An Overview of Machine Learning Approaches for Predicting Marshall Parameters in Modified Asphalt Mixtures (MAM)

Asphalt is a basic material used for pavements and roads construction due to its durability and capacity to endure loads, pressure and stress. To minimize construction cost, asphalt is typically combined with readily available and economically recycled materials. Some of these materials includes glass furnace dross, ashes from municipal waste incineration, crushed bricks, plastic, glass, and crumb rubber, sourced from waste tires. Evaluating Marshall parameters after modification is crucial to maintaining the original capacity of asphalt to withstand enormous stress. There are several Marshall Parameters of modified asphalt mixture (MAM) but Marshall Stability (MS) and Marshall Flow (MF) are the most critical parameters in evaluating the performance of the MAM. Researchers have repeatedly relied on Marshall test in the laboratory to determine the Marshall properties of MAM, which have proved to be expensive, labor-intensive, and tedious. Numerous studies have proposed machine learning (ML) models as an alternative to the traditional evaluation method of Marshall parameters of MAM. The popularity of ML models is largely due to their ability to learn patterns and predictive characteristics from complex data. ML models have been successfully used in the prediction of Marshall parameters of MAM with varying degrees of accuracy, as documented in the literature. Consequently, this paper examines the literature on the use of ML models for predicting Marshall Parameters, particularly MS and MF of MAM. This study identified several ML models, such as support vector machine (SVM), K-nearest neighbor, artificial neural networks, and random forest (RF), previously employed in this domain. The study also looked at various performance metrics used in evaluating the predictive accuracy of MS and MF. Some of the metrics include Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), and R-squared (R²). The paper also highlighted the potentials of ML models in reducing costs, time and labour as well as improving prediction accuracy. In addition the study also address challenges such as over fitting and the need for more quality and open source datasets. Recommendations for future research include the development of standardized datasets and the exploration of synthetic data to enhance model reliability and generalizability.

Machine Learning, Marshal Parameters, Asphalt Mixtures, pavement construction.

1. Al Kaaf, K., & Ibeabuchi, V. T. (2023). Marshall Asphalt Mix and Superior Performance Asphalt Mix in Oman: A Comparative Study. Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, 13(6), 12258–12263. https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.6206 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Ali, A., & Mashwani. (2023). A Supervised Machine Learning Algorithms: Applications, Challenges, and Recommendations. Proceedings of the Pakistan Academy of Sciences: A. Physical and Computational Sciences, 60(4). https://doi.org/10.53560/PPASA(60-4)831 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Althoey, F., Akhter, M. N., Nagra, Z. S., Awan, H. H., Alanazi, F., Khan, M. A., Javed, M. F., Eldin, S. M., & Özkılıç, Y. O. (2023). Prediction models for marshall mix parameters using bio-inspired genetic programming and deep machine learning approaches: A comparative study. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 18, e01774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01774 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Ameri, M., & Ebrahimzadeh Shiraz, M. (2024). A Review of the Studies on the Effect of Different Additives on the Fatigue Behavior of Asphalt Mixtures. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2024(1), 6695747. https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/6695747 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Asi, I., Alhadidi, Y. I., & Alhadidi, T. I. (2024). Predicting Marshall stability and flow parameters in asphalt pavements using explainable machine-learning models. Transportation Engineering, 18, 100282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.treng.2024.100282 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Asif, U., Khan, W. A., Naseem, K. A., & Rizvi, S. A. S. (2025). Enhancing the predictive accuracy of marshall design tests using generative adversarial networks and advanced machine learning techniques. Materials Today Communications, 45, 112379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2025.112379 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Atakan, M., & Yıldız, K. (2024). Prediction of Marshall design parameters of asphalt mixtures via machine learning algorithms based on literature data. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 25(3), 454–473. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2023.2213774 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Awan, H. H., Hussain, A., Javed, M. F., Qiu, Y., Alrowais, R., Mohamed, A. M., Fathi, D., & Alzahrani, A. M. (2022). Predicting Marshall Flow and Marshall Stability of Asphalt Pavements Using Multi Expression Programming. Buildings, 12(3), 314. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12030314 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Ayazi, M. F., Singh, M., & Kumar, R. (2024). Prediction and modelling marshall stability of modified reclaimed asphalt pavement with rejuvenators using latest machine learning techniques. Engineering Research Express, 6(3), 035004. https://doi.org/10.1088/2631-8695/ad65b7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Baldo, N., Miani, M., Rondinella, F., Valentin, J., Vackcová, P., & Manthos, E. (2022). Stiffness Data of High-Modulus Asphalt Concretes for Road Pavements: Predictive Modeling by Machine-Learning. Coatings, 12(1), 54. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12010054 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Bilema, M., Yuen, C. W., Alharthai, M., Al-Saffar, Z. H., Al-Sabaeei, A., & Yusoff, N. I. M. (2023). A Review of Rubberised Asphalt for Flexible Pavement Applications: Production, Content, Performance, Motivations and Future Directions. Sustainability, 15(19), 14481. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151914481 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Cai, X., Wu, K., Huang, W., Yu, J., & Yu, H. (2021). Application of recycled concrete aggregates and crushed bricks on permeable concrete road base. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 22(10), 2181–2196. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2020.1742193 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Chai, T., & Draxler, R. R. (2014). Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? – Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature. Geoscientific Model Development, 7(3), 1247–1250. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-1247-2014 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Dao, D. V., Nguyen, N.-L., Ly, H.-B., Pham, B. T., & Le, T.-T. (2020). Cost-Effective Approaches Based on Machine Learning to Predict Dynamic Modulus of Warm Mix Asphalt with High Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement. Materials, 13(15), 3272. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13153272 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Dimter, S., Šimun, M., Zagvozda, M., & Rukavina, T. (2021). Laboratory Evaluation of the Properties of Asphalt Mixture with Wood Ash Filler. Materials, 14(3), 575. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14030575 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Elmagarhe, A., Lu, Q., Alharthai, M., Alamri, M., & Elnihum, A. (2022). Performance of Porous Asphalt Mixtures Containing Recycled Concrete Aggregate and Fly Ash. Materials, 15(18), 6363. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15186363 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Gul, M. A., Islam, M. K., Awan, H. H., Sohail, M., Al Fuhaid, A. F., Arifuzzaman, M., & Qureshi, H. J. (2022). Prediction of Marshall Stability and Marshall Flow of Asphalt Pavements Using Supervised Machine Learning Algorithms. Symmetry, 14(11), 2324. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14112324 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Hamid, A., Baaj, H., & El-Hakim, M. (2022). Rutting Behaviour of Geopolymer and Styrene Butadiene Styrene-Modified Asphalt Binder. Polymers, 14(14), 2780. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14142780 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Huang, W., Guo, W., & Wei, Y. (2020). Prediction of Paving Performance for Epoxy Asphalt Mixture by Its Time- and Temperature-Dependent Properties. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 32(3), 04020017. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003060 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Jwaida, Z., Dulaimi, A., Mydin, M. A. O., Özkılıç, Y. O., Jaya, R. P., & Ameen, A. (2023). The Use of Waste Polymers in Asphalt Mixtures: Bibliometric Analysis and Systematic Review. Journal of Composites Science, 7(10), 415. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs7100415 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Khasawneh, M. A., Al-Oqaily, D. M., Abu Alia, A. H., & Al-Omari, A. A. (2022). Evaluation of aggregate-binder bond strength using the BBS device for different road materials and conditions. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 23(9), 2889–2902. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2021.1873332 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Mohalder, N. R., Alam Hossain, Md., & Hossain, N. (2024). CLASSIFYING THE SUPERVISED MACHINE LEARNING AND COMPARING THE PERFORMANCES OF THE ALGORITHMS. International Journal of Advanced Research, 12(01), 422–438. https://doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/18138 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Nada, Amr., Edris, W. F., Al-Jabali, H. M., D. Almutairi, A., A. Al Sayed, A. A.-K., & Khairy, S. (2025). An Investigation of the Capabilities of Resin Tire Carbon Black “N-330” as a Waste Binder in Asphalt Concrete Mixtures. Buildings, 15(2), 158. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15020158 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Naeem, S., Ali, A., Anam, S., & Ahmed, M. M. (2023). An Unsupervised Machine Learning Algorithms: Comprehensive Review. International Journal of Computing and Digital Systems, 13(1), 911–921. https://doi.org/10.12785/ijcds/130172 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Nyirandayisabye, R., Li, H., Dong, Q., Hakuzweyezu, T., & Nkinahamira, F. (2022). Automatic pavement damage predictions using various machine learning algorithms: Evaluation and comparison. Results in Engineering, 16, 100657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2022.100657 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Ogundipe, O. M. (2016). Marshall Stability and Flow of Lime-modified Asphalt Concrete. Transportation Research Procedia, 14, 685–693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.333 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Oguntayo, D., Ogundipe, O., Aladegboye, O., Ogunkunbi, G., Babatunde, Y., & Aransiola, O. (2023). Performance Evaluation of Hospital Waste Ash-Modified Asphalt Mixtures. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2023, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/6880766 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Phung, B.-N., Le, T.-H., Nguyen, T.-A., Thi Hoang, H.-G., & Ly, H.-B. (2023). Novel approaches to predict the Marshall parameters of basalt fiber asphalt concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 400, 132847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.132847 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Plevris, V., Solorzano, G., Bakas, N., & Ben Seghier, M. (2022). Investigation of performance metrics in regression analysis and machine learning-based prediction models. 8th European Congress on Computational Methods in Applied Sciences and Engineering. 8th European Congress on Computational Methods in Applied Sciences and Engineering. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. https://doi.org/10.23967/eccomas.2022.155 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Rahman, S., Bhasin, A., & Smit, A. (2021a). Exploring the use of machine learning to predict metrics related to asphalt mixture performance. Construction and Building Materials, 295, 123585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123585 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Rahman, S., Bhasin, A., & Smit, A. (2021b). Exploring the use of machine learning to predict metrics related to asphalt mixture performance. Construction and Building Materials, 295, 123585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123585 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Rasheed, S. S., Nsaif, M. H., & Abduljabbar, A. S. (2024). Experimental study of improving hot mix asphalt reinforced with carbon fibers. Open Engineering, 14(1), 20220507. https://doi.org/10.1515/eng-2022-0507 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Schlosser, T., Friedrich, M., Trixy Meyer, & Kowerko, D. (2024). A Consolidated Overview of Evaluation and Performance Metrics for Machine Learning and Computer Vision. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.14331.69928 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Sharma, D. K., Chatterjee, M., Kaur, G., & Vavilala, S. (2022). Deep learning applications for disease diagnosis. In Deep Learning for Medical Applications with Unique Data (pp. 31–51). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-824145-5.00005-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Singh, S. K., Tiwari, A. K., & Paliwal, H. K. (2023). A state-of-the-art review on the utilization of machine learning in nanofluids, solar energy generation, and the prognosis of solar power. Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements, 155, 62–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enganabound.2023.06.003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Sreedhar, S., Coleri, E., Obaid, I. A., & Kumar, V. (2021). Development of a Balanced Mix Design Method in Oregon to Improve Long-Term Pavement Performance. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2675(12), 1121–1137. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981211032222 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Sumargono, S., Candra, A. I., Ridwan, A., Winarno, B., Budi, K. C., & Kharisma, D. A. (2020). Concrete Asphalt Marshall Stability Using Concrete Objective Waste. THE SPIRIT OF SOCIETY JOURNAL, 3(2), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.29138/scj.v3i1.1086 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Taher, Z. K., & Ismael, M. Q. (2022). Rutting Prediction of Hot Mix Asphalt Mixtures Modified by Nano silica and Subjected to Aging Process. Civil Engineering Journal, 9, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.28991/CEJ-SP2023-09-01 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Upadhya, A., Thakur, M. S., Al Ansari, M. S., Malik, M. A., Alahmadi, A. A., Alwetaishi, M., & Alzaed, A. N. (2022). Marshall Stability Prediction with Glass and Carbon Fiber Modified Asphalt Mix Using Machine Learning Techniques. Materials, 15(24), 8944. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15248944 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Usanga, I. N., Inyang, E. O., & Ikeagwuani, C. C. (2025). Investigation of deformation characteristics of asphalt mixtures containing Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement (RAP) binders using laboratory simulations. Hybrid Advances, 10, 100426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hybadv.2025.100426 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Wang, Y., Cui, Z., & Ke, R. (2023). Machine learning basics. In Machine Learning for Transportation Research and Applications (pp. 25–40). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-32-396126-4.00008-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Zhang, W., Khan, A., Huyan, J., Zhong, J., Peng, T., & Cheng, H. (2021). Predicting Marshall parameters of flexible pavement using support vector machine and genetic programming. Construction and Building Materials, 306, 124924. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124924 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Zhao, H., Guan, B., Xiong, R., & Zhang, A. (2020). Investigation of the Performance of Basalt Fiber Reinforced Asphalt Mixture. Applied Sciences, 10(5), 1561. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10051561 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• What the Desert Fathers Teach Data Scientists: Ancient Ascetic Principles for Ethical Machine-Learning Practice
• Comparative Analysis of Some Machine Learning Algorithms for the Classification of Ransomware
• Comparative Performance Analysis of Some Priority Queue Variants in Dijkstra’s Algorithm
• Transfer Learning in Detecting E-Assessment Malpractice from a Proctored Video Recordings.
• Dual-Modal Detection of Parkinson’s Disease: A Clinical Framework and Deep Learning Approach Using NeuroParkNet