The Legacy of Slavery and Racism in International Relations: Understanding Modern Human Rights Issues through the Lens of the Emancipation Proclamation

The abolition of slavery, formally declared through the Emancipation Proclamation of 1863, represented a watershed moment in the global pursuit of human rights. Yet, the end of legalised slavery did not dissolve the structural and institutionalised racism that continues to shape international relations and global governance. This study investigates the enduring legacy of slavery and its influence on the evolution of human rights discourse within the international system. While slavery as an institution was dismantled in the nineteenth century, racial hierarchies and discriminatory ideologies became embedded in treaties, legal frameworks, and global institutions, perpetuating unequal power relations among states and peoples. Employing a qualitative research design, the study analyses treaties, historical records, and critical literature to trace how racialised thinking was reproduced in international law and policy. The findings reveal that systemic racism persists in the operations of international organisations, the application of human rights norms, and the treatment of marginalised groups across borders. These dynamics demonstrate that the legacies of slavery continue to hinder genuine equality in global governance. By highlighting these continuities, the study underscores the urgent need for a reassessment of international norms and practices. It argues that confronting historical injustices requires a deliberate commitment by global actors to acknowledge, redress, and dismantle entrenched racial inequalities. Ultimately, the paper calls for a more inclusive and equitable international order that not only recognises the historical roots of human rights struggles but also actively advances justice in the present.

Slavery, Racism, Emancipation Proclamation, Human Rights, Racial Capitalism,

1. Achiume, E. T. (2020). Migration as decolonisation. Stanford Law Review, 71(6), 1509–1574. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Achiume, E. T. (2021). Racial discrimination and emerging digital technologies: A human rights analysis. United Nations Report A/76/440. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Anderson, M. (2023). Decolonizing International Law: The Legacy of Slavery and the Quest for Justice. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Banaji, M.R., Fiske, S.T. & Massey, D.S. (2021). Systemic racism: individuals and interactions, institutions and society. Cogn. Research 6, 82 https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-021-00349-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Brantlinger, P. (1985). Victorians and Africans: The genealogy of the myth of the dark continent. Critical Inquiry, 12(1), 166-203. doi:10.1086/448326 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Blackiston, H. S. (1922). Lincoln's emancipation plan. The Journal of Negro History, 7(3), 257-277. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Bassil, N. R. (2006). The Rise and Demise of the Keira Sultanate of Dar Fur. The Journal of North African Studies, 11(4), 347-364. doi:10.1080/13629380601036098 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Bhambra, G., Bouka, Y., Persaud, R., Rutazibwa, O., Thakur, V., Bell, D., Smith, K., Haastrup, T., & Adem, S. (2020). Why is mainstream international relations blind to racism? Ignoring the central role of race and colonialism in world affairs precludes an accurate understanding of the modern state system. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Bhattacharyya, S., & Bhattacharyya, S. (2020). Atlanticism, the Slave Trade, and the Westward Expansion of Western Europe. A History of Global Capitalism: Feuding Elites and Imperial Expansion, 27-43. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Brown, D., L. (2020). ‘It was a modern-day lynching’: Violent deaths reflect a brutal American legacy, https://www.nationalgeographic.com/history/article/history-of-lynching-violent-deaths-reflect-brutalamerican-legacy [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Brown, J. L. (2025). From Jesus to Avocado Toast: Examining How Different Age Cohorts of Black Americans Cope Under Racial Capitalism. Journal of African American Studies, 1-24. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Busumtwi-Sam, J., & Kashyap, R. (2025). Racialised Representations and the Global South: Insights from Critical Race Studies. India Quarterly, 09749284251328227. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Daly, S. F. C. (2019). From crime to coercion: Policing dissent in Abeokuta, Nigeria, 1900–1940. The Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History, 47(3), 474-489. doi:10.1080/03086534.2019.1576833 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Darity, W., Craemer, T., Berry, D. R., & Francis, D. V. (2024). Black Reparations in the United States, 2024: An Introduction. RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences, 10(2), 1–28. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48775323 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Dancy, G., & Michel, J. (2022). Human rights enforcement and global inequality. Human Rights Quarterly, 44(3), 399–428. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. De Genova, N. (2022). The racialisation of refugees: Ukraine and beyond. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 45(12), 2245–2253. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Enyia, A. (2024). Global Reparations Agenda for Afrodescendants: An Overview of Recent Developments and the Way Forward. Development and Change, 55(4), 601-627. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Emancipation Proclamation. (1863). Abraham Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation, January 1, 1863. National Archives. https://www.archives.gov/exhibits/featured-documents/emancipation-proclamation [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Falcão Jr, J. W. (2024). What to Do after the Emancipation Proclamation? A Princeton Seminary Alumnus’s Views on Racial Issues and Slavery in Brazil and the United States (1852–1867). The Journal of World Christianity, 14(2), 228-239. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Fitzgerald, R. (2024). British Labour Management & Industrial Welfare: 1846–1939. Taylor & Francis. 21. FitzGerald, D. (2019). Refuge beyond reach: How rich democracies repel asylum seekers. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Fokkens, A. M. (2023). The ovamboland expedition of 1917: the deposing of King Mandume. Small Wars & Insurgencies, 34(2), 382-421. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Foner, E. (2019). The second founding: How the Civil War and Reconstruction remade the Constitution. W. W. Norton & Company. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Getachew, A. (2019). Worldmaking after empire: The rise and fall of self-determination. Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Gevers, C. (2023). Race, Racism, and International Law. AJIL Unbound, 117, 71–76. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/american-journal-of-international-law/ajil-unbound-bysymposium/race-racism-and-international-law [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Giulia B. (2023). Africa's promise: Chief M.K.O. Abiola and reparations for slavery and colonialism, [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. 1990-1993. International Journal of African Historical Studies, 56 (2), pp.141-157. ⟨hal-04439436⟩ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Howard-Hassmann, R. E. (2004). Reparations to Africa and the group of eminent persons. Cahiers d’études africaines, 44(173-174), 81-97. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Ibhawoh, B. (2018). Human Rights in Africa. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Katz, W. L. (2024). Breaking the Chains: African American Slave Resistance. Seven Stories Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Koca, B. T. (2023). The racialised politics of protection: Ukrainian refugees and beyond. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 49(13), 3123–3139. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2023.2172157 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. League of Nations Covenant. (1919). The Covenant of the League of Nations. Yale Law School: The Avalon Project. https://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/leagcov.asp [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Lerner, N. (2024). The UN Convention on the elimination of all forms of racial discrimination. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Mahoney, K. E., & Mahoney, P. (Eds.). (2023). Human Rights in the 21st Century: A Global Challenge. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Manjapra, K (2024, August 23). How the long fight for slavery reparations is slowly being won. https://www.theguardian.com/news/2020/oct/06/long-fight-for-slavery-reparations-evanston-chicago [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Michalopoulos, S., & Papaioannou, E. (2017). The long economic and political shadow of history volume i. a global view. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Mohan, P. S. (2025). Climate Reparations for a Just Response to Climate Change: A Review of Historical Responsibility and Future Implications. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 16(2), e70007. 37. Mubangizi, J. C. (2025). Towards a Human-Rights-Based Approach to Economic Development in Africa. In Economic Development and Human Rights in Contemporary Sub-Saharan Africa (pp. 1-18). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Mueller, R. J. (2022). History 1100 Reader: Foundations of Western Civilization, Ancient to Medieval. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Nowak, M. (2021). Introduction to the international human rights regime (Vol. 14). Brill. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Pahuja, S. (2020). Decolonising international law: Development, economic growth and the politics of universality. Leiden Journal of International Law, 33(2), 315–335. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Pakenham, T. (2020). The scramble for Africa. Harper Perennial. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Porter, B. (2020). Interdependence of human rights. In Research handbook on economic, social and cultural rights as human rights (pp. 301-326). Edward Elgar Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Pew Research Center. (2019). Most Americans say the legacy of slavery still affects black people in the U.S. today. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2019/06/17/most-americans-say-the-legacy-ofslavery-still-affects-black-people-in-the-u-s-today/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Ramcharan, B. G. (2021). The concept and present status of the international protection of human rights: forty years after the universal declaration (Vol. 13). Brill. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Read, J. H. (2023). Sovereign of a Free People: Abraham Lincoln, Majority Rule, and Slavery. University Press of Kansas. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Roberts, J. D., Dickinson, K. L., Hendricks, M. D., & Jennings, V. (2022). “I can’t breathe”: examining the legacy of American racism on determinants of health and the ongoing pursuit of environmental justice. Current environmental health reports, 9(2), 211-227. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Reuters. (2024, September 25). Europe's racial disparities cannot be united from historical wrongs, the report says. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/europes-racial-disparities-cannot-be-untiedhistorical-wrongs-report-says-2024-09-25/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Roycraft, P. (2024). The Plot to Perpetuate Slavery: How George McClellan, Southern Spies and a Confidence Man Nearly Derailed Emancipation. McFarland. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Lukin, A. V. (2020). The Theory of Universal Racism. Russia in Global Affairs, 18(3), 182-199. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Tanyu, H. (2020). "Black with a Capital "B": Mainstream Media Join Black Press in Upper-casing Race". www.blackvoicenews.com. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Ugwanyi, D. M., Okonkwo, G. K., Amadi, I. A., & Nnamani, I. R. (2025). Economic Trauma as Catalyst for Violence and Social Survival in EE Sule’s Sterile Sky. Nigerian Journal of Social Psychology, 8(1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. United Nations. (2024). Reparatory Justice: Addressing the Legacy of Slavery and Colonialism. United Nations Human Rights Council Report. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. Uzuegbunam, I., Kapletia, D., & Ituma, A. (2024). Historical shocks and community-based enterprises: [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. the slave trades, family dynamics, and social entrepreneurship in Africa. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 1-25. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. UNHCR. (2022, March 21). UNHCR calls for equal treatment for all fleeing Ukraine. UNHCR. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

57. https://www.unhcr.org/news/press/2022/3/6238c8a44/unhcr-calls-equal-treatment-fleeing-ukraine.html [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

58. UNESCO. (2024). The deep legacy of slavery. The UNESCO Courier. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

59. https://courier.unesco.org/en/articles/deep-legacy-slavery [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

60. United Nations. (2023). 2023 Remembrance Programme. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

61. https://www.un.org/en/rememberslavery/observance/2023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

62. Uzoigwe, G. N. (1984). Reflections on the Berlin West Africa Conference, 1884-1885. Journal of the Historical Society of Nigeria, 12(3/4), 9-22. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

63. Webb, S. (2023). The Slave Trade in Africa: An Ongoing Holocaust. Pen and Sword History. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

64. Wilson, J. T. (2024). Emancipation. Its Course and Progress from 1102 to 1875, with a Cursory Review of President Lincoln's Proclamation, and the XIII Amendment. BoD–Books on Demand. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

65. Zvobgo, K. and Loken, M. (2020). Why Race Matters in International Relations: Western Dominance and White Privilege Permeate the Field. It’s Time to Change that; https://foreignpolicy. com/2020/06/19/whyrace-matters-international-relations-ir/> [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Occupational Culture in Relation to Job Satisfaction and Work Performance among Police
• Inmates' Character Reformation and Recidivism in Nigeria: A Study of Okaka Correctional Facility, Yenagoa, Bayelsa State.
• Life World of Former Female Basic Internal Security Operations Course (BISOC) Trainees
• Efficacy of Fingerprint and Facial Recognition in Enhancing National Security in Kenya
• No More Catcalling: Awareness of College of Criminal Justice Education Students on Republic Act 11313 Also Known as Safe Spaces Act