The Impact of Autocratic Leadership on Employee Well-Being in Bangladeshi Non-Profit Humanitarian NGOs

This study looks at how autocratic leadership affects the well-being of employees in small humanitarian NGOs in Bangladesh. Based on interviews with 15 staff members, including project managers, supervisors, and field workers from various NGOs, the research finds that workers face long hours, unpaid salaries, and no clear balance between work and personal life because top leaders make decisions without talking to others. Employees described tough schedules, like working 15 to 16 hours a day without breaks, even during important events like Eid. They also had to do extra tasks without being asked. These conditions caused physical issues like body pain, malnutrition, and sunburn, and mental health problems like depression, anxiety, and even thoughts of suicide. The study also notes that many of these issues are made worse by a lack of funding and resources, which makes exploitation more common in small NGOs.
The paper highlights a gap in existing literature, pointing out that not enough research focuses on leadership styles in developing countries like Bangladesh, where traditional cultural structures often support autocratic leadership. To address this, the study introduces the Supportive Leadership and Management (SLM) model. This model promotes a more inclusive and democratic work environment with set working hours, holidays, ongoing training, stable pay that isn't tied to donor funds, and systems for feedback and support. Thematic analysis of the interview data supports the idea that autocratic leadership harms well-being, while supportive leadership improves job satisfaction and productivity. The findings suggest that NGO leaders, policymakers, and donors should put employee well-being first to ensure long-term success. The SLM model can be useful beyond NGOs and in different organizations around the world. Future studies should include quantitative validation of the model and comparisons across different sectors. This research contributes to discussions about ethical leadership, especially in challenging environments, by promoting humane practices that help retain valuable workers and help reach important goals.

Autocratic leadership, Employee well-being, Humanitarian NGOs

1. Hossain, M. I. (2026). Exploring the Reasons for Autocratic Leadership in Bangladesh?s Underdeveloped Humanitarian NGOs. Adv Urban Region Dev Plann, 3(1), 01-05. https://www.opastpublishers.com/open-access-articles/exploring-the-reasons-for-autocratic-leadership-in-bangladeshs-underdeveloped-humanitarian-ngos.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Alam et al. (2019). Leadership in Bangladesh Corporate Culture: A research on the changes in organizational leadership & culture in Bangladesh. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/334942918_Leadership_in_Bangladesh_Corporate_Culture_ A_research_on_the_changes_in_organizational_leadership_culture_in_Bangladesh [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Rahman (2024). Impact of Democratic Leadership Styles on the Employee Well-being of Top Mobile Financial Services Companies in Bangladesh. Theseus. https://www.theseus.fi/bitstream/10024/875678/2/Rahman_Md%20Atiar.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Jony (2019). The Impact of Autocratic, Democratic and Laissez-Faire Leadership Styles on the Success of the Organization: A Study on the Different Popular Restaurants of Mymensingh, Bangladesh. UniversePG. https://www.universepg.com/cjbis/the-impact-of-autocratic-democratic-and-laissez-faire-leadership-styles-on-the-success-of-the-organization-a-study-on-the-different-popular-restaurants-of- mymensingh-bangladesh [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Haque (2019). Leadership is practicing in the NGOs -A Case in a developing country like Bangladesh (BRAC). ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332570774 Leadership_is practicing_in_the_NGOs_-A_Case_in_a_developing_country_like_Bangladesh_BRAC [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Rahman (2022). Key Success Factors of NGO Leadership that Leads to Sustainable and Effective Development: A Case on BRAC, Bangladesh. Revista de Cercetare si Interventie Sociala, Vol. 77. https://www.rcis.ro/en/section1/165-volumul-772022iunie/2994-key-success-factors-of-ngo-leadership- that-leads-to-sustainable-and-effective-development-a-case-on-brac-bangladesh.html [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Mufti (2020). Influence of leadership style on job satisfaction of NGO employee: The mediating role of psychological empowerment. Journal of Public Affairs, Vol. 20, Issue 1. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2 002/pa.1983 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Srisathanonchai (2011). Leadership Effect on the Retention of Nongovernmental Organizations (NGOs) Employees in Thailand. Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, Vol. 3, No. 2. https://ideas.repec.org/a/rnd/arjebs/v3y2011i2p153-156.html [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Khan (2024). Unlocking Success in NGOs: The Power of Servant Leadership. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/378172915_Unlocking_Success_in_NGOs_The_Power_of_S ervant_Leadership [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Central Michigan University (2023). What kind of leader are you? Five leadership styles for non- profits. Central Michigan University Blog. https://www.cmich.edu/blog/all-things-higher-ed/five- leadership-styles-for-non-profits [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Lodestar Center (2023). Nonprofit leadership models: moving beyond hierarchies and empowering teams. Lodestar Center Blog. https://lodestar.asu.edu/blog/2023/12/nonprofit-leadership-models- moving-beyond-hierarchies-and-empowering-teams [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Annie E. Casey Foundation (2025). Shared Leadership in Nonprofits: Collaboration and Collective Leadership Models in Action. The Annie E. Casey Foundation. https://www.aecf.org/resources/shared- leadership-in-action [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Bagga (2024). Leading Through Uncertainty: How Transformational and Transactional Leadership Shape Employee Satisfaction and Performance in Lebanese NGOs. Administrative Sciences, Vol. 15, Issue 5. https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/15/5/172 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Sharp Eizinger et al. (2022). Innovations in Talent Investment for Individuals, Organizations, and Communities. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Blog. https://johnsoncenter.org/blog/innovations-in-talent-investment-for-individuals-organizations-and- communities/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• IFRS S1 and S2: A Global and Indian Perspective with Implications for Auditors
• A Study on Consumer Attitudes and Buying Behavior towards organic Food Products
• India’s Transfer Pricing Framework: Evolution, Challenges, and Future Directions
• Application of Statistical Methods in Business Administration: A Quantitative Study on Organizational Performance
• Decoding Fintech Adoption: The Role of Trust, Risks and Perceived Benefits