Regional Trade Stratagem Influencing Kenya’s Diplomatic Engagements Within the East African Community Paradigm

Authors

Mr. Samson Kemboi Koech

Student : Riara University (Kenya)

Dr. Paul. K. Kurgat

Lecturer: Riara University (Supervisor) (Kenya)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS.2026.110200024

Subject Category: International Relations

Volume/Issue: 11/2 | Page No: 280-290

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-02-09

Accepted: 2026-02-18

Published: 2026-02-27

Abstract

Many countries around the world use economic diplomacy to exert their influence. Kenya is a major economy in Africa ranking currently among the biggest economies in East Africa Community. While many studies explore Kenya’s economic growth, few interrogate its efficiency as a tool for economic diplomacy in the EA. This study examined how regional trade stratagems influence Kenya’s diplomatic engagements within the EAC paradigm. The objective of this study was to investigate how regional trade stratagems influence Kenya’s diplomatic engagements within the EAC framework the literature was reviewed thematically guided by Interdependence theory and reinforced by Neoliberal theory. This study used a descriptive research design and its target population included Kenya’s Ministry of Trade and Industrialization. The study used purposive, stratified and random sampling methods to sample its respondents. Quantitative data was collected using questionnaires and coded using SPSS and analyzed using descriptive statistics (frequencies and percentages) and presented in tables. Qualitative data was collected by interviewing Key Informants (KIIs), analyzed using content and thematic analysis and presented in narrative and verbatim format. The study found that trade policies (b=0.245, p<0.001), economic partnerships (b=0.278, p<0.001), and strategic approaches (b=0.289, p<0.001) played a significant role in promoting Kenya in the EAC, whereas the persistent challenges (b=0.236, p=0.001) like tariffs and logistical barriers acted as a limit to progress. The study concludes that Kenya has its regional influence based on good policy alignment, economic integration, and strategic partnerships. The research recommends the harmonization of trade frameworks, investing in regional infrastructure and digital diplomacy as methods to enhance Kenya economic diplomacy in the EAC paradigm.

Keywords

Regional Trade Strategem, Diplomacy and Diplomatic Engagements, East African Community Paradigm.

Downloads

References

1. African Development Bank (AfDB). (2023). Africa Trade Report 2023: Unlocking Regional Potential. AfDB Group. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. EAC Trade Report, (2023). Report on Imports and exports in East Africa. Retrieved from www.eac.int/tradereport on 15th Feb, 2025. Arusha. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. EU–Kenya Economic Partnership Agreement. (2023). Summary of key elements of the EU–Kenya EPA. European Commission. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Gordon, R. A. (2023). Applied statistics for the social and health sciences. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Irungu, E. J. (2024). The Role of Kenya’s Economic Diplomacy in Enhancing Economic Resilience in the East African Community (EAC) Region. International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation,can 11(1), 208-219. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Kafle, H. B. (2022). China’s Foreign Direct Investment in South Asia: A Strategic Quest of China’s Economic Diplomacy. Shanti Journal, 1(1), 49-66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3126/shantij.v1i1.47791 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Kenya Secures Markets Representing 46 percent of the Global GDP. (2025). State Department for Trade, Kenya [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Keohane, R. O. (1984). After hegemony: Cooperation and discord in the world political economy. Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. S. (1987). Power and interdependence (2nd ed.). Little, Brown and Company. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Kothari, C. R. (2014). Research methodology: Methods and techniques (3rd ed.). New Age International Publishers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607–610. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Mishra, P., Pandey, C. M., Singh, U., Gupta, A., Sahu, C., & Keshri, A. (2019). Descriptive statistics and normality tests for statistical data. Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia, 22(1), 67–72. https://doi.org/10.4103/aca.ACA_157_18 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Mugenda, O., & Mugenda, A. (2013). Research methods: Quantitative and qualitative approaches. Afri Centre for Technology Studies. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Rajapakse, T., & Samaratunge, R. (2002). The evolving role of trade diplomacy in multilateral trade negotiations: Experience of agricultural trade liberalisation. Journal of International and Area Studies, 43-62. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43107064 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Republic of Kenya. (2025). Sessional Paper No. 1 of 2025 on the Foreign Policy of the Republic of Kenya. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Romaine, K. A. (2012). East Timor: A model for future United States involvement in Sub_Saharan peace operations? Creative Media Partners, LLC/BiblioScholar [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. World Bank. (2023). Kenya economic update: Navigating global uncertainty. World Bank Group. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles