Traditional Reading Methods and Neil Anderson’s Active Reading Approach: Its Application in EFL Context

Authors

Pedro Fernandes Lukeba

ISP-Bengo, Department of BA (Angola)

Agnaldo de Assunção Cardoso Fernando

ISP-Bengo, Department of AS (Angola)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS.2025.10120022

Subject Category: Social science

Volume/Issue: 10/12 | Page No: 271-282

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-12-15

Accepted: 2025-12-22

Published: 2026-01-02

Abstract

Reading is widely acknowledged as a core component of English as a Foreign Language (EFL) pedagogy, particularly in contexts where learners’ exposure to spoken English is limited and written texts represent the main source of language input. Despite its importance, reading instruction has traditionally been dominated by teacher-centred practices such as reading aloud, translation, and post-reading comprehension questions, which often emphasise decoding and accuracy rather than strategic and metacognitive development (Harmer, 2007, p. 99; Wallace, 2001, p. 21). The main objective of this article is to comparatively examine traditional reading methods and Neil Anderson’s ACTIVE Reading Approach in order to identify their theoretical foundations, pedagogical orientations, and implications for effective EFL reading instruction. Adopting a bibliographical and conceptual research design, the study is based on a critical review and synthesis of seminal and contemporary literature in applied linguistics and reading pedagogy. Key theoretical works on traditional reading instruction and strategy-based approaches were analysed to establish points of convergence and divergence between the two models. The analysis indicates that traditional reading methods provide structural organisation and teacher guidance but tend to treat reading as a product to be tested, offering limited support for learner autonomy and strategic awareness. In contrast, the ACTIVE Reading Approach conceptualises reading as an active and self-regulated process, explicitly integrating strategy instruction, vocabulary development, comprehension monitoring, reading fluency, and self-evaluation (Anderson, 2003, p. 5; Anderson, 2020, p. 3). As a result, ACTIVE reading is more responsive to cognitive and metacognitive dimensions of reading. The article concludes that while traditional reading methods retain pedagogical value, they are insufficient on their own to meet the demands of contemporary EFL pedagogy. Integrating strategy-based principles from the ACTIVE Reading Approach can contribute to more effective, learner-centred, and sustainable reading instruction across diverse educational contexts.

Keywords

traditional reading methods; active reading; bibliographical analysis

Downloads

References

1. Anderson, N. J. (2003). Active reading: The research base for a pedagogical approach in the reading classroom. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Anderson, N. J. (2003). Reading. In D. Nunan (Ed.), Practical English language teaching (pp. 67–86). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. McGraw-Hill. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Anderson, N. J. (2020). ACTIVE skills for reading. National Geographic Learning. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Baharuddin, E. (2017). Reading approach use, effectiveness and EFL reading comprehension at University Muhammadiyah of Parepare. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 6(10), 35–39. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bamford, J., & Day, R. R. (2004). Extensive reading activities for teaching language. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Broughton, G., Brumfit, C., Flavell, R., Hill, P., & Pincas, A. (1980). Teaching English as a foreign language. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Cook, V. (2008). Second language learning and language teaching (4th ed.). Hodder Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Debat, E. V. (2006). Applying current approaches to the teaching of reading. English Teaching Forum, 44(1), 8–15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Fauzi, I., Saman, T. N., N. Z., Octaviani, S., & Winey, B. G. (2022). The relationship between students’ reading motivation and success in comprehending English texts. Journal of English Teaching and Learning Issues, 5(1), 31–38. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Grabe, W. (2002). Reading in a second language: Moving from theory to practice. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Harmer, J. (2007). How to teach English (new ed.). Pearson Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Hutchinson, T., & Waters, A. (1987). English for specific purposes: A learning-centred approach. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Muhamad, B. K., Hoang, D. Y., & Chu, C. D. (2023). Reading habits and educational achievement of secondary school learners in Bishan, Singapore. Journal of Education, 1(1), 11–20. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Nadea, B., Jumariati, & Nasrullah. (2021). Bottom-up or top-down reading strategies: Reading strategies used by EFL students. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Education, Language, Literature, and Arts (pp. 30–36). Atlantis Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Nuttall, C. (1996). Teaching reading skills in a foreign language. Macmillan Heinemann. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Renandya, W. A., & Jacobs, G. M. (2002). Extensive reading: Why aren’t we all doing it? In J. C. Richards & W. A. Renandya (Eds.), Methodology in language teaching (pp. 295–302). Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Richards, J. C., & Renandya, W. A. (2002). Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Richards, J. C., & Schmidt, R. (2010). Longman dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics (4th ed.). Pearson Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Scrivener, J. (2011). Learning teaching: The essential guide to English language teaching (3rd ed.). Macmillan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Shin, K.-C. (2013). Developmental approaches to the teaching of EFL reading. Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 17(1), 159–170. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Smith, F. (2004). Understanding reading: A psycholinguistic analysis of reading and learning to read. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Stoller, F. L., Anderson, N. J., Grabe, W., & Komiyama, R. (2013). Teaching and researching reading (2nd ed.). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Thongwichit, S., & Buripakdi, A. (2021). Enhancing EFL students’ reading comprehension through strategy-based instruction. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 12(1), 108–116. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1201.13 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Wallace, C. (2001). Reading. In R. Carter & D. Nunan (Eds.), The Cambridge guide to teaching English to speakers of other languages (pp. 21–27). Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles