Governing Digital Transformation in Non-Governmental Organisations: How Board Governance and Leadership Behaviours Shape Sustainable Digital Transformation in Nigerian NGOs

Digital transformation is increasingly reshaping how non-governmental organisations (NGOs) mobilises resources, deliver programmes, manage employees, report to donors, protect data and demonstrate organisational impact. However, digital transformation is frequently approached as a technology acquisition exercise rather than as a strategic governance and organisational-development challenge. This article examines how board governance and leadership behaviours shape the successful implementation of digital transformation frameworks in Nigerian NGOs. The study builds on empirical evidence from 317 respondents drawn from NGOs in South-South Nigeria. The underlying quantitative study examined transformational, transactional, visionary and collaborative leadership, corporate governance practices and financial sustainability using structured questionnaire data, multiple regression and moderation analysis. The findings demonstrated significant positive effects of transformational leadership (β = 0.449, p = .048), transactional leadership (β = 1.290, p < .001) and corporate governance (β = 1.452, p < .001) on financial sustainability, with the overall model explaining 77% of the variance. Corporate governance also significantly constrained the effect of transactional leadership under highly regulated conditions, suggesting that governance can simultaneously enable accountability and restrict managerial flexibility. Building on these findings and contemporary digital-governance literature, the article develops a Board–Leadership Digital Transformation Governance Framework (BL-DTGF) comprising board digital oversight, strategic alignment, leadership behaviour, digital capability, change management, data governance, cybersecurity, performance accountability and continuous organisational learning. The article argues that successful digital transformation in NGOs depends less on technology acquisition than on the ability of boards and executives to establish strategic clarity, appropriate governance, leadership commitment, organisational readiness and mechanisms for learning and adaptation. The framework provides actionable guidance for NGO boards and senior management seeking to convert digital investments into sustainable organisational capability and measurable development impact.

Digital Transformation, NGO governance, Board Governance, Leadership Behaviour, Organisational Development, Digital Strategy, Sustainability, Nigeria, Nonprofit Organisations, strategic management.

1. Abera, M. (2025). Impact of digitalization: a qualitative study on impact of digitalization within organizations in Ethiopia (Doctoral dissertation, Technische Universität Wien). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Autio, C., Schwartz, R., Dunietz, J., Jain, S., Stanley, M., Tabassi, E., Hall, P., & Roberts, K. (2024). Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework: Generative Artificial Intelligence Profile. National Institute of Standards and Technology. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.AI.600-1 (NIST) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Cordery, C. J., Goncharenko, G., Polzer, T., McConville, D., & Belal, A. (2023). NGOs’ performance, governance, and accountability in the era of digital transformation. The British Accounting Review, 55(5), Article 101239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2023.101239 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Hanelt, A., Bohnsack, R., Marz, D., & Antunes Marante, C. (2021). A systematic review of the literature on digital transformation: Insights and implications for strategy and organizational change. Journal of Management Studies, 58(5), 1159–1197. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12639 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Jarvis, L. (2026). The NGO Digital Divide: Structural Barriers to Digital Transformation in Nigerian Non-Governmental Organizations. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 1-10. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Martínez-Peláez, R., Ochoa-Brust, A., Rivera, S., Félix, V. G., Ostos, R., Brito, H., ... & Mena, L. J. (2023). Role of digital transformation for achieving sustainability: mediated role of stakeholders, key capabilities, and technology. Sustainability, 15(14), 11221. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Mathias Adoyi. (2026). The moderating effect of corporate governance practices on the relationship between leadership styles and financial sustainability of non-governmental organizations in South-South, Nigeria [Doctoral dissertation]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Mergel, I., Edelmann, N., & Haug, N. (2019). Defining digital transformation: Results from expert interviews. Government Information Quarterly, 36(4), Article 101385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.06.002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Moaz, A., & Awny, M. M. (2025). Digital transformation of non-governmental organizations in Egypt: Harnessing technology for social impact. In Interdisciplinary studies on digital transformation and innovation: Business, education, and medical approaches (pp. 157-190). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Morgado Oliveira, J., & F. Gomes, C. (2024). Leveraging digital transformation on the path to sustainable development: the role of excellence models. Business Process Management Journal, 30(4), 1340-1366. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. National Institute of Standards and Technology. (2023). Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0). U.S. Department of Commerce. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.AI.100-1 (NIST) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. National Institute of Standards and Technology. (2026). NIST AI Risk Management Framework. (NIST) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. National Institute of Standards and Technology. (2026). NIST AI RMF Playbook. (NIST AI Resource Center) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Obiakor, M. I., & Oruonyeije, A. A. (2025). The Impact of Financial Reporting Standards on Donor Trust in Girl-Child Education Initiatives in Nigeria. International Nexus Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 2(1), 57-70. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Okafor, C. (2024). Civil Society in Digital Governance: Building Advocacy Capacity for Technological Transformation in Nigeria. Asian Digital Governance Problems, 1(2), 42-57. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Okonkwo, C., & Anele, A. (2026). Digital Transformation and Sustainable Development in Emerging Economies: Moderating Effects of Institutions, Skills, and Affordability. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Pinski, M., Hofmann, T., & Benlian, A. (2024). AI literacy for the top management: An upper echelons perspective on corporate AI orientation and implementation ability. Electronic Markets, 34, 24. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Sheriffdeen, K. (2026). Digital Transformation Readiness Models for Small and Medium Enterprises. International Journal of Economics and Business Management Research, 2(1), 1-8. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and micro-foundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. USA National Institute of Standard and Technology (NIST's) Contemporary Risk-Management Approach. https://www.nist.gov/itl/ai-risk-management-framework/nist-ai-rmf-playbook?utm_source=chatgpt.com [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Vial, G. (2019). Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28(2), 118–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2019.01.003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Vial, G. (2019). Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28(2), 118–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2019.01.003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Wessel, L., Baiyere, A., Ologeanu-Taddei, R., Cha, J., & Jensen, T. B. (2021). Unpacking the difference between digital transformation and IT-enabled organisational transformation. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 22(1), 102–129. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00655 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Xia, L., Cao, Z., & Bilawal Khaskheli, M. (2025). How digital technology and business innovation enhance economic–environmental sustainability in legal organizations. Sustainability, 17(14), 6532. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Board Characteristics and Environmental Disclosure; A Review of Literatures
• A Study of the Effectiveness of Risk Management Practices in Financial Loss Reduction in Zambian State-Owned Enterprises. A Case of Zambia Railways Limited (ZRL)
• Social and Environmental Reporting Practices in Zambia: A Scoping Review of Evidence.
• Sustainability Disclosure and Performance of Firms in Nigeria
• Millennials and Buy Now Pay Later Adoption in Sabah: Trends, Determinants, and Insights from the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology 2 and Perceived Risk Framework