Overview of the Role of Microalgae in Wastewater Management: Challenges and Opportunities.

Microalgae-based wastewater treatment has emerged as a sustainable approach to addressing global water pollution challenges while simultaneously producing valuable biomass. This method is based mainly on the natural nutrient uptake capabilities of microalgae to remove nitrogen, phosphorus, organic pollutants, and heavy metals from various wastewater sources, including municipal, industrial, and agricultural effluents. Scientific studies and successful implementations across different regions, such as High Rate Algal Ponds in New Zealand and microalgal systems in China and the United States, demonstrate high nutrient removal efficiencies, often exceeding 90%. The treated biomass can be used in diverse ways, including biofuel production, animal feed, and fertilizers. However, several challenges such as nutrient imbalances, variability in wastewater composition, light limitations, contamination risks, and high harvesting costs, hinder widespread adoption. Technological innovations such as advanced photobioreactors, integrated treatment systems, and genetic engineering are critical for overcoming these barriers and improving the system. Public awareness and policy support will essentially facilitate broader implementation of microalgae-based systems as well as continued innovation and collaborative efforts among researchers, industry, and policymakers. Microalgae wastewater treatment holds significant promise for advancing environmental sustainability, resource recovery, and rural development on a global scale. Future research priorities includes; optimizing operational parameters, developing cost-effective harvesting techniques and conducting comprehensive life cycle assessments to evaluate environmental and economic impacts.

Microalgae, Wastewater treatment and water pollution.

1. Benemann, J.R. (2013). Microalgae for biofuels and wastewater treatment: A review. Algal Research, 2(1), 1– 10. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Cho, D.-H., Ramanan, R., Heo, J., Lee, J., Kim, B.H., & Oh, H.M. (2015). Enhancing microalgal biomass productivity by engineering a microalgal–bacterial community. Bioresource Technology, 175, 78–85. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Christenson, L. and Sims, R. (2011). Production and harvesting of microalgae for wastewater treatment, biofuels, and bioproducts. Biotechnology Advances, 29(6), 686-702. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Craggs, R. J., Lundquist, T. J., & Benemann, J. R. (2013). Wastewater treatment and algal biofuel production. Algal Research, 2, 3–8. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Craggs, R.J., Heubeck, S., Lundquist, T.J. and Benemann, J.R. (2011). Algal biofuels from wastewater treatment high rate algal ponds. Water Science and Technology, 63(5), 660-665. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Ferrero, E.M., Godos, I. de., Rodríguez, E.M., García-Encina, P.A., Muñoz, R. and Bécares, R.E. (2012). Molecular characterization of bacterial communities in algal–bacterial photobioreactors treating piggery wastewaters. Ecological Engineering, 40, 121-130. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Geng, H., & Belas, R. (2010). Molecular mechanisms underlying Roseobacter–phytoplankton symbioses. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 21(3), 332–338. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Hernández, D., Riaño, B., Coca, M. and García-González, M.C. (2013). Treatment of agro-industrial wastewater using microalgae–bacteria consortium combined with anaerobic digestion of the produced biomass. Bioresource Technology, 135, 598-603. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Khan, C. M. (2015). Merck Veterinary Manual, 10th Edition. Merck & co. Inc. White house station, NJ, USA, P. 1249-1288. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Kim, B. H., Ramanan, R., Cho, D.-H., Oh, H.-M. and Kim, H.-S. (2014). Role of Rhizobium, a plant growth promoting bacterium, in enhancing algal biomass through mutualistic interaction. Biomass and Bioenergy, 69, 95-105. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Krohn-Molt, I., Wemheuer, B., Alawi, M., Poehlein, A., Güllert, S., & Schmeisser, C. (2013). Metagenome survey of a multispecies and alga-associated biofilm revealed key elements of bacterial–algal interactions in photobioreactors. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 79(19), 6196–6206. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Lee, J., Ramanan, C. D.-H., R., Kim, B.-H., Oh, H.-M., & Kim, H.-S. (2013). Microalgae associated bacteria play a key role in the flocculation of Chlorella vulgaris. Bioresource Technology, 131, 195–201. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Markou, G., & Georgakakis, D. (2011). Cultivation of filamentous cyanobacteria (Spirulina) in agroindustrial wastes. Applied Energy, 88, 3389–3401. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Park, J. B. K., Craggs, R. J., & Shilton, A. N. (2011). Wastewater treatment high rate algal ponds for biofuel production. Bioresource Technology, 102, 35–42. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Taita, K., White, D. A., Kimmancea, S. A., Tarrana, G., Rooksa, P., Jonesa, M., & Llewellynb, C. A. (2019). Characterization of bacteria from the cultures of a Chlorella strain isolated from textile wastewater and their growth enhancing effects on the axenic cultures of Chlorella vulgaris in low nutrient media. Algal Research, 44, 101666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.algal.2019.101666 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Woertz, I., Feffer, A., Lundquist, T. and Nelson, Y. (2009). Algae grown on dairy and municipal wastewater for simultaneous nutrient removal and lipid production for biofuel feedstock. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 135(12), 1115-1122. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Quantitative Assessment of Serum C - Reactive Protein Levels among Smokers and Non Smokers
• Extraction and Characterization of Eco-Friendly Hair Dye from Agricultural Waste: A Study on Coconut Husk
• Intermittent Preventive Treatment among Pregnant Women Attending a Tertiary Healthcare Facility in Jos, North Central Nigeria: Adherence Patterns and Preliminary Assessment of Associated Factors
• Assessment Of Degradative Potentials Of Bacteria Isolated From Palm Oil-Polluted Site Using Spectrophotometric Method
• An Analysis of Machine and Deep Learning Insights on the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology