Probiotic Activities of Lactic Acid Bacteria Isolated from Different Types of Pap Against Selected Bacterial Strains
Authors
Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka (Nigeria)
Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka (Nigeria)
Ezeuko Chukwuemeka Marcellinus
Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka (Nigeria)
Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka (Nigeria)
Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka (Nigeria)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS.2025.10120013
Subject Category: Microbiology
Volume/Issue: 10/12 | Page No: 150-167
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2025-12-15
Accepted: 2025-12-22
Published: 2026-01-02
Abstract
Probiotics are different kinds of living organisms that have beneficial health effects on humans. Their first origin was from dairy products, but today most probiotic organisms are sources from fermenting fruits and other agricultural products. Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) majorly used as probiotics are groups of Gram-positive, non-sporulating, anaerobic or facultative aerobic cocci or rods, which produce lactic acid as one of the main fermentation products of metabolism from carbohydrates sources. This study investigated the probiotic potential of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) isolated from different types of ogi (pap), a traditional fermented cereal porridge made from maize (Zea mays), millet (Pennisetum typhoideum), and guinea corn (Sorghum bicolor). A total of fifteen ogi samples were collected from Eke Awka market, Nigeria. Using pour-plate method, total bacterial count was done using nutrient agar while total LAB count was done using deMan Rogosa and Sharpe (MRS) agar. Isolates that developed on the plates were characterized and identified using standard biochemical methods. Molecular identification of the isolates were also done using 16s rRNA sequencing. The isolates were evaluated for probiotic properties, including tolerance to NaCl (2–8%), bile salts (0.3%), and phenol (0.1–0.4%). The antimicrobial activity of crude bacteriocins from the LAB isolates was tested against multidrug-resistant clinical specimen namely; Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecalis, Bacillus cereus, Escherichia coli, Salmonella enterica, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Results indicated that the total bacterial counts ranged from 3.50 × 104 to 2.30 × 105 CFU/ml, while LAB counts ranged from 1.80 × 104 to 8.90 × 104 CFU/ml in seven of the samples. Five LAB isolates were phenotypically identified as Pediococcus acidilactici, Lactobacillus delbrueckii, Lactobacillus plantarum, Lactobacillus fermentum, and Leuconostoc mesenteroides. Molecular identification via 16S rRNA sequencing confirmed the isolates to be Lactiplantibacillus plantarum and Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus. All LAB isolates exhibited inhibitory effects against at least three pathogens, with Lactiplantibacillus plantarum (J3) showing broad-spectrum activity against all test organisms. The findings showed that traditionally fermented ogi is a valuable source of probiotic LAB which can be harnessed and purified and used against some multidrug resistant organisms to achieve healthy conditions.
Keywords
Probiotics, Lactic Acid Bacteria, Pap, Antimicrobial
Downloads
References
1. Begley, M., Hill, C., and Gahan, C. G. M. (2006). Bile salt hydrolase activity in probiotics. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 72(3): 1729–1738. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Ben-Lagha, A., Bruno, H., Marcelo, G. and Daniel, G. (2017). Antimicrobial potential of bacteriocins in poultry and swine production. VeterinaryResearch, 48: 22 - 28. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Berebon, D. P., Ofokansi, K. C., Attama, A. A., Eze, C. O., Onwusoba, R. C. and Ugwoke, I. C. (2019). Preliminary Studies on Isolation, Bile Tolerance and Antibiogram of Potential Probiotics (Probionts) from Locally Fermented Food Products at Beach Market, Nsukka Metropolis, Enugu State, Nigeria. Biotechnology Journal International, 22(3): 1 - 10. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Cavera, V. L., Arthur, T. D., Kashtanov, D. and Chikindas, M. L. (2015). Bacteriocins and their position in the next wave of conventional antibiotics. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, 46(5): 494 - 501. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Cebeci, A. and Gürakan, C. (2016). Properties of potential probiotic Lactobacillus plantarum strains. Food Microbiology, 20: 511 – 518. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Cheesbrough, M. (2010). District laboratory practices in Tropical countries, part 2. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, UK. Pp. 89-92. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Cleveland, J., Montville, T. J., Nes, I. F., and Chikindas, M. L. (2001). Bacteriocins: safe, natural antimicrobials for food preservation. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 71(1): 1–20. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Cotter, P. D., Ross, R. P., and Hill, C. (2013). Bacteriocins — a viable alternative to antibiotics? Nature Reviews Microbiology, 11(2): 95–105. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Dobson, A., Cotter, P. D., Ross, R. P., and Hill, C. (2012). Bacteriocin production: a probiotic trait? Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 78(1): 1–6. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. FAO/WHO. (2002). Guidelines for the Evaluation of Probiotics in Food. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and World Health Organization Working Group Report. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Giraffa, G. (2014). Overview of the ecology and biodiversity of the LAB. In Lactic Acid Bacteria: Biodiversity and Taxonomy (pp. 45-54). Wiley-Blackwell. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Hoque, M. Z. (2010). Isolation, identification and analysis of probiotic properties of Lactobacillus spp. from selective regional yoghurt. World Journal of Dairy and Food Science, 5(1): 39 –46. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Kanmani, P., Satish-Kumar, R., Yuvaraj, N., Paari, K. A., Pattukumar, V. and Arul, V. (2013). Probiotics and its functionally valuable products – a review. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition,53: 641 – 658. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. LeBlanc, J. G., Chain, F., Martín, R., Bermúdez-Humarán, L. G., Courau, S. and Langella, P. (2011). Beneficial effects on host energy metabolism of short-chain fatty acids and vitamins produced by commensal and probiotic bacteria. Microbial cell factories, 16(1): 79 - 87. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Leroy, F., and De Vuyst, L. (2004). Lactic acid bacteria as functional starter cultures for the food fermentation industry. Trends in Food Science and Technology, 15(2): 67–78. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Liao, S. F. and Nyachoti, C. M. (2017). Using probiotics to improve swine gut health and nutrient utilization. Animal Nutrition, 3(4): 331 - 343. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Mokoena, M. P. (2017). Lactic acid bacteria and their bacteriocins: classification, biosynthesis and applications against uropathogens: a mini-review. Molecules, 22(8): 1255. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Oguntoyinbo, F. A., Tourlomousis, P., Gasson, M. J., and Narbad, A. (2016). Analysis of bacterial communities of traditional fermented cereal foods from Ghana and Nigeria. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 145(1): 239–244. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Olanbiwoninu, A. A., and Odunfa, S. A. (2015). Enhancing the production of bioactive compounds in fermented foods using lactic acid bacteria. Food Research International, 104: 86-93. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Onyeze, R. C., Udeh, S. M. C., Okwor, J. C. and Ugwu, P. C. (2013). Isolation and characterisation of bacteria that is associated with the production and spoilage of ogi (Akamu). International Journal of Pharma-Medicine and Biological Sciences, 2(3): 79 - 85. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Ruiz, L., Margolles, A., and Sánchez, B. (2013). Bile resistance mechanisms in Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium. Frontiers in Microbiology, 4: 396. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Sadiqi, S., Hamza, M., Ali, F., Alam, S., Shakeela, Q., Ahmed, S., Ayaz, A., Ali, S., Saqib, S., Ullah, F. and Zaman, W. (2022). Molecular Characterization of Bacterial Isolates from Soil Samples and Evaluation of their Antibacterial Potential against MDRS. Molecules, 27(19): 62 - 81. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Salami, O. O., Banjoko, O. J. and Odusola, K. B. (2015). Hazard analysis and critical control point (HACCP) of ogi (cornmeal) as affected by handlers hygiene. International Journal of Recent Scientific Research, 6(7): 4900 - 4907. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Salvetti, E., Harris, H. M. B., Felis, G. E., and O'Toole, P. W. (2018). Comparative genomics of the genus Lactobacillus reveals robust phylogroups that provide the basis for reclassification. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 84(17): e00993-18. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Segers, M. E., and Lebeer, S. (2014). Towards a better understanding of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG - host interactions. Microbial Cell Factories, 13(Suppl 1): S7. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Siezen, R. J., and van Hylckama Vlieg, J. E. T. (2011). Genomic diversity and versatility of Lactobacillus plantarum, a natural metabolic engineer. Microbial Cell Factories, 10(Suppl 1): S3. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Soccol, C. R., de Souza Vandenberghe, L. P., Spier, M. R., Medeiros, A. B. P., Yamaguishi, C. T., Lindner, J. D. D., Pandey, A. and Thomaz-Soccol, V. (2011). The Potential of Probiotics: A Review. Food Technology and Biotechnology, 48: 413 - 434. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Speranza, B., Racioppo, A., Beneduce, L., Bevilacqua, A., Sinigaglia, M. and Corbo, M. R. (2013). Autochthonous lactic acid bacteria with probiotic aptitudes as starter cultures for fish-based products. Food Microbiology,65: 244 – 253. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Vieco-Saiz, N., Belguesmia, Y., Raspoet, R., Auclair, E., Gancel, F., Kempf, I. and Drider, D. (2019). Benefits and Inputs from Lactic Acid Bacteria and Their Bacteriocins as Alternatives to Antibiotic Growth Promoters During Food-Animal Production. Frontiers in Microbiology, 10: 57 – 62. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Wang, J., Han, M., Zhang, G., Qiao, S., Li, D. and Ma, X. (2016). The signal pathway of antibiotic alternatives on intestinal microbiota and immune function. Current Protein and Peptide Science, 17: 785 – 796. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Wolska, K. I., Grzes, K. and Kurek, A. (2012). Synergy between antimicrobials and conventional antibiotics or bacteriocins. Polish Journal of Microbiology, 61: 95 - 104. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Zommiti, M., Feuilloley, M. G. J., and Connil, N. (2020). Update of Probiotics in Human World: A Nonstop Source of Benefactions till the End of Time. Microorganisms, 8(12): 1907. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Quantitative Assessment of Serum C - Reactive Protein Levels among Smokers and Non Smokers
- Extraction and Characterization of Eco-Friendly Hair Dye from Agricultural Waste: A Study on Coconut Husk
- Intermittent Preventive Treatment among Pregnant Women Attending a Tertiary Healthcare Facility in Jos, North Central Nigeria: Adherence Patterns and Preliminary Assessment of Associated Factors
- Assessment Of Degradative Potentials Of Bacteria Isolated From Palm Oil-Polluted Site Using Spectrophotometric Method
- An Analysis of Machine and Deep Learning Insights on the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology