketers in Lagos State, Nigeria
- Enhancing Rice Yield Prediction Using UAV-Based Multispectral Imaging and Machine Learning Algorithms
- Seed-Borne Fungi of Groundnuts (Arachis Hypogaea) and Their Management with Ginger (Zingiber Officinale) Extract In Makurdi, Nigeria
- The Influence of Landforms and Slope on Agricultural Cropping Patterns in Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar District