Assessment of Fertility Status, Degradation Rate and Vulnerability Potentials of Soils of Selected Sites in Makurdi Area of Benue State-Nigeria

Authors

A. O. Adaikwu

Department of Soil Science, Joseph Sarwuan Tarka University, Makurdi, Benue State (Nigeria)

F. Etuonu

Department of Soil Science, Joseph Sarwuan Tarka University, Makurdi, Benue State (Nigeria)

P. I. Agber

Department of Soil Science, Joseph Sarwuan Tarka University, Makurdi, Benue State (Nigeria)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS.2025.101100041

Subject Category: Environment

Volume/Issue: 10/11 | Page No: 436-445

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-11-16

Accepted: 2025-11-16

Published: 2025-12-09

Abstract

This study evaluates the fertility, degradation rate, and vulnerability of soils in selected sites in Makurdi area of Benue State, Nigeria. The objectives were to assess the soil fertility status, determine the rate of soil degradation and vulnerability, and suggest management strategies to improve soil quality and productivity. A total of 60 composites soil samples were collected from six sites using a systematic grid design, at 0 – 30 cm depth. The samples were analyzed for soil physical and chemical properties. Descriptive statistics tools were used for the analysis with SPSS software. Soil degradation and vulnerability were assessed using the Soil Degradation Rating and Soil Vulnerability Potential frameworks. Results indicate that the soils are predominantly loamysand texture, Soil bulk density ranged from 1.35 - 1.46 gcm-3, gravimetric water content ranged from 12.95–20.53%, while saturated hydraulic conductivity ranged from 3.05-6.73 x 10-3 cm hr-1. Soil pH varied between 6.51 and 6.78.Organic matter content ranged from 28.9 - 31.3 g kg-1. Total nitrogen content ranged from 0.30 to 3.80 g kg-1. Available phosphorus content varied between 1.79 and 3.5 mgkg-1 across the soils of the study area. The exchangeable bases of soils were in the order of Ca2+>Mg2+>Na+>K+ on the exchange complex. Whereas, the physical properties of the study area suggest moderate to high soil degradation rating and vulnerability potential the chemical properties suggest soil with moderate to low soil degradation rating and vulnerability potential. These differences highlight the importance of considering multiple soil health dimensions, not only chemical but also physical and biological, for a comprehensive assessment. Continuous monitoring and sustainable land management practices are recommended to maintain these soil qualities and prevent degradation escalation.

Keywords

fertility status, degradation rate, vulnerability potential

Downloads

References

1. Adams, R., & White, S. (2018). Cation exchange capacity in agricultural soils. Soil Science, 183(7), 345–357. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Adaikwu A. O., Salako F. K., Busari M. A. and Azeez J. O. (2020) Restorative effects of amendments on artificially degraded soils in the Southern Guinea Savanna of [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Soil Science, (NJSS) 30 (1) 2020 124-132 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Agbede, O. O., Ojeniyi, S. O., & Adeyemo, A. J. (2011). Soil physical properties and growth of maize as influenced by green manure and organic fertilizer. Journal of Soil Science and Environmental Management, 2(1), 9–13. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Blanco-Canqui, H., & Lal, R. (2008). Soil and crop response to harvesting corn residues for biofuel production. Geoderma,141(3–4),355–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2007.06.006libguides.navitas [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Brady, N. C., & Weil, R. R. (2008). The nature and properties of soils (14th ed.). Pearson Prentice Hall. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Brown, P. (2018). Effects of land management practices on soil moisture retention. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 259, 36–44. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Brown, P. (2019). Impact of soil compaction on root growth and water infiltration. Plant and Soil, 433(1), 65–76. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Dasog, G. S. (2011). Soil texture and its impact on soil moisture retention. Journal of Soil Science, 181(2), 75–82. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Doran, J. W., & Zeiss, M. R. (2000). Soil health and sustainability: Managing the biotic component of soil quality. Applied Soil Ecology, 15(1), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0929-1393(00)00067-6[1] [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Esu, I. E. (1991). An introduction to soil fertility assessment. Nigerian Journal of Soil Science, 1(1), 21–29. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Fagbemi, A., & Akamigbo, F. O. R. (1986). Soil taxonomy: A tool for soil classification in Nigeria. Journal of the Science of Agriculture, Food Technology and the Environment, 2(1), 27–35. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Garcia, D., Martinez, F., & Lopez, J. (2018). Spatial variability of soil organic matter and its implications for sustainable soil management practices. Geoderma, 320, 47–56. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Johnson, A., & Garcia, D. (2020). Exchangeable cations and their influence on soil fertility and crop productivity. Agronomy Journal, 112(3), 764–772. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Johnson, A., Smith, B., & Jones, C. (2018). Hydraulic conductivity and its role in soil management. Journal of Environmental Quality, 47(5), 1122–1130. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Johnson, A., Smith, B., & Jones, C. (2019). Organic carbon dynamics in tropical soils. Global Change Biology, 25(5), 1512–1526. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Jones, A., & Simmons, C. (2015). Vulnerability assessment of soil ecosystems: Addressing regional risks. Environmental Science and Policy, 48, 133– [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2014.12.002libguides.navitas [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Jones, A., Smith, B., & Johnson, C. (2018). Soil pH variability and its implications for crop production. Field Crops Research, 219, 51–60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Jones, A., Smith, B., & Johnson, C. (2019). Influence of land use on soil moisture content in a tropical environment. Soil Use and Management, 35(3), 420–430. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Kogbe, C. A. (1981). Geology of Nigeria. Elizabethan Publishing Co. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Lal, R. (2009). Soil degradation as a reason for inadequate global food production. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 29(1), 65–74. https://doi.org/10.1051/agro:2008021libguides.navitas [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Lal, R. (2015). Restoring soil quality to mitigate soil degradation. Sustainability, 7(5), 5875–5895. https://doi.org/10.3390/su7055875libguides.navitas [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Miller, M. H., & Johnson, A. (2021). Exchangeable acidity and its impact on soil fertility. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 85(3), 650–660. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Montgomery, D. R. (2007). Soil erosion and agricultural sustainability. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(33), 13268–13272. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Offodile, M. E. (2014). The geology of the Lower Benue Valley. Bulletin of the Nigerian Mining, Geology and Metallurgical Society, 21, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Ojanuga, A. G. (2006a). Agroclimatology and geography of Nigeria's agro-ecological zones. Agricultural Journal, 42(1), 1–10.library.ulethbridge [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Ojanuga, A. G. (2006b). Agroecological zones of Nigeria: Assessment of land degradation. National Research Institute for Chemical Technology. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Oldeman, L. R., Hakkeling, R. T. A., & Sombroek, W. G. (1991). World map of the status of human-induced soil degradation: An explanatory note (2nd ed.). United Nations Environment Programme. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Smith, J., & Brown, P. (2019). Role of exchangeable bases in enhancing soil fertility and plant growth. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 65(4), 358–367. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Smith, J., Brown, L., & Thompson, P. (2015). Impact of soil compaction on root growth, nutrient uptake, and water movement in agricultural soils. Soil Science Journal, 180(4), 223–231. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Smith, J., Brown, P., & Thompson, P. (2019). Role of exchangeable bases in enhancing soil fertility and plant growth. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 65(4), 358–367. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Smith, J. K., & Jones, A. B. (2020). Nitrogen content in tropical soils: Implications for crop production. Journal of Agricultural Science, 158(2), 100–115. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Smith, J., Johnson, A., & Brown, P. (2017). The impact of soil pH on nutrient availability. Agricultural Sciences, 8(9), 1021–1029. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Smith, J., Johnson, A., & Brown, P. (2020). Soil organic matter content as an indicator of soil health: Implications for nutrient availability and soil structure in agricultural systems. Soil Health Journal, 25(2), 312–322. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Smith, J., Johnson, A., & Brown, P. (2021). Phosphorus content variability in tropical soils. Soil and Plant Nutrition, 42(1), 34–45. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Vågen, T.-G., Winowiecki, L. A., Abegaz, A., & Hadgu, K. M. (2017). Land degradation surveillance: An evidence-based approach to monitoring and assessing the global extent of soil degradation. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 15(9), 474–481. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1733libguides.navitas [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles