Vegetative Growth Response of Spinach (Spinacia Oleracea L.) to the Transition from Conventional to Nano Urea

Spinach is a nutrient rich leafy vegetable with high nitrogen demand. Its growth and productivity are strongly influenced by the availability of nitrogen. This study evaluated the effect of foliar-applied nano urea on the vegetative growth, chlorophyll content, and soil nutrient status of spinach in Hajee Mohammad Danesh Science and Technology University, Dinajpur, Bangladesh. The pot experiment was conducted in open-field conditions during the Rabi season, from mid-February to March 2025, using a completely randomized design (CRD) with six treatments and three replications. Treatments included T0 = Control (only soil), T1 = 100% RDF, T2 = Only Nano Urea (4 times) + 100% RDF (without Urea), T3 = 4 Times Nano Urea + 50% RDF (No Urea), T4 = 2 Times Nano Urea + 50% RDF, and T5 = No Nano Urea + No Urea + 100% Rest RDF. The results demonstrated that nano-urea treatments, especially the T3 treatment, significantly enhanced vegetative growth, such as plant height (12.81 cm and 17.47 cm at 30 and 45 DAS), number of leaves per plant (4.67 and 6.67 at 30 and 45 DAS), root length (6.90 cm), shoot length (17.47 cm), fresh plant weight (64.31 g), and chlorophyll content like chlorophyll a (11.22 mg g-1 FW), chlorophyll b (3.06 mg g-1 FW), and carotenoid (2.67 mg g-1 FW) compared to conventional fertilizer treatments. Soil nutrient analysis revealed improved availability of N, P, K, and S under nano-fertilizer treatments. The study highlights the potential of nano-urea to improve nitrogen use efficiency, enhance growth, and optimize soil fertility in spinach cultivation, suggesting its suitability as a sustainable nutrient management strategy.

Nano fertilizer, chlorophyll, Carotenoid, growth, and Fertility

1. Abdelraouf, E. A. A. (2016). The effects of nitrogen fertilization on yield and quality of spinach grown in high tunnels. Advances in Environmental Sciences and Agricultural Research, 1(2), 45–53. https://doi.org/10.21608/asejaiqjsae.2016.2517 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Akhtar, N., Ilyas, N., Meraj, T. A., Pour-Aboughadareh, A., Sayyed, R. Z., Mashwani, Z.-U.-R., & Poczai, P. (2022). Improvement of plant responses by nanobiofertilizer: A step towards sustainable agriculture. Nanomaterials, 12(6), 965. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12060965 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Arnon, D. I. (1949). Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts. Polyphenoloxidase in Beta vulgaris. Plant Physiology, 24(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.24.1.1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Challa, L., Bhoyar, S. M., & Oguboyana, S. Y. (2025). Impact of nano urea and nitrogen optimization on growth and nutrient uptake in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Biochemical and Agricultural Research Journal, 9(3), Article 3986. https://doi.org/10.33545/26174693.2025.v9.i3f.3986 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Dhivyalakshmi, S., & Aravinth, K. V. (2025). A review of the effect of nano urea on crop growth and development. ShodhVarta Journal, 4(3). https://shodhvarta.in/index.php/SVJ/article/view/PID-250605 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Gil-Díaz, M., García-Gonzalo, P., Mancho, C., Hernández, L. E., Alonso, J., & Lobo, M. C. (2022). Response of spinach plants to different doses of two commercial nanofertilizers. Scientia Horticulturae, 301, 111143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2022.111143 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Glotra, A., Singh, M., & Maneesha, M. (2023). Nanofertilizers: A Review on the Futuristic Technology of Nutrient Management in Agriculture. Agricultural Reviews, 44(2), 238–244. https://doi.org/10.18805/ag.R-2469 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Gogoi, B., Kanth, R. H., Bhat, T. A., Saxena, A., Khan, I. M., Wani, F. J., Nazir, A., Jan, B., Kounsar, H., Jamsheed, B., Dar, K. A., & P T, J. (2024). Efficacy of Nano Urea on Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Irrigated Maize under Temperate Ecology. Archives of Current Research International, 24(6), 396–409. https://doi.org/10.9734/acri/2024/v24i6797 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Ibrahim, G. A. Z. (2022). Role of bio and nano fertilization in increasing growth and productivity of spinach in sandy soil. Egyptian Journal of Desert Research, 72(2), 265–283. https://doi.org/10.21608/ejdr.2022.142700.1109 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Kumar, S., Muthukumar, S., & Sanjeevkumar, K. (2024). Effect of Nano Urea on Growth, Yield and Quality of Horticulture and Field Crops. In Advances in Horticulture (Vol. 32, pp. 1–13). AkiNik Publications. https://doi.org/10.22271/ed.book.3055 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Lichtenthaler, H. K., & Wellburn, A. R. (1983). Determinations of total carotenoids and chlorophylls a and b of leaf extracts in different solvents. Biochemical Society Transactions, 11(5), 591–592. https://doi.org/10.1042/bst0110591 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Mubashir, A., Nisa, Z., Shah, A. A., Kiran, M., Hussain, I., Ali, N., Zhang, L., Madnay, M. M. Y., Alsiary, W. A., Korany, S. M., Ashraf, M., Al-Mur, B. A., & AbdElgawad, H. (2023). Effect of foliar application of nano-nutrient solution on growth and biochemical attributes of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) under drought stress. Frontiers in Plant Science, 13, 1066790. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.1066790 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Olsen, S.R. 1954. Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. 939. US Department of Agriculture, USA. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Reddy, K. S., Shivay, Y. S., Kumar, D., Parida, B. K., Bora, R., Borate, R. B., Das, K., Mandi, S., Nayak, S., Baral, K., & Alekhya, G. (2025). Nano DAP augments productivity, phosphorus use efficiency, and profitability of spring wheat. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 24771. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-92364-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Saurabh, K., Prakash, V., Dubey, A. K., Ghosh, S., Kumari, A., Sundaram, P. K., Jeet, P., Sarkar, B., Upadhyaya, A., Das, A., Kumar, S., Makarana, G., Kumar, U., & Singh, R. R. (2024). Enhancing sustainability in agriculture with nano-fertilizers. Discover Applied Sciences, 6, 559. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-024-06267-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Sharma, R., Aadesh, Jadoun, S. S., Panwar, K., & Tomar, A. (2024). Growth and Performance of Baby Spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) grown under different organic fertilizers. BIO Web of Conferences, 110, 04005. https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/202411004005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Taha, A., Ghazy, M., & Omar, M. M. (2024). Enhancing spinach performance: Effectiveness of nano-fertilizers in conjunction with conventional NPK fertilizers. Egyptian Journal of Soil Science, 64(3), 927–950. https://doi.org/10.21608/ejss.2024.278586.174 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Walkley, A. and A. Black. 1934. Organic matter was determined by wet digestion: An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter, and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci., 37: 29-38. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Wang, Q., Liao, Y., Zhao, W., Yi, T., Jiang, Y., Zhu, G., Sun, Y., Wang, Q., Huang, L., Chen, F., Zhang, P., & Rui, Y. (2024). Potassium-based nanomaterials significantly enhance nutrient utilization efficiency and promote high crop yields. Environmental Science: Nano, Issue 7, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1039/d4en00148f [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Yashaswini, K. P., Prasanna, S. M., & Patil, S. (2025). Influence of nitrogenous fertilizers (Urea and nano urea) on soil chemical properties: Post-harvest. International Journal of Advanced Chemistry Research, 7(6A), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.33545/26646781.2025.v7.i6a.288 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Breeding for a Greener Future: Selective Breeding and Crossbreeding Approaches to Minimize Methane Emissions in Ruminant Livestock
• Determinants of Adoption of Post-Harvest Losses Prevention Techniques among Banana/Plantain Marketers in Lagos State, Nigeria
• Enhancing Rice Yield Prediction Using UAV-Based Multispectral Imaging and Machine Learning Algorithms
• Seed-Borne Fungi of Groundnuts (Arachis Hypogaea) and Their Management with Ginger (Zingiber Officinale) Extract In Makurdi, Nigeria
• The Influence of Landforms and Slope on Agricultural Cropping Patterns in Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar District