Application of Genetic Algorithm for Optimal Design of Portal Frame Structures

Authors

Onwuka D.O

Department of Civil Engineering, Federal University of Technology Owerri (Nigeria)

Njoku F.C

Department of Civil Engineering, Federal University of Technology Owerri (Nigeria)

Okorie D

Department of Civil Engineering, Federal University of Technology Owerri (Nigeria)

Ukachukwu O. C

Department of Civil Engineering, Federal University of Technology Owerri (Nigeria)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS.2025.10100000194

Subject Category: Design

Volume/Issue: 10/10 | Page No: 2274-2284

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-11-10

Accepted: 2025-11-18

Published: 2025-11-22

Abstract

This study developed and applied a MATLAB-based Genetic Algorithm (GA) program for the optimal design of steel portal frames with the aim of minimising cross-sectional area, weight, and cost. A single-span pitched-roof frame of 30 m span, 7 m eave height, and 3.5 m overheight was analysed, with variations in frame spacing from 6 m to 7.5 m, using S275 steel and BS 5950 design provisions. The GA optimisation consistently converged to efficient solutions, achieving 4–13 % cost savings and up to 10 % weight reduction compared with the empirical method. Results further showed that the column plastic modulus was approximately 50 % greater than that of the rafter, rafter depth was about span/55, and purlin depth was roughly one-quarter of the rafter depth. Although minor variations occurred due to stochastic algorithm behaviour, all runs produced results within the same performance bounds. The findings confirm the reliability of the developed GA framework as a practical and computationally efficient tool for designing cost-effective and structurally sound steel portal frames.

Keywords

Genetic algorithm, optimisation, portal frame, steel structures

Downloads

References

1. Greco, A., Cannizzaro, F., Bruno, R., & Pluchino, A. (2023). A nested genetic algorithm strategy for an optimal seismic design of frames. Computational Optimization and Applications, 87, 677 704. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10589-023-00523-x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Huang, B., et al. (2023). Exploring embodied carbon comparison in lightweight frame structures. Sustainability, 15(20), 15167. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152015167 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Issa, H. K., & Mohammed, S. A. (2010). Design optimisation of steel portal frames using modified distributed genetic algorithms. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Civil, Structural and Environmental Engineering Computing (pp. 1-10). Stirlingshire, UK: Civil-Comp Press. doi:10.4203/ccp.93.86 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Martins, J. P., Correia, J., Ljubinković, F., & Simões da Silva, L. (2023). Cost optimisation of steel I girder cross sections using genetic algorithms. Structures, 55, 379 388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2023.06.030 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Phan, D. T., Lim, J. B. P., Tanyimboh, T. T., Wrzesien, A. M., Sha, W., & Lawson, R. M. (2013). Optimization of cold-formed steel portal frame buildings using genetic algorithms. Computers & Structures, 89(15-16), 1653-1663. doi:10.1016/j.compstruc.2011.10.010 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Ross McKinstray, R., Lim, J. B. P., Sha, W., & Tanyimboh, T. T. (2014). Optimization of cold-formed steel portal frames subject to stressed-skin action using genetic algorithms. Thin-Walled Structures, 75, 76-86. doi:10.1016/j.tws.2013.10.005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Salama, A., Atif Farag, A., Eraky, A., El Sisi, A. A., & Samir, R. (2023). Embodied carbon minimization for single story steel gable frames. Buildings, 13(3), 739. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13030739 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Salama, A., et al. (2023). An enhanced meta-heuristic algorithm for optimizing gable frames with tapered members for different spans. Engineering Optimization. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(23)00080-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Silva, F. T. da, & Pimentel, R. L. (2022). Optimization of steel portal frames under a parametric structural design framework. Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction, 27(4), 04022038. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000748 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Stulpinas, M., & Daniūnas, R. (2024). Optimization of cold formed thin walled cross sections in portal frames using a genetic algorithm. Buildings, 14(8), 2565. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14082565 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Whitworth, A. H., & Tsavdaridis, K. D. (2020). Embodied energy optimisation of steel concrete composite beams using a genetic algorithm. Procedia Manufacturing, 44, 417 424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.02.275 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Xue, P., Wan, Y., Takahashi, J., & Akimoto, H. (2024). Structural optimization using a genetic algorithm aiming for the minimum mass of vertical axis wind turbines using composite materials. Heliyon, 10, e33185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33185 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles